Act
surprised. John Roberts is a rat and Clarence Thomas....well,
remember, he's the one who mocked that the U.S. Supreme Court
was "evading that one" referring to the eligibility cases against
the fraud in the White House.
Since prostitution is illegal, John's faces have been made public by
law enforcement around the country here and there. It should be no
different in this case except it involves individuals like this:
Perhaps a man who is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Exposing
him as a DC John might cost him bundles in a divorce or high ranking
elected officials or other powerful insiders. That's why Ms. Palfrey
was 'suicided".
The names of her John's should be released instead of protected by
compromised federal judges. Remember from my last column:
(Incidentally, the judge who turned down Sibley's petition is Judge
Richard Roberts of the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia. On March 16, 2016, the same Judge Roberts resigned. The 63
year-old is being sued by a woman who claims Roberts sexually
assaulted her when she was 16 years old; Roberts was 27. Roberts
says the relationship was mutual consent (a 27-year old with a 16
year old teen) and that the sexual assault allegations are
"categorically false". The usual denials just like former Speaker of
the U.S. House of Representatives, Dennis Hastert, cutting a deal
last October in the hush money cover up over allegations he sexually
molested a young boy when Hastert was a high school coach. Hastert's
sentencing has been postponed due to health issues.)
An update to that one: It now appears there are 4 new individuals
who want to step forward with accusations Hastert also molested them
as boys.
This is from Montgomery Blair Sibley, who was the attorney for
Deborah Jeane Palfrey and keeper of her records:
April 6, 2016
Greetings:
As you asked me to keep you in the loop,here is the latest on
the D.C. Madam’s records:
Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to remove the
Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing the D.C. Madam's
Escort Service Records I believe relevant to the Presidential
Election. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22, I am now renewing
that Application to Justice Thomas a procedural second bite at the
apple so to speak. I will wait upon his decision which in
the normal course should come by the middle of next week before
taking any further action regarding those Records. The Renewed
Application can be found on my blog: http://amoprobos.blogspot.com/
I am scheduled to appear by telephone on the Alex Jones Show Jeane
Palfrey’s favorite radio show this Friday at 1:00 p.m. (Central
Time).
I have reviewed the putative D.C. Madam records released on-line and
can state they are not the Records I seek to release. Instead, they
appear to be those that I released publicly in 2007 and which were
organized into a searchable database by the Brandeis Boys.
(http://thehill.com/homenews/news/12600-brandeis-boys-come-to-dc-madams-rescue-with-website-of-phone-listings)
Respectfully, I have sought to answer all your questions, so now I
am going to ask you a few of my own: With the Wisconsin Primary now
in the books and more Primaries on the horizon:
1. Will the Press begin to “press” Chief
Justice Roberts as to why he denied my Application in Supreme Court
Case No. 15A1016? Is he a Caesar at the Coliseum turning his
thumb up or down as the whim strikes him or does he have to
account-through-legal-analysis for his decision to allow my First
Amendment Political Speech to be muzzled by explicitly approving the
refusal of the lower courts in his administrative jurisdiction to
allow me to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order? (I
trust you know for time sensitive or urgent questions, Reporters can
contact the Supreme Court Public Information Office at 202-479-3211,
press 1).
2. When will the Press begin to “press”
D.C. Circuit Court Chief Judge Garland as to why his Court has
refused since March 9, 2016 to address my Petition which seeks
an order directing the District Court Clerk to file my Motion to
Modify the Restraining Order. Notably, in Case No.: 16-3007, I
requested Expedited Consideration which the Circuit Court also has
refused to grant or deny creating in effect a judicial pocket veto
without explanation and thus denying me the ability to appeal such a
decision. (Such an inquiry can be directed to: Tracy Hauser Scarrow,
(202-216-7460) Special Assistant to Chief Judge Garland).
Needless to say, there will be more to follow.
Montgomery Sibley
Also:
BREAKING: GOP “Rule 40b” Makes Brokered Convention Impossible, Only
Trump Qualifies to Be Nominee!!
Hogan Gidley: Rule GOP Establishment Wrote to Block Ron Paul Now
Prevents Them from Blocking Trump
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/03/16/gidley-political-jihad-will-erupt-if-gop-changes-rules-to-steal-nomination-from-trump/
"Technically, most of the analysts citing Rule 40 are referring to
the current version of Rule 40(b), which sets a certain minimum
threshold for candidates at the Republican National Convention.
According to this rule, candidates must arrive at the convention
with a majority of the delegates from eight states or territories,
or else they are disqualified from the first round. In most
elections, this is a mere formality because the clear winner of the
nomination is well-known before the convention begins, making the
convention an extended infomercial for the party and its nominee.
"Of course, there is good reason to suspect the Republican
convention will be rather more exciting this year. Gidley noted
there is apprehension among front-runner Donald Trump’s supporters
that the GOP Establishment will use some “shenanigans” to “steal”
the nomination from him at the convention. Among those shenanigans
could be changing Rule 40 to bring candidates who don’t meet the
established minimum threshold into the game.
"There are two ghosts from the 2012 election haunting the
Shakespearean drama of the 2016 primary, and Gidley invoked them
both in a single breath: Ron Paul and Mitt Romney.
“This is actually called the ‘Ron Paul Rule.’ The Romney people put
this in place,” Gidley explained. “The Establishment hurt Ron Paul,
but I think this Establishment rule will actually help Donald
Trump.”
"Gidley noted there is no way for one of the last three remaining
candidates, Governor John Kasich of Ohio, to win the necessary
majority of delegates from eight states. Texas Senator Sen. Ted Cruz
(R-TX) currently stands at seven.
"He further asserted that, contrary to much speculation from
pundits, Rule 40(b) technically blocks disqualified candidates from
participating in any of the subsequent ballots, which scuttles the
notion of denying Trump victory in an initial vote where only he and
Cruz are qualified candidates, and then parachuting some other
Establishment-preferred candidate into the convention hall to seize
the nomination, possibly someone who didn’t even run in the 2016
primary at all."
Rest at link - like how the scum bags who control that convention
can still change the rules.
