9/11 - Build Those Models

By Devvy Kidd
Exclusive To


As I and so many others have written over the past decade, September 11, 2001, is the reason for all the draconian Bill of Rights killing legislation like the mis-named 'Patriot' Act, John Warner Defense Authorization Act, NDAA and police state level snooping on U.S. citizens by the NSA. 9/11 IS the reason for the build up of a totalitarian police state in this country and it's all based on heinous lies.

Thousands of fiercely patriotic, dedicated Americans have spent more than a decade making sure 9/11 doesn't fade into lost memories like other false flag operations of the past starting with Pearl Harbor. We now know FDR wanted the Japanese to attack first, knew they were coming and did nothing while 2,403 Americans were acceptable casualties in order to draw America into another war. A book I can't highly recommend enough by a serious historical researcher/writer, Patrick Buchanan: Churchill, Hitler and "The Unnecessary War".

As time goes by "incidents" like the downing of KAL 007, TWA Flight 800, Ruby Ridge, WACO and the OKC bombing fade into the dust bins of history, the lies and cover up issued by the General Government under this president or that president under one of the two "main" parties. One bird of prey with two wings. The families and victims keep praying for the truth while the whores in the Outlaw Congress do everything in their power to keep truth as far away from the unwashed masses as possible.

In the case of 9/11, so complete and forceful have the lies spewed by the federal government and all it's mouthpieces been, most Americans recoil as if bitten by a cobra at the mere mention that "something just isn't right" about the official narrative. It's just too much to even think about much less sacrifice time doing research.

Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—about 9/11? is an outstanding piece by Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C.

“If what you are saying is true, I don't want to know!” exclaimed a young male visitor at our 9/11 Truth booth at the Denver People's Fair. He was referring to the evidence of controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center (WTC) skyscrapers on September 11, 2001.

“Why?” I asked. “Because if what you are saying is true, I would become very negative. Psychologically, I would go downhill.” With gratitude, I responded “Thank you!” Surprised, he asked, “Why are you thanking me?” “Because it's rare to hear such raw truth. Thank you for being so honest.”

"Softened by our exchange, the young man chatted with me a while longer before taking his leave. I have never forgotten him; he has likely never forgotten me. We both felt it. Paradoxically, deep truth had been shared.  

"We who work to educate the public about 9/11, and about false flag operations,2 are puzzled by the often forceful resistance from our listeners. Yet, many of us in the 9/11 Truth Movement also once vigorously resisted this challenging evidence. We have our own stories to document this. What drives those negative reactions?

"Before continuing, I would like to clarify that people who continue to resist the evidence that indicates 9/11 was a false flag operation are no more mentally healthy or unhealthy than those of us who question the official account. Both groups consist of folks who span the mental health spectrum. So, there is no need to pathologize those who currently do not see what is now so clear to us, just as those of us in the 9/11 Truth Movement should not be dismissed and maligned as “conspiracy theorists”— the latter being an obvious defense and a not so obvious offense.3
"The psychology professionals interviewed in the documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth clearly speak about our human tendencies toward denial in order to avoid the discomfort of cognitive dissonance. They speak compassionately about all of us. There is no sophisticated name-calling (diagnosing) as can sometimes be popular among the members of this profession. This is indeed refreshing. In this spirit, and in the spirit of beginning a conversation—for we humans are complicated creatures—I will share my thinking as to why some of us defend ourselves from information that is troubling."

Ms. Shure's essay is one that should be read by everyone because she does such a great service explaining the title of her piece. Anyone who undertakes the search for truth as Ms. Shure writes above: "Yet, many of us in the 9/11 Truth Movement also once vigorously resisted this challenging evidence" - including yours truly. It took me about 18 months when I finally said, I have to know even if it's as ugly as the cover ups I cited at the beginning of this column. I'm of the same mindset as Patrick Henry: "For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it".

While there is no reporting on the work of Architects and Engineers Truth 9/11 by the old media, including cable networks like FOX except a hit piece now and then long ago, whose anchors ridicule and slash and burn anyone questioning the official story, there is much to tell about their work. Let me cover this that probably few are aware of:

Conclusion of Our Report on September Congressional Outreach - December 29, 2013
AE911Truth Teams Sweep Through Capitol Hill

"We reported back in October that we were Encouraging the Senate to ReThink 911 when we visited them during our September Action of the Month. We detailed Pamela Senzee’s visit with Ben Sundholm, Legislative Correspondent for Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ). In this article we highlight the other actions we took to educate members of Congress while we were in Washington.

"Wayne Coste, P.E., visited several Congressional offices the week before the DC911Truth Conference. We then invited conference attendees to join us in visiting their members of Congress. AE911Truth founder and CEO Richard Gage, AIA, hosted a group amounting to a dozen who traversed the honored halls the day after the conference. We attempted at least two dozen drop-in visits, with a constituent, for each of these members of Congress:" Rest at link.

At the bottom of that report, Richard Gage, AIA, spoke the truth: "Each time I go back I come away with the realization that these people are political animals - and are likely to continue doing nothing about the mass hypnosis and public myth known as 9/11, until their constituents either force them to do something, or force them out of office. We are now placing our focus on educating the American people directly - through efforts such as the ReThink911 ad campaign."

9/11 is a very complicated lie. If you go to the link above, ReThink911 ad campaign, you'll see there is a serious world wide effort to bring the truth front and center. I interviewed Richard Gage years ago when I had my radio show. He is as passionate and dedicated as anyone you'll find because he knows the monstrous lies told to the victims, families and people around the world about what really happened that day.

There have been endless theories about what brought down those towers. It certainly was not directed energy weapons as some believe. Please, don't send me hate mail about Dr. Judy Wood and her work. If people want to believe her theory, that's certainly their right; I don't. I have read her material and watched a few videos, but my mind is firmly on nanothermite in the basement of the twin towers. Just like OKC which was blown from the inside; another gigantic lie spoon fed to the American people to cover up a blown sting operation. Your eyes tell you the truth.

And, so it was on 9/11 when tens of thousands of ordinary, working folks saw with their own eyes the two planes hit the towers. They were not victims of mind control and certainly had/have no reason to lie. For those who haven't done a great deal of research on what really caused those buildings to collapse because it was not fire, Dr. Steven Jones, a physicist, is a name well known in the 9/11 truth movement. Education: Cornell University, Brigham Young University, Vanderbilt University. His specialty: Muon-catalyzed fusion, metal-catalyzed fusion, archaeometry, solar energy; Research group: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical.

Dr. Jones paid dearly for his research about controlled demolitions, nanothermite and the collapse of those towers. He was run out of his job (he retired) in an attempt to silence him. I would like to refer you to this video of Dr. Jones. It's a 46 minute presentation on the controlled demolition of those two towers. Under the video box it says Show More; those comments are an important read. I know time is at a premium, but if you take the time to watch the video, you will not come away from it believing the government's fairy tale any longer.
Thermite has its own oxygen and doesn't need atmospheric oxygen to burn. If you'll go over to this site, Thermite and the WTC Collapses, you will see an excellent photo presentation. Molten steel burned under the rubble for months.

Michael Ruppert's, Crossing the Rubicon, was published in 2004; I read it. Although I disagree with him about peak oil, his research at that time was excellent. Many do not know the WTC towers were closed the weekend before 9/11; an unusual and rare event. Why and who was in charge of security? Answered in Crossing as well as questions asked and answered that I don't think most Americans know anything about as it relates to stock trading that day and much more.

You just have to get facts the old media and cable "news" networks like FOX refuse to cover - just like OKC and the eye witnesses who saw two men in the basement area of the building a couple of days before it was blown near the columns looking like they were doing something wrong. Witnesses said they didn't look like they should even be in the Murrah Building.. My dear, dear friend, retired Brig. General Ben Partin, was a guest speaker at an event I put on in Santa Clara, California back in June 1998. This video is Ben's analysis of OKC. For those unfamiliar with his background, he spent 33 years in the Air Force designing sophisticated weapons systems.

I believe most Americans can remember exactly where they were that day. Probably a billion people around the world watched at least the first few hours depending on time zones. A good friend of mine who is now deceased, God rest his soul, Jerry Longspaugh, who provided me with the raw footage that eventually became the full length video, OKC Cover Up, called and woke me up that morning after the first tower was hit. Other than potty breaks, I spent 15 hours watching all the coverage until I couldn't stand it anymore.

Once the dust settled as they say, allegations of an inside job came in waves. Without stepping on anyone's efforts and God bless all those who have remained committed these past 12 years to getting the truth out, I would say the two organizations are in the forefront. One is Pilots for 9/11 Truth. These are very serious individuals with a thousand years experience (those who belong and contribute) in aviation. I have many of their DVDs and while some of the technical "stuff" I don't understand, the important overall picture I get.

Everyday I get 10 emails to watch some You Tube. I simply don't have time and a lot of them are just a waste of my time because the subject matter is usually the latest distraction. However, Pilots for 9/11 Truth put one out in January 2012. It is 45 minutes of your time well spent and a must watch in my opinion. The individuals in that video, Pilots for 9/11 Truth: World Trade Center Attack, know what they're talking about and make it easy to understand using visuals.

The other organization is the one I mentioned above, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. I direct you to this page as a superb source of evidence - not speculation. Now, on the left side of that page, you'll see Ed Asner. Click on the link. It's a 15 minute presentation that is so very important. I know, Asner is a socialist, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. That 15 minutes contains visual proof Building 7 did not collapse because it was part of 'collateral' damage from the twin towers.

The amount of evidence on that page was put together by Americans who want nothing more than the truth to be told and a real, unbiased, official investigation. Personally, I believe individuals like Michael Rupert, David Ray Griffin, the principles and members of Pilots for 911 Truth and AE for 9/11 Truth should testify in front of a congressional committee live on C-SPAN for the world to watch. I doubt FOX would cover it, although give credit where credit is due, they did air a critical interview about Building 7, once. The previously named individuals are the ones to get the truth on record - not liars for hire who work for NIST or any government agency. We've already heard from them.

Haul in Dick Cheney and put him on the stand under oath - although I have no doubt whatsoever he would take the Fifth. A whole lot of people believe George Bush, Jr., knew what happened that day based on his reaction that morning at the elementary school in Florida. I am not one of those. I don't believe he knew because I don't believe the architects who planned and executed 9/11 could trust that puppet, who I never thought was very intelligent, with the truth. Also Colonel Rick Gibney who was a major at the time. See my investigation here:

"And, last but not least, is an interview with a man who claims to have interviewed the pilot who shot down Flight 93, a Col. Donn de Grand-Pre, U.S. Army (ret.):

"Colonel, before we take these four final calls, go over that a little bit slower for folks. That's a big deal. You talked to the pilot, a friend of yours, who shot down Flight 93 that was going for the Capitol or the White House. And go over that for folks.

"DGP: Okay, quick rundown. They were out of Hector Field, Fargo, North Dakota. A bunch, this 119 Fighter Group and they are called the Happy Hooligans. They are probably the best interceptors that we have in the country. They were moved to Langley Air Force Base from Hector Field down to Southern Virginia. And when the klaxon horn went off at 9:35, those two pilots put down their coffee and shot into their aircraft and took off. They didn't know where they were going initially but by 10:00 hours, they had rendezvoused over Southern Pennsylvania. That's about 250 miles in just a matter of minutes and engaged 93 with two side-winder missiles. And they accomplished their objective. Now Hector Field, I use to fly out of Hector Field some time ago. I know most of those pilots. I could name names. I know the National Guard Adj. General. And they were decorated about a year later and I have the full write up of that story in my book."

"I was able to find out this regarding the 119th Fighter Group:

"The announcement was made in March 1999 that the 119th Fighter Wing would convert from an air defense mission to a general purpose mission with 15 F-16A/B aircraft while activating an alert detachment at Langley AFB, VA. In its 2005 BRAC Recommendations, DoD recommended to realign Hector International Airport Air Guard Station, ND. The 119th Fighter Wing's F-16s (15 aircraft) would retire. The wing's expeditionary combat support elements would remain in place. Hector (125) ranked low in military value. The reduction in F-16 force structure and the need to align common versions of the F-16 at the same bases argued for realigning Hector to allow its aircraft to retire without a flying mission backfill."

"Yes, they were flying F-16s out of North Dakota and it was widely reported that immediately following the crash, two F-16s showed up. Whether or not these fighter jets were scrambled from Hector Field is unknown to any degree of certainty. I could fine no references to this unit flying Warthogs out of Hector Field. It is my understanding that the actual individual who "pulled the trigger" is a Maj. Rick Gibney." [End of excerpt]

Building 7. My husband was an engineer for 43 years before he retired. Like thousands of other engineers who saw the collapse of that building, the first thing he said was a controlled implosion. We know the order was given to "pull it" (click here). Amazingly, TV news stations actually showed Building 7 collapsing 20 minutes before it did! A man in the UK sued over that fraud and won: UK Man Wins Court Victory Over BBC for 9/11 Coverup Broadcast
In some videos, you can see the white puffs floor by floor as it pancakes- just like both towers. One doesn't just wire a 47 story building in an hour or two or even six. It takes days and in the case of Building 7, it was an implosion meaning the building was to collapse into its own footprint. Setting up a skyscraper like that takes days, not a few hours. The question is why Building 7? Who and what was in that building? I direct you to this page: Building What?” The Strange Fall of WTC-7. Really one should read all of it, but in particular </>sections: Early Evacuation and Explosions at WTC-7 and Stranded Aides Make Unsettling Reports.

Robert Motch is a dear friend who has written the most comprehensive details about those who really control this country and much of the world: seven secret societies. He's also spent a massive amount of time looking into 9/11. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have been all over this country for many years educating the American people about the three buildings. Robert has come up with an idea he believes could bust this wide open: Build a model to scale of the south twin tower and also Building 7. He explains it here; use a word search (Control F) for Darmouth.

Robert believes Architects and Engineers could team up with Darmouth, home of the Thayer School of Engineering. Make it a project. Build the south tower as he explains and then light the match. Prove to the world in real time that a 1350' skyscraper did not collapse because of jet fuel or fire. Everything that can be written about 9/11 without real congressional hearings has been written. Excellent conferences such as the big one in Toronto a few years ago are already on the record. AE for 9/11 Truth have excellent tools for informing the public; brochures, etc. But, seeing is believing, which is why Robert Motch is so keen to get this project underway.
You and your group might want to contact Richard Gage at AE911Truth and see what he thinks about the viability of project Build Those Models. Personally, I think students at Darmouth's engineering school would jump at the chance.

Other resources:

Top documentary is this 1 hour 30 minute film: 911 Mysteries: Demolitions
If you can't watch it now, bookmark for later, but it's well worth the time because your eyes will tell you the truth.

My 9/11 Archives
My earliest 9/11 columns on my CD, not on the link above

In addition to the web sites for Pilots for 9/11 Truth and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, I also highly recommend the books below because they are not just the author's opinion. Those books are fully footnoted with sources and once you read them, only someone in complete denial will discount the truth contained in them. Those millions of us who have spent so much time looking into 9/11 haven't done it because we have nothing better to do with our time and money or because we're "Bush haters". All we seek is the truth because the victims, the families of those murdered and we the people deserve the whole truth, not more lies.

The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 by David Ray Griffin and Richard Falk (Mar 30, 2004)
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions by David Ray Griffin (Nov 30, 2004)
Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory by David Ray Griffin (May 1, 2007)
The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé by David Ray Griffin (Sep 1, 2008)
The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False by David Ray Griffin (Sept 8, 2009)
Donate to
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


This Site Served by TheHostPros