SIGHTINGS


 
Pocket DNA Labs Set Off
Crime Scene Forensics Revolution
Mark Bourrie
The Ottawa Citizen
2-22-99
 
Pocket-sized DNA sequencers and full forensics labs that can fit into briefcases are hitting the market this year, replacing the cumbersome technology that botched police investigations of serial killer Paul Bernardo and helped wrongly convict Guy Paul Morin of murder.
 
The technology will allow police labs to go to crime scenes. And, combined with new DNA databases that are being built by most major governments, police will be able to run genetic searches on potential suspects within minutes of the discovery of a crime scene.
 
Researchers say the new labs, based on micro-fluidics and incredibly advanced computer chip technology, will do for forensic and drug labs what the microcomputer did for mainframes. Backlogs at DNA test labs, which delayed the capture of Mr. Bernardo by two years, will be wiped out.
 
Some of the researchers compare the new technology to Star Trek's "tricorder," devices that allow fictional space explorers to test the biological makeup of aliens and the health of humans with a palm-sized instrument.
 
Today's DNA labs require several table-top sized machines to isolate DNA from tissue samples, find the fragment to be analysed, amplify it and map its sequences. The chemicals used in the process are expensive, and each machine needs its own technician.
 
But the new microlabs allow forensic scientists to take the lab to the crime scene. Mini-DNA sequencers are already being sold by Connecticut-based medical instrument maker Perkin-Elmer.
 
And the miniaturized "labs on a chip" are useful for more than just DNA testing. They can be used to test for air and water pollution, to look for new drugs, hunt for chemical weapons and may even be sent on interplanetary missions. One "lab on a chip" has already been used on a European Space Agency experiment carried on a NASA space shuttle mission.
 
Jed Harrison, professor of chemistry at the University of Alberta, is heading a 15-member research team developing the new technology.
 
"We're doing planar micro-fluidics: making the fluidic part of the lab miniaturized. On the microchip, you're able to do things at higher speed," said Mr. Harrison. "The distances are shorter, the volume is smaller. Where it might take half an hour to do a chemical separation in a conventional laboratory, you can do the same separation in five seconds or even in a millisecond on a chip.
 
"So just as a microprocessor integrates a whole bunch of transistors together, and then combines memory functions with calculating functions and adds them all together in a single structure, we can take various kinds of chemical sample processing and do them in different parts of the same chip. So we integrate the entire process.
 
"And they're at their best when in cases where contamination can be important, working with DNA samples, for example. One of the hazards in DNA samples is that the sample gets exposed to the laboratory and gets contaminated by the lab, and then you end up measuring the DNA of Joe Lab-technician instead of President Clinton."
 
Last May, a group of privately funded scientists in the U.S. announced they would use the new microlab technology to finish sequencing the entire human genome in three years, at a cost of $300 million.
 
If they succeed, they will finish four years earlier than the U.S. government's project to map human genetics, and they'll do it at a tenth of the cost.
 
"You can integrate onto a chip lots of channels parallel to each other," said Mr. Harrison. "So, if you think of each channel representing a chemical system where you might run some reactions and separations and measure your results, you can have 100 of those in parallel. You can get a really high number of data analyses at once.
 
"By integrating all of these processes, you get a system that is really amenable to automation. You have the ability to make these things small enough and cheap enough -- in principle, but not in practice yet -- to make them single-use, disposable elements."
 
Some of the new micro-labs can perform as many as 600 tests or chemical reactions at once. Technicians use a tiny amount of salt to break open tissue cells and release the DNA. A near-microscopic sample is injected into the machine's storage chamber, and the machine's computer does the rest of the work.
 
The nucleic acids stick to a small glass wall, and the machine spits out the rest of the sample. The DNA gets three rinses of ethanol and water. Then it moves into the next chamber, where re-agent chemicals are mixed with it.
 
The DNA is then amplified and mapped by the machine's computer. The process takes only a few minutes.
 
Wally Parce, research director of Caliper Technologies, a micro-fluidics lab equipment company in Palo Alto, California, says the new labs are chemistry's equivalent of the evolution of computers from mainframes to laptops.
 
And the labs are as easy to use as a personal computer, he adds.
 
Another practical use of the microlabs is in medicine. Many genetic-based diseases aren't diagnosed quickly because doctors can't find labs to do the tests. Or the results come back so slowly that they're too late to help.
 
"DNA testing really isn't a medical doctor's tool," says Mr. Harrison. "You can't wait that long, usually. But, in about 10 years, genetic analysis will be a $10-billion-a-year business."
 
Copyright 1998 Ottawa Citizen





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE