SIGHTINGS


 
Canadian Study Questions
So-Called 'Gay Gene'
4-22-99
 
WASHINGTON (CP) -- Researchers at the University of Western Ontario are questioning a U.S. study that said a gene inherited from mothers influences men's sexual orientation. In 1993, Dr. Dean Hamer and colleagues at the U.S. National Cancer Institute provoked a worldwide furor when they reported they had found evidence of a "gay gene" in men.
 
They had studied 40 pairs of gay brothers and found 33 of them shared a particular sequence of the genetic codes on their X chromosomes, in an area called Xq28. They said that pointed to a possible gay gene. But in a study published in this week's Science, George Rice and colleagues at Western in London, Ont., said they studied more pairs of gay brothers and found no evidence that they shared some sort of mutation in that area.
 
"These results do not support an X-linked gene underlying male homosexuality," Rice's team wrote in its report. But the team added that the search should continue for any possible genetic cause of homosexuality. Men, in addition to their 22 pairs of matched chromosomes, have one X and one Y chromosome. Women have two Xs.
 
Men inherit their X chromosomes from their mothers, and because they have just one copy, are vulnerable to genetic defects carried on the X chromosome such as colour blindness and Fragile X syndrome, which causes a form of mental retardation.
 
Hamer's team had noted a tendency for homosexuality to run in the female line -- men whose mothers had gay brothers also tended to be homosexual, the team reported. So it looked for an area on the X chromosome that might be involved.
 
The team homed in on an area known as Xq28.
 
Rice's team tried to duplicate and expand on those results, studying 52 sets of brothers in Canada who were both gay, looking specifically at the Xq28 gene. "We advertised in Canadian gay news magazines for families in which there were at least two gay brothers," the team wrote.
 
It compared their genes to samples taken from 33 pairs of brothers who had been gene-tested for multiple sclerosis. But the researchers did not find any particular variation of the gene that marked gays from non-gays. Gay brothers were not unusually likely to share one of four variations of Xq28 that they looked for.
 
"It is unclear why our results are so discrepant from Hamer's original study," the team wrote. The researchers said it was possible there was another "gay gene," as the team only looked at one gene for its study. But Rice's team also said that if homosexuality was a simple inherited trait, it would be very likely to have been bred out -- because homosexuals would be less likely to have children and pass on the trait.
 
But studies dating back to the 1980s show some evidence that homosexuality might run in families.
 
One study on identical twins, who share more of their genes than regular siblings, found one twin was more likely to be gay if his twin was, and another study found homosexual men were more likely to have homosexual brothers even if they were not twins.
 
Other experts point out that being homosexual does not preclude having children, so there would be no reason for a "gay gene" to have been bred out.





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE