Our
Federal Wallet Stretched To Limit By Illegal Aliens Getting Welfare
"Even worse, Americans have seen heinous crimes committed
by individuals who are here illegally." - Senator Dirty Harry
Reid, Democratic/Communist Party USA. He also said that the U.S.
open door policy is being abused at the expense of honest, working
citizens. August 5, 1993, Dirty Harry's office issued the following:
"In
response to increased terrorism and abuse of social programs by
aliens, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) Today introduced the first and
only comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress. Currently,
an alien living illegally in the United States often pays no taxes
but receives unemployment, welfare, free medical care and other
federal benefits. Recent terrorist acts, including the World Trade
Center bombing, have underscored the need to keep violent criminals
out of the country.....
"Our
borders have overflowed with illegal immigrants placing tremendous
burdens on our criminal justice system, schools and social programs.
The Immigration and Naturalization Service needs the ability to
step up enforcement. Our federal wallet is stretched to the limit
by illegal aliens getting welfare, food stamps, medical care,
and other benefits often without paying any taxes.”
“Safeguards
like welfare and free medical care are in place to boost Americans
in need of short-term assistance. These programs were not meant
to entice freeloaders and scam artists from around the world.
Even worse, Americans have seen heinous crimes committed by individuals
who are here illegally.”
His
statements were to announce a bill he introduced back then titled
the Immigration
Stabilization Act [S.1351]. I'm betting it was not written
by Dirty Harry, but by lawyers who know what they're doing and
the sure to come legal challenges. It covers the whole gambit
of turning off the trillions spent over the past 28 years since
Reagan sold us out. One section I want to highlight: TITLE X--CITIZENSHIP
SEC.
1001. BASIS OF CITIZENSHIP CLARIFIED.
"In
the exercise of its powers under section 5 of the Fourteenth Article
of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Congress
has determined and hereby declares that any person born after
the date of enactment of this title to a mother who is neither
a citizen of the United States nor admitted to the United States
as a lawful permanent resident, and which person is a national
or citizen of another country of which either of his or her natural
parents is a national or citizen, or is entitled upon application
to become a national or citizen of such country, shall be considered
as born subject to the jurisdiction of that foreign country and
not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States within the
meaning of section 1 of such Article and shall therefore not be
a citizen of the United States or of any State solely by reason
of physical presence within the United States at the moment of
birth."
Dirty
Harry was speaking about the legal fiction called 'anchor babies'
something I have been very vocal about: States
Must Fight Legal Fiction Called Anchor Babies. Judge Jeanine
‘Illegally
Entering U.S. Is Not a Right to Citizenship' - She is on point
and says it like it is: "I draw but one conclusion: Barack Obama
is intentionally using the immigration crisis as an excuse to
change the demographics and ultimately the electorate of this
nation." Illegals
tell filmmakers: we were told to vote democrat, or be deported:
"Livingston wrote that, prior to the 2012 presidential election,
“the illegals were handed voter registrations and told they would
be sent to states with NO ID check for voting.”
Of
course, that puffed up peacock has changed his tune: Harry
Reid: The Border is Secure, Now We Need Illegal Alien Amnesty
- July 15, 2014: "Ladies and gentlemen, an idiot."
A
friend recently contacted me about the issue of the massive invasion
on our border here in Texas. I reinforced to him this all started
when "conservative", former Democrat, Ronald Reagan, signed the
"immigration reform bill to stop illegals once and for all " into
law in 1986. With approximately 2.1 million liars, cheats and
thieves, illegals, in our country at that time, it didn't take
long for the invasion to go into high gear once illegals
found out they could steal from you to fund their life styles.
Reagan opened the flood gates and here we are today with 25-30
million leeches sucking us dry.
By
1994, eight years after Ronnie Reagan invited in tens of millions
of liars, cheats thieves, Californians had had enough. Prop.
187 (Known as SOS or Save Our State) was put on the ballot.
"The People of California find and declare as follows:
"That
they have suffered and are suffering economic hardship caused
by the presence of illegal aliens in this state.
"That they have suffered and are suffering personal injury and
damage caused by the criminal conduct of illegal aliens in this
state.
"That they have a right to the protection of their government
from any person or persons entering this country unlawfully.
"Therefore, the People of California declare their intention to
provide for cooperation between their agencies of state and local
government with the federal government, and to establish a system
of required notification by and between such agencies to prevent
illegal aliens in the United States from receiving benefits or
public services in the State of California."
The
voters passed it by a wide margin. At that time there were approximately
1.3 million illegals in the state; over 300,000 minors. Lawsuits
were filed and two federal judges declared the law unconstitutional
in 1999. I told my friend that what we need is a federal version
of Prop. 187, so I wrote one and sent it to him. He has a U.S.
House member interested in the big magnet - welfare - which
keeps illegals in this country. Illegals stay here because
they know they can steal jobs and resources.
I
told my friend here is what members of Congress are going to go
up against, besides America hating groups like the ACLU, La Raza
and others because I did more research. I simply could not understand
how those who enter this country by sneaking across the border
would be entitled to free welfare, education, medical and all
the other programs since they are NOT U.S. citizens. Well, I soon
found out the ugly truth.
Initially,
I thought the decision to over turn Prop 187 was the genesis,
but having done more research, here is the damning case once again
bastardizing the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment:
PLYLER
v. DOE, 457 U.S. 202 (1982) - 457 U.S. 202 - Argued December
1, 1981; Decided June 15, 1982. Held:
"A
Texas statute which withholds from local school districts any
state funds for the education of children who were not "legally
admitted" into the United States, and which authorizes local school
districts to deny enrollment to such children, violates the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pp. 210-230.
"(a)
The illegal aliens who are plaintiffs in these cases challenging
the statute may claim the benefit of the Equal Protection Clause,
which provides that no State shall "deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Whatever his
status under the immigration laws, an alien is a "person" in any
ordinary sense of that term. This Court's prior cases recognizing
that illegal aliens are "persons" protected by the Due Process
Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which Clauses
do not include the phrase "within its jurisdiction," cannot be
distinguished on the asserted ground that persons who have entered
the country illegally are not "within the jurisdiction" of a State
even if they are present within its boundaries and subject to
its laws. Nor do the logic and history of the Fourteenth Amendment
support such a construction. Instead, use of the phrase "within
its jurisdiction" confirms the understanding that the Fourteenth
Amendment's protection extends to anyone, citizen or stranger,
who is subject to the laws of a State, and reaches into every
corner of a State's territory. Pp. 210-216......
"The
court held that "the absolute deprivation of education should
trigger strict judicial scrutiny, particularly when the absolute
deprivation is the result of complete inability to pay for the
desired benefit." Id., at 582. The court determined that the State's
concern for fiscal integrity was not a compelling state interest,
id., at 582-583; that exclusion of these children had not been
shown to be necessary to improve education within the State, id.,
at 583; and that the educational needs of the children statutorily
excluded were not different from the needs of children not excluded,
ibid."
In
other words, too bad for the states of the Union and the taxpayers.
Illegal aliens cannot be deprived of an education
paid for by stealing from the taxpayers! Illegal alien students
who have no legal right to be on U.S. soil. Here
in Texas there are more than 400,000 ILLEGAL aliens minors in
grades K-12 costing we Texans nearly $4 BILLION dollars a year.
Those illegal "students" have been bleeding our schools dry.
The
court goes on to say that illegal alien students didn't have any
control over their parents smuggling them into this country, so
they are entitled to special consideration under the 14th Amendment.
What rot. In 1982, 4 justices on that court were appointed by
Nixon, one by Eisenhower, one by LBJ, one by JFK and two by Reagan.
When
that decision was made, Congress had already passed immigration
laws. Anyone who enters this country without going through the
proper channels is here illegally. They are not "persons"
invited in the US, they smuggle themselves across the border.
Since
the "supreme" court vomited up such a convoluted decision based
on the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution,
shall we look at the historical facts regarding the Fourteenth
Amendment? The largest number of illegals come from Mexico - or
at least until this last surge of the on-going invasion; 80% are
Hondurans. Mexicans who illegally enter the US are Mexican citizens
under their constitution and so are their kids,
born or unborn regardless of whether they leave the country or
not:
Mexican
Constitution - Chapter II - Article 30. "Mexican nationality is
acquired by birth or by naturalization. A. Mexicans by birth are:
I. Those born in the territory of the Republic, regardless of
the nationality of their parents: II. Those born in a foreign
country of Mexican parents; of a Mexican father and a foreign
mother; or of a Mexican mother and an unknown father."
The
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: “All persons
born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein
they reside.”
Illegal
aliens "reside" illegally on U.S. soil. And:
"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor
shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Since
illegal Mexicans are Mexican citizens, their allegiance is to
Mexico, not any state of the Union where they illegally "reside".
Honduras also has a constitution which says their citizens are
Honduran citizens: ARTICLE 28. - "No honduran by birth may be
deprived of their nationality . This right we retain the hondurans
by birth even when acquire another nationality." Illegal minors
are not US citizens. They are persons who by birth owe their allegiance
to Honduras, not the United States.
El
Salvador also has a constitution, but this one is probably for
the lawyers because it's seriously only one sentence about citizenship,
but later under the political part it reads
something a little different: Article 71 - All Salvadorans
more than eighteen years old are citizens. But, on page 29 is
reads: "To be elected Deputy, one must be over twenty five years
old, Salvadoran by birth, child of a Salvadoran father or mother....."
The
quoted research below is from Leo Donofrio. For those not
familiar with his name, Leo is the attorney out in NJ who filed
the first challenge to get Juan McCain and Barry Barack Soetoro
Obama off the ballot in 2008. This goes to the heart of that outrageous
Supreme decision in Plyler v Doe.
"Dr.
John Fonte, Senior Fellow of The Hudson Institute had this to
say about the issue at a Congressional hearing on dual citizenship
from September 29, 2005:
"The
authors in the legislative history, the authors of that language,
Senator Lyman Trumbull said, ”When we talk about ’subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States,’ it means complete jurisdiction,
not owing allegiance to anybody else.” Senator Jacob Howard said
that it's ”a full and complete jurisdiction.”
"This
illustrates that Congress recently discussed the issue, and they
can't claim they were unaware. But we don't have to take Dr. Fonte’s
word for it. The following discussion by the various 14th Amendment
Framers took place on the Senate floor. I took it from P.A. Madison’s
research at http://www.14thamendment.us (use his link for footnotes):
"It
is clear the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment had no intention
of freely giving away American citizenship to just anyone simply
because they may have been born on American soil. Again, we are
fortunate enough to have on the record the highest authority tell
us, Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee…
and the one who inserted the phrase: "[T]he provision is, that
‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, are citizens.’ That means ’subject to the complete jurisdiction
thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’
Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.
"Then
Madison quotes Sen. Howard, another Framer, concurring with Trumbull:
"Sen.
Howard concurs with Trumbull’s construction:
"Mr.
HOWARD: I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois
[Trumbull], in holding that the word “jurisdiction,” as here employed,
ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction
on the part of the United States, whether exercised by Congress,
by the executive, or by the judicial department; that is to say,
the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every
citizen of the United States now.[3]
"Mr.
Madison continues with even more proof of what the 14th Amendment
Framers meant:. "Sen. Johnson, speaking on the Senate floor, offers
his comments and understanding of the proposed new amendment to
the constitution:
"[Now],
all this amendment [citizenship clause] provides is, that all
persons born in the United States and not subject to some foreign
Powerfor that, no doubt, is the meaning of the committee who
have brought the matter before usshall be considered as citizens
of the United States. That would seem to be not only a wise but
a necessary provision. If there are to be citizens of the United
States there should be some certain definition of what citizenship
is, what has created the character of citizen as between himself
and the United States, and the amendment says that citizenship
may depend upon birth, and I know of no better way to give rise
to citizenship than the fact of birth within the territory of
the United States, born to parents who at the time were subject
to the authority of the United States.[4]
And:
"No doubt in the Senate as to what the citizenship clause means
as further evidenced by Sen. W. Williams:
"In
one sense, all persons born within the geographical limits of
the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States…All persons living within a judicial district may be said,
in one sense, to be subject to the jurisdiction of the court in
that district, but they are not in every sense subject to the
jurisdiction of the court until they are brought, by proper process,
within the reach of the power of the court. I understand the words
here, ’subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,’ to mean
fully and completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States.[5]
"Madison
saves for last the greatest authority on the issue: "Rep. John
Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment,
confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in
regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil
rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:
"[I]
find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which
is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution,
that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United
States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty
is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born
citizen…[6]
"It's
important to note this statement was issued by Bingham only months
before the 14th Amendment was proposed." End of excerpt.
In
Plyler v Doe, those "supreme" court justices said:
"(a)
The illegal aliens who are plaintiffs in these cases challenging
the statute may claim the benefit of the Equal Protection Clause,
which provides that no State shall "deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Whatever his
status under the immigration laws, an alien is a "person" in any
ordinary sense of that term. This Court's prior cases recognizing
that illegal aliens are "persons" protected by the Due Process
Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which Clauses
do not include the phrase "within its jurisdiction," cannot be
distinguished on the asserted ground that persons who have entered
the country illegally are not "within the jurisdiction" of a State
even if they are present within its boundaries and subject to
its laws. Nor do the logic and history of the Fourteenth Amendment
support such a construction. Instead, use of the phrase "within
its jurisdiction" confirms the understanding that the Fourteenth
Amendment's protection extends to anyone, citizen or stranger,
who is subject to the laws of a State, and reaches into every
corner of a State's territory. Pp. 210-216"
(a)
The illegal aliens who are plaintiffs in these cases challenging
the statute may claim the benefit of the Equal Protection Clause,
which provides that no State shall "deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Fifth
Amendment: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or
otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment
of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval
forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war
or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same
offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall
be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process
of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without
just compensation."
Now,
here's where the argument starts: The
Politics of Immigration: "1791 (ratified): First 10 amendments
to the Constitution ("Bill of Rights"). Guarantee basic rights
of freedom of religion and of speech, the right to protest, the
right to freedom from unreasonable searches, and the right to
due process, including the right to remain silent. Nothing in
the text limits these rights to citizens; several rights are specifically
guaranteed to "the people" or a "person."
But
- did that mean those who enter the country illegally? Congress
has the absolute right to set immigration laws. Our immigration
law says if you enter this country without being invited, without
the proper documentation you're an illegal alien. So, how does
that give that "person" a U.S. Constitutional right under the
Bill of Rights?
Right
now the American people are beyond enraged about what's going
on with the illegals invasion. Polls are showing the people want
those illegal minors shipped out of here instead of dumped in
their schools. There's no question the criminal impostor in the
White House is going to attempt to use an Executive Order to grant
amnesty to tens of millions of liars, cheats and thieves without
any regard to background checks, health checks or anything else.
Do you know EOs have been overturned by the courts? Yes,
they have when a lawsuit is filed and properly argued.
The
BIG magnet all these years has been what they can steal from you,
your children and grand children. Trillions of dollars spent on
illegals since Reagan is paid for by borrowed money with the interest
slapped on our backs. Want to drive millions and millions of illegals
out of this country? STOP ALL WELFARE IN ANY FORM AND
KICK ILLEGAL MINORS OUT OF AMERICA'S SCHOOLS, COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES.
Get
Ready To Get Sick No Health Screenings of Illegals, What Isn't
Being Reported on the Border Stampede and, in a liberal bastion
of all places: Historic
Boston Protest Against Illegals - thousands, not hundreds.
GAME
PLAN: Dirty Harry's bill is just about tailor made. It
may need a little fine tuning to get the statutes up to speed.
At the time, it had a grand total of 3 cosponsors; two Republicans
and one Democrat. But, as I said, Sec. 503 needs to be removed.
The simple bill I wrote using California's Prop 187 is more explicit.
See Appendix at the end. Section
503 of Reid's bill must be replaced with Sections 5, 6 &
7 of the bill I wrote.
Congress
goes back into session in a couple of weeks. Please call or fax
your U.S. House member if he/she is a strong opponent of amnesty.
The same for these specific senators: Ted Cruz, Jeff Sessions
and Richard Shelby who was one of the three cosponsors to Reid's
bill in 1993. Tell them about Reid's bill, give the bill number:
S. 1351 (103rd): Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993. Tell them
you want it introduced in the House and Senate - with the exception
about Sec. 503 that puts real teeth into cutting off benefits.
If you can, fax the short bill I wrote and ask that Sec. 503 of
Reid's bill be deleted and Sections 5, 6 & 7 of the bill I
wrote be inserted.
This
can be done by the time the Outlaw Congress reopens the candy
store, September 8th. Get it introduced and put on the heat to
get Boehner to put it to a vote. The same in the senate and let's
see what Dirty Harry Reid has to say - after all, it would be
99% of his own bill!
Democrats
are in serious trouble over any amnesty and this latest surge
of illegals regardless of age. We know the malignant narcissist
would immediately veto the bill (even though he's an impostor
president), BUT Congress has the power to over ride his
veto. In a straight party vote in the House, it should
pass. In the senate, we would need a half dozen Democrats and
it would pass there. Democrats know Barry Soetoro aka Obama has
become toxic. They value reelection more than a lame duck "president".
Those would be Mary Kay Hagen (NC), Mark Pryor (AR) Mary Landrieu
(LA.), and Mark Begich (AK). The following Democrats are too scared
to comment on Obama threatening to use an EO to grant amnesty:
Al Franken (Minn.), Mark Warner (Va.), Merkley (Ore.) and Jeanne
Shaheen (N.H.).
Should
it not get passed in this session ending December 31st, it can
get reintroduced in January 2015. If the Republicans take the
senate, then there will be NO excuses - pass the bill intact and
over ride Barry's veto. Would it not be delicious irony for Dirty
Harry's bill (with the mentioned additions from mine) to get passed
into law?
As
for the U.S. Supreme Court: "[How] to check these unconstitutional
invasions of... rights by the Federal judiciary? Not by
impeachment in the first instance, but by a strong protestation
of both houses of Congress that such and such doctrines advanced
by the Supreme Court are contrary to the Constitution; and if
afterwards they relapse into the same heresies, impeach and set
the whole adrift. For what was the government divided
into three branches, but that each should watch over the others
and oppose their usurpations?" --Thomas Jefferson to Nathaniel
Macon, 1821. (*) FE 10:192
Congress
can make it very clear: The U.S. Supreme Court in Plyler v
Doe was a bad decision because it made new "law" allowing
ILLEGALS to receive benefits they have no right to since they
are on U.S. soil illegally. God almighty. Tell your U.S. House
member and Senator to stop being such gutless cowards. If "supreme'
court justices make bad decision, impeach them or shut the hell
up. We are fighting here for our very survival. We don't need
sissies, wimps or political whores. We need warriors who aren't
worried about their next election.
This
is going to take massive heat and we the people had better step
up to the plate because illegals and their supporters
are going to storm Congress next month demanding amnesty.
They've announced their intentions. We the people must crush any
amnesty and take away the big magnet of welfare in all forms.
Have you had enough being raped to pay for illegals to get free
medical when you are having trouble paying your own health premiums?
Your child is about to be exposed to TB and other diseases because
more than 60,000 illegal minors are going to be put in schools
across this country next month who are not only diseased, most
of them speak no English. What a nightmare for school districts.
Are you fed up with paying for all the crimes committed by illegals
and the cost of prosecuting and incarcerating them?
Then
tell your US. rep and senator: No, but hell no - NO amnesty
regardless of country of origin or how long an illegal has been
here. Deport not reward.
Hundreds
More Criminal Illegal Aliens With Brutal Records Released Onto
American Streets. "Earlier this year a report from the Center
for Immigration Studies showed the Obama administration released
68,000 criminal illegal aliens onto the streets of the United
States. Many of those released have criminal records of armed
robbery, assault, rape and homicide. -In 2013, ICE targeted only
195,000, or 25 percent, out of 722,000 potentially deportable
aliens they encountered. Most of these aliens came to ICE’s attention
after incarceration for a local arrest. ICE released 68,000 criminal
aliens in 2013, or 35 percent of the criminal aliens encountered
by officers. The vast majority of these releases occurred because
of the Obama administration's prosecutorial discretion policies,
not because the aliens were not deportable."
Demand
they vote to pass Dirty Harry's bill eliminating his Sec. 503
with Sections 5, 6 and 7 of the bill I wrote denying illegals
access to our schools and medical. See Appendix
for my bill.
Links:
1
- Obama’s
Deputies Release 169 Foreign Killers Into US Neighborhoods
2 - Obama
Preparing Executive Order To Flood Job Market With Millions Of
Illegal Aliens
(High tech & low skill which will hurt Americans of all races
3 - Huge
protest against illegal immigration in Massachusetts
4 - While
Democrats Push for Amnesty, 77% of Americans Want Illegals Sent
Home
While the numbers are bit outdated - we know they've grown exponentially-
5 - Go
look at how much we the people have been raped to give a free
ride to liars, cheats and thieves.
6 - Understanding
Executive Orders and abuses
Click
here to visit NewsWithViews.com
home page.
©
2014 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy - All Rights Reserved
APPENDIX
This is the
simple bill I wrote to convert California's Prop 187 into federal:
DRAFT
H.R.
___
H.R.
_________________________
113th
CONGRESS
2nd
Session
H.
R. _____
To
enforce U.S. immigration laws by removing all financial incentives
for illegal aliens regardless of age or country of origin.
IN
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Month 2014
____________________
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Subcommittee
on Border and Maritime Security under the Department of Homeland
Security.
A
BILL
To
relieve the American people of crippling financial costs of services
provided to individuals regardless of age or country of origin
who have no legal right to be on U.S. soil.
Be
it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION
1. SHORT TITLE.
This
Act may be cited as the
SECTION
1. Findings and Declaration.
The
People of these united States of America for decades have suffered
and are suffering economic hardship caused by the presence of
illegal aliens. Hundreds of billions of dollars a dollars a year
are spent for welfare, education, medical and incarceration costs
for individuals who have no right to be on U.S. soil passed on
to the hard working men and women of America
That
they have suffered and are suffering personal injury and damage
caused by the criminal conduct of illegal aliens in throughout
the states of the Union.
That
they have a right to the protection of their government from any
person or persons entering this country unlawfully.
Therefore,
this bill declares it is the intention of this bill to provide
for cooperation between agencies of state and local government
with the federal government, and to establish a system of required
notification by and between such agencies to prevent illegal aliens
regardless of age or country of origina in the United States from
receiving any benefits or public services in any state of the
Union.
SECTION
2. Manufacture, Distribution or Sale of False Citizenship or Resident
Alien Documents: Crime and Punishment.
Any
person who manufactures, distributes or sells false documents
to conceal the true citizenship or resident alien status of another
person is guilty of a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment
in the state prison for five years or by a fine of seventy-five
thousand dollars ($75,000).
SECTION
3. Use of False Citizenship or Resident Alien Documents: Crime
and Punishment.
Any
person who uses false documents to conceal his or her true citizenship
or resident alien status is guilty of a felony, and shall be punished
by imprisonment in the state prison for five years or by a fine
of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).
SECTION
4. Law Enforcement Cooperation with ICE.
(a)
All law enforcement agencies in the 50 states must fully cooperate
with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (hereinafter
referred to as ICE) regarding any person who is arrested if he
or she is suspected of being present in the United States in violation
of federal immigration laws.
(b)
With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected
of being present in the United States in violation of federal
immigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the following::
(1)
Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen
of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent
resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of
time or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation
of immigration laws. The verification process may include, but
shall not be limited to, questioning the person regarding his
or her date and place of birth, and entry into the United States,
and demanding documentation to indicate his or her legal status.
(2)
Notify the person of his or her apparent status as an alien who
is present in the United States in violation of federal immigration
laws and inform him or her that, apart from any criminal justice
proceedings, he or she will be deported immediately.
(3)
Immediately notify ICE of the apparent illegal status and provide
any additional information that may be requested by any other
public entity.
(c) Any legislative, administrative, or other action by a city,
county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity
with jurisdictional boundaries, or by a law enforcement agency,
to prevent or limit the cooperation required by subdivision (a)
is expressly prohibited.
SECTION
5. Exclusion of Illegal Aliens from Public Social Services.
(a)
In order to carry out the intention of the People of these united
States of America that only citizens of the United States and
aliens lawfully admitted to the United States may receive the
benefits of public social services and to ensure that all persons
employed in the providing of those services shall diligently protect
public funds from misuse, the provisions of this section are adopted.
(b)
A person shall not receive any public social services, specifically
food stamps (federal or state), welfare (state or federal), unemployment
(state or federal) or any other publicly funded programs to which
he or she may be otherwise entitled until the legal status of
that person has been verified as one of the following:
(1)
A citizen of the United States.
(2)
An alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident.
(3)
An alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time.
(c)
If any public entity in the fifty states is state to whom a person
has applied for public social services determines or reasonably
suspects, based upon the information provided to it, that the
person is an alien in the United States in violation of federal
law, the following procedures shall be followed by the public
entity:
(1)
The entity shall not provide the person with benefits or services.
(2)
The entity shall, in writing, notify the person of his or her
apparent illegal immigration status, and that the person must
either obtain legal status or leave the United States.
(3)
The entity shall also notify the ICE of the apparent illegal status,
and shall provide any additional information that may be requested
by any other public entity.
SECTION
6. Exclusion of Illegal Aliens from Publicly Funded Health Care.
(a)
In order to carry out the intention of the People of these united
States of America, excepting emergency medical care, only citizens
of the United States and aliens lawfully admitted to the United
States may receive the benefits of publicly-funded health care,
and to ensure that all persons employed in the providing of those
services shall diligently protect public funds from misuse, the
provisions of this section are adopted.
(b)
A person shall not receive any health care services from a publicly-funded
health care facility, to which he or she is otherwise entitled
until the legal status of that person has been verified as one
of the following:
(1)
A citizen of the United States.
(2)
An alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident.
(3)
An alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time.
(c)
If any publicly-funded health care facility in the fifty states
from whom a person seeks health care services, other than emergency
medical care, determines or reasonably suspects, based upon the
information provided to it, that the person is an alien in the
United States in violation of federal law, the following procedures
shall be followed by the facility:
(1)
The facility shall not provide the person with services.
(2)
The facility shall, in writing, notify the person of his or her
apparent illegal immigration status, and that the person must
be deported immediately. If the illegal alien is a female who
has given birth, both she and her child shall be deported as that
child does not automatically become a citizen of these United
States of America. The popular "legal" myth that a child born
of an illegal on U.S. soil, "anchor baby" has no legal definition
under the Fourteenth Amendment.
(3)
The facility shall also notify ICE of the apparent illegal status,
and shall provide any additional information that may be requested
by any other public entity.
(d)
For purposes of this section "publicly-funded health care facility"
shall be defined as ___________________________________________.
SECTION
7. Exclusion of Illegal Aliens from Public or Private Elementary,
Secondary or High Schools as Well as Any Junior College, Community
College, University or College in Any of the Fifty States.
(a)
No public or private elementary, secondary or high Schools as
well as any junior college, community college, university or college
shall admit, or permit the attendance of, any child who is not
a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as
a permanent resident, or a person who is otherwise authorized
under federal law to be present in the United States.
(b)
Commencing January 1, 2015, each school district shall verify
the legal status of each child enrolling in the school district
for the first time in order to ensure the enrollment or attendance
only of citizens, aliens lawfully admitted as permanent residents,
or persons who are otherwise authorized to be present in the United
States.
(c)
By January 1, 2015, each school district shall have verified the
legal status of each child already enrolled and in attendance
in the school district in order to ensure the enrollment or attendance
only of citizens, aliens lawfully admitted as permanent residents,
or persons who are otherwise authorized under federal law to be
present in the United States.
(d)
By January 1, 2015, each school district shall also have verified
the legal status of each parent or guardian of each child referred
to in subdivisions (b) and (c), to determine whether such parent
or guardian is one of the following:
(1)
A citizen of the United States.
(2)
An alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident.
(3)
An alien admitted lawfully for a temporary period of time.
(e)
Each school district in the fifty states shall provide information
to ICE regarding any enrollee or pupil, or parent or guardian,
attending a public or private elementary, secondary or high Schools
as well as any junior college, community college, university or
college determined or reasonably suspected to be in violation
of federal immigration laws within thirty days after becoming
aware of an apparent violation. The notice shall also be provided
to the parent or legal guardian of the enrollee or pupil, and
shall state that an existing pupil may not continue to attend
the school effective thirty days from the date of the notice,
unless legal status is established.
SECTION
8. Attorney Generals of the fifty states cooperation with ICE.
(a)
Whenever a state, city or a county, or any other legally authorized
local governmental entity with jurisdictional boundaries reports
the presence of a person who is suspected of being present in
the United States in violation of federal immigration laws that
report shall be transmitted to ICE. The Attorneys General shall
be responsible for maintaining on-going and accurate records of
such reports, and shall provide any additional information that
may be requested by any other government entity.
SECTION
9. So called 'sanctuary cities'.
(a)
This law will apply to every city, town, township, parish or other
designation. 'Sanctuary cities' are political creations and not
exempt from this law.
SECTION
10. Amendment and Severability.
The
statutory provisions contained in this measure may not be amended
by the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Congress makes immigration
laws not the U.S. Supreme Court. An individual, regardless of
age or country of origin, who is in the U.S. illegally has no
constitutional rights because they are not citizens. If found
to be in the U.S. illegally, he or she will be deported as quickly
as possible back to their country of origin. Click
here to go back to the main article.
©
2014 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy - All Rights Reserved