Boiling Point Has Been Reached
“The Bundy family of Nevada joined with hard-core militiamen Saturday to take over the headquarters of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, vowing to occupy the remote federal outpost 50 miles southeast of Burns for years.
The occupation came shortly after an estimated 300 marchers militia and local citizens both paraded through Burns to protest the prosecution of two Harney County ranchers, Dwight Hammond Jr. and Steven Hammond, who are to report to prison on Monday.”
The 'takeover of the 'closed for the holidays' federal building happened with no loss of life or property to anyone. The building itself is federal, which means that it belongs to the people themselves, in the first place. While their actions in taking over the building could be seen as a preventative measure to encourage a peaceful outcome to something that is by nature hostile, in the over-reach of the government to enforce 'a law' that has no record of having been used before. Still this level of hostile-action has no precedence within recent memory.
The 'law' in question has the look and feel of having been made-up on the spur of the moment; by over-zealous government agents, to simply give the government a second-chance to punish the harassed family even further: A family that has already served time in jail for something which is frequently done by the rangers at Yellowstone Park as burning the grasslands has a proven record of being beneficial to the area that are burned, to increase the health of the grasses overall.
In any event what these ranchers did could never be considered as anything like 'terrorism”. The way this phony 'terrorism' charge was 'framed', was itself designed by the criminal BLM to deny these ranchers any attempt to appeal any decision, before arresting the ranchers on Monday..
Enter the militias that have come to the aid of the ranchers, who have purposely designed their efforts to create a situation that could lend itself to a peaceful resolution, if the feds don't overreact, as usual.
The issue here is not whether or not the Hammond's want the assistance of the Militias. The issue at issue in Oregon, I believe, is about Federal overreach over the rights of American citizens, wherever they live in America. The court system throughout the USA is totally 'in bed' with the criminally complicit government, and against the public of the United States—and this has to be faced and dealt with, preferably in a diplomatic way. So far the opposition to the government has behaved responsibly but proactively in challenging the government to prove their previously phony-case in public. That must begin by showing the public the history of the law under which the Hammond's were prosecuted the first time. While at the same time clarifying where the terrorist-law came from and what the foundation for that so-called 'law' is based upon.
Not everyone agrees with any prospective action that may or many not be engaged in, in this case. The Hammond's have specifically not requested the help of the militia's, as they have said that they will willing “go back to jail” - something that many find inconceivable. But this case is about more than just the injustice being exercised a single family of ranchers: This is about whether or not the ranchers were properly charged in the first place, in addition to the obviously 'excessive and potentially illegal charges that are possibly being used against the Hammond's in this case. Here's another view:
The Hammon Ranch: Divide & Conquer! Conflict Between Patriots
“The Bureau of Land management are claiming that stepping over the line of private into Federally owned land is grounds for having your Constitutional rights stripped under the Article 4 regulations. The grievance presented states that the federal Article 4 is not valid inside the state of Oregon.”
k- Really, so Oregon is not part of the United States of America?
“The terrorist labeled peaceful Americans are father and son ranchers Dwight and Steven Hammond of Diamond in Harney Country, Oregon. Back in 2001 they did what farmers and ranchers normally do to clear out brush and promote the growing of new grass, they set fire on neighboring BLM land for which they had grazing permits since 1964. Several years later the court did agree that the fire had made a difference which made the land more useful for grazing”
“However the BLM and the US government are now claiming that what they did was intentionally a violation of the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Eleven years after the fact they went on trial and on June 22, 2012 a jury convicted Dwight (70 yrs old) and son Steven Hammond (43 years old)pf arson on Federal lands in 2001. These men were first indicted on nineteen counts in June of 2010, but the courts reduced the number to 9 counts.
In 2012 Dwight and Steven Hammond were sentenced and served time, 3 months for Dwight and one year in jail for Steven for the productive fires in 2001 and 2006. They were tried and convicted of terrorist acts under the anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.
The 2001 fire was all part of a plan the Hammond's and the BLM had agreed to prior. They called ahead of time to confirm that there was not a burn ban in effect and proceeded to burn on their BLM grazing allotment. They ended up burning 139 acres to make it more fertile without harm to any humans, animals or structures.
k - totally unlike what the BLM did to the Bundy property in Nevada.
Civil Unrest, Militia On Alert As Government Attempts Double Jeopardy By Imprisoning Ranchers
Here's what the people going into the building near Burns intend to do.
Their's is a multiple-year plan that the defenders intend to implement'
This 2min 26sec VIDEO is a Must Watch
Armed Militia occupying forest reserve HQ in Oregon
|Donate to Rense.com Support Free And Honest Journalism At Rense.com||Subscribe To RenseRadio! Enormous Online Archives, MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, Highest Quality Live Programs|