Media scoundrels specialize
in distorting comments and meaning.
They're hyperbolic over Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi saying
Syria would only use chemical weapons against external aggression.
His message was clear. Distortion, misinterpretation, and willful lying
about it followed. Inflammatory headlines blared. More on what Makdissi
meant below.
At the State Department's daily press briefing, Victoria Nuland commented
on Syria's chemical weapons, saying:
Talk about using chemical weapons "is horrific and chilling." Syria
"has a responsibility to the world (and) its own citizens to protect
and safeguard those weapons."
Any "kind of loose talk just speaks to the kind of regime that we're
talking about."
"I think we've been absolutely clear where we stand on this issue, which
is that any possible use of these kinds of weapons would be completely
unacceptable."
"We’ve been making our position clear for many, many days now, and we’ve
also been working with all of our allies and partners to monitor the
situation, to compare information, and to send the same messages."
Syria "knows where we stand." Asked about securing them, Nuland said
"warnings that we have given with regard" to these weapons have "been
absolutely clear."
Asked about warning regime opponents, she added nothing further. Asked
also to comment on Washington's position on a potential Israeli attack,
she said "obviously I'm not going to walk into hypothetical scenarios."
"Like all countries in the neighborhood, it makes sense for there to
be prudent planning for self-defense."
Reports suggest Washington and Israel discussed destroying Syria's stockpiles.
Both countries know where they're held. Allegedly they're in dozens
of locations. Bombing them would unleash a firestorm of toxins. Everyone
nearby would be harmed.
The threat of a chemical weapon false flag attack blamed on Syria is
real. On June 10, Russia Today headlined "Syrian rebels aim to use chemical
weapons, blame Damascus - report," saying:
Opposition fighters have chemical weapons. Libyan sources supplied them.
Allegedly they're planned for use "against civilians." The scheme involves
blaming Assad.
DamPress "claims the opposition group in possession of the weapons is
being trained in its use inside Turkey. No further details on the alleged
conspiracy is given."
"The Libyan stockpile of chemical weapons was a matter of great concern
during last year’s civil war in the country. There were fears that they
may end up in the hands of the terrorists and used elsewhere in the
world."
Independent analysts also fear a possible US-led NATO/Free Syrian Army
(FSA) false flag chemical attack on Syrian civilians blamed on Assad.
Doing so would provide Washington an easy way to circumvent Security
Council authority to intervene militarily and enlist popular support
for it.
If harmful enough, it could be Syria's 9/11. American strategists may
find that scheme too tempting to pass up. Regime change is longstanding
US policy.
NATO and regional allies head closer to war. A casus belli remains to
initiate it. The horror of chemical attack mass casualties looks perfect.
Whether it's planned or not remains to be seen. The possibility is real.
Media War of Words
On July 23, The New York Times headlined "Syria Threatens Chemical Attack
on Foreign Force," saying:
"Syrian officials warned Monday that they would deploy chemical weapons
against any foreign intervention...."
"The warning came out of Damascus, veiled behind an assurance that the
Syrian leadership would never use such weapons against its own citizens,
describing chemical and biological arms as outside the bounds of the
kind of guerrilla warfare being fought internally."
The Times cited CIA reports saying:
"Syria has had a C.W. program for many years and has a stockpile of
C.W. agents, which can be delivered by aerial bombs, ballistic missiles,
and artillery rockets."
"We assess that Syria remains dependent on foreign sources for key elements
of its C.W. program, including precursor chemicals."
Syria's arsenal includes "the nerve agent sarin, which can be delivered
by aircraft or ballistic missile."
On July 24, Reuters headlined "After bloody week, West warns Syria on
chemical arms," saying:
"Western states expressed alarm" after Syria acknowledged its capability
for the first time. Makdissi said chemical weapons won't be used against
insurgents "regardless of (internal) developments."
"These weapons are stored and secured by Syrian military forces and
under (their) direct supervision and will never be used unless Syria
faces external aggression."
The Mossad-connected DEBKAfile (DF) published various reports hyping
an alleged Syrian chemical weapons threat.
It's latest July 23 one headlined "Syrian chemical threat targets Israel.
Obama warns Assad against 'tragic mistake,' " saying:
Makdissi's statement indicated "a direct threat (against) Israel." On
Sunday, Netanyahu said preventing Syria's chemical weapons from "falling
into the wrong hands" was key to Israel's security.
Defense Minister Ehud Barak ordered the IDF to prepare possibly attacking
their storage areas because "Israel cannot accept the transfer of advanced
weapons from Syria to Lebanon."
Nothing, of course, suggests Assad plans this. Hyping the threat advances
the ball for war.
Guilty parties include US officials, Israeli ones, Britain's Foreign
Secretary William Hague, France's Minister of Foreign Affairs Laurent
Fabius, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, UN/Arab League Syria envoy
Kofi Annan, and Human Rights Council High Commissioner Navanethem Pillay,
among others.
DF is part of the regime change campaign. It cited an unnamed Israeli
official saying Assad "holds all the cards on when and against whom
to use its chemical weapons."
Assad gave "himself carte blanche for resorting to chemical warfare
at a time of his choosing by (saying) his government is subject to external
Arab and Western aggression."
Indeed he's very much threatened. Alleging he's hyping what doesn't
exist ignores reality.
DF cited an unnamed US military source saying Assad is "preparing to
expand the Syria war into Lebanon whence his troops can threaten northern
and Mediterranean areas of Israel."
In a Monday speech to veterans, Obama said Syria "will be held accountable
by the international community and the United States should they make
the tragic mistake of using those weapons."
Hyping fake threats conceals real ones Syria faces. Distorting comments
by its officials advances the ball for war. Washington planned it years
ago. Electoral politics influence its timetable. Whether it comes before
of post-election doesn't matter. Regime change policy remains unchanged.
Syria Responds to Western Distortions and Deceit
On July 23, SANA state media headlined "Information Minister: Foreign
Media and Diplomatic (Sides) Misconstrued Foreign Ministry Statement
and Put it Out of Context," saying:
Makdissi's meaning was clear. Since early 2011, Syria's been a battleground.
Western-generated violence continues daily. International law legitimizes
self-defense.
Syria's in a war for survival. Its people know the stakes. They deplore
becoming another Afghanistan, Iraq, or Libya. They expect their government
to do what it takes to prevent it. Makdissi and other officials vow
to do so. It's their right and duty.
Information Minister Omran al-Zoubi told Sham FM Radio about "an international
campaign led by US-Israeli diplomacy under the guise of warning against
alleged chemical weapons that Syria supposedly possesses, and that this
campaign is part of ongoing pressure to pass an international resolution
under the pretext of preserving world peace."
For over two decades, he added, Syria called for abolishing all regional
WMDs. Israel's open secret is well known. Its formidable nuclear, chemical,
and biological arsenal poses the most significant threat.
It has hundreds of warheads and sophisticated long-range delivery systems.
It never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT).
It signed the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), but didn't ratify
it. It never signed the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). Its
policy is CBW ambiguity, but worse than that.
Analysts most familiar with Israeli strategy acknowledge that it won't
hesitate using nuclear or other weapons to advance its regional imperium.
Against Lebanon in 2006, Gaza during Cast Lead, and other attacks, it
used direct energy weapons, chemical and/or biological agents. Injuries
and symptoms followed never before seen.
The Palestinian health ministry said Israel used a new type explosive
in Gaza. It contained toxins and radioactive materials. They burned
and tore victims’ bodies from the inside. They also left long term deformations.
Since the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Israel's been using depleted uranium
weapons. Washington initially supplied them. America's military and
Israel use them freely.
They're used in bombs, shells, missiles, and bullets. They spread deadly
radiation like nuclear bombs. Vast areas get contaminated. Water, air,
soil, and food become unsafe. Cancer and other disease rates soar. Locations
far from target sites are affected.
No evidence suggests Syria used WMDs of any kind or plans to except
in self-defense against external aggression. Washington and Israel use
them freely in all wars they wage and other belligerence.
Fingers pointing the right way would blame them. Media scoundrels say
nothing. Cheerleading war instead of forthrightly denouncing it threatens
to embroil the entire region.
Perhaps Washington, key NATO partners, and regional allies won't be
satisfied until it's incinerated. Unless years of belligerent madness
stops, end game consequences may demolish it from one end to the other.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled "How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized
Banking, Government Collusion and Class War"
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge
discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News
Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time
and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy
listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour
Likud, Kadima, Labor, or new centrist party leadership hardly matters.
Israel remains hardline, belligerent, and repressive. Arab citizens
have no rights.
They and most Jews chafe under neoliberal harshness. Instead of improving
conditions, they're worsening.
Malcolm X once said "I see America through the eyes of the victim. I
don't see any American dream - I see an American nightmare."
Israelis face similar harshness. Remaining rights are eroding en route
to being lost altogether. Populist change demands sustained public rage.
Nothing else can work.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled "How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized
Banking, Government Collusion and Class War"
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge
discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News
Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time
and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy
listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour
|