Back in early July 2009, political prostitutes on the Senate Judiciary Committee began confirmation hearings for a politically correct socialist, Sonia Sotomayor, to the U.S. Supreme Court. Having the correct female parts and ethnicity (Hispanic), she was a shoe-in regardless of how unqualified for the job. At that time, Dr. Richard Cordero contacted me. Dr. Cordero is an attorney who practices law in New York and was not only very familiar with Sotomayor, his research proves little Sonia concealed her assets and is guilty of tax evasion and perjury. I immediately began reading his evidence; it took a couple of days. Not speculation, but hundreds of pages of documents.

Gutless Republicans like Sen. Jeff Sessions refused to even contact Dr. Cordero. It's not as if he didn't know about Dr. Cordero's evidence, many of us made sure he did. Sessions and his colleagues brushed it off and proceeded with the sham confirmation hearings.

Back then I wrote two columns exposing this [1], [2], yet strangely, few people seemed interested or concerned. Certainly not the liars for hire in the "mainstream" media or even the mis-named "fair and balanced" FOX News. Not even some of the news web sites one would think would have jumped on this scandal. Nothing. Here is an individual who could have not only derailed Sotomayor's nomination, but force a criminal investigation into her activities as well as other judges in New York. Well, there was a bit of sniffing going on, but just like their refusal to fully investigate the impostor president back in 2007 & 2008, the NY Times, Washington Post and Politico, did not follow through on Sotomayor. Heaven forbid they would actually investigate such a politically correct nominee! Why, it might bring backlash from minority groups and we can't have that in America. Better to let the mobs take control.

Now to the meat of the issue from Dr. Richard Cordero who is a doctor of law with a Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in England; a Master of Business Administration from the University of Michigan; and a law degree from La Sorbonne in Paris:

"Indeed, federal judges engage in wrongdoing because they are held by their peers, Congress, and the media unaccountable. As a result, their wrongdoing is riskless. This makes it irresistible for them to grab wrongfully personal material and judicial class benefits. The analysis of the official statistics shows it: In the 223 years since the creation of the Federal Judiciary in 1789, only 8 federal judges have been impeached and removed. The Judiciary has allowed its chief circuit judges to dismiss systematically 99.82% of the complaints filed against judges in the 1 oct 96-30 sep 08 12-year period. In that period, its judicial councils –the circuits all judge disciplinary bodies– denied up to 100% of the petitions to review those dismissals, as did the 2nd Circuit's council, of which then Judge Sotomayor was a member. Up to 9 of every 10 appeals are disposed of ad-hoc through no-reason summary orders or opinions so “perfunctory” that they are neither published nor precedential, mere fiats of raw judicial power.

"Judges abuse their means, unaccountable power, to pursue the most corruptive motive: money! Just in the bankruptcies filed by consumers in CY10, bankruptcy judges ruled on $373bl. Money is what drives the blatant concealment of assets in DeLano, a consumer bankruptcy appeal presided over by then Judge Sotomayor). She engaged in such concealment as part of a routine practice that has developed into a judge-run bankruptcy fraud scheme. In fact, even the liberal papers The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico suspected her of concealing assets of hers despite her duty to disclose, which pointed to evasion of taxes or concealment of the assets’ illicit source. Yet, the President nominated her as he had for cabinet positions other known tax cheats. While 1.5ml. bankruptcies are filed annually, only .23% are reviewed by district courts and fewer than .08% by circuit courts. Their unreviewability provides the opportunity for riskless wrongdoing since nobody will hold judges accountable."

I removed the footnote numbers just for the sake of reproduction here. But, they're all in Dr. Cordero's 149 page presentation at the link above and they back up his statements. He initially discovered Sotomayor's participation in bankruptcy fraud schemes like the DeLano case and it snow balled from there. That distinguished gentleman has done comprehensive, massive research on one of the most critical and important issues that affects every one of us: judicial corruption. A subject I have written about many times; one of the greatest failures by the Outlaw Congress decade after decade to investigate because they are simply cowards or too busy raising buckets of cash for their next election.

Backtracking to 2009, Sotomayor absolutely concealed her assets:

"Dr. Cordero spent all last week calling every member of that committee, both Republicans and Democrats to confirm they received the documents. I called several offices (Sessions, Coburn, Franken) to confirm they had these documents. They do. And, yet, not a single question was asked of Sotomayor on any of the evidence presented by Dr. Cordero. Instead, all of them (Coburn, Sessions, Graham, et al) have remained silent.

"Why? That would be the $64,000 question. One which Dr. Cordero finds perplexing; his own words in an email to me:

"This puzzles me greatly, particularly since each of the three acts of wrongdoing that I discussed bears corroboration by either: (1) The Committee's questionnaire; (2) Judge Sotomayor's answers to it and her conduct; (3) The docket of the DeLano case, 06-4780-bk, CA2; and (4) statistics of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on the denial by the 2nd Circuit Judicial Council, of which Judge Sotomayor is a member, of 100% of petitions for review of dismissed judicial misconduct complaints during the 1 Oct 96 - 30 Sep 08 - 12-year period."

"If you click here, it will take you to the 173 page questionnaire Sotomayor was required to answer and submit to the committee. She had to disclose ALL cases, see Heading: 13 - Judicial Office on page 87. The list is extensive, but no where will you find the DeLano case. A glaring omission that Sotomayor could not possibly have simply forgotten. She did not list it because to do so would expose her participation."[1]

The other million dollar question: What did Obama/Soetoro know and when did he know it? We know the FBI has a file on Sotomayor as part of the alleged vetting process. What's in it? Obama/Soetoro knows. THAT is what GOP presidential candidates, media and Americans should be demanding answers to instead of being distracted with nonsense deliberately injected into discussions on issues.

Which brings me around to addressing the current blitzkrieg on the Internet that "Obama is officially ineligible." I bring this up because it's important to stop this kind of junk:

"Lawyers representing the current sitting President of the United States of America have been forced, under penalty of perjury, to admit that the long-form birth certificate presented by the White House in April of 2011 is a total forgery. In a NJ ballot access eligibility case spawned by Tea Party activists, attorneys representing Obama had to admit the document presented to the American people by Obama himself is actually knowingly faked and was used to fool the American public into believing a complete fabrication."

What did Alexandra Hill, Barry Soetoro's attorney actually say at that hearing?

"After calling to the witness stand Mr. Moran and Mr. Purpura, who gave testimony as to why they brought the ballot challenge, and introducing documents showing there is a question as to Mr. Obama’s identity, I called Brian Wilcox to testify as an internet image expert. Mr. Wilcox was going to testify on how the Obama April 27, 2011, long-form birth certificate has been altered and manipulated either by computer software or by a human or both, producing a forged documents, and that since the image is not reliable, we need to see the original paper version. Obama’s lawyer objected to my proffered testimony.

"I then offered that I would not need to have Mr. Wilcox testify, provided that Obama stipulated that the internet image of his birth certificate could not be used as evidence by either Judge Masin or the New Jersey Secretary of States and that he presented to the court or the Secretary of State no other evidence of his identity or place of birth. Judge Masin also asked Obama’s attorney whether she would so stipulate. She did so stipulate, agreeing that both the court and the Secretary of State cannot rely on the internet birth certificate as evidence of Obama’s place of birth and that Obama has produced no other evidence to the court regarding his place of birth."

Who wrote that? Mario Apuzzo. The attorney who argued the case for The Objectors.

Where does it say Soetoro's attorney "forced, under penalty of perjury, to admit that the long-form birth certificates is a total forgery"? No where. Soetoro's attorney agreed to stipulate the internet image of the usurper's birth certificate could not be used as evidence because it was not reliable. Yes, the inference is there, but to write what you see above from the link cited is grossly misleading. "Officially" my foot.

I do encourage you to read all of Mario's explanation as to what actually took place at the hearing. It contains an update with the judge's decision. There's no question the birth certificate released by Barry Soetoro is a forgery, but to present, as dozens and dozens of people have written in columns that counsel for Soetoro admitted that document is a "total forgery", is just more yellow journalism to grab headlines. It looks like Soetoro's attorneys are going to take legal action to suppress the video of that hearing. The ALJ (Administrative Law Judge) in that case soiled his robes and proved he left his manhood at the door when he issued his decision. You can watch the entire NJ hearing at the link below:

Obama Lawyers Want the Video of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing Pulled and Suppressed

One other thing. In 2009, two outstanding attorneys, Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon became legal counsel for 76 Chrysler dealerships knocked dead over the illegal bail outs; illegal because no where in Art. 1, Sec. 8, in the U.S. Constitution does it give the Outlaw Congress any authority to steal your hard earned wages to bail out banks, auto manufacturers or any other private business. The bankruptcy judge in Leo and Stephen's case was one Arthur J. Gonzalez of the Second District in New York. Sotomayor was also a judge in the Southern District of New York at the time of her nomination and handled bankrupcy cases.

I encourage you to take the time to read this post by Leo Donofrio dated February 8, 2010: Judge Gonzalez Now Guilty Of Intentional Fraud In Chrysler Case. When I read what went on in that bankruptcy case the first thing that popped into my head was Sonia Sotomayor. It's quite clear Gonzalez 'fixed' that bankruptcy case. The question is did he profit from it?

Obama/Soetoro is vulnerable in several areas. The number one issue being he is ineligible to run for president, the same as he was ineligible in 2008. Second, posters by the millions should be plastered all across this country with former Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's photo on it. Lakin is Obama's Willie Horton.[3]

A poster with the photo which reads:

This highly decorated member of the military was court martialed for simply requesting Barack Obama release his birth certificate. Lt. Col. Lakin spent six months in Ft. Leavenworth prison. Only then did Obama release his birth certificate. Obama willingly and knowingly sacrificed a man's freedom and military career to hide his birth certificate until forced by mounting pressure to release it. Why?

Provide a web site to Lakin's story. Make sure a few hundred thousand get distributed to veteran's organizations, VFW chapters, conventions and meetings.

Sotomayor's criminal activities can create such a scandal, Obama/Soetoro won't have a chance. Not that corrupt U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, will do anything about it. But, we the people and the alternative media can. You want Obama/Soetoro gone? Then make this a top issue: "What did the President and the justices and judges know about J. Sotomayor’s concealment of assets and consequent tax evasion and other judges’ wrongdoing and when did they know it?" (Dr. Cordero)

Dr. Cordero has put together a document addressed to the GOP presidential candidates. It it now up to supporters of those candidates to bring this issue to their attention as quickly as possible. Why wouldn't Romney, Paul or Gingrich jump on this like a june bug? As Dr. Cordero points out in his opening:

Dear Republican Presidential Nominee Candidates: "You have courageously criticized federal judges for being “activist” or Then-Judge, Now-Justice Sotomayor, P. Obama’s first justiceship nominee, for being “liberal.” Those are subjecttive notions describing matters of opinion; as such, they resonate only with some voters; their use can even indispose you with a block of them, e.g., Hispanics. This is a proposal, supported by my professional research on, and litigation experience in, the Federal Judiciary for you to base your criticism of federal judges, including J. Sotomayor, on their wrongdoing, which is a matter of objective evidence of their disregard of their duties and infraction of the law."

Dr. Cordero has sent a massive amount of his research to the Santorum, Ron Paul (and Rand Paul) and Romney camps. Why are they silent? Have their trusted aides even mentioned this to the candidates and Rand Paul?

All the candidates have the resources to have attorneys and forensic experts evaluate Dr. Cordero's evidence. They all have the means to invite him to a sit down and go over his evidence. Will they do it and go for the jugular?