My,
my, how things have changed since the first volley of lawsuits
to keep the criminal impostor in the White House, Barry Soetoro
aka Barack Obama [fictitious, made up name] off the ballot.
Immediately shrill squawking came from the ethically bankrupt
Democrat/Communist Party USA. Why, to challenge the constitutional
eligibility of a candidate was racist pure and simple. The object
of scrutiny has black skin, therefore, any attempts to uphold
the Constitution were being done by kooks, racists, Kool-Aid
drinkers and as Yule Brenner said in the 1956 movie, The King
And I, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera .
'Conservative'
biggies were just as outraged as the left that anyone should question
Barry's eligibility:
Obama
Citizenship Crisis & Industrial Strength Stupidity
"David
Horowitz, much admired by conservatives, makes an astonishing and completely
anti American statement on the issue of the law: Obama Derangement Syndrome
"The
continuing efforts of a fringe group of conservatives to deny Obama
his victory and to lay the basis for the claim that he is not a legitimate
president are embarrassing and destructive...What difference does it
make to the future of this country whether Obama was born on U.S. soil?
Advocates of this destructive campaign will argue that the constitutional
principle regarding the qualifications for president trumps all others.
But how viable will our Constitution be if five Supreme Court justices
should decide to void 64 million ballots?"
"What
difference does it make whether Obama was "born on U.S. soil?"
That's not the issue and it's a shame someone like Horowitz shoots off
the pie hole in his face without even knowing the correct legal argument.
How viable would it be if the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the supreme
law of the land? Shame on you, Mr. Horowitz, for your cavalier attitude
about the law." Since Barry Obama was not eligible no one had the
'right' to vote for him, period.
The
very dangerous Mark Levine (his book promoting a constitutional convention)
is going
ballistic over anyone challenging Ted Cruz's eligibility:
"He
added that the birther issue with both Cruz and President Obama is “stupid,”
no one has standing to challenge it, no court would take it up, and
is “just not true.” Levin continued that “the liberals
love this stuff.”...
"Levin
then said anyone who is born to a US citizen can run for president,
regardless of where they were born. He then read the 5th clause of Article
II, Section I of the US Constitution, and argued that children born
to US citizens abroad are natural born US citizens under US law.
"He
continued by pointing to arguments that child born in the US are not
automatically natural born citizens under the 14th Amendment, that he
and other conservatives have embraced, contrary to the “amnesty
crowd, the establishment Republicans, [and] dummies on TV”...Levin
then declared that Cruz's eligibility was “resolved,” and
questions over Cruz's eligibility are “for the kooks."
Well,
Mark, liberals didn't "love this stuff" when their boy, Barry,
was in the spotlight back in 2008. Levin's comment "read the 5th
clause of Article II, Section I of the US Constitution, and argued that
children born to US citizens abroad are natural born US citizens under
US law" is completely disingenuous:
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United
States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be
eligible to the office of President;
neither
shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained
to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident
within the United States.
No
where in that clause does it say children born to US citizens abroad
are natural born citizens under US law. His comment regarding no one
having standing to challenge eligibility deliberately skips over two
things:
1.
When Leo Donofrio filed his lawsuit in NJ to keep Barry Obama, Juan
McCain and Róger Calero (born in Nicaragua) off the ballot, standing
was not challenged although that judicial
hallucination was used in most of the other lawsuits to get rid
of them. There was a great deal of confusion regarding McCain because
everyone assumed the hospital he was born in was on a military installation.
Not so and I do encourage you to take the time to read this entire piece:
A
Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What
& For How Long?
“According
to the birth certificate and COLB of John McCain, McCain was born in
Colon Hospital, city of Colon, Panama. While the BC states at the top
that it is from the “Canal Zone”, the document also states
that McCain was born in Colon Hospital, city of Colon. The city of Colon
and the hospital were not in the Canal Zone. The common story you hear
is that McCain was born in the Canal Zone, but these documents posted
online do not testify to that. Furthermore, there is no official document
that has ever surfaced which states that McCain was born in the Canal
Zone."
Why
Senator John McCain Cannot Be President: Eleven Months and a Hundred
Yards Short of Citizenship by Gabriel J. Chin, University of California,
Davis - School of Law, August 13, 2008
Abstract:
"Senator McCain was born in 1936 in the Canal Zone to U.S. citizen
parents. The Canal Zone was territory controlled by the United States,
but it was not incorporated into the Union. As requested by Senator
McCain's campaign, distinguished constitutional lawyers Laurence Tribe
and Theodore Olson examined the law and issued a detailed opinion offering
two reasons that Senator McCain was a natural born citizen. Neither
is sound under current law.
"The
Tribe-Olson Opinion suggests that the Canal Zone, then under exclusive
U.S. jurisdiction, may have been covered by the Fourteenth Amendment's
grant of citizenship to "all persons born . . . in the United States."
However, in the Insular Cases, the Supreme Court held that "unincorporated
territories" were not part of the United States for constitutional
purposes. Accordingly, many decisions hold that persons born in unincorporated
territories are not Fourteenth Amendment citizens. The Tribe-Olson Opinion
also suggests that Senator McCain obtained citizenship by statute. However,
the only statute in effect in 1936 did not cover the Canal Zone. Recognizing
the gap, in 1937, Congress passed a citizenship law applicable only
to the Canal Zone, granting Senator McCain citizenship, but eleven months
too late for him to be a citizen at birth. Because Senator John McCain
was not a citizen at birth, he is not a "natural born Citizen"
and thus is not "eligible to the Office of President" under
the Constitution.
Because
of the flap in 2008 over Juan McCain, the Senate passed a resolution
to accomodate a presidential candidate. S.Res.511
- A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural
born citizen. It certainly pays to have friends in high places.
I
deliberately decided to make a Part II to this column because it is
historical FACTS regarding the Fourteenth Amendment and natural born
as written by Leo Donofrio.
2.
Mark Levin knows not a single lawsuit was decided on merits of the argument
regarding what constitutes a natural born citizen. Not one single court
allowed a true legal discussion of what constitutes natural born.
Cruz,
naturally has come out saying it's 'settled law'. Yes, it is and you,
Ted Cruz are ineligible. Cruz knew this was going to become
an issue which is why he began legal proceedings to give up his dual
citizenship finalized in 2014. If he didn't think his dual
citizenship would be a problem, why go to all the trouble to renounce
his Canadian citizenship?
"News"
media giants, including FOX led the charge to discredit anyone questioning
Barry's eligibility. Haaavard grad and telly clown, Bill O'Reilly, has
proclaimed over the years that a birth announcement in a Hawaii newspaper
was proof positive Barry was a natural born citizen. And, so all these
years, Barry Obama has gotten away with usurping the office of president
aided and abetted by the left and the right. And now
they're deliberately doing it all over again using the same talking
points from 2008 & 2012 to protect Ted Cruz.
Rep.
Alan
Grayson: I Will File Lawsuit Over Ted Cruz's Citizenship If He's Elected
President, November 27, 2015. Grayson is a stupid, rabid Democrat.
His proclamation is baloney. I can tell you exactly what a judge will
say: Mr. Grayson, if you had a problem with Cruz's citizenship, you
should have filed before the election. Grayson's comments in that article
demonstrates he's a run of the mill dummy on the issue of natural born
citizen.
Nancy
Pelosi Wades Into Cruz Eligibility Dispute, Jan. 7, 2016
Like
Barry Obama, Cruz has one parent who was a U.S. citizen at the time
of his birth - his mother. A plethora of hot articles have flooded the
Internet over the past few days. This one is a prime example of ignorance:
Why
Ted Cruz Is Vulnerable on Canadian Birth Issue: "That is not
because Cruz is ineligible for the presidency. In an article in the
Harvard Law Review in March 2015, former Solicitors General Neal Katyal
and Paul Clement made a compelling argument that the Framers of the
Constitution intended “natural-born citizen”a requirement
for the presidencyto include those born to U.S. citizens abroad."
Going
back to JB Williams column
regarding Ted Cruz being ineligible to run for the senate, he provides
copies of critical legal documents:
"The
above Canadian document is proof of Canadian Citizenship at birth for
Senator Ted Cruz. The next piece of authenticated evidence released
by Ted Cruz is a Canadian document proving that he remained a legal
citizen of Canada until renouncing that citizenship in May of 2014,
which means, he was still a legal citizen of Canada in 2012 when he
ran for, was elected and took the oath of office for the US Senate.
"Again,
the above authenticated evidence proves that Ted Cruz was born Canadian
in 1970 and remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing his
Canadian citizenship in May of 2014. These official documents also prove
that Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada in 2012, when he sought
and claimed a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal US citizen....
"Ted's
parents were at no time serving in the U.S. Armed Forces, employed by
the U.S. Government or by any of the certain international organizations,
during their eight years in Canada, between 1966 and 1974. Further,
Ted's father Rafael, was at no time a legal citizen of the United States
prior to naturalizing in 2005, from Canada. Rafael’s known legal
citizenship status as of 1970 was Cuban, not American.
"This
is an EXAMPLE of a US CRBA Form (Consular Report of Birth Abroad)
"Unfortunately,
there is no evidence to suggest that the parent or parents of Ted Cruz
ever filed a CRBA form with the U.S. Government in or around 1970, which
is why Ted Cruz released a copy of his Canadian citizenship records
and not any U.S. citizenship records. At present, all FOIA (Freedom
of Information Act) requests filed in search of any U.S. citizenship
documents to confirm the true official U.S. citizenship status of Ted
Cruz have been denied access. All citizenship records for Ted Cruz are
sealed unless and until Ted Cruz agrees to allow any such records to
be released by either U.S. or Canadian agencies.
"As
a result, there remains no authentic evidence to support the claims
that Ted Cruz is either a “natural born” or “naturalized”
citizen of the United States."
Shall
we look at that Haaavard Law Review? A
Response to Neil Katyal and Paul Clement on the Meaning of a Natural
Born Citizen By Mario Apuzzo, Esq. Take the time to read Mario's
response because he quite succinctly proves the authors of the aforementioned
'law review' piece are wrong.
As
I mentioned in my last column,
Mario is the attorney for a ballot eligibility case in Vermont assisted
the plaintiff in preparing his filing. A lawsuit has been filed to keep
ineligible candidates off the primary ballot in Florida: Michael
Voeltz, registered Republican Party voter of Broward County Florida
v. Senator Ted Cruz, of Texas, Senator Marco Rubio, of Florida, Secretary
of State of Florida, Republican Party of Florida Executive Committee.
A
challenge has also been made in Illinois.
1974
Canadian Electors’ List Named Ted Cruz's Parents
"Canadian
immigration authorities declined a request by Breitbart News for additional
documents, citing Canadian privacy laws. Under U.S. law, Cruz would
have inherited his citizenship at birth in 1970 from his mother, provided
she remained a U.S. citizen. She likely would have retained her U.S.
citizenship even if she had become a naturalized Canadian citizen, though
Canadian law required naturalized citizens formally to renounce all
foreign allegiances until 1973."
There's
that nasty thing again: privacy laws. This is Barry Obama and the Hawaiian
birth certificate all over again. I wonder if Ted will spend, as did
the fraud in the White House, more than a million dollars to keep official
records under wraps? The article above ends with the boiler plate stupidity
about what constitutes a natural born citizen.
It's
not Barry or Cruz or Rubio's birthplace, it's the citizenship of the
parents at the time of the child's birth. They key word being parents,
not parent. Every single article or commentary written since Donald
Trump brought up the issue last week always ends with Cruz's mother
is a U.S. citizen therefore Ted Cruz is a natural born citizen. Intellectual
laziness or political bias does not erase historical facts.
There
was a reason the 'natural born citizen' clause was grandfathered into
the Constitution: To keep any president that might have foreign interests
he would use to betray this country. Think Barack Hussein Obama. I don't
doubt Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio love this country, but in the future
do we want another Barry Obama? Since 2008, there have been a lot of
articles by individuals, mostly foreign born, who want to get rid of
the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution to suit their own
agenda, but we can not let that happen.
In
my column last week I provided links to legal analysis by two individuals
who have been heavily involved in this issue that Americans should read
if they want to fully understand why Cruz and Rubio are not natural
born citizens:
•
Leo
Donofrio's Amicus Brief
• A
Citizen is One Thing, But a Natural Born Citizen is Another
Something
is happening that is quite extraordinary. When the issue was Democrat
Barry Obama, FOX and other powerful 'conservative' mouth pieces bent
over backwards to help an ineligible candidate. Now the issue is a popular
GOP senator (who
usurped that office), Ted Cruz, and his eligibility and those same
media mouthpieces and 'conservative' legal geniuses are again bending
over backwards to make sure another ineligible candidate can run for
president.
Why
hasn't Marco Rubio's ineligibility been brought up in all this frenzy?
If the argument being put forth by all the above is that a natural born
citizen means one parent is a U.S. citizen at the time of the child's
birth, that sure as hell eliminates Marco Rubio. He was born in May
1971 in Miami, Florida. His parents did not become U.S. citizens
until November 1975 - four years after his birth. Since neither
of his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth, he's out.
Why
this screeching from all of the above to protect Cruz's candidacy?
Because the top four GOP candidates are Trump, Cruz, Rubio and Carson.
If you knock out Cruz and Rubio that leaves Donald Trump and Dr. Ben
Carson - unless one figures Paul, Fiorina, Bush and the rest of the
single digit candidates can be resurrected from the dead. Democrats
and their lackeys in the media don't want Trump. The GOP establishment
and their lackeys in the media don't want Trump. Can the jury make the
inference that both sides are working feverishly to keep Cruz and Rubio
in the contest hoping Donald Trump will flame out or lose the early
primaries? I submit to you that's exactly what's going on.
Everything
possible is being done by the GOP, with help from Megyn Kelly over at
FOX, to keep Donald Trump from securing the GOP nomination: GOP
Planning 'Firewall' to Stop Trump in South Carolina. A pathetic
attempt to bolster the pathetic Jeb! Bush's chances: "GOP leaders
increasingly see South Carolina as their last best chance to stop Donald
Trump's populist political juggernaut. On Wednesday, influential South
Carolina Republican Katon Dawson issued a plea for former President
George W. Bush to step into the ring in the Palmetto State's Feb. 20
primary. Bush is quite popular among South Carolina Republicans, and
Dawson called his involvement a potential "game changer."
GOP
"leaders" are so far out of touch with voters it defies imagination.
As for a game changer, dream on. If voters wanted Jeb! he would be leading
the pack.
So,
what happens now? Well, we have Barry Obama who usurped the office of
president and has gotten away with it. His mother was a natural born
citizen, but his father was a foreign national who never applied for
citizenship. Barry Obama was born with dual citizenship and ineligible
to be president.
Marco
Rubio was four years old when his parents became citizens. Rubio is
hardly a natural BORN citizen and therefore, clearly ineligible.
Ted
Cruz's mother's birth certificate shows she is a natural born citizen,
but Cruz's father was a foreign national and not a U.S. citizen at the
time Ted was born. Cruz believes because he renounced his Canadian citizenship
at age 44 and his mother being a U.S. citizen he can be a natural born
citizen.
Likely
more lawsuits will be filed. Donald Trump could file a lawsuit;
'standing' would not be an issue; or shouldn't be. But, make
no mistake: The stakes are as high as they can get because if
Ted Cruz is not eligible then neither was the criminal fraudster
in the White House in 2008 and 2012. If anyone thinks the
shadow government is going to let this new challenge regarding
Ted Cruz blow that whole thing out of the water, they are sadly
mistaken. Ted can continue to 'cruz' along hoping he would
be Trump's pick for VP. But, since he's ineligible for the presidency
he's also ineligible to be VP.
Should
Donald Trump dive in or continue steamrolling his competition? Baring
some catastrophe, if he stays on course and doesn't fall into the trap
of filing a lawsuit, he will be the nominee regardless of what GOP "leaders"
want. As I said in a past column, big hay is being made Cruz is ahead
in Iowa.
So
what? Santorum won in 2012 and Mike Huckabee in 2008. Both flamed out
and never made it to the White House. The same fate was dished out to
John Kerry, Al Gore[bechev] and others. Predictions are Trump will take
New Hampshire and South Carolina. If that happens, Cruz will likely
continue spending millions to catch Trump for the next set of primaries.
We
shall see if the lawsuits that have been filed move forward like Leo
Donofrio's did only to be kicked to the curb by a deceitful batch of
disgraceful "justices" on the U.S. Supreme Court. I sincerely
hope they do and that there is just one judge, one, who believes in
the supreme law of the land.
As
for the darling of the right, Mark Levin, referring to people like me
as kooks, shame on you. Questioning the constitutional eligibility for
president or even members of Congress is not kooky. It's our duty and
obligation to make sure the Constitution is upheld. For part two click
below.
Click
here for part -----> 1, 2,
[Just
a short note about 9/11 and Smart Electric Meeters.
The cost of America's undeclared "war" (invasion) in Afghanistan
has now reached $1 trillion borrowed dollars - massive debt heaped on
us all based on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column
know I continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military
grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and tested
from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film has been released:
The
Anatomy of a Great Deception. For full disclosure I receive no compensation,
but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or
give a copy as a present. I've purchased half a dozen copies and given
them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It's very powerful simply
because it's one 'ordinary' man's story who ask a simple question that
led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in
this film that many have never heard about but everyone should.
Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend.
Also, must
see video on the dangers of Smart Meeters on your home, titled: Take
Back Your Power.]
© 2016 - NewsWithViews.com
and Devvy - All Rights Reserved