Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

The Highest
Treason Substantiated
Conclusions drawn from the evidence in
the September 11, 2001 killings at the Pentagon
Part 2
By Dick Eastman
Part 1..........Part 2..........Part 3..........Part 4..........Part 5
From: Don Fredrick
To: Dick Eastman
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Dick Eastman to Don Fredrick Re: Highest treason.
Thanks for the response. Yes, I included some ridicule in my question. (I assume that my being routinely ridiculed for believing in the U.S Constitution constitutes grounds for my use of the same practice.) Now that I have your answers, I realize I was going easy on you. I have tried to keep an open mind on this subject, and have read quite a few things sent to me by 9/11 skeptics. I do not underestimate the depths of evil or abuse to which a government - any government, Republican or Democrat - will go. I imagine that pretty much anything is possible. (I am skeptical, however, when they tell me they "see something" in a blurry Pentagon photograph that, to me, simply looks like a blurry photograph.
Dick Eastman responds:
Fair enough.
Regarding the series of photos you dismiss as  "a blurry photograph" -- you need to review that data -- or else you will be like the Jewish girl "Jude"  who after I sent her 13 posts of long articles and dozens of photographs sent back within one hour dismissing it all with general ridicule that showed she handn't examined any of it.
For example, Don, what do you do with this:
From: Dick Eastman
To: A. K. Dewdney
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 9:32 AM
Subject: proof 1: security cam video pics released Mar 2002, used as Federal evidence, re-released in 2006 under FIA -- establishes killer plane or missile at most half the length of a 757
The security camera video released in March 2002 shows five pictures, one just prior to the explosion and four of the explosion. The first picture shows the tail fin of the attacking object sticking up behind a parking-pass machine in the foreground. There is also a thick white smoke trail leading from the right edge of the picture to the parking-pass machine suggesting that the smoke trail is either coming from the object with the tail fin or else is the trail of a missile being fired from the object with the tail fin. 1) given the size of the tail fin that is showing and given the proportions of a Boeing 757 -- the ratio of tail fin height and width to fuselage length -- the front end of the 757 would have to be projecting from behind the parking-pass machine -- no front-end of the fuselage is visible; 2) given a true-to-scale simulation of the 155 foot Boeing 757 beside the 71 ft. high Pentagon it is immediately obvious that the plane hidden by the parking-pass machine is shorter than the Pentagon is tall -- i.e., the killer object is less than half the length of a Boeing 757.
The security camera pictures released in March of 2002 and officially released in May of 2006 establish that the aircraft or missile that attacked the Pentagon was no more than half the length of a Boeing 757. 
I. Pentagon security camera pictures released March 7, 2002 reveal:
A. Too-short a plane
1. tail fin too large for amount of fuselage concealed (seven tail fins could fit along back of a Boeing 757)
2. picture shows killer jet must be shorter than the height of the Pentagon, whereas a Boeing 757 is over twice as long (155 ft.) as the 71 ft. height of the building.
3. The F-16 is 50 feet long -- that would be about right, it is one possibility. See pictures suggesting how a remote controlled  F-16 could have fired a missile at the target ahead of its own crash.
B. Smoke trail of a missile being fired
1. Too thick for off-wing condensation
2. Exactly matches air-to-ground missile trails
C. White-hot flash explosion consistent with a missile warhead
1. Aluminum airliner with kerosene jet fule hitting concrete office building would not produce 120 ft. white flash
2. Trail of missile still seen in flash picture
3. Photos of large flash-burn stain on the wall confirm the flash picture
Security cam video pictures released March 7, 2002, were used as Federal evidence, then officially re-released in 2006 under FIA -- establishes killer plane or missile to be at most just half the length of a 757
But as an elephant cannot hide behind a teacup, so a Boeing 757 cannot be behind that box. To convince yourself of this look at the size of a Boeing 757 in relation to the Pentagon in this graphic put out by Purdue University engineers.
An F-16, shown above is one possibility for the "killer jet" -- there are other possibilities, only not the Boeing 757.
The Boeing 757 is 155' long. The Pentagon is 71' high.
But by direct inspection of the photo the plane behind the yellow pass reader box cannot be even as long as the Pentagon is high, i.e., not even half the length of a 757.
In the photo below, you see that when you match the image size of the killer jet's tail fin and that of the tail fin of a Boeing 757 and then overlay the Boeing so that tail fins are aligned you find, as Richard Stanley and Jerry Russell demonstrate below, that the overlaid image of the Boeing fuselage sticks out past the obstruction which completely conceals the image of the actual killer jet in the original picture. The killer jet, therefore, has to be shorter and differently proportioned than the Boeing 757. This alone tells us Flight 77 was not the killer jet.
Source: http://911-strike.com/pentagon.htm
But wait. We are not finished yet. We had no right to make the Boeing 757 tail fin the same size as the killer jet's tail fin. A Boeing 757 is over twice as long (155 ft.) as the Pentagon is high (71 ft.)! But, as seen by direct inspection, the killer jet in the picture is not even as long as the height of the building, much less twice its height. Thus the matched-tail-size Boeing overlay shown above is scaled far too small for a real Boeing 757. An actual Boeing 757 in the same position as the killer jet in the picture would present a much bigger image. What Stanley and Russel have done is scale down a lion until its tail is the same size as a cat, resulting in a puss-sized lion. Thus even their overlay demonstrating that if the tail fin belonged to a Boeing 757 the plane's fuselage would have had to stick from behind the obstruction, understates the case because the tail fin shown is too small for a Boeing 757 given its location with respect to the Pentagon.
Here is someone's simulation showing roughly what a Boeing 757 would have looked like positioned where the actual killer object was located in the first picture of the security camera series. Clearly this is not what was going on.
If the real video showed this there would be no problem. However, it does not and we do have a problem.
But whis information is only one piece of a picture that fits in with other pieces of evidence proving the false-flag black op.
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


This Site Served by TheHostPros