.
The
Community College Scam Part 2a By Professor Doom

Last time around I was searching through the course offerings of a large, well established community college to see if there was any college coursework. Alas, there were many, many, sections of openly remedial courses of no college content, a few high school courses deceptively labeled as college, and several openly bogus courses just to give “cheap and easy” credits to students that don’t know how they’re being cheated into turning over those sweet student loan checks. Let’s continue to wade through all the crud to see if there’s any higher education going on here. “0” With
College Algebra so watered down now, it’s all but impossible to address
even a very simplified version of calculus. The above is the number of
students that, with the opportunity to copy down the definition of the
word “derivative” on their formula sheet for the final exam, elected to
do so, despite being explicitly told they would need to provide that definition
for the exam. It’s also the number of students that elected to simply
memorize the definition of the word, and were able to write it down on
the final. Performance on the other questions was likewise minimal, but
I still had to pass half the class, to lessen somewhat the condemnation
from admin. Honest, lowering the standards to this point doesn’t do any
good for anyone. Only after well over a hundred sections of openly dubious courses do we come to a course that, sort of, is college material, “Calculus for NonScience Majors”, Math 201. Seven sections, no less. The material in this course is far inferior to the “AP Calculus” taught in the high schools, and a bit lighter than the less demanding (non AP) high school calculus. The numbering makes one think this is a second year course, but in a university setting, this is a “first year math for very weak math students” course, with extra watering down. I remember a friend of mine that took (non AP) calculus in high school, laughing about how stupid this course was when she took it in college. A course that is offered for noncollege credit in high school just shouldn’t count as college credit in college. Then comes 9 statistics courses, but nothing like the statistics courses that used to be offered, or even the 2000 level courses I taught over a decade ago. BRCC makes no illusion about how watered down the material is. Some courses are called “Basic Statistics”, some are called “Elementary Statistics”…I imagine someday there will be courses called “Basic Elementary Statistics.” For the sake of argument, we’ll call these college level since not every high school offers this material, although many advanced students would have access to it in high school. Finally, there are 8 courses on (real) calculus and differential equations. I could quibble some of these, since some is taught in the AP courses in high school, but that’s hardly fair—the whole point of AP is for college credit, after all. Let’s call all 8 of these college courses. Two of these courses, multivariate calculus and differential equations, require a year of college material (i.e., calculus 1 and calculus 2) before they could be taken. Thus, we finally come to some second year courses, a single section each. Again to emphasize, amongst all the offerings, there are 2 sections of second year material offered. So, let’s tally up here. BRCC teaches 198 sections of math classes. A mere 17 of those courses, many arguably, are beyond the high school level, or not offered in many high schools. Even more stunning, there are 2 (!) courses out of those 198 that are 2^{nd} year courses. A 2year college where 99% of the material is first year or lower, even after 10 YEARS? What does that say about the percent of students that are getting a real education? A high school where only 1% of the students actually make it to the 12^{th} grade would be shut down immediately as totally ineffective; heck, it would be a national embarrassment! A community college that performs similarly is quite common, and will be considered successful merely based on its size. Outside of these 17 courses, all the rest of the material has been paid for already by the community, for their children to learn before they go to the community college. Then those children get to pay again, via student loans. Then they pay again, and again, and again, via interest on those loans…why am I the only one that thinks there’s something unfair about this? While CUNY could be forgiven for not having “advanced” courses on account of only being a year old, BRCC is a mature school. After 10 years, BRCC has basically done nothing with 99% of their students. More than 90% of what BRCC does is at the remedial, high school or lower, level. How is it a wonder that more than 90% of these students get nothing out of college but debt? BRCC has been offering “higher education” for 10 years, but still is hard pressed to bring even 10% of their students up to the “first year of college” level. It is a damn lie to claim that community colleges are about higher education. When over 99% of students in a 2 year college are not in second year courses, over 90% aren’t even in college courses after ten freakin’ years, how much progress could they be making? On the other hand, all of those students are spending a great deal of time and considerable (borrowed) money in “higher education.” How did it happen that these schools ended up being 90% fraudulent? Hint: if accreditation had any academics looking at course offerings, it wouldn’t be possible for schools of “higher education” to offer almost all high school material…and nobody is making any claims that high school material is particularly advanced nowadays. Think about it. 
Donate to Rense.com Support Free And Honest Journalism At Rense.com  Subscribe To RenseRadio! Enormous Online Archives, MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, Highest Quality Live Programs 