- F.E.M.A. [Federal Emergency Management
Agency] has been authorized for the past 15 years by Presidential Executive
Orders to: confiscate ALL property from the American People; separate families
into the current 43 internment camps [already built and operational by
the way, 5 of which are located in Georgia. The largest can confine somewhere
on the order of 100,000 American citizens -BTW], called 'relocation camps'
by the 'government', for assignment to work camps; declare martial law
and TOTALLY overrides the U.S. Constitution. The Presidential Executive
Orders that are related or control all of this are given at the end of
this article. Two of the state prisons here in Georgia are currently empty,
although manned by a minimal number of staff, have been setup and intentionally
unpopulated by prisoners just to support this political policy.
-
- Concentration Camps.
-
- An Executive Order signed by then President
BUSH in 1989 authorized the Federal Emergency Management Agency [F.E.M.A.]
to build 43 primary camps [having a capacity of 35,000 to 45,000 prisoners
EACH and also authorized hundreds of secondary facilities. It is interesting
to note that several of these facilities can accommodate 100,000 prisoners.
These facilities have been completed and many are already manned but as
yet contain no prisoners. [Remember all the TALK of over-crowded prisons
that exist -BTW]. In south Georgia there are several state prisons that,
except for a few guards, are completely devoid of prisoners.
-
- Under F.E.M.A., the Executive Orders
which are already written and is the current law of the land, calls for
the COMPLETE suspension of the United States Constitution, all rights and
liberties, as they are currently known. The following executive orders,
which are in the Federal Register located in Washington DC for anyone to
request copies of, call for the suspension of all civil rights and liberties
and for extraordinary measures to be taken in, as most of the orders state,
"ANY national security emergency situation that might confront the
government."
-
- When F.E.M.A. is implemented, the following
executive orders will be immediately enforced:
-
- E.O. (Executive Order) 12148 - FEMA national
security emergency, such as: national disaster, social unrest, insurrection,
or national financial crisis. E.O. 10995 - "... provides for the seizure
of ALL communications media in the United States."
-
- E.O. 10997 - "... provides for the
seizure of ALL electric power, petroleum, gas, fuels and minerals, both
public and private."
-
- E.O. 10998 - "... provides for the
seizure of ALL food supplies and resources, public and private, and ALL
farms, lands, and equipment."
-
- E.O. 10999 - "... provides for the
seizure of ALL means of transportation, including PERSONAL cars, trucks
or vehicles of any kind and TOTAL CONTROL over all highways, seaports,
and waterways."
-
- E.O. 11000 - "... provides for the
SEIZURE OF ALL AMERICAN PEOPLE for work forces under federal supervision,
including SPLITTING UP OF FAMILIES if the government has to."
-
- E.O. 11001 - "... provides for government
seizure of ALL health, education and welfare functions."
-
- E.O. 11002 - "... designates the
postmaster general to operate a national REGISTRATION of all persons."
[Under this order, you would report to your local post office to be separated
and assigned to a new area. Here is where families would be separated -BTW].
-
- E.O. 11003 - "... provides for the
government to take over ALL airports and aircraft, commercial, public and
PRIVATE."
-
- E.O. 11004 - "... provides for the
Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, designate areas
to be abandoned and establish new locations for populations."
-
- E.O. 11005 - "... provides for the
government to TAKE OVER railroads, inland waterways, and public storage
facilities."
-
- E.O. 11051 - "... the office of
Emergency Planning [has] complete authorization to put the above orders
into effect in time of increased international tension or economic or financial
crisis."
-
- All of the above executive orders were
combined by President NIXON into Executive Order 11490, which allows all
of this to take place if a national emergency is declared by the President.
The burning and insurrection in Los Angeles in the case of Rodney King
could have executed [and partially did execute] these Executive Orders.
-
- Executive Order 12919: "National
Defense Industrial Resources Preparedness" signed by CLINTON June
3, 1994, delegates authorities, responsibilities and allocations of F.E.M.A.'s
Executive Orders [last entry] for the confiscation of ALL PROPERTY from
the American people, and their re-location and assignment to 'labor' camps.
The Executive Order also supersedes or revokes eleven (11) previous Executive
Orders [from 1939 through 1991] and amends Executive Order 10789 and 11790.
This executive order is A DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
by
-
- the [Secret] Government of the United
States in concert with the UNITED NATIONS.
-
- Operation Dragnet
-
- Janet Reno can implement this operation
upon receiving one call from the President. Arrest warrants will be issued
via computer to round-up over 1 MILLION PATRIOTIC AMERICANS who may 'resist'
the NEW WORLD ORDER...Americans who are not 'politically correct.' Specifically
mentioned are CHRISTIANS or those who read the Bible. Concentration/internment
camps have already been built to accommodate these American prisoners.
See above paragraph as these internment camps have been setup and are run
by F.E.M.A.
-
- Operation Rolling Thunder.
-
- Reno and Benson have mentioned this operation
which comprises county-wide sweeps of house to house, dynamic entry, search
and seizures for all guns and food stockpiles by B.A.T.F., state national
guard, activity duty soldiers, as well as local police. This function is
also run and coordinated through F.E.M.A.
-
- Public Law 100-690 banned almost ALL
RELIGIOUS GATHERINGS [not yet enforced.] and grants no-knock search and
seizures without a search warrant; expands the drug laws to include EVERY
American. This will generally be the prelude, or in addition to, a F.E.M.A.
operation and contingency plan implementation.
-
- The Omnibus Crime Bill of 1990
-
- Ensures confiscation of all private property
via money laundering, environmental violations of the Clean Water and Air
Act, and extends as far as child abuse. This act also coordinates activities
through F.E.M.A. and the Department of the Army, Commanding General, U.S.
Forces Command, Fort McPherson, GA which is the executive and implementing
agency upon initiation of many of these acts. The responsible agency within
U.S. Army Forces Command was what used to be known as the Deputy Chief
of Staff for Operations, Plans Division [DCSOPS, Plans], which was changed
several years ago to J-3 after the Headquarters became a joint headquarters.
They keep on file copies of all F.E.M.A. Emergency Management Operation
Plans, including those plans developed by the Army to support the F.E.M.A.
plan to eliminate the U.S. Constitution upon implementation. According
to current plans, the Constitution will be 'temporarily' discontinued and
shelved until the real or perceived and declared 'threat' has been neutralized
(ask yourself -- who or what is the REAL threat that needs to be 'neutralized'?
- Branton). But once 'shelved,' as with almost every other action of the
Government, it STAYS shelved.
-
- The Crime Bill of 1994
-
- Banning of all military weapons which
are necessary to the formation of a militia [when needed], denies other
military equipment to the people's militia units, prelude to confiscating
ALL guns in the hands of private citizens, DESTROYS the 1st Amendment,
and makes virtually every American an outlaw. See above comments concerning
the house-to-house search. The agency responsible for the actual implementation
and search is the Department of the Army in concert with local and state
police, including F.E.M.A., FBI, BATF, and other Federal Agencies.
-
- Secret Underground Bases
-
- There have been documented over 60 secret,
Virtual cities, underground. These have largely been built by the Government,
Federal Reserve Bank Owners, and high ranking members of the Committee
of 300. In addition, there exist underground Satellite Tracking Facilities
which have the ability to punch your 911 address into the computer and
a satellite can, within seconds, bring a camera to bear on your property
to the point that those monitoring can read a license number on an automobile
in your driveway. These facilities have as of Oct. 1, 1994, been turned
over to the [foreign power of the] UNITED NATIONS. (Note: Forget the license
plate...according to information released by Norio Hayakawa, this satellite
technology is now so sophisticated that they can CLEARLY read every word
on your driver's LICENSE supposing it were in view of the satellite)
-
- --Col. (Dr) Byron T. Weeks
Comment by Ron Regehr
regehrr@ms1.aes.com
- MUFON, Orange County, CA
Several comments come to mind, but I will restrain my comments to that
which I know to be true.
-
- The claim, "...a satellite can,
within seconds, bring a camera to bear on your property to the point .
. . in view of the satellite)" can best (politely) be termed HOGWASH!
-
- Briefly allow me to explain. The only
orbit that would allow this coverage is a geosynchronous orbit, wherein
the observing satellite is nominally 22,300 miles above the Earth. What
they view is reflections--just as you and I do. The Earth's atmosphere
attenuates (e.g., "soaks up") more and more of the reflected
energy the further away from "straight down" we go. As it is,
because we're at 30 to 50 degrees north latitude, we're 30 to 50 degrees
off axis (the satellites are positioned above the equator) thus only a
small portion of the signal reaches the satellite.
-
- But let's assume that that amount is
sufficient to register on the satellite's sensitive detectors. (We no longer
deploy satellites with film, relying instead on the more reliable television
or "video" imaging. While this is excellent, we can only resolve
images that are the apparent size of the detector. Just as our vision is
limited by the size of the rods and cones of our eyes, the vision of a
satellite is limited by the size of the detector elements. Hence we are
limited to images having a resolution measured in 10's of meters--and that
is when looking straight down (at the equator) on a cold, clear day.
-
- "Clear" is obvious, but why
cold? Have you ever been on a long straight road on a hot day? Notice how
the horizon above the roadway seems to dance and oftentimes have "water"
on it? This is the result of "air turbules"--different air densities
causing the signal (what you see) to distort because of the varying air
densities. Whereas you're probably only looking through about 1000 meters,
the satellite must look through possibly 100,000 meters, all containing
(to a more or lesser degree) these image distortions.
-
- Sometimes, I'll wager, you cannot even
see through them at distant objects you KNOW are beyond your vision! Please
explain to me how you could "read" a license plate (let alone
the text on a printed page!!!) with that interference. As for non-geosynchronous
orbiting satellites, forget it. They have much higher resolution (can even
"see through walls") but are in predictible orbits.
-
- Gee, maybe I should "take this on
the road"!
-
- Actually, I do. The problem is most people
would prefer to wallow in their own ignorance than enjoy the freedom of
knowledge.
Response To Ron Regehr
- By Jason
Leigh, Ph.D.
- 11-7-97
Being a former Electronics Expert and Designer
at the Top Security Level with NASA, via Martin Marietta Aerospace, and
also helping to design and build the first prototype of "S.P.O.T."
(the 'spy-satellite'[1978-1979] used in the "Desert-Storm War"
[1990], which could zero-in on an area the size of a quarter-coin, from
an orbit of only several hundred miles above the Earth), I can state, with
much certainty of DIRECT INVOLVEMENT, that Mr. Regehr does not know of
what he speaks. I have never heard of ANY U.S. SATELLITE orbiting at 22,300
miles above the Earth, as Mr. Regehr expresses in his 'debunking' essay.
'Too far out!
-
- 22,300 miles above the Earth is too far
away for any satellite to be placed into orbit, for as Mr. Regehr actually
tries to mislead us with his 'techno-speak' of, "atmosphere attenuates
(e.g., 'soaks up'), reflected energy," and the variable, "we're
30 to 50 degrees off axis (the satellites are positioned above the equator)."
What? At 22,300 miles above the Earth (only 250,000 miles to the Moon),
would a satellite be, "positioned above the equator?" Yeah, .
. 'right.
-
- I would ask everyone to remember the
Desert-Storm War and the satellite pictures we were shown from CNN, and
other Broadcast News-TV stations, shot from "S.P.O.T." and other
such satellites, then go to NASA's Web site and look-up the orbits of these
satellites--if you are interested.
-
- Is MUFON really a committee of 'Debunkers,'
or are they really interested in the objective proving of UFOs and other
such "unknowns?" Does Mr. Regehr speak for ALL of MUFON?
-
- It now appears that Mr. Regehr is trying
to bath us in his, "HOGWASH," which he must have dripping from
his hands as we read . . .
-
- 'Sorry 'Debunkers,' but the U.S. DOES
HAVE THESE TYPES OF SATELLITES WHICH CAN ZERO-IN ON A--DIME-COIN: now.
Who cares about one reading your license plate number, when in point-of-fact:
they can zero-in on your dimples--and the clothes you are wearing?
-
- I, therefore, confirm Col. (Dr.) Byron
T. Weeks report, and or essay, to be FACTUALLY BASED . . .
-
- Respectfully, Jason Leigh, Ph.D.
-
- ---
-
- RESPONSE
-
- Sightings:
-
- I have been on a personal fact-finding mission of a broad
nature for roughly the last year. I am retired, and in such, I have accessed
the Internet extensively, and as a result came across your web site. Although
I was attempting to gather more data on FEMA, there was a blurb of related
information at the end of the page about satellites spying on people and
their possible capabilities. This led to comments being posted.
-
- I have input to relay concerning comments made to the
aforementioned page, specifically a reply to those made by Ron Regehr and
Jason Leigh. You have posted what appears to be "Pro" and "Con"
views of satellite imagery capabilities from these gentlemen. My expertise
comes to bear as I am an Electromagnetic Spectrum Authority (retired).
My forte encompasses all forms of radiating energy between the oscillations
of 1 Hertz (1 Hz) through roughly 5 YottaHertz (5,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
Hz), which is the entire electromagnetic spectrum. This effectively covers
everything between the fundamental frequency of the Earth itself (1 Hz
to 25 Hz (due to energy variations of tectonic activity), but with a prominent
resonation at 7.6 Hz) to the upper end of Cosmic Rays (3X / 5 YHz) where
pure particle emissions exist and the duality of wave-particle dualism
comes into play. I believe that this more than qualifies me to make comments
on the subject at hand.
-
- To the comments made by Ron Regehr (no date):
-
- First, I would point out that the distance of a satellite
operating in a geosynchronous orbit is not 22,300 miles above the earth
(and there is no "mean" distance in this case). That is a figure
which is stated erroneously in most publications for the general public,
I surmise it is to make things easier to absorb. The exact distance is
22,247 miles. Anyone that is really "in the know" would have
given this figure and not the former, if they truly wanted to put weight
behind their statements. Ironically, COMSAT even uses 22300 COMSAT Drive
as the address of their facility in Clarksburg, MD. So the error goes on
and on....
-
- Second, I would point out that a geosynchronous orbiting
satellite would not be the common attempted means for such reconnaissance
coverage. There are numerous "levels" of operations for satellites,
in example: LEO (Low Earth Orbiters) which orbit 650 to 1,300 miles up,
MEO (Medium Earth Orbiters) which orbit 4,000+ miles up, etc. As I write
this, there are "lighter than air" platforms (constantly aloft)
under construction that would dwell at the height of roughly 10,000 feet
above the Earth to be used for communications in large cities. These also
would be labeled as satellites (in a technical sense).
-
- Third, Ron's explanation (though crude) of light refraction,
"clear skies", and "cold weather" although having truth
to it, are not necessarily applicable to the end result of obtaining "graphic"
(not emulsion based photographs) information from the terrain below. As
to thermal distortion, his comments are slightly askew as he is pointing
out thermal distortion in the visible light spectrum that is discernible
to the greatest degree along a horizontal axis (where it "hugs"
the immediate body of the Earth from which it is generated) versus vertical
axis distortion (looking down through the body of the thermal distortion
and not across it, wherein said thermal energy is dissipated progressively
as it ascends and would be less "dense"). As a further (but extremely
simplistic) example I would point out trying to look "across"
a hard driving rain versus looking up "through" or "between"
the rain drops towards their point of origin. Discounting the physical
rain drops touching your eyes (negated in this example as thermal energy
would be), which do you think would yield a clearer view over a chosen
distance? Remember we are not trying to look at stars here (adding greatly
to the distortion would be space debris / dust crossing our field of view,
etc.), just a span of a few hundred miles.
-
- Many systems exist in other than the "visible light"
spectrum for gathering information. I think the general public has been
under the impression that if you can't see it with your "eyeball",
amplified or not, then you can't see it. Of course this is not true. Through
proper spectrum utilization, one can look through clouds, terra firma and
even solid objects. Computers of course play a significant roll in extracting
the data for visual presentation to be assimilated. I will not expound
here as I believe you and your audience are already aware of these techniques
in general, and it would be too lengthy.
-
- Fourth, I would point out that most satellites are in
a fixed orbit of travel, but some can change their orbit significantly
if they are proprietary satellites of a "reconnaissance" nature.
All LEO, MEO, etc. satellites have the capability to adjust their "trajectory"
as their orbits decay (due to gravity) to keep them "on station"
until such time that their "adjustment" fuel is near spent and
would then be boosted to a benign orbit in space (there are thousands of
dead "birds" and debris out there). Many satellites are launched
under cover of secrecy. Has anyone ever heard of the "Keyhole"
(KH-11, 12, 13) series satellites?
-
- Lastly, unless Ron is injecting phrases like "in
my opinion"or "I guess", then he should not state as fact
that "...most people would prefer to wallow in their own ignorance
than enjoy the freedom of knowledge." Has he communed with the masses
as an all-powerful deity?
-
- To the comments made by Jason Leigh of 11-7-97:
-
- First, If Jason posses a Doctorate in Philosophy, what
is it in? "Electronic Expert" is not a valid classification or
Field.
-
- Second, If Jason was involved in the stated projects,
why does he dispute that a satellite cannot be placed in a geosynchronous
orbit? Has he never heard of DirecTV or USSB? If he meant to imply that
a visual light spectrum reconnaissance satellite is never placed in such
an orbit, then Jason needs some refreshment in communications skills. Jason
incorrectly states (as did Ron) the figure of 22,300 miles for geosynchronous
orbit. Likewise, he is in error when he states that a geosynchronous satellite
is not fixed above a point on the Equator. They are indeed placed in an
equatorial orbit.
-
- Third, the Moon is always in a fluctuating orbit, not
a stationary orbit of 250,000 miles. If Jason meant to relay the mean distance
it would be 238,860 miles with an average perigee of 225,000 miles and
an average apogee of 252,000 miles, which are distances measured from the
center of the Earth to the center of the Moon, and not surface to surface.
With this in mind, the mean distance would be averaged as roughly 233,816
miles from surface to surface. Where Jason gets 250,000 miles from I do
not know.
-
- Fourth, "Zero in on a dime coin" would not
be a technical term used to convey the acuity of a satellites resolution
powers, nor, I suspect, a term that a person with a Ph.D. within the field
of satellite imagery would use. Furthermore, S.P.O.T. imagery is far from
the highest resolution and is widely available to the general public. Unless
Jason was inebriated (sorry, I cannot think of any other reason) when he
wrote his reply, I am highly suspicious of his academic level of achievement.
-
- In conclusion, it is my belief, based on my present knowledge,
that timely (not instant, and not within seconds) surveillance of persons
and activity from a plethora of satellite (meaning any orbiting platform)
configurations and capabilities is indeed possible down to the degree of
clear identification of said target with resolutions in the area of a few
inches or better. It must be pointed out that such tasking of satellites
to accommodate "urgent" needs is complicated and expensive as
many "jobs" are placed in the que to handle, so a strong level
of need would be required. I personally wish that persons projecting "technical"
information would negate any personal beliefs until the conclusion of said
information and strive to be as accurate as possible. The funny part is,
both gentlemen are partially correct and mistaken in their juxtaposition
comments. A real mishmash of confusion.
-
- Sincerely,
-
- Richard E. J. Driskill
- Electromagnetic Spectrum Authority (retired)
|
Homepage