Once
again a constitutionally ineligible individual has declared his
candidacy for president of these united States of America.
Once
again another battle rages that should have been addressed in
2008 when the criminal impostor in the White House, Barack Obama
(Known aliases: Barry Soetoro, Barry Dunham, Barry Obama, Barack
Dunham), who also lied
on his Illinois Bar Application when he said he has never
used another name was allegedly elected. The usurper was/is using
Barack Obama then but his friends at Occidental College knew him
only as Barry Soetoro. Barack Obama was simply
made up by the pathological liar at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Instead
of addressing Barry's ineligibility back then, the criminal enterprise
went all the way to submission of the electoral college vote to
the Outlaw Congress on January 9, 2009. Every member of that body
of politicians sat mute - Ron Paul - all of them - and allowed
the electoral college vote to stand. When the usurper ran again
in 2012 and allegedly won (which would not have been possible
without all the vote fraud in both elections), once again all
of them - both parties- allowed Barry Soetoro to steal the office
of president.
On
January 14, 2009, Chief Justice Roberts had cases on the docket
where Barry Soetoro was the defendant or was the subject of the
litigation. Roberts and the other eight justices had already held
two 'Distribution for Conferences' on the Donofrio and Wrotnoski
cases on Obama's citizenship ineligibility; there were others
also ignored by the 'high' court.
On
the date above Roberts meets with the man at the heart of that
case, Soetoro, in private. Two days later,Roberts sat
down to discuss the case with the other justices after having
a closed door meeting with the defendant! There was still the
Lightfoot v Bowen case to be heard in conference, January 23,
2009. Again, Chief Justice Roberts was to sit in that private
meeting to discuss whether the case should go to oral arguments.
In my lifetime I have never seen such in your face shenanigans
by a member of the U.S. 'Supreme' Court.
In
April 2010, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas joked during
a congressional
house sub-committee hearing:
“Oh
really?” asked Serrano. “So you haven't answered the
one about whether I can serve as president, but you answer this
one?”
“We're
evading that one,” answered Thomas, referring to questions
of presidential eligibility and prompting laughter in the chamber."
Yeah,
that's real funny, Clarence. The U.S. Supreme Court is evading
the eligibility issue. So, Clarence, why didn't you just come
out in 2008 with Leo's case and the others and say: "Hey
- we're going to evade the eligibility issue so don't waste your
time and money."?
The
reason why Ted Cruz must be declared eligible is because if he
isn't eligible then neither is the criminal impostor in the White
House.
Barry
Soetoro's father was a foreign national on U.S. soil. He had not
applied for citizenship and in fact, there was question as to
whether or not he should be allowed to stay in the U.S., as his
personal behavior was in the slutty category. Soetoro's mother
was a natural born citizen. Soetoro was born with dual citizenship
and no amount of political high jinx and lies can change that
fact. He was and always will be constitutionally ineligible to
be president of this country.
Ted
Cruz's mother is a natural born citizen. His father was a foreign
national in the U.S. with Cuban citizenship; he finally became
a U.S. citizen in 2005. Ted Cruz was born with dual citizenship:
Cuban and American. No different than Soetoro.
But,
Cruz has taken the position that 'natural born' means he can change
his citizenship at age 44 (he will be 45 in December) and magically
turn himself into a natural born citizen. Well, Ted, it doesn't
work that way. Natural born means when you're born. This doesn't
seem to matter to Cruz or some of his ardent supporters. I tried
to find the interview conducted at one of Cruz's events a couple
of years ago, but was unsuccessful. The reporter ask one of Cruz's
supporters about his eligibility. The woman replied, "We
don't care. We want him as president." Does that make her
any different than the ethically bankrupt who have supported the
fraudulent stealing of the office of president by Soetoro? It
does not. That Cruz supporter is just as willing to crap on the
Constitution as Barry's supporters.
Ted
Cruz announced in 2013 he was giving up his Canadian citizenship;
it was finalized in 2014. However, that does not make him a natural
born citizen. And, like Barry/Obama, Cruz is using the same deceitful
tactic by making fun of the citizenship issue: Ted
Cruz Cracks to Press: ‘I Am Secretly a Citizen of Ethiopia’
Gov.
Bobby Jindal is not a natural born citizen as proclaimed
in this piece: "They arrived Feb 1, 1971, and a bit over
four months later, on June 10, 1971, Piyush Jindal was born at
Woman's Hospital in Baton Rouge, a natural-born U.S. citizen,
who like every other child born in America, could, constitutionally,
grow up to be president."
Jindal's
mother was five months pregnant when they arrived on U.S. soil
and obtained green cards. Neither of his parents were
either natural born or U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.
I believe Jindal became a U.S. citizen via the fraudulent 'anchor
baby' bastardization of the Fourteenth Amendment. His parents
were not illegals since they obtained green cards, but they were
not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.
The
same situation exists for Marco Rubio who is rumored to announce
throwing his hat into the ring on April 13th. Rubio also doesn't
give a damn about the constitution. He has simply brushed off
the legal fact that he is constitutionally ineligible. Rubio was
born in May 1971 in Miami, Florida. His parents did not become
U.S. citizens until November 1975 - four years after
his birth. Rubio's parents were naturalized in 1975, so neither
of his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth. I
believe Rubio, like Jindal, became a U.S. citizen via the fraudulent
'anchor baby' myth.
The
stealing of the presidency beginning in 2008 was breathtaking
in scope. I doubt the majority of adult aged Americans in this
country have any idea of just what went on to get Barry and McCain
declared constitutionally eligible. This piece is a must read
because it factually lays out how an ineligible candidate was
able to usurp the office of president. This piece is long, but
read it over lunch, coffee in the morning or on the weekend: A
Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who
Knew What & For How Long?
Now,
all of the opinions that Cruz is a natural born citizen is based
on his mother being a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth:
•
Is
Ted Cruz, born in Canada, eligible to run for president?
(Updated)
• Lawyers:
Canadian-born Cruz eligible to run for president
• Yes,
Ted Cruz is Constitutionally Eligible to Be President
• No,
Canada: Sen. Ted Cruz has formally shed his dual citizenship
(June 2014)
There
are dozens more which all chirp the same story line: one parent
a U.S. citizen. However, that is not the definition of a natural
born citizen. In some of the pieces above you'll see reliance
on the Fourteenth Amendment and the 1790 Naturalization Act which
are covered in the next set of links below. We know the nearly
100 eligibility cases filed to stop Barry/Obama from stealing
the White House were dismissed and never heard on the
merits of the argument: who is a natural born citizen?
The Outlaw Congress, every damn one of them unleashed the horror
of Barack Obama on this country because of their cowardice or
in the case of the ethically bankrupt Democratic/Commnist Party
minions - they knew they could use the race card to get that waste
of oxygen in the White House on the ballot.
For
those unfamiliar with Leo Donofrio, he lives in New Jersey, he's
a lawyer and filed the first eligibility case against Barry and
McCain in 2008. His case was not thrown out on the judicial hallucination
called standing, but was killed by the U.S. Supreme Court and
their duplicity. This piece deals with Juan McCain: John
McCain: Citizen of Panama At Birth (Sept 2009)
Historical
and legal analysis: Natural Born at Birth (Dec 2008) - This
is a lengthy piece by Leo, but the research is impeccable and
the only way we are going to stop ineligible candidates is with
hard facts.
The
articles below are not filled with speculation or the "my
candidate" syndrome meaning I don't care what the U.S. Constitution
says. They all deal with historical facts. They are by no means
the only ones, but I feel clearly cover in-depth why Cruz, Rubio
and Jindal are not constitutionally eligible. Since this is a
problem not likely to go away (Cruz is running despite knowing
he will be in the same fight as Barry Soetoro over his eligibility
and is counting on media like FOX to give him cover) it is imperative
Americans and that means big shot anchors like Hannity, O'Reilly,
Megyn Kelly and the rest of them that crushed Obama's ineligibility
learn the real definition of natural born citizen. Ted Cruz's
children can run for president because Cruz is a U.S. citizen.
I do not believe Rubio or Jindal's children can since both of
them were born to parents holding only green cards and no flavor
of citizenship. I could be wrong; I'm sure my email box will fill
up.
•
The
Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires
that Both of the Child's Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time
of Birth (Sept 2009)
• Founder
and Historian David Ramsay Defined "Natural Born Citizenship"
in 1789 (April 2010)
• Senator
Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen” and Therefore
Not Eligible to be President (Mar 2013)
• The
Fallacies of Congressional Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell’s
Definition of a “Natural Born Citizen” (June 2013)
• Congressional
Research Service: Ted Cruz Not Qualified
• Papers
Discussing Natural Born Citizen Meaning
I
know everyone has time issues, but unless Cruz and Rubio are stopped
and if one of them should get elected, we might as well just burn
the U.S. Constitution. The reason the framers grand fathered in
the natural born citizen clause was to ensure a president's first
loyalty would be to our constitutional republic. One can see just
where Barry/Obama stands on that issue. No president in the history
of this country has hated America more than the current occupant
of the White House and done so much to destroy her. I have no
doubt whatsoever that Cruz and Rubio do love America, but if they
get away with becoming president it will mean anyone can hold
that office just like the unvetted criminal in the White House.
Do we want another Barry/Obama down the road?
What
can be done?
We
need to focus on the states right now getting them to stand firm
against the Outlaw Congress and the usurper in the White House.
When the time comes - if and it's a big if - any of those three
were to get the GOP nomination, I hope lawsuits are brought in
as many states as possible to keep them off the ballot. As we
know from the nearly 100 lawsuits to keep the criminal impostor
in the WH off the ballot, suing the Secretary of State is a waste
of time and money because all the judges involved were and are
cowards. Almost all of the cases were filed after
the habitual liar in the White House took office. The judges weren't
going to touch throwing the impostor president out of office.
No,
the target would be the Republican National Committee for putting
forth a candidate on state ballots who is constitutionally ineligible.
It's fraud - just like the Democratic/Communist Party USA did
in 2008. Maybe even a RICO lawsuit. In the meantime, Cruz and
his mouth pieces are trying to deflect away from the issue and
I suspect Rubio will do the same. You might send each of them
a short letter: You're not constitutionally eligible; both parents
must be U.S. citizens at the time of the child's birth and we
will file lawsuits to keep you off the ballot. Just maybe they
will drop out of the race. Can't raise enough money, don't want
to lose their powerful seats in the Senate, some excuse to evade
the real issue.
You
can take money to the bank the controlled media and that includes
cable networks like FOX will continue to insist both are eligible
- although there have been a few useful fools out there who likely
will be silenced once they're told to back off Cruz's eligibility:
Cruz
'as eligible as Obama is' - House member deflects MSNBC host's
'birther' assault: "MSNBC host Chris Matthews didn't have
the slightest issue with Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility.
But he is grilling Republican supporters of Sen. Ted Cruz’s
presidential ambitions with reckless “birther” abandon."
Act surprised: the Republican house member being interviewed did
the usual political tap dance with a stupid smirk on his face
- but read his words. They know. They all know.
“I'm telling you that President Obama is the president,”
Farenthold said. “If he's eligible to be president,
Ted Cruz is.” “Was he legitimately elected
president?” Matthews responded. “I wasn't in Congress
to make that determination,” Farenthold said. “That
was determined before I got here.
I
must mention Donald Trump here because he's stuck his foot in
his mouth, again. He's on the eligibility issue going after Cruz
being born in Canada instead of the meat of the issue: both parents
being U.S. citizens at the time of the child's birth. I wish he'd
shut his trap because all he's doing is distracting people instead
of educating them on what natural born really means.
And
so the big lie, one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated against
the people of this country stays in place because (1) Republicans
want the White House in 2016 and (2) as I said, to declare Cruz
ineligible would cause a massive constitutional crisis: a usurper
is sitting in the Oval Office and any laws, EO, treaties or other
legal documents he signed are null and void - and they are - every
last one of them.
Links:
1
- How to pack a big event and make it seem you're popular
& have lots of support: Attendance
at Ted Cruz's 2016 announcement was mandatory for Liberty University
students
2 - Text
of A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a
natural born citizen.
3 - States
must fight legal fiction called 'anchor babies'
4 - Immigration:
The Myth Of The 'Anchor Baby'
5 - Full Audio: Dr.
Terry Lakin On Challenging Obama’s Article II Constitutional
Eligibility - His Life Was Threatened
[Just
a short note about 9/11. The cost of America's
undeclared "war" (invasion) in Afghanistan has now reached
$1 trillion borrowed dollars - massive debt heaped on us all based
on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column know I
continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military
grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and
tested from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film
has been released: The
Anatomy of a Great Deception. For full disclosure I receive
no compensation, but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share
it with others or give a copy as a present. I've purchased half
a dozen copies and given them to individuals I believe seek the
truth. It's very powerful simply because it's one 'ordinary' man's
story who ask a simple question that led him to a not so simple
journey. There is factual information in this film that many have
never heard about but everyone should. Just a
suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend. The
more people we wake up the better.]
© 2015 - NewsWithViews.com
and Devvy - All Rights Reserved
-
-
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
This Site Served
by TheHostPros