A
few short months ago headlines dominated the Internet and some
cable network shows over the massive surge of illegal minors coming
across the border. An open border by design. Now many are wondering
if terrorists can come across the border? Will there be another
9/11 in one or more big cities to kill as many infidels (that
would be us) as possible?
Well,
I hate to tell folks, but they've been crossing the border for
years, blending in with the hordes. If any form of amnesty goes
through, likely some will be rewarded with citizenship while plotting
to kill as many infidels as they can. Whether you're talking 8
million liars, cheats and thieves or 20 million, there is no way
to do background checks on all of them; not even a fraction.
The
latest flavor of savages and barbarians are known as ISIS or ISIL.
Animals who have no humanity left, only extreme hatred. Evil in
human form who take great delight in murdering other human beings
and raping women and children regardless of ethnicity or religion.
Satan awaits each and every one of them.
But,
are they here?
Four
Terrorists Captured on US Border on September 10 Day Before
9-11 - "Congressman Jason Chaffetz broke this shocking news
Wednesday that four known terrorists were apprehended at the US
border in Texas on September 10 the day before the 13th anniversary
of the 9-11 attacks." Now, which organization do those known terrorists
about to slip into Texas belong?
Military
Experts: With ISIS in El Paso, Ft. Bliss in Danger of Terrorist
Attack: "The recent increase in security at a key Army base
near a Mexican border city where Islamic terrorists are confirmed
to be operating and planning an attack on the United States indicates
that the facility is a target, according to senior military experts
contacted by Judicial Watch." Those are just the ones they know
about.
Isn't
this just grand and why were they not immediately apprehended
and questioned? Dem
Rep: 40 American ISIS fighters have already returned to the United
States
Well,
we should all feel safe since the FBI is tracking them! But, somehow
in the convoluted games played by FBI and the CIA, those agencies
manage to entangle themselves with bad guys who should never,
ever have been allowed into this country in the first place.
Tapes
Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast
(6 people killed and more than 1,000 injured)
"Mr.
Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian army officer, was used by
the Government to penetrate a circle of Muslim extremists now
charged in two bombing cases: the World Trade Center attack and
a foiled plot to destroy the United Nations, the Hudson River
tunnels and other New York City landmarks. He is the crucial witness
in the second bombing case, but his work for the Government was
erratic, and for months before the trade center blast, he was
feuding with the F.B.I. Supervisor 'Messed It Up' . "After the
bombing, he resumed his undercover work. In an undated transcript
of a conversation from that period, Mr. Salem recounts a talk
he had had earlier with an agent about an unnamed F.B.I. supervisor
who, he said, "came and messed it up."
"He
requested to meet me in the hotel," Mr. Salem says of the supervisor.
"He requested to make me to testify and if he didn't push for
that, we'll be going building the bomb with a phony powder and
grabbing the people who was involved in it. But since you, we
didn't do that."
"The
transcript quotes Mr. Salem as saying that he wanted to complain
to F.B.I. headquarters in Washington about the bureau's failure
to stop the bombing, but was dissuaded by an agent identified
as John Anticev. "He said, I don't think that the New York people
would like the things out of the New York office to go to Washington,
D.C.," Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev had told him. Another agent,
identified as Nancy Floyd, does not dispute Mr. Salem's account,
but rather, appears to agree with it, saying of the New York people:
"Well, of course not, because they don't want to get their butts
chewed."
True?
Not true? I ask again: Why are dangerous individuals with known
terrorist ties even brought into this country?
The
1993 World Trade Center Bombing: Decoys, Aliases and NeoConspiracy
Theories
"Towards
the end of the 1980s, as the Soviet-Afghan war was coming to its
inevitable conclusion, the Blind Sheikh escaped from house arrest
in Egypt and paid several visits to the US. Specifically, he fostered
a following at the Al-Kifah Refugee Centre at the Al Farooq moseque
in New York. Al-Kifah was the local branch of the Maktab Al-Khidamat
or Services Office for the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, and was
central to the process by which young men were recruited, moved
around the world for training and ultimately deployed against
the Soviets.
"The
CIA has remained tight-lipped about their involvement in Al-Kifah
but given the timing of its development, its location and the
fact that their agents posing as consular officials arranged the
visas that allowed the Blind Sheikh to enter the US, it is obvious
that they were at the least happy about Rahman’s growing influence
there. In April and May 1989 US officials secretly met with followers
of the Blind Sheikh in Egypt, including a lawyer representing
the group. The cables recording these meetings were signed by
Frank Wisner — the US ambassador to Egypt and the son of the veteran
of CIA black ops. A year later the Blind Sheikh moved to New York
permanently.
"Six
months after that El Sayyid Nosair, a follower of Rahman, assassinated
prominent rabbi Meir Kahane, founder of the Jewish Defence League
and a former FBI informant. A few weeks later the State Department
revoked all of the Blind Sheikh’s visas, but nothing else happened
to him. Nosair was arrested but the investigation didn't reach
into the question of what was going on at the Al-Kifah. Rahman
was never arrested or deported."
Now
that the new player on the block, ISIS/ISL, has shown the world
they are little better than savages, it's time to bomb, bomb,
bomb and and send hundreds of millions of our money to groups
we don't even know for sure won't walk away or use the money and
weapons they buy with our money against us over there:
Dem
Senator: Obama's
Plan To Train Syrian Opposition Would Cost $100,000 Per Rebel
"On
September 16 Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) blasted President Obama's
request for $500 million to train 5,000 Syrian rebels, saying
the breakdown on the money works out to "$100,000 per [rebel]"
for one year. He said that even after all that money is spent
the U.S. has no guarantee that the rebels will not side with ISIS
for religious reasons, and fight Bashar al-Assad instead of the
ISIS insurgency. "According to The Hill, Manchin said: "I have
a hard time understanding why all of a sudden we are going to
convince these 5,000 [rebels] to turn and fight ISIS, who is fighting
the same religious war they are fighting against the Assad regime."
And
fighting is what those people over in the Middle East do best-
century after century after century. Religious and tribal squabbles.
Murder and mayhem, this one funding that group and some other
group funding one faction or another: Top
U.S. Military Official Admits: Our Arab Allies Are Funding ISIS
In
that piece above, the allegation is made: "As we have exhaustively
documented, innumerable examples prove how Washington-backed FSA
fighters and ISIS militants were moving closer even before the
two groups signed a non-aggression pact last week. In July it
emerged that “several factions within the FSA, including Ahl Al
Athar, Ibin al-Qa’im” had “handed over its weapons to the Islamic
State in large numbers” and pledged allegiance to ISIS. Three
leading Syrian rebel commanders also announced back in December
that they had relinquished ties with the Free Syrian Army's Supreme
Military Council, the military wing of the western-backed Syrian
National Coalition, in order to join ISIS.
"Islamic
State fighter Abu Atheer also told Al-Jazeera, “We are buying
weapons from the FSA. we bought 200 anti-aircraft missiles and
Koncourse anti tank weapons. We have good relations with our brothers
in the FSA. For us, the infidels are those who cooperate with
the West to fight Islam.” In addition, a recent study by Conflict
Armament Research revealed that Islamic State militants obtained
U.S. supplied weapons, including M16 assault rifles, which were
originally smuggled out of Jordan and provided to so-called “moderate”
FSA rebels.
"ISIS
terrorists also acquired M79 rockets which were initially given
to FSA rebels by Saudi Arabia. The rockets, “were part of the
arms shipments from Croatia that were meant for the Free Syrian
Army. The weapons were either captured, or acquired by former
FSA fighters as they joined ISIS,” reports LJR Review."
However,
denial of such an agreement came swiftly: Syrian
Opposition Blasts Reports It Signed a Truce With ISIS. Who
do you believe? None of the players over there in my opinion.
Neither the Outlaw Congress nor the criminal impostor in the White
House has any constitutional authority to keep throwing our money
at foreign groups engaged in endless conflicts within their countries.
All borrowed debt slapped on our backs. Enemies
created by different governments - including the U.S. government.
Let me quote Jeri Lynn Ball, a meticulous researcher and author
of several fully documented books who hits the nail on the head:
Opposition
to Invasion of Iraq Based on Emotion or Facts?
"In
Stalin's Russia, notes Mikhail Heller, enemies were blamed for
everything; they were used to justify the invasion of Czechoslovakia
(1968), the invasion of Afghanistan in 1980, and so on. The Soviet
Communists were thus able to manipulate Soviet citizens into supporting
government hunts for "terrorists," "traitors," and spies, for
"liberation wars" for humanity.
"Using
Marxist-Leninist strategies, the Russian, Chinese, and U.S. ruling
elites have sought to frighten Americans and other populations
with the specter of ruthless mass terror. They have created enemies
and blamed them for everything including terrorist acts. They
have used them ...to manipulate Americans into supporting government
hunts for "traitors," "terrorists," and these never ending "wars
of national liberation." Their aim is to manipulate whole populations
into supporting "wars of national liberation" and achieving not
only the sovietization of "liberated" underdeveloped countries
such as Afghanistan and Iraq, but also the full altruization and
sovietization of the United States and other Western nations."
How
many more enemies are "we" going to create as a result of bombing
the hell out of countries in pursuit of one world government and
control of oil and natural resources?
ISIS
“Made in USA”. Iraq “Geopolitical Arsonists” Seek to Burn Region:
"Despite an open conspiracy to drown the region in sectarian strife,
the US now poses as a stakeholder in Iraq's stability. Having
armed, funded, and assisted ISIS into existence and into northern
Iraq itself, the idea of America “intervening” to stop ISIS is
comparable to an arsonist extinguishing his fire with more gasoline.
Reviled across the region, any government be it in Baghdad,
Tehran, or Damascus that allies itself with the US will be immediately
tainted in the minds of forces forming along both sides of this
artificially created but growing sectarian divide."
Ron
Paul: War
on ISIS is Foolish Continuation of 24 Years of US War in Middle
East
"Ron
Paul, speaking Monday with Erin Ade on RT, explained that it is
“foolish” for the United States to wage war on ISIS in Iraq and
Syria, noting that the new war is a continuation of 24 years of
foolish US war in the Middle East. Instead of extending the war
another six or more years, Paul says "it's time to quit” and bring
the US military back home. Paul, who is RPI’s chairman and founder,
minces no words in explaining his opposition to the US war on
ISIS:" Rest at link above.
An
opposing opinion comes from Larry Klayman in a WND piece, September
21, 2014: Best
ISIS strategy: Nuke 'em
"Let
us finally face it and stop pussyfooting around. We are in a religious
war! In the end, it is either them or us. If we intend to have
any chance of survival, it is also time that we face reality.
Either we kill these radical Muslim ISIS cockroaches all of
them before they spread like cancer and infest the globe, or
in time they will kill all of us. It is survival time, boys and
girls. No time for the weak at heart....
"Indeed,
in taking on the Muslim caliphate, now being spearheaded by ISIS,
we need to take a lesson from President Harry Truman in ending
World War II. Showing real grit and leadership, Truman and his
advisers correctly concluded that even if thousands of Japanese
civilians had to be sacrificed in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki, this seemingly unthinkable strategy would save countless
lives in the end. And, not just the lives of U.S. servicemen who
were then fighting in the Pacific theater, but by bringing the
war to a close quickly also countless Japanese lives as well."
Seems
to be I remember someone else talking about sacrificing civilians:
'We
Think the Price Is Worth It': Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions
against Iraq: "We have heard that a half million children have
died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And,
you know, is the price worth it?" Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we
think the price is worth it." And Americans wonder why people
in those muslim countries hate us? Some may be too young to remember,
but following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the anger by Americans
was a huge roar with tens of thousands signing up to "get the
Japs". Americans instantly hated the Japanese because of what
political leaders did, not innocent civilians in Japan who had
no power to do anything.
Pat
Buchanan on Syria plans: 'Are
we again creating more enemies than we are killing?'
And,
FDRs famous day of infamy: FDR
and the Pearl Harbor attack
"Stinnett
spent 16 years doing his research and fighting in the courts to
obtain a plethora of shocking documents under the Freedom of Information
Act their authenticity cannot be denied. This link to a .pdf
file provides a few of the official documents, i.e., “It (official
document) directs the Hawaiian U.S. Army commander, Lt. Gen. Walter
Short, to follow an official U.S. government desire: ‘The United
States desires that Japan commit the first overt act.’”
"Pearl
Harbor was no surprise. “Day of infamy,” indeed.
"While
Stinnett should be commended for his commitment to expose the
truth and help clear the names of those military officers wrongly
blamed, I was shocked by his comment on page 259: “As heinous
as it seems to families and veterans of World War II, of which
the author is one, the Pearl Harbor attack was, from the White
House perspective, something that had to be endured in order to
stop a greater evil the Nazi invaders in Europe who had begun
the Holocaust and were poised to invade England.”
"There
were 2,403 Americans who died at Pearl Harbor. According to Stinnett,
who backs up FDR, those 2,403 Americans were acceptable casualties
in order to take America into war. Stinnett goes on to say (same
page), “Had the facts uncovered in this book been known immediately
after the war ended, and had Roosevelt explained his war strategies
and tactics to the families who lost their sons at Pearl Harbor,
how different American history might be viewed today.”
"I
feel confident in saying that the families of those 2,403 Americans
slaughtered at Pearl Harbor with the full knowledge of a sitting
president of the United States would not have been very understanding.
I was further shocked by Stinnett’s next comments (same page),
“The truth that has been told here does not diminish FDR’s magnificent
contributions to the American people. His legacy should not be
tarnished by the truth. As with all American presidents, Roosevelt
must be viewed in the total context of his administration, not
just Pearl Harbor.” Quite frankly, I would be ashamed to say such
a thing.
"Allowing
Japan to “commit the first overt act” military aggression against
America on our own soil can hardly be called anything but murder."
One
could go on to write millions of words about the tragedies on-going
in the Middle East, who is arming who, but the bottom line is
the Outlaw Congress - both parties - have allowed the borders
to remain open to terrorists crossing over as well as the scum
of the earth, rapists, murderers and gang members. Texas
State Senator: 100,000 Illegal Immigrant Gang Members in State
What
do we do? Depend on the joke called the Department of Fatherland
[Homeland] Security? No. Homeland Security is OUR responsibility
and if this isn't the time in history to revitalize the constitutional
militia, I don't know what is. After the latest, massive surge
of illegal alien minors crossing the border, good intentioned
Americans brought their 'militia' groups to the border. The only
problem is they have no legal authority to do anything other than
observe and perhaps detain some scared illegals until border patrol
agents can arrive. They have been vilified by nitwits in the media
who have zero understanding of the Second Amendment or the constitutional
militia. The author of the piece below refers to them as vigilantes.
However, he does make a valid point:
Armed
‘militias’ unnecessarily raise the danger threat along the border
"Just
a few weeks ago, a Border Patrol agent pursuing a group of immigrants
along the border opened fire on an armed man. It turned out the
man was a militia member. Not only did the incident pose a threat
to the militia member, who dropped his weapon, but the gunfire
could have been interpreted by that man as justification for him
to shoot back, meaning he put the Border Patrol agent's life at
risk. In addition, the confusion caused by the confrontation with
the militia member caused the agent to lose track of the immigrants
he was pursuing. So they got away....
“We
really don't need the militia here,” said Cameron County Sheriff
Omar Lucio. “It just creates a problem from my point of view,
because we don't know who they are.”
It
is just that type of situation that has worried me since the news
broke about 'militia' groups heading to the border. For years,
many of us have been trying to get the constitutional militia
reconstituted by our state legislatures who are woefully ignorant
of the Second Amendment and the history of the constitutional
militia. Instead, they seem willing to use more Band Aids and
depend on DHS and other federal dragoons to save their bacon.
Let me repeat: If there was ever a time in our history when the
constitutional militia is needed, it's right now. Not a year down
the road, but right now. I urge you to take the time to listen
to a six part interview with Dr. Edwin Vieria so we can all get
with the same game plan:
Edwin
Vieira, the Militia and the Constitution - that link takes
you to part I. If you look to the right of the screen, you will
see the links to parts 2-6. NOW is the time to go after
your state legislatures to get this done. While many
legislatures are out of session, getting the constitutional militia
reconstituted must be considered an urgent matter. Urgent as in
getting
the legislation written and into the hopper for opening sessions
come January 2015.
Realistically,
it won't get done before then - unless there is another 9/11 or
a spate of mini-9/11s which would give the madmen and women in
the Outlaw Congress another golden opportunity to crush what's
left of our freedom and liberties. With the way the FBI plays
with known terrorists, I feel it's just a matter of time before
more blood is shed on our soil. Our best defense is us, we the
people and the constitutional militia, reconstituted with the
authority of the state is our best weapon against homegrown Middle
Eastern terrorists and ones coming across the border.
Speaking
of 9/11, the other night I watched a new DVD titled, The Anatomy
of a Great Deception. This film was written by a man named David
Hooper who also appears in it. Hooper is just your average American
family man who never questioned the official story line about
what happened on September 11,.2001. Three years ago, he asked
one innocent question about that day. It almost ruined his marriage,
made a shambles out of his relationship with family and friends.
He was just another nut out there who had the audacity to ask
a legitimate question.
Hopper's
film is very well done in that he takes you on his journey but
tells you to believe what you can see. His research
is impeccable. Not conspiracy theories, but using actual film
and interviews from that day. No one and I mean no one who watches
that film can come away with the same belief system about 9/11
as they had before they watched it. It's very painful because
as Hooper says several times: no one wants to go there, but he
did, asking questions and trying to get answers without losing
his mind. Trying to cope with his job, he and his wife welcoming
a new baby and the death of his father.
I
purchased a half dozen copies because I'm going to give them to
specific individuals asking them to view it and then give me their
opinion. No pre-judging, just what do you think? For those of
us who have been attacked or ridiculed by family and/or friends
(and even fellow writers), Hooper's film is a way to get those
you know who don't want to hear anything other than the official
story line to look at what one man went through simply because
he wanted to know the answer to his question. I believe Americans
can relate to that better than they can getting hit over the head
with a sledgehammer.
The
Anatomy of a Great Deception: One Man's Personal 9/11 Journey:
"A personal journey of discovery began just over three years ago
for businessman and filmmaker David Hooper when he began to ask
questions about what
really happened on September 11, 2001. The result of his quest
is a ground-breaking documentary, The
Anatomy of a Great Deception.
"During
his search for answers, each question Hooper asked led to another,
until eventually he deduced that the official story of how 9/11
transpired simply couldn't be true. Besides the emotional upheaval
of that realization, Hooper faced the added pain of feeling isolated
from family members and friends, who shared neither his conclusions
nor his conviction that America had been betrayed. So, as a way
of reaching out to loved ones, Hooper decided to make the film,
in hopes that it would help them grasp the facts that had shattered
his worldview."
One
of the new pieces of information in the film I had not seen is
a clip by Susan Lindauer. Who is she? Amazon:
"Former
Congressional staffer Susan Lindauer covered Iraq and Libya at
the United Nations, as a U.S. Intelligence Asset and back door
channel on anti-terrorism from 1993 to 2003. Most notoriously,
in the summer of 2001, her team warned about a major terrorist
attack involving airplane hijackings and a strike on the World
Trade Center. Lindauer also campaigned heavily against the War
in Iraq, and developed a comprehensive peace framework through
her back-channel in the run up to War. This is the story of what
happened when Lindauer tried to disclose the true facts of Iraqi
Pre-War Intelligence and the 9/11 warning to Congress and the
American people. It details the nightmare of her arrest on the
Patriot Act and her imprisonment without a trial at the notorious
prison inside Carswell Air Force Base in Texas. Extreme Prejudice
is a true life spy thriller."
In
the film, Lindauer talks about trucks coming to the WTC towers
in the middle of the night shortly before September 11th; that
one is a shocker. I have known for a long time about the towers
being closed the weekend before that horrible day, but not about
those trucks. You
can also listen to her (I highly recommend) in a fairly short
interview talking about those trucks in detail. Lindauer's life
was flipped upside down and turned into hell on earth. What happened
to her should NEVER happen to anyone in our country who attempts
to tell the truth - no matter who is responsible for such heinous
crimes like 9/11. Laudauer is the author of Extreme
Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover
Ups of 9/11 and Iraq
One
thing I want you to keep in mind if you watch The Anatomy of a
Great Deception: Look at the credentials of those being interviewed.
Scientists, physicists, pilots, engineers with credentials a mile
long. Are they all nuts? Do they all hate Bush? Are they all nothing
more than conspiracy whack jobs wearing tin foil hats? Only someone
afraid of the truth would say yes. Seeking the truth about 9/11
has been about as popular as seeing a proctologist. Yet, the professionals
interviewed in that film have stood firm for the truth regardless
of the labels slapped on them. As for the eyewitnesses at 'ground
zero' and the Pentagon, why would they lie about what they saw?
Book deals? None. Fame and fortune? Hardly. They saw what they
saw up close and personal.
9/11
is the justification for draconian "laws" like the "Patriot" Act,
the NDAA and endless undeclared wars in the Middle East. The
truth must be exposed instead of clinging to old lies because
they're easier to swallow. As Patrick Henry said: "For
my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing
to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it."
Links:
1
- IMPORTANT:
What is the constitutional militia vs private ones?
2 - Interview
with FBI Whistler blower Sibel Edmonds about Operation Gladio
3 - 3
High Level Intelligence Operatives Who Exposed 9/11 Foreknowledge
Government ignored repeated warnings from inside the system
4 - Dem
Rep Calls Obama's Plan to Arm Syrian Rebels 'Lame'
5 - Stay
out of latest Muslim civil war
Click
here to visit NewsWithViews.com
home page.
©
2014 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy - All Rights Reserved
-
-
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
This Site Served
by TheHostPros