SIGHTINGS



A 'Numb Generation'
The Whys & Why-Nots Of So-Called Generation Y
*An Overview of Generations Past & Present*
By Peter Petrisko (ptp@primenet.com)
12-29-99



 
The 'Beat Generation' was beaten before the current one was born. It drowned in its own blood in the Fall of '69, among the twilight comforts of a stiff drink and the quiet seclusion afforded by a mother's arms.
 
The 'Love Generation' loved life, loved love, left love, and left the Left behind. From levitating the Pentagon and raising social awareness to innocently singing and chanting its way into the faceless boardrooms of America. Trading its Woodstock for corporate stock. Selling its peace of mind for a piece of the profit.
 
The 'Blank Generation' snarled, "No future!" as a whole, following through individually by overdosing or reluctantly settling into the nine-to-five routine, complete with generic spouse and twenty-year mortgage. For 'Generation X', alienation became a fashion statement. Dressing in black. Wearing peace symbols crafted into earrings, necklaces, and other accessories. Saying "anarchy" enough times to effectively turn the philosophy into just another meaningless pop culture buzzword. Pretending the word "alternative" in alternative music wasn't just a shorter way to say, "another preprogrammed Top-40 format." Never taking up the slack, thinking those before them had already done so.
 
Now comes the latest generation, alphabetically dubbed 'Y' by grammatically challenged media-types. But neither 'Y' nor mere echoes of those who went 'boom' before them - and here's why not. Actions speak louder than words - or letters - so it is only fitting that the youth of today be called the "Numb Generation". Viewing the world by remote, forgetting somebody else put the batteries in the remote control. Doing deeds as seen on TV, just to know "what it feels like". Whether it be stealing a candy bar from the local store or shooting down a classmate in cold blood. Ironically, then feeling nothing - neither the high of excitement nor the lows of depression or remorse. Dressing in a cross-cultural mix of oversized clothes, aesthetically turning the old phrase, "It's no longer a black or white world" on its ear. They're tuning out, logging in, dropping dead. Theirs is a self-medicated generation. Theirs is a government regulated generation. Theirs is an over-stimulated generation. Theirs is a computer simulated generation. Theirs is a numb generation whose rallying cry is, "I don't care!"
 
_____
 
REPRINT
 
'Millennium Children' And Their 'End Times' Counterparts
 
By Peter Petrisko (ptp@primenet.com)
 
Within the last decade or so, a growing number of children have been born that appear to be more intuitive and more creative than older generations were at that age, take to computers like a fish takes to water, have a natural understanding of technology in general that can border on the uncanny and, in some cases, may be natural healers. An understanding of the spiritual beyond their years and a matter-of-fact attitude toward the paranormal are often attributed to these youngsters.
 
These bright and gifted youngsters were dubbed "Millennium Children" in the book of the same name by Caryl Dennis and Parker Whitman, published in 1998.
 
However, as with many things, there is the other side of the same coin, a yin to the extraordinary yang of these "Millennium Children", not yet discussed in books or New Age circles.
 
These others are the "End-Times Children", living amongst us, just as their inspiring counterparts do, and also making their presence known in extraordinary ways. In towns like Pearl, Mississippi; Jonesboro, Arkansas; Springfield, Oregon; and perhaps most notably, in Colorado's Columbine High School.
 
Whereas "Millennium Children" represent humankind's best, its hope at the turn of the century, the "End-Times Children" are the embodiment of our fears, our uncertainties, as we face both a spiritual and historical turning point. Two parts of a larger "Numb Generation".
 
As with their millennial counterparts, "End-timers" are, for the most part, quite intelligent and creative. They, too, have a natural understanding of technology. But it's the technology of destruction - such as bombs, firearms or other weapons - that interests them. Or an uncanny ability to manipulate, and destroy, technology - like in the case of a gifted hacker who breaks into official files, wantonly wreaking havoc. They appear to lack the intuitive compassion of their opposites, instead focusing inward, their feelings short-circuited or merely keep tightly underwraps until the day it bursts forth in an unstoppable rage. After which, they become numb once again, stoic, blankfaced, and unable to explain - and perhaps even comprehend - why they did what they did.
 
While some are quick to blame the usual boogeymen - TV violence, sports, lack of parental discipline or involvement - these alleged "triggers" seemingly have to be shoehorned in when it comes to many of these, and less extreme, cases.
 
In many cases, it is revealed the parents were fair and supportive. That sports and TV weren't big interests. The usual suspects don't ring true.
 
Perhaps because they are no more than superficial flotsam, obscuring the truth.
 
If a schism has occurred, that is spiritual in nature and may even be evolutionary in scope, giving us the enlightened "Millennium Children", it goes without saying that quite the opposite could just as easily occur.
 
And, if a cosmic balance is to remain, the opposite must be true.
 
Both once removed from the older generations, both not easily understood nor accepted. One, natural healers - whether it be on a spiritual or, in some cases, physical level. The other, bringing emotional or spiritual pain to those they touch and, in some cases, being natural killers.
 
These are the two paths to our future.
 
These are our children.
 
(REPRINTED 12/29/99, first published in Spring '98 in "Earth-Changes Weekly")
 
_____
 
CDC REPORTS MULTIPLE VICTIM SCHOOL VIOLENCE RISING
 
Data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta on Wednesday, one day after 15 people were killed by gunmen at a school in Denver, show that the number of violent events at US schools involving multiple victims appears to have increased between 1995 and 1998.
 
"During the past three school years, August 1995 through June 1998, there were an average of five multiple victim events per year. This is compared to an average of one multiple victim event per year in the three years from August 1992 through July 1995," according to a CDC statement.
 
But it is premature to label any one factor as responsible for the rise in multiple victim homicides at schools, Dr. Rodney Hammond of the CDC's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control told Reuters Health.
 
"I would be hesitant to name any one factor, because although many have been suggested in the general public discourse, I'm afraid if we don't take the time to look at this very carefully and closely compare it to others we have seen over the last three years, we could make the mistake of oversimplifying this issue," Hammond said. (Reuters, Apr. 21 1999)
 

Why The Century Ends
Now...Blame It On Denis
link
12-28-99
 
PARIS (AFP) - Suffering from pre-millennial tension? Worried at what the millennium bug might do to your business? Is it all getting too much for you? The man to blame is called Denis the Short.
 
The reason why the world is about to mark the end of the second millennium is that early in the sixth century a monk named Dionysius Exiguus (Denis the Short), living in Scythia in what is now southwest Russia, decided that a new calendar was needed.
 
Denis believed that it made more sense to count the years from the birth of the Christian church's founder than from the start of the reign of the Roman emperor Diocletian, as previously.
 
His system of Anno Domini (AD - "In the year of of our Lord") failed to catch on at first, and was rescued from obscurity two centuries later by the Venerable Bede. The custom of naming years in the Christian Era came into common use in ecclesiastical circles in the Middle Ages, but was not adopted for civil use until much later.
 
Meanwhile the rest of humanity was advancing to a different drumbeat. Even today there are about 40 other calendars in use around the world, all beginning at different epochs and with the start of the year occurring at different times.
 
On January 1, 2000 it will be 7508 by the Byzantine calendar, 5760 by the Jewish, 4636 by the Chinese, 1921 by the Indian (Saka) and 1420 by the Islamic (Hegira) calendars.
 
And while Denis the Short claims the credit for laying the foundations for the first universal dating system, he is also responsible for two anomalies, one of which is of consequence to astronomers, the other mainly of interest to purists.
 
Firstly, and understandably, he left out the year 0 AD because the concept of zero had not yet arrived from the Arab world.
 
He therefore counted the first year of the Christian Era as 1 AD, with the year preceding Christ's birth as 1 BC. Astronomers are therefore obliged in their calculations to subtract one, so that the year 4 BC becomes the year -3.
 
A further consequence is that, as pedants are fond of pointing out, the end of the millennium occurs at the end of the 2000th year, not at the beginning, and the revellers on December 31 upcoming will be jumping the gun by no fewer than 366 days, 2000 being a leap-year.
 
Denis's second error was in thinking that Christ was born at the start of the year now known as 1 AD. Modern research indicates that Christ was probably born between 6 and 4 BC, so that the dawn of the third millennium, technically speaking, is already a few years behind us.
 
In compiling his calendar Denis assigned Christ's birth to the December 25 preceding January 1, in line with a Christian tradition arising from the Jewish orthodox belief that the real start of a baby boy's life began not with his birth but with his circumcision and naming ceremony eight days later.
 
As it happens, some scholars believe that Christ was more probably born in the spring, rather than in the depths of winter. They note biblical references to shepherds watching their flocks, as occurs at lambing time, and to the local hostelries being full, as was more likely to be the case at the Jewish Passover.
 
But whatever the truth, the current confusion cannot be blamed entirely on Denis, and doubts remain even as to his name. Historians believe the epithet "Exiguus" may refer not to the monk's stature but to his modesty.


SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE

This Site Served by TheHostPros

SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE

This Site Served by TheHostPros