Do So Many ‘9-11-2001’
W. B. Schwarz
One has to wonder why Russia based Sputnik News runs a major headline and US MSM is silent on the matter.
Headline: “Nearly 4,000 First Responders Have Been Diagnosed With Cancer”.
How is that possible? Why have so many First Responder police and firemen (3,700) been hit with cancer since September 11, 2001?
This is an article I have waited a long time to write. Due to being the first true conservative to come out against Bush and his fabricated Global War on Terror I have had to endure over a decade of idiotic comments about me from the Far Left crowd that saw 9-11-2001 as a chance to get rid of Bush-Cheney in 2004.
Well, they failed to get rid of Bush-Cheney and we can now see how lame their agenda was and is when the world has to endure watching and listening to Barrack Obama fiddle-fart around and even outdo George W. Bush in pathetic leadership.
Of course, announcing for President of the United States as a Third Party conservative independent brought out the venom and vituperations towards me from both RNC and DNC types.
What were they so afraid of that they rushed to pass a law that would limit me or any other third party candidate to $50,000,000 in campaign donations? There are over 70,000,000 as third party and politically agnostic voters in America. If combined, could bury any candidate the RNC and DNC puts forth. That is what they were terrified of and with good reason.
These assholes in Washington DC and a few other choice places knew I would turn the DOJ and FBI on them and clean out much of the cancer inside of the US government, Wall Street and corporate fraud.
Well, they failed to slow me down. If you read on you will understand why most consider me a far better investigator than any of the nitwits on the Left or the ones on the Right that rush out to defend the likes of McCain, who has to choose his words carefully or incriminate himself. That is why McCain and some others are always ‘shouting at the Moon’ for it deflects from far more serious matters.
When I was going after Viatel, Ebone, Williams Communications Group and Global Crossing in US Bankruptcy Court, it was said that I could track securities fraud across the concrete sidewalks of Manhattan. Often I would go to DC or NYC and people would leave town fearing that their ass might be the next one I put in my briefcase or let the DOJ, SEC and FBI do the honors.
Just on Global Crossing and information I provided to the DOJ Criminal Division and FBI, Wall Street was fined $3.0 billion and Deutsche Bank $3.6 billion. I did not get the Global Crossing assets, but I did nail some very big asses to the wall.
There were some in Manhattan that feared me as much as Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid feared the Wells Fargo tracker that was following them at night across solid rock.
Read on and you are about to learn how absolutely despicable New York City is and the US Government, and Larry Silverstein.
What you are about to read is going to be in a new 9-11-2001 video that I am producing. The screenplay is done, the video experts are preparing to go into production. There will be plenty of facts and graphics so American Sheeple can understand it. It will be very professional but I have days I want to do it as a cartoon so ignorant and cowardly American Sheeple ‘GET IT!’
The New York & New Jersey Port Authority lost a lawsuit in Newark NJ that sealed the fate of the World Trade Center long before September 11, 2001.
The architects and engineers tried to come up with a way to use structural scaffolding and take the buildings down a floor at a time and rebuild. When the price tag for that came in at around $5.6 billion, no one was willing to cough up that much money to fix the problem.
What was the problem? Asbestos that had been lavishly applied to the WTC facilities and even the three major airports LaGuardia, Kennedy and Newark.
The NY&NJPA filed a lawsuit against the insurers to get enough funds to do a massive asbestos environmental remediation project… but they lost.
This is the link and the legal case header of the lawsuit that they lost about asbestos and when they lost the WTC was doomed:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NY AND NJ v. AFFILIATED FM INS. CO. No. CIV.A. 91-2907(JWB).
245 F.Supp.2d 563 (2001)
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY and Port Authority
Trans-Hudson Corporation, Plaintiffs,
United States District Court, D. New Jersey.
May 17, 2001.
On June 3, 1991, the plaintiffs the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (collectively " the Port Authority" or "plaintiff) filed this action in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, against various insurance companies that had issued first-party property insurance policies to the Port Authority between 1969 to 1988. In this suit, the Port Authority seeks to recover costs and expenses it incurred and would continue to incur from asbestos management and abatement activities in its New York and New Jersey facilities.
On May 7, 1996, the Court entered Case Management Order No. 1. due to the size and complexity of the case, the Court divided the litigation into three cumulative phases. In Phase I, the parties would address whether coverage existed under any of the first-party insurance policies named by the Port authority in its Complaint.2
In mid-2000, the Court considered an initial round of summary judgment motions directed to certain coverage issues. By its Opinion and Order ("the First Summary Judgment Opinion") of June 5, 2000, this Court granted partial summary judgment against the Port Authority in favor of the certain defendants, and others, on the grounds that plaintiffs’ claims for losses under certain insurance policies were barred due to the Port Authority's breach of contractual provisions requiring timely notice and suit within a prescribed period, and the non-issuance of an insurance policy by a particular defendant. One of the determinations in that Opinion was that, for purposes of provisions in the policies pertaining to notice of loss and suit limitations, the Port Authority was aware of its asbestos losses at the latest when it filed a lawsuit against asbestos manufacturers and distributors in 1987 ("the Allied lawsuit").
When the NY&NJPA lost in New Jersey they appealed in Third District US Court of Appeals and people in NYC apparently never heard about it. The Third District does not cover the State of New York.
Third Circuit US Court of Appeals
No.01-2513. Decided: November 14, 2002 - See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-3rd-circuit/1113815.html#sthash.MLBDFvvD.dpuf
Stop and think for a minute about everything you heard Rudi Giuliani say, and George Bush and Dick Cheney and all of the other ‘Official Mouthpieces’.
None of them ever said a word that the buildings were fundamentally condemned when the NY&NJPA lost this asbestos lawsuit and no one was willing to do the $5.6 billion ‘take them down and rebuild without the asbestos’.
Viola!!! We have 9-11 and the Urban Renewal problem is solved.
Then we have this Zionist Jew weasel Larry Silverstein that cuts that juicy deal. I used to be a design-build-development executive and can assure you that due to lender’s requirements and laws regarding asbestos (and prior cases awarding billions to asbestos victims), Silverstein knew all about the asbestos problem. So did Rudi Giuliani and the entire city commission in NYC and the entire Port Authority board.
Of course, neither the Sputnik article nor MSM in the USA have addressed the problem of how many in NYC and NJ have either died or now have cancer due to a willful, despicable, evil group of insiders that wanted 9-11-2001 so they could rush at Afghanistan, Iraq and others and point the finger of blame. Asbestos and other hazardous elements got blown out all over the place due to someone’s version of how to get rid of WTC and the asbestos problem.
Think on that comment, and if you do not get livid maybe you do not deserve the freedoms or liberties they want to strip you of all on the basis of the most colossal lie I have ever seen in my life.
Another reason I was attacked by RNC and DNC types is if I had been elected there would have already been many trials, many convictions and many executions or life in prison without parole.
Millions were premeditatedly exposed to asbestos, so I bet the 3,700 is far from the real number.
I do not know what you would call it; I call it despicable.
|Donate to Rense.com Support Free And Honest Journalism At Rense.com||Subscribe To RenseRadio! Enormous Online Archives, MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, Highest Quality Live Programs|