-
- Contrary to public statements made in recent days, Attorney
General Janet Reno and FBI officials planned the final deadly assault on
the Branch Davidian church in Waco, Texas, with top officers of the Delta
Force, according to classified documents obtained through the Freedom of
Information Act and Special Forces sources.
-
- The FBI actually requested that Special Forces Delta
Force operatives consult with them, be present on the scene and maintain
equipment in preparation for a resolution of the 1993 51-day standoff that
resulted in a fire that killed 80 civilians including many children, according
to the documents and a knowledgeable military source.
-
- Despite this powerful evidence, as of yesterday an FBI
spokesman, Tron Brekke, was still telling the Dallas Morning News that
he could not say whether Delta Force might have actively assisted the FBI
in any way in Waco "because I don't think anybody knows. ... That's
part of the reason that the attorney general and the director are, in a
very expeditious manner, going to have 40 assistant inspectors and whoever
is chosen to lead them come down and find out definitively what did happen,"
he said. "I don't know what was done or wasn't done down there."
-
- Meanwhile, the documented information WorldNetDaily has
obtained reveals that not only did Reno actively seek involvement by Delta
Force, but she was warned at one meeting she attended with the FBI, Delta
Force Colonel John Boykin and Webster Hubbell that the use of CS tear gas
would have a variety of effects, one of which would be "Some people
would panic, Quote: "mothers may run off and leave infants."
-
- The FBI's admission just days ago that pyrotechnic tear-gas
canisters "may have been used" was an abrupt reversal of a six-year
denial that its agents used anything capable of sparking a fire at the
compound. The Delta Force document detailing the Delta Force/Reno/FBI meeting
notes that when Reno asked Delta Force officers for their "assessment"
of the plan, she was told: "This was not a military operation and
could not be assessed as such. We explained that the situation was not
one that we had ever encountered and that the Rules of Engagement for the
FBI were substantially different than for a military operation. [name redacted]
stated, "We can't grade your paper," as a way of explaining our
position."
-
- A WorldNetDaily Special Forces source who analyzed this
and other statements says Delta Force was clearly uncomfortable with any
association with the FBI's plans at Waco.
-
- In another section of the document, a Delta Force colonel
writes: "My final comments were that I believed that the HRT (Hostage
Rescue Team) should consider pulling their people off the target for a
short period to retrain and polish some of the perishable(WND: difficult
to read, looks like "perishable") skills. I made it clear that
I was not encouraging an immediate execution of the operation. My exact
words were, "I don't have a dog in this fight."
-
- WorldNetDaily's source says he believes that statement
shows again how Delta Force cringed over getting involved at WACO, "I
believe he (the Delta Force colonel) meant that he didn't want to be directly
involved in it, and did not want to be dragged into it. Delta Force operators,
and Task Force 160 operators continually cautioned the FBI against attempting
an "open air assault" on the target, and stated emphatically
that they did not want to be involved in firing on or assaulting American
civilians, according to a source. These official and unofficial comments
went ignored and, in fact, one Special Operations Officer was threatened
with court-martial if he continued to protest, the source said. At another
point in the document, Delta Force personnel explain to Reno that Special
Forces encounters are almost always militaristic and involve outright enemies
who are often heavily armed. Delta Force explains that in its standard
modus operandi it was, "The principles of surprise, speed and violence
of action [that] were essential to any operation. [redacted] stated that
momentum should be maintained and that ground gained should not be relinquished."
A WND military source says "violence of action" usually refers
to killing the "hostiles."
-
- A former Special Forces commando says he spoke yesterday
to a Delta Force commando who was present at the final tear-gas assault
on the Branch Davidian compound. Keith Idema, who was a member of Special
Forces and Special Operations units from 1975 to 1992 and helped to train
hostage rescue team personnel for both Delta Force and the FBI, says pictures
from Waco released this week by the Texas Department of Public Safety have
been mistakenly identified by the department as gun silencers and suppressors
belonging to David Koresh and his followers which were found inside the
compound after the fire. Idema says they are actually concussion grenades
manufactured by a company, Defense Technology, and purchased by the FBI.
-
- Idema also says the bright light seen on video footage
as flashing inside the building moments before the fire broke out have
been misidentified as a fire started by Branch Davidian leader David Koresh,
when, in fact, to the trained eye of a Special Forces explosive expert
it is unmistakably the flash caused by a "concussion grenade"
that has been lobbed inside the compound. A concussion grenade uses a brilliant
flash and loud bang to render an enemy in its vicinity blind, deaf and
immobile for a brief period during which commandos can overpower them.
Such grenades should be used only for military purposes and were wholly
inappropriate, if not illegal to be used in a situation involving women
and children -- and any situation where potentially inflammable tear gas
was still hanging in the air, the former Special Forces operative said.
-
- Charges that the FBI used incendiary grenades which may
have caused the fire were dismissed by Reno. For six years, since the assault
on April 19, 1993, until six days ago, Reno maintained that no military
weapons were used. When a report from Texas DPS forced her to admit that
some might have been used, she still dismissed any possibility that they
could have caused the fire, stating that they were used in the early morning
hours before the fire began. According to Idema, the FBI was taking an
ill-advised chance using a military CS tear gas grenade at any time knowing
that, unlike the kind of tear gas used in civilian situations, this type
leaves a vapor that hangs in the air for a longer period of time and can
ignite under certain circumstances.
-
- The concussion grenades and military fuses he says were
used moments before the fire broke out could have ignited the lingering
tear gas vapors and started the fire. Idema also points out that other
photographs released clearly show an FBI agent with a .50-caliber Browning
machine gun next to his leg.
-
- Such weapons are to be used only against armored equipment
and weapons, certainly not civilians, says Idema.
-
- "Why were they there?" he asks. "Koresh
didn't have any tanks or helicopters, or APCs. The Geneva Convention states
that these weapons are never to be used in an anti-personnel role."
-
- The bureau's admission that such devices "may have
been used" marked an abrupt reversal of a long-standing denial that
its agents used anything capable of sparking a fire at the church.
-
- Bureau and Justice Department officials have maintained
that the devices could not have played a role in the fire because they
were used hours before the blaze and were fired at an underground bunker
adjacent to the wooden church compound.
-
- A pending wrongful-death suit filed by surviving Branch
Davidians and families of the dead has alleged that agents launched pyrotechnic
devices into the compound and fired into the building. The government vehemently
denies those charges.
-
- Federal officials from President Clinton down have staunchly
maintained in the six years since the tragedy that FBI agents did not fire
a single shot during the entire 51-day siege.
-
-
- 1999 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
|
