Food Standards reports new Hull Study as discussed
in the Daily Mail.
Honest aspartame studies will never show safety. Just another
When Food Standards said they were going to have this study
done they even admitted they were having a hard time getting people
to sign up who had had reactions to aspartame in the past and
reported headaches and nausea. You will notice in the FDA
Report of 92 documented symptoms from 4 types of seizures to coma
and death, headaches and nausea are #1 & 2. It's so very
What Food Standards probably didn't know at the time is that aspartame
is so poisonous that it causes chemical hypersensitization. For
those who have seen "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World" on aspartame there
is the case of Cheryl Kemptner. I told her even when she had
surgery there would be interaction with a chemical because of aspartame,
and she would have problems which she did. I recommended prolotherapy
which she had later for her joint pain which did work and cured
her of the agonizing pain she suffered. I even had Dr. Ross
Hauser write an article to explain, and quoted Dr. James Bowen on the
chemical hypersensitization. http://www.wnho.net/prolotherapy_treatment.htm
So when Cheryl entered the hospital she told them not to give her
aspartame, and that she would definitely react being chemically
hypersensitive. They put it in the records and gave her a bracelet
but a dietitian gave her Crystal Lite anyway with aspartame. She
became a Code Blue and had to be resuscitated to save her life.
You can get a copy of "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World" from producer
Cori Brackett at email@example.com&nb
sp; When Cheryl called me she was furious. I was sorry she
didn't make an issue with the hospital because hospitals are filled with
aspartame and because it damages the mitochondria it interacts
with drugs and vaccines. Hospitals need to remove aspartame
and sucralose as well.
Over the years I've even spoken to people who have gone into anaphylactic
shock because they accidently were given aspartame long after getting
off of it. Unfortunately most are chemically hypersensitive
While I knew there would be reactions by the people if they did
this study honestly I expected the study to be reported as
showing aspartame to be just fine in an effort to once again get
the European Food Safety Authority to say aspartame is safe.
The list time they did a review and said it was safe Parliament
made them do it over since independent study after study showed
the harm aspartame causes from pre-term births to heart attacks,
strokes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cancer and even raising
fasting blood sugar. This is just for starters.
You have to remember that anytime a government agency is involved
because of their strong ties to the manufacturers they will always
say its safe. Dr Ralph Walton did research for 60 minutes
on scientific peer reviewed studies and funding 92 per
cent of the studies showed problems with aspartame but Walton said
if you remove 6 studies because the FDA had something to do with
it and their controversy, and 1 pro-industry summary, 100 per cent
of independent scientific peer reviewed studies showed the problems
aspartame causes. Here is that report: http://www.dorway.com/peerrev.html So how
could the manufacture say their studies showed safety? There
is emphatically no way for an honest study on aspartame to show
safety because its a deadly chemical poison. In fact, its
an addictive, excitoneurotoxic, carcinogenic, genetically engineered
drug, adjuvant and teratogen - for starters. It was listed
with the pentagon in an inventory of prospective biochemical warfare
weapons submitted to Congress. This is discussed in the Ecologist
on aspartame in 2005 and in the article NutraPoison on www.dorway.com
How can I be so sure you can't do an honest study on aspartame and
show safety? Because of the government records. Not
even the original manufacturer could do it. They kept getting
caught by the FDA when the "old FDA" was on our side and they tried
to have G. D. Searle indicted for fraud. They were so powerful
they hired both U.S. Prosecutors and the statute of limitations
expired. So the FDA Board of Inquiry revoked the petition
for approval. Read it on a banner on my web site, www.mpwhi.com Meantime Searle knowing
they had been found out hired Don Rumsfeld to get aspartame approved.
He was on President Reagan's transition team, and Reagan owed him
a favor. Rumsfeld said he would call in his markers and get aspartame
on the market.
The day after Reagan took office he had someone
from the transition team call the FDA Commissioner Jeri Goyan
who was going to sign the revoked petition into law and had him
fired, and did it at 3:00 AM. I have the letter from his
wife on web. Then he wrote an executive order making the
FDA powerless to do anything about aspartame or sign the revoked
petition until he could get a new commissioner there who would over-rule
the Board of Inquiry. His name was Arthur Hull Hayes, friend of
Rumsfeld from the defense department, and that is what he
did. What was his reward? When he left he went to work for
the PR Agency of the manufacturer Burson Marsteller for $1000.00 a day
on a ten year contract. One article said he was only there for
about 15 days. Of course, as aspartame was marketed consumers
began to complain of such horrible diseases and reactions there were
three congressional hearings. You can read them on my web
site. The UPI investigation says it all: http://www.mpwhi.com/upi_nutrasweet_questions_swirl.pdf
This is how aspartame got approved in England in the first place: http://www.mpwhi.com/how_aspartame_got_approved_in_england.htm
Some years ago Jerome Bressler, the last hero of the old
FDA retired. I called to thank him and was quite shocked
when he told me FDA had removed two of the studies in his report
and horrible information about aspartame was kept from the public.
I had seen where info had been removed and wondered myself.
Not wanting to be the only one to know I immediately notified
Doctors H. J. Roberts and Dr. Russell Blaylock who called Bressler.
Jerome pleaded with me to find those studies and it took me 8
years. It was given to Jerome before he died and added back
to his report of the shenanigans pulled when the manufacturer
tried to show studies proved safety. Read the complete Bressler
Report on my web site. Also notice how far G. .D. Searle
went to try and prove safety. Aspartame breaks down to diketopiperazine,
a brain tumor agent. As the rats developed brain tumors
Searle would excise the tumors, put the rats back in the study
and when they died resurrected them on paper. This is just one
of the reasons the FDA attempted to indict them for fraud. I
even have the affidavit from the lady who was hired by Searle to shred
all the studies and send a copy to France. Here is a excerpt
from that letter from Jana Marie:
"I was sent from a Laural, Md tem agency to an office complex
at a corner intersection near Jessup, Md ( I can find out the
exact location if you really need it). I am an executive
secretary w/ high skills and made top dollar. This job paid
top dollar. I was asked to take piles of paper and COPY,
THEN SHRED them. I was told very sternly NOT to read the
material and that if I did I would be fired. Well, I grew up in
the military in the 60's w/ secrets all around and I'm very curious.
I am afterall a paralegal. So, I read while copied and read
Here's what was going on. The copies were being sent to
France, then I was shredding them, too and the originals were
being shredded. They were about the new product not yet
on the market, EQUAL. They were the lab results from the
tested rats and other animals. The results were outrageous.
This stuff killed everything it touched.
I overheard a conversation on the second day by the "boss" and
the girls who was telling me what to do. She told him what
I was doing and that I was also doing the faxing to France.
He was livid and started screaming at her, "What if she reads
some of this stuff?" she told him I was too stupid to know
what I was reading, even if I did.
What she didn't know was that I was a doctor's daughter, that
I had 3 years of college and I was extremely intelligent. Nor
did she know that all during my father's college years when he
was in charge of the animal lab at his college, he would take
me to help give the rats their injections. I knew what I
We know that you know some of this information, but did
you know the originals are in France? I should have
told someone then, but WHO? I just never touched the stuff
when it came out and tell everyone I know it is dangerous stuff.
I didn't know it was the Aspartame in it that was the problem
until recently. A friend of mine sent me to this web site
so that I could finally tell what I know."
Get the point? Aspartame killed everything it touched.
You cannot get a poison to show safety! It is impossible
and that's why independent unbiased peer reviewed studies show
aspartame is not safe.
Let's get back to why Bressler was so concerned that the public
was kept from finding out what these studies showed. They
were teratology studies and had the FDA admitting aspartame causes
birth defects. There is no warning on the product.
When Dr. Roberts wrote his congressman who wrote the FDA they
said they could not release the information because it was confidential.
When I tried to get these studies through Freedom of Information
the FDA in Chicago told me they were so old they shredded them.
Lane Shore, Mission Possible Chicago, and I took this letter to
Jerome Bressler who was then in a nursing home. He looked at
the letter and said, "I was his boss and I can't call him a liar?"
I said, "Why not, he lied". Jerome wanted the truth about
aspartame in the Chicago Tribune. We went so far as to get a
reporter to his bedside. She spoke to him for two hours with a
tape recorder. He told her "Searle went to such lengths not to
let the FDA see the studies they locked the doors when Dr. Adrian
Gross and I visited them. Dr. Gross would yell 'open the
doors or we will get a court order'. Unfortunately the story
was never published in the Chicago Tribune. Lane Shore and
Diane Murphy (MP Illinois) accompanied the reporter as well.
Interestingly, after taking so long in getting the information
added back to the Bressler Report, the FDA finally released to
Dr. Woodrow Monte four more of these reports. The teratology
studies had shown neural tube defects - autism, spina bifida and
cleft palate. This is from the free methyl alcohol.
I imagine after I released the ones that I got from Dr. John Olney's
records through the efforts of his biochemist, Dr. Madelon Price,
the FDA must have felt it was over, they couldn't hide the information
any longer. I feel sure that's why under Freedom of Information
they finally released the info to Dr. Monte. He immediately
wrote the book, "While Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills".
On www.whilesciencesleeps.com you can
read the last chapter on aspartame and autism free. Monte even
tells how his house was blown up with him in it. However, you
should get the whole book because you simply won't be able to put it
down. Find out all that was done to keep Monte from getting
aspartame banned in Arizona. They simply had to stop aspartame
from being investigated.
Dr. Ralph Walton is now doing a study on birth defects as we now
have the information Bressler insisted the public had to know
about in order to have healthy children. If you have given
birth after 1984 please complete the short form on www.mpwhi.com and send it to Dr. Walton
If you believe there is the possibility of a study on aspartame
being able to show safety consider the Trocho Study by Dr. M.
Alemany in Barcelona. It showed that the formaldehyde converted
from the free methyl alcohol embalms living tissue and damages
DNA by which you can destroy humanity. In Dr. Monte book
he explains the formaldehyde turns the tissues to plastic. You
are embalmed and in Dr. Roberts medical text, Aspartame Disease:
An Ignored Epidemic, ( www.sunsentpress.com ) he has a page
on pre-embalming. In fact, when I was in New York and met
the President of the Board of the American Anti-Cancer Institute
she told me funeral homes are now using 25% less formaldehyde
in embalming. When I visited Dr. Alemany in Barcelona he told
me aspartame would murder 200 million people. He also told
me he would never do another study on aspartame because they aspartame
people tried to assassinate his character. Even his research
funds were reduced. I think every country should duplicate
the Trocho Study with independent unbiased researchers like Dr.
Alemany. If aspartame is not banned by Codex it could be used
even in countries where it is not approved.
It is of interest that I met a man who use to work for the EPA
on aspartame, Reginall Bundrage. He is a pathologist.
I kept giving him information but he told me he knew more about
aspartame than I did. I explained I had been trained by
the world expert, Dr. H. J. Roberts, who dedicated the medical
text to me and if there was something I didn't know fill me in.
He told me he had told his superiors in the early 90's aspartame
had to be taken off the market because nothing kills this many
people and they said with all the deaths FDA would have to do
that. This was in 2010 I spoke with Reginall and he said
they told him that in the early 90's and its still on the market and
its still killing people. Interesting, Dr. Adrian Gross,
of the FDA was the one who asked for the indictment of G. D. Searle
and told Congress that aspartame violated the Delaney Amendment
because it caused cancer. He said that FDA shouldn't have
been able to even set an allowable daily intake. He was
transferred to EPA to keep him quiet according to Dr. James
Bowen, and interesting also had a degree in pathology. I
didn't even know there was a department at the EPA that had to
do with aspartame. How much more has been kept from us.
So here is the point. Aspartame is a literal poison.
Dr. Blaylock in a lecture said: "Understand the reactions to aspartame
are not allergic but toxic like arsenic and cyanide." Four
studies have shown aspartame is a multipotential carcinogen.
Original studies showed aspartame causes birth defects and even
seizures. The formaldehyde from the free methyl alcohol
embalms living tissue. Independent unbiased studies show the
problems. How could any study ever show safety. It
is a molecule composed of an excitotoxin and two neurotoxins and
breaks down to a brain tumor agent. If anyone ever tells
you a study on aspartame showed safety laugh in their face.
How does the manufacturer have studies done that show safety.
They are experts at it. Mark Gold of the Aspartame Toxicity
Center has exposed them. Read all about it: http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/abuse/
Be assured when we get a copy of the Hull study below we will
get to the bottom of what was done. In the meantime be assured
it just another whopper!
Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder
Mission Possible International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com, www.wnho.net
Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
Aspartame Is Actually SAFE And Doesn't Cause Headaches Or Nausea
- Human guinea pigs were fed snack bars which contained
- Food Standards Agency say there is no need
to ban aspartame
- The concern about artificial sweeteners
relates to fact they contain methanol
By Sean Poulter
18:33, 4 December 2013 | UPDATED: 20:22, 4 December
controversial sweetener aspartame has effectively been cleared as
safe to eat by Government experts following human feeding
guinea pigs were fed cereal snack bars, some of which contained
the artificial sweetener, by a team of researchers at HullYork
The study recruited 50 people who had reported reactions
after consuming aspartame in the past, such as headaches and nausea.
also a control group of another 50 others who have eaten aspartame
in food and fizzy drink over many years without any ill-effects.
the investigation found no evidence of harm in either those who
reported past sensitivity to aspartame or the control group.
Significantly, this was a so-called double-blind trial
where neither the trial participants or the researchers knew
which of the bars was being eaten.
Yesterday, the Food Standards Agency announced that
as a result of the British research, the Committee on Toxicity(CoT)
had decided there is no need to ban or control the sale or
consumption of the sweetener.
The FSA said: 91The expert committee concluded that
'the results presented did not indicate any need for action
to protect the health of the public'.92
The government watchdog has not released the full details
of the research because they remain confidential until they
have been published in a peer reviewed journal.
And despite concluding there
is no reason to protect consumers, the FSA said the committee
had not carried out an overall safety evaluation of aspartame
A separate safety
evaluation is being conducted by the European Food Safety
Authority (EFSA), which is due to be published this month.
The FSA said it will send the results of the British trial
to EFSA, so they can be taken into account.
conclusions of the experts on the CoT are unlikely to satisfy the
many critics of aspartame, who include Erik Millstone, Professor
of Science Policy at the University of Sussex.
He insists there is good quality independent research
projects that have identified potential problems, ranging
from premature births in women who enjoy diet drinks, to cancer.
Prof Millstone, of the university92s
Science and Technology Policy Research unit, believes that
EFSA92s evaluation is biased in favour of aspartame.
He claims the EFSA panel set
up to carry out the safety assessment is dominated by experts linked
to manufacturers or regulators that have previously supported
The professor pointed to several studies that raise real
questions about the safety of aspartame and justify the need for
An EU funded project published in 2010 found pregnant women
who down cans of fizzy drink containing artificial sweeteners appear
to be at greater risk of having a premature baby,.
It is rare for a mother to be to give birth early -
before 37 weeks - assuming all aspects of the pregnancy have
been normal. The research found this low risk was increased
by 38per cent if the woman was drinking an average of one can
of diet drink a day.
gathered by academics in Denmark, showed that a woman who
routinely drank at least four cans a day could increase the
risk by as much as 78per cent. This meant that if the risk
of a premature birth was normally one in a 100, it increased to
1.78 in 100.
professor also highlighted work by the independent Ramazzini Foundation
in Italy, which has published research suggesting aspartame caused
several types of cancer in rats at doses very close to the current
acceptable daily intake for humans.
The concern about artificial sweeteners, such as aspartame,
relates to the fact that they contain methanol.
a nerve toxin, which can be metabolised in the body to form formic
acid, which is another nerve toxin, as well as formaldehyde,
which is the chemical used to preserve dead bodies.
All of these
research studies have formed part of the EFSA review. A paper
detailing the review92s draft conclusions found they did not
identify a health risk.