in early July 2009, political prostitutes on the Senate Judiciary Committee
began confirmation hearings for a politically correct socialist, Sonia
Sotomayor, to the U.S. Supreme Court. Having the correct female parts
and ethnicity (Hispanic), she was a shoe-in regardless of how unqualified
for the job. At that time, Dr. Richard Cordero contacted me. Dr. Cordero
is an attorney who practices law in New York and was not only very familiar
with Sotomayor, his research proves little Sonia concealed her assets
and is guilty of tax evasion and perjury. I immediately began reading
his evidence; it took a couple of days. Not speculation, but hundreds
of pages of documents.
Republicans like Sen. Jeff Sessions refused to even contact Dr. Cordero.
It's not as if he didn't know about Dr. Cordero's evidence, many of us
made sure he did. Sessions and his colleagues brushed it off and proceeded
with the sham confirmation hearings.
then I wrote two columns exposing this ,
yet strangely, few people seemed interested or concerned. Certainly not
the liars for hire in the "mainstream" media or even the mis-named
"fair and balanced" FOX News. Not even some of the news web
sites one would think would have jumped on this scandal. Nothing. Here
is an individual who could have not only derailed Sotomayor's nomination,
but force a criminal investigation into her activities as well as other
judges in New York. Well, there was a bit of sniffing going on, but just
like their refusal to fully investigate the impostor president back in
2007 & 2008, the NY Times, Washington Post and Politico,
did not follow through on Sotomayor. Heaven forbid they would actually
investigate such a politically correct nominee! Why, it might bring backlash
from minority groups and we can't have that in America. Better to let
the mobs take control.
to the meat of the issue from Dr. Richard Cordero who is a doctor
of law with a Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in England; a Master
of Business Administration from the University of Michigan; and a law
degree from La Sorbonne in Paris:
federal judges engage in wrongdoing because they are held by their peers,
Congress, and the media unaccountable. As a result, their wrongdoing is
riskless. This makes it irresistible for them to grab wrongfully personal
material and judicial class benefits. The analysis of the official statistics
shows it: In the 223 years since the creation of the Federal Judiciary
in 1789, only 8 federal judges have been impeached and removed. The Judiciary
has allowed its chief circuit judges to dismiss systematically 99.82%
of the complaints filed against judges in the 1 oct 96-30 sep 08 12-year
period. In that period, its judicial councils –the circuits all
judge disciplinary bodies– denied up to 100% of the petitions to
review those dismissals, as did the 2nd Circuit's council, of which then
Judge Sotomayor was a member. Up to 9 of every 10 appeals are disposed
of ad-hoc through no-reason summary orders or opinions so “perfunctory”
that they are neither published nor precedential, mere fiats of raw judicial
abuse their means, unaccountable power, to pursue the most corruptive
motive: money! Just in the bankruptcies filed by consumers in CY10, bankruptcy
judges ruled on $373bl. Money is what drives the blatant concealment of
assets in DeLano, a consumer bankruptcy appeal presided over by then Judge
Sotomayor). She engaged in such concealment as part of a routine practice
that has developed into a judge-run bankruptcy fraud scheme. In fact,
even the liberal papers The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico
suspected her of concealing assets of hers despite her duty to disclose,
which pointed to evasion of taxes or concealment of the assets’
illicit source. Yet, the President nominated her as he had for cabinet
positions other known tax cheats. While 1.5ml. bankruptcies are filed
annually, only .23% are reviewed by district courts and fewer than .08%
by circuit courts. Their unreviewability provides the opportunity for
riskless wrongdoing since nobody will hold judges accountable."
the footnote numbers just for the sake of reproduction here. But, they're
all in Dr. Cordero's 149 page presentation at the link above and they
back up his statements. He initially discovered Sotomayor's participation
in bankruptcy fraud schemes like the DeLano case and it snow balled from
there. That distinguished gentleman has done comprehensive, massive research
on one of the most critical and important issues that affects every one
of us: judicial corruption. A subject I have written about many times;
one of the greatest failures by the Outlaw Congress decade after decade
to investigate because they are simply cowards or too busy raising buckets
of cash for their next election.
to 2009, Sotomayor absolutely concealed her assets:
Cordero spent all last week calling every member of that committee, both
Republicans and Democrats to confirm they received the documents. I called
several offices (Sessions, Coburn, Franken) to confirm they had these
documents. They do. And, yet, not a single question was asked of Sotomayor
on any of the evidence presented by Dr. Cordero. Instead, all of them
(Coburn, Sessions, Graham, et al) have remained silent.
That would be the $64,000 question. One which Dr. Cordero finds perplexing;
his own words in an email to me:
puzzles me greatly, particularly since each of the three acts of wrongdoing
that I discussed bears corroboration by either: (1) The Committee's questionnaire;
(2) Judge Sotomayor's answers to it and her conduct; (3) The docket of
the DeLano case, 06-4780-bk, CA2; and (4) statistics of the Administrative
Office of the U.S. Courts on the denial by the 2nd Circuit Judicial Council,
of which Judge Sotomayor is a member, of 100% of petitions for review
of dismissed judicial misconduct complaints during the 1 Oct 96 - 30 Sep
08 - 12-year period."
you click here, it will take you to the 173 page questionnaire Sotomayor
was required to answer and submit to the committee. She had to disclose
ALL cases, see Heading: 13 - Judicial Office on page 87. The list is extensive,
but no where will you find the DeLano case. A glaring omission that Sotomayor
could not possibly have simply forgotten. She did not list it because
to do so would expose her participation."
other million dollar question: What did Obama/Soetoro know and when did
he know it? We know the FBI has a file on Sotomayor as part of the alleged
vetting process. What's in it? Obama/Soetoro knows. THAT is what GOP presidential
candidates, media and Americans should be demanding answers to instead
of being distracted with nonsense deliberately injected into discussions
brings me around to addressing the current blitzkrieg on the Internet
is officially ineligible." I bring this up because it's important
to stop this kind of junk:
representing the current sitting President of the United States of America
have been forced, under penalty of perjury, to admit that the long-form
birth certificate presented by the White House in April of 2011 is a total
forgery. In a NJ ballot access eligibility case spawned by Tea Party activists,
attorneys representing Obama had to admit the document presented to the
American people by Obama himself is actually knowingly faked and was used
to fool the American public into believing a complete fabrication."
did Alexandra Hill, Barry Soetoro's attorney actually say at that hearing?
calling to the witness stand Mr. Moran and Mr. Purpura, who gave testimony
as to why they brought the ballot challenge, and introducing documents
showing there is a question as to Mr. Obama’s identity, I called
Brian Wilcox to testify as an internet image expert. Mr. Wilcox was going
to testify on how the Obama April 27, 2011, long-form birth certificate
has been altered and manipulated either by computer software or by a human
or both, producing a forged documents, and that since the image is not
reliable, we need to see the original paper version. Obama’s lawyer
objected to my proffered testimony.
then offered that I would not need to have Mr. Wilcox testify, provided
that Obama stipulated that the internet image of his birth certificate
could not be used as evidence by either Judge Masin or the New Jersey
Secretary of States and that he presented to the court or the Secretary
of State no other evidence of his identity or place of birth. Judge Masin
also asked Obama’s attorney whether she would so stipulate. She
did so stipulate, agreeing that both the court and the Secretary of State
cannot rely on the internet birth certificate as evidence of Obama’s
place of birth and that Obama has produced no other evidence to the court
regarding his place of birth."
wrote that? Mario Apuzzo. The attorney who argued the case for The Objectors.
does it say Soetoro's attorney "forced, under penalty of perjury,
to admit that the long-form birth certificates is a total forgery"?
No where. Soetoro's attorney agreed to stipulate the internet image of
the usurper's birth certificate could not be used as evidence because
it was not reliable. Yes, the inference is there, but to write what you
see above from the link cited is grossly misleading. "Officially"
encourage you to read
all of Mario's explanation as to what actually took place at the hearing.
It contains an update with the judge's decision. There's no question the
birth certificate released by Barry Soetoro is a forgery, but to present,
as dozens and dozens of people have written in columns that counsel for
Soetoro admitted that document is a "total forgery", is just
more yellow journalism to grab headlines. It looks like Soetoro's attorneys
are going to take legal action to suppress the video of that hearing.
The ALJ (Administrative Law Judge) in that case soiled his robes and proved
he left his manhood at the door when he issued his decision. You can watch
the entire NJ hearing at the link below:
Lawyers Want the Video of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge Public
Hearing Pulled and Suppressed
other thing. In 2009, two outstanding attorneys, Leo Donofrio and Stephen
Pidgeon became legal counsel for 76 Chrysler dealerships knocked dead
over the illegal bail outs; illegal because no where in Art. 1, Sec. 8,
in the U.S. Constitution does it give the Outlaw Congress any authority
to steal your hard earned wages to bail out banks, auto manufacturers
or any other private business. The bankruptcy judge in Leo and Stephen's
case was one Arthur
J. Gonzalez of the Second District in New York. Sotomayor was also
a judge in the Southern District of New York at the time of her nomination
and handled bankrupcy cases.
you to take the time to read this post by Leo Donofrio dated February
8, 2010: Judge
Gonzalez Now Guilty Of Intentional Fraud In Chrysler Case. When I
read what went on in that bankruptcy case the first thing that popped
into my head was Sonia Sotomayor. It's quite clear Gonzalez 'fixed' that
bankruptcy case. The question is did he profit from it?
is vulnerable in several areas. The number one issue being he is ineligible
to run for president, the same as he was ineligible in 2008. Second, posters
by the millions should be plastered all across this country with former
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's photo on it. Lakin is Obama's Willie Horton.
with the photo which reads:
highly decorated member of the military was court martialed for simply
requesting Barack Obama release his birth certificate. Lt. Col. Lakin
spent six months in Ft. Leavenworth prison. Only then did Obama release
his birth certificate. Obama willingly and knowingly sacrificed a man's
freedom and military career to hide his birth certificate until forced
by mounting pressure to release it. Why?
a web site to Lakin's story. Make sure a few hundred thousand get distributed
to veteran's organizations, VFW chapters, conventions and meetings.
criminal activities can create such a scandal, Obama/Soetoro won't have
a chance. Not that corrupt U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, will do
anything about it. But, we the people and the alternative media can. You
want Obama/Soetoro gone? Then make this a top issue: "What did the
President and the justices and judges know about J. Sotomayor’s
concealment of assets and consequent tax evasion and other judges’
wrongdoing and when did they know it?" (Dr. Cordero)
Cordero has put together a document addressed to the GOP presidential
candidates. It it now up to supporters of those candidates to bring this
issue to their attention as quickly as possible. Why wouldn't Romney,
Paul or Gingrich jump on this like a june bug? As Dr.
Cordero points out in his opening:
Republican Presidential Nominee Candidates: "You have courageously
criticized federal judges for being “activist” or Then-Judge,
Now-Justice Sotomayor, P. Obama’s first justiceship nominee, for
being “liberal.” Those are subjecttive notions describing
matters of opinion; as such, they resonate only with some voters; their
use can even indispose you with a block of them, e.g., Hispanics. This
is a proposal, supported by my professional research on, and litigation
experience in, the Federal Judiciary for you to base your criticism of
federal judges, including J. Sotomayor, on their wrongdoing, which is
a matter of objective evidence of their disregard of their duties and
infraction of the law."
Cordero has sent a massive amount of his research to the Santorum, Ron
Paul (and Rand Paul) and Romney camps. Why are they silent? Have their
trusted aides even mentioned this to the candidates and Rand Paul?
the candidates have the resources to have attorneys and forensic experts
evaluate Dr. Cordero's evidence. They all have the means to invite him
to a sit down and go over his evidence. Will they do it and go for the
http://www.devvy.com . You may also sign up for her free email alerts.
Site Served by TheHostPros