As
we all can see, sexual deviants are becoming more aggressive in
trampling our God-given rights backed up by ignorant and/or activist
judges, both at the state and federal level. Part of the reason
why is more sexual deviants are being elected or appointed to
judgeships.
Allow
me to do a little back story here because it's critically important
Americans understand how they've been manipulated into believing
something that is not true. George Orwell defined
it as doublethink:
"Doublethink
is the act of ordinary people simultaneously accepting two mutually
contradictory beliefs as correct, often in distinct social contexts.
Doublethink is related to, but differs from, hypocrisy and neutrality.
Somewhat related but almost the opposite is cognitive dissonance,
where contradictory beliefs cause conflict in one's mind. Doublethink
is notable due to a lack of cognitive dissonance — thus the person
is completely unaware of any conflict or contradiction.
"According
to the novel, doublethink is: “The power of holding two contradictory
beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them...
To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to
forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it
becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just
as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality
and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies
all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word
doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using
the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh
act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely,
with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth."
For
37 years, Exodus International was a leading voice in helping
sexual deviants turn away from sin and their dangerous sexual
preferences. On June 19, 2013, that organization announced they
were not only closing their doors, their president, Alan Chambers,
actually apologized to sexual deviants for their decades of helping
the lost and confused. The
reason made me want to gag. Doublethink.
In
order to sell something so toxic, you have to market the product
in a way that becomes acceptable to the masses using a lot of
positive images. After all, telling youngsters and pre-teens anal
sex can expose you to HIV/AIDS isn't the picture leaders of the
sexual deviant movement want to portray. They want to parade "funny"
people like Ellen DeGeneres into your living room to show you
how normal lesbians are, just regular Americans. Add a media icon
like Oprah selling the message on her show reaching millions of
empty headed women and the advancement of the cause increases
in a big way.
The
term 'sexual preference' was used until 1992, when the battle
for a constitutional amendment was raging in Colorado. Sexual
deviants were losing that fight because opponents reminded voters
that sexual deviants preferred, their own words, unnatural sex.
That's when a new marketing term was born: 'sexual orientation'
to promote the pervasive lie "born that way" to sway voters. It
didn't work, we passed Amendment Two to the Colorado State Constitution;
activist judges then over turned the will of the people.
As
time went by, more clever marketing came into play and the word
'gay' was birthed to make Americans forget homosexuals have sex
in each other's feces; I refer to it as bowel movement sex. From
there the next step in marketing became comparing 'sexual orientation'
to the civil rights movement. If one is born with black skin,
they simply cannot wake up one day and declare themselves to be
Caucasian and vice-a-versa. God made humans with different color
skin, all equal in his eyes as it should be in everyone's. You
can't simply decide one day to change your race to another race.
The militant sexual deviant movement has tried to make that one
stick, but thankfully, a large number of Americans, black and
white, haven't drank the poison:
Civil
Rights Activist: ‘No Comparison’ Between Civil Rights, Gay Rights
Movement
Sodomites
claim they are born that way and have no choice in their attraction
to men instead of a woman. The same for lesbians. They claim just
as someone with black or white skin, they have no choice. Really?
Thousands of sodomites and lesbians have left their destructive,
preferred life styles. Actress Anne Heche used to have sex with
Ellen DeGeneres. Ms. Heche then went on to marry a man, have a
child. Unfortunately, she divorced, allegedly due to a new relationship,
not with a woman, but with a man. So, which way was Ms. Heche
born? Another clear example I can give you that it's a choice
and not an "accident" of birth is the candor of WNBA star Sheryl
Swoopes. In an interview following her "coming out" in 2005, this
was the exchange:
Interviewer:
"You have said that you don't believe you were born gay, which,
as you said, may confuse many people. How do you believe you came
to be gay?"
SW:
"I think there are a lot of people -- gays and lesbians -- who
believe you are born that way. I think there also a lot of people
who believe it's a choice. And, for me, I believe it was a choice.
I was at a point in my life where I had gone through a divorce
and was not in a relationship, and the choice I made happened
to be that I fell in love with another woman. It might confuse
some people, and some people may not understand that, but I think
in life, no matter what it is that you're doing, you always have
a choice and you make that choice and you have to live with that
choice. And it just happened that, you know, my partner and I
were really, really good friends, and the more we hung out, the
more we did stuff together, my feelings grew stronger and stronger
for her, and it got to a point to where I said, "I can't fight
this any more."
Ms.
Swoopes made the choice of embracing sin because she wanted to,
not because she was born that way. But, wait! Ms. Swoopes has
been engaged to a man since 2011. So, I guess she's not "gay"
anymore.
Ignorant,
useful fools in NYC just elected a died in the wool Marxist for
their next mayor, Bill De Blasio. His wife, Chirlane McCray, is
a "former" lesbian. Angelina Jolie used to have sex with a female;
now she's engaged to Brad Pitt. Amber Heard has sex with men and
women; her current partner is Johnny Depp. Makes your head spin.
Lawrence
v Texas (2003) went all the way to the un-Supreme Court and
is worth mentioning here:
"In
her opinion, Justice O'Connor did not deny that homosexuality
is a voluntarily chosen "lifestyle" --a startling admission. In
his highly acclaimed work, "How
to Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary," legal scholar and constitutional
attorney, Dr. Edwin Vieira sums up the Lawrence decision:
“Rather
the majority opinion in Lawrence "effectively decrees the end
of all legislation" based on morals of any kind. For if morality
cannot be invoked as a legitimate basis for legislation in a sexual-morality
case, how can it be invoked in any other? Surely the particular
area of conduct to which We the People address their moral judgments
cannot determine the constitutional outcome.
“Thus,
perforce of Lawrence, in the future to constitute "due process
of law" as a basis for limiting "liberty," all legislation must
be amoral that is, all legislation must demonstrably serve some
goal other than a concededly moral one. A "wall of separation"
between morality and state must be thrown up and maintained.
“Therefore,
the Lawrence majority's repudiation of the history of Western
civilization and Christian moral and ethical standards amounted
to repudiation of the Declaration of Independence and consequently
the Constitution, and consequently again, the justices' own authority
further proof that whom the gods would destroy they first make
mad.”
"In
the Lawrence decision, the Supreme Court not only came up with
one of the most convoluted, toxic decisions of the past century,
it went much deeper than that. This was an all out attack on states'
rights. This decision was so putrid, it should have caused a massive
uproar from every Christian, minister, pastor and priest in this
country and demand for removal of half the U.S. Supreme Court.
The silence has been deafening. This decision not only bodes something
akin to a death knell for America's moral foundation, the injection
of international law into America's judicial system has set an
unbelievably dangerous precedent."
Countless
lawsuits have been filed over the past decade by Christians who
refuse to genuflect at the altar of political correctness. Some
cases have been won on religious grounds, others who know the
Bible is God's words and His Commandments haven't been so lucky:
Supremes
asked to halt 'compelled' lesbian speech
"The
U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to restore religious and speech
freedoms in New Mexico, where the state Supreme Court recently
ruled that abandoning one's freedom is just the “price of citizenship.”
The dispute centers on the refusal by Elaine Huguenin, co-owner
with her husband, Jonathan, of Elane Photography, to memorialize
a same-sex ceremony planned by Vanessa Willock. Willock, who found
another photographer for the event, filed a complaint with the
state under its anti-discrimination law. The state Supreme Court
said the photographer had no right to not be forced to express
statements through her work that violated her Christian beliefs."
The
attack on Christianity in this country is reaching the level of
fanaticism. Americans are losing their businesses because their
religious beliefs are being trampled by thugs on the bench:
‘Bible-Thumping…B**ch’:
Bakers Who Refused to Make Gay Couple's Wedding Cake Shut Down
Their Shop Following Threats
"In
May, The Blaze told you about Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners
of Sweet Cakes by Melissa, an Oregon-based bakery that has fallen
under intense scrutiny. Throughout 2013, the Christian couple
and their business have been in the midst of a media firestorm
after refusing to make a wedding cake for a lesbian couple. From
threats to vicious phone calls and e-mails, the Klein family has
been inundated with angry responses. Now, Aaron and Melissa have
announced that they are shutting down their shop."
Those
'tolerant' sexual deviants who demand everyone else give up their
religious beliefs so less than 2% of the population can run rough
shod over the entire country displayed the usual hate towards
anyone who disagrees with their filthy sexual preferences:
"From
proclamations that Aaron should be shot to one apparent threat
that he be raped, the hate and angst being thrown the Klein family's
way is certainly serious in nature. Some have even wished for
the couple's five children to be stricken with illness. Earlier
this summer, Aaron and Melissa shared a number of these e-mails
with The Blaze. “You stupid bible-thumping, hypocritical b**ch.
I hope your kids get really, really, sick and you go out of business,”
read one e-mail. “Here's hoping you go out of business, you bigot.
Enjoy hell,” read another."
Bigot?
Reminds me of this quote: "It's better to be silent and presumed
a fool than to open your mouth and doubt removed altogether."
The List of 7 by Mark Frost
Sexual
deviants have always had an agenda. One is to get a foot hold
in public schools; they have succeeded with ease. Predators trolling
schools across the country for fresh recruits. Since sexual deviants
don't reproduce; their goal is to brainwash your child(ren) into
adopting a dangerous lifestyle of filth and sin. A whole lot of
those grade school students are now on college campuses continuing
the push for deviancy and spreading diseases and AIDS/HIV. Second
and of utmost importance:
'Gays'
admit END A game: Outlaw Christian morality - The religious
liberty death spiral continues.
"One
of the most dangerous and discriminatory pieces of legislation
in modern times the ironically tagged “Employment Non-Discrimination
Act,” or ENDA passed the U.S. Senate on Thursday by a vote of
64-32. Ten Republicans disgracefully joined liberal Democrats
in this effort to ultimately outlaw the Judeo-Christian sexual
ethic.
"According
to its leftist proponents, ENDA would merely insulate people who
choose to engage in homosexual conduct (sexual orientation) or
those who suffer from gender confusion (gender identity) against
employment intolerance. In truth, however, this legislation effectively
would codify the very thing it purports to combat: workplace discrimination.
"Writing
in the Huffington Post, popular homosexual radio personality Michelangelo
Signorile confessed that, of any potential ENDA legislation that
might reach President Obama’s desk for his pledged signature,
“none should include any religious exemptions” whatsoever.
"If
Signorile and other “LGBT” activists get their way, this would
mean that churches, mosques, synagogues, religious schools, Bible
bookstores, as well as any and every other business in America
with 15 or more employees, would be forced, under penalty of law,
to abandon the biblical and traditional-values viewpoint on human
sexuality, and hire (and otherwise not offend) those who openly
flaunt expressly sinful and demonstrably self-destructive sexual
behaviors."
Communism
can only survive in a God-less country where the 'state' becomes
the parents and total authority over what you can and cannot say,
think or feel. The push to Sovietize these united States of America
is all but a fait accompli. Normalizing and legalizing
sexual deviancy has always been a top goal:
The
revolution of the family: the Marxist roots of ‘homosexualism’
(Do take the time to read the full column)
"I
have been asked recently “what is homosexualism?” I started using
the term in my writing on these issues a few years ago when it
became clear that we were dealing not with a group of people,
but with a particular ideology that is often held by people who
are not themselves homosexuals.
"A
few days ago in The Guardian, Peter Tatchell wrote a pretty good
description not only of that ideology's goals but its origins.
This political ideology, often called “queer theory” by its proponents
in academia, is what is being pushed, quite openly these days,
by the “gay rights” movement. Despite what we are told all day
by their collaborators in the mainstream media, from the six o'clock
news to your favourite sit-com, this movement is not about “equal
rights”. It is about re-writing the foundational concepts of our
entire society. I predict that it will not be much longer before
the pretense of “equality” is dropped, having done its work.
"Many
people are scratching their heads and asking how we have suddenly
found ourselves at the point where two men can be “married,” a
woman can be called a “husband” and a man, a “wife,” and children
are reduced to political bargaining chips in the adoption wars,
when it seems just yesterday we were only talking about equal
rights. Since when do “equal rights” mean deconstructing, dismantling,
these foundational social concepts?
"If
we read them closely, however, the activists themselves have begun
to explain it in quite straightforward terms. For them, it has
never been about “equal rights” but about the re-writing of our
entire social order. The “gay rights” movement has always been,
in Peter Tatchell’s own words, “revolutionary, not reformist.”
"Others
have pointed out the Marxist origins of the Sexual Revolution
as a whole, and it is clear that the sudden explosion of homosexualism
is merely the next logical step in a systematic programme. A close
cousin to radical feminism and grandchild of Marxism, homosexualism
was developed out of the politico-academic pseudo-field of “gender
studies” and has, for 30 or 40 years, been pushed on a mostly
unwilling public, through “anti-discrimination” and “equalities”
legislation by a coalition of lobbyists, NGOs and politicians
on the extreme left, and in increasingly powerful international
circles."
The
one issue sexual deviants stay away from is science because it's
the fatal blow to the big lie of born that way.
Decades
ago, Simon LeVey, a homosexual and author of Queer Science, attempted
to use science to prove sexual deviants are born that way. LeVey's
science has been highly criticized over the years, yet sexual
deviates held up LeVey as the scientific genius proving "born
that way." However, many forgot LeVey's own words on that: "It's
important to stress what I didn't find. I did not prove that homosexuality
is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn't show
that gay men are born that way, the most common mistake people
make in interpreting my work."
Please
take the time to read the two articles below because it IS the
issue that must become a legal one:
Identical
twin studies prove homosexuality is not genetic
"Eight
major studies of identical twins in Australia, the U.S., and Scandinavia
during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion:
gays were not born that way....
"Because
identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality
cannot be genetically dictated. “No-one is born gay,” he notes.
“The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical
twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.” Dr.
Whitehead believes same-sex attraction (SSA) is caused by “non-shared
factors,” things happening to one twin but not the other, or a
personal response to an event by one of the twins and not the
other.
"For
example, one twin might have exposure to pornography or sexual
abuse, but not the other. One twin may interpret and respond to
their family or classroom environment differently than the other.
“These individual and idiosyncratic responses to random events
and to common environmental factors predominate,” he says."
"This
is the Way God Made Me"- A Scientific Examination of Homosexuality
and the "Gay Gene"
"Consider
the obvious problem of survival for individuals who allegedly
possess a gay gene: individuals who have partners of the same
sex are biologically unable to reproduce (without resorting to
artificial means). Therefore, if an alleged “gay gene” did exist,
the homosexual population eventually would disappear altogether.
We now know that it is not scientifically accurate to refer to
a “gay gene” as the causative agent in homosexuality. The available
evidence clearly establishes that no such gene has been identified.
Additionally, evidence exists which documents that homosexuals
can change their sexual orientation. Future decisions regarding
policies about, and/or treatment of, homosexuals should reflect
this knowledge."
But,
of course, it's exactly those scientific findings
sexual deviants don't want in the court room. There goes the bogus
"civil rights" argument as well as the "I was born that way" falsehood
- the main staples of the sexual deviant crowd in selling their
toxic sexual behavior to children, parents, lawmakers and the
courts. Strip away the "born that way" by science and there goes
the sympathy factor. It also pins judges to science instead of
religion.
Sexual
deviants and their supporters always resort to name calling (homophobic
or worse) in response to opposition to their preferred, dangerous
sexual preferences. Bring up the issue of science and they go
ballistic. This isn't about not liking a sodomite or lesbian.
I have met several over the years who seem to be really nice people.
I don't (and never have) called them ugly names like faggot. I
do pity them because God has called what they do an abomination
and they risk spending eternity in hell. This isn't about being
nice, it's about science. It's also about saving lives.
HIV/AIDS
is preventable and so are the dozens and dozens of 'lavender'
diseases which plague sodomites: Medical
Consequences of What Homosexuals Do. Horrific, and yet, sodomites
continue spreading those horrible medical problems and diseases.
Sodomy should be declared a national health issue and condemned,
not celebrated. Instead the U.S. government and Department of
Defense are the biggest promoters in the world of HIV/AIDS and
all the diseases spread by sexual deviants.
If
I were a business owner like the two cited at the top of this
column or any other individual or entity charged with discrimination,
I wouldn't just put all my eggs in the religion basket (although
it is absolutely the right of those folks to protect their religious
beliefs), I would also make the case in court that sexual deviants
are not born that way. How can you discriminate against
someone for a behavior they choose to engage in?
Should
priests, pastors or even a justice of the peace of the peace be
forced to "marry" individuals who claim they were born to have
sex with dogs or horses or children or other deviant acts? Where
will it end? Just say, I'm born that way and all is excused? I
think not. It's time to put science at the top of the legal battle
and expose the truth.
I
have included another appendix
of items you might have missed. Click here.
There
is help for sexual deviants who sincerely wish to turn their lives
around:
1-
Homosexuals Anonymous
2-
P-FOX
(Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays) also offer resources
and support.
3- The
National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality
Appendix
Click
here to visit NewsWithViews.com
home page.
©
2013 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy - All Rights Reserved
-
-
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
This Site Served
by TheHostPros