- For years, Helen Caldicott warned it's coming. In her
1978 book, "Nuclear Madness," she said:
-
- "As a physician, I contend that nuclear technology
threatens life on our planet with extinction. If present trends continue,
the air we breathe, the food we eat, and the water we drink will soon be
contaminated with enough radioactive pollutants to pose a potential health
hazard far greater than any plague humanity has ever experienced."
-
- More below on the inevitable dangers from commercial
nuclear power proliferation, besides added military ones.
-
- On March 11, New York Times writer Martin Fackler headlined,
"Powerful Quake and Tsunami Devastate Northern Japan," saying:
-
- "The 8.9-magnitude earthquake (Japan's strongest
ever) set off a devastating tsunami that sent walls of water (six meters
high) washing over coastal cities in the north." According to Japan's
Meteorological Survey, it was 9.0.
-
- The Sendai port city and other areas experienced heavy
damage. "Thousands of homes were destroyed, many roads were impassable,
trains and buses (stopped) running, and power and cellphones remained down.
On Saturday morning, the JR rail company" reported three trains missing.
Many passengers are unaccounted for.
-
- Striking at 2:46PM Tokyo time, it caused vast destruction,
shook city skyscrapers, buckled highways, ignited fires, terrified millions,
annihilated areas near Sendai, possibly killed thousands, and caused a
nuclear meltdown, its potential catastrophic effects far exceeding quake
and tsunami devastation, almost minor by comparison under a worst case
scenario.
-
- On March 12, Times writer Matthew Wald headlined, "Explosion
Seen at Damaged Japan Nuclear Plant," saying:
-
- "Japanese officials (ordered evacuations) for people
living near two nuclear power plants whose cooling systems broke down,"
releasing radioactive material, perhaps in far greater amounts than reported.
-
- NHK television and Jiji said the 40-year old Fukushima
plant's outer structure housing the reactor "appeared to have blown
off, which could suggest the containment building had already been breached."
Japan's nuclear regulating agency said radioactive levels inside were 1,000
times above normal.
-
- Reuters said the 1995 Kobe quake caused $100 billion
in damage, up to then the most costly ever natural disaster. This time,
from quake and tsunami damage alone, that figure will be dwarfed. Moreover,
under a worst case core meltdown, all bets are off as the entire region
and beyond will be threatened with permanent contamination, making the
most affected areas unsafe to live in.
-
- On March 12, Stratfor Global Intelligence issued a "Red
Alert: Nuclear Meltdown at Quake-Damaged Japanese Plant," saying:
-
- Fukushima Daiichi "nuclear power plant in Okuma,
Japan, appears to have caused a reactor meltdown." Stratfor downplayed
its seriousness, adding that such an event "does not necessarily mean
a nuclear disaster," that already may have happened - the ultimate
nightmare short of nuclear winter.
-
- According to Stratfor, "(A)s long as the reactor
core, which is specifically designed to contain high levels of heat, pressure
and radiation, remains intact, the melted fuel can be dealt with. If the
(core's) breached but the containment facility built around (it) remains
intact, the melted fuel can be....entombed within specialized concrete"
as at Chernobyl in 1986.
-
- In fact, that disaster killed nearly one million people
worldwide from nuclear radiation exposure. In their book titled, "Chernobyl:
Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment," Alexey
Yablokov, Vassily Nesterenko and Alexey Nesterenko said:
-
- "For the past 23 years, it has been clear that there
is a danger greater than nuclear weapons concealed within nuclear power.
Emissions from this one reactor exceeded a hundred-fold the radioactive
contamination of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki."
-
- "No citizen of any country can be assured that he
or she can be protected from radioactive contamination. One nuclear reactor
can pollute half the globe. Chernobyl fallout covers the entire Northern
Hemisphere."
-
- Stratfor explained that if Fukushima's floor cracked,
"it is highly likely that the melting fuel will burn through (its)
containment system and enter the ground. This has never happened before,"
at least not reported. If now occurring, "containment goes from being
merely dangerous, time consuming and expensive to nearly impossible,"
making the quake, aftershocks, and tsunamis seem mild by comparison. Potentially,
millions of lives will be jeopardized.
-
- Japanese officials said Fukushima's reactor container
wasn't breached. Stratfor and others said it was, making the potential
calamity far worse than reported. Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety
Agency (NISA) said the explosion at Fukushima's Saiichi No. 1 facility
could only have been caused by a core meltdown. In fact, 3 or more reactors
are affected or at risk. Events are fluid and developing, but remain very
serious. The possibility of an extreme catastrophe can't be discounted.
-
- Moreover, independent nuclear safety analyst John Large
told Al Jazeera that by venting radioactive steam from the inner reactor
to the outer dome, a reaction may have occurred, causing the explosion.
-
- "When I look at the size of the explosion,"
he said, "it is my opinion that there could be a very large leak (because)
fuel continues to generate heat."
-
- Already, Fukushima way exceeds Three Mile Island that
experienced a partial core meltdown in Unit 2. Finally it was brought under
control, but coverup and denial concealed full details until much later.
-
- According to anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman,
Japan's quake fallout may cause nuclear disaster, saying:
-
- "This is a very serious situation. If the cooling
system fails (apparently it has at two or more plants), the super-heated
radioactive fuel rods will melt, and (if so) you could conceivably have
an explosion," that, in fact, occurred.
-
- As a result, massive radiation releases may follow, impacting
the entire region. "It could be, literally, an apocalyptic event.
The reactor could blow." If so, Russia, China, Korea and most parts
of Western Asia will be affected. Many thousands will die, potentially
millions under a worse case scenario, including far outside East Asia.
-
- Moreover, at least five reactors are at risk. Already,
a 20-mile wide radius was evacuated. What happened in Japan can occur anywhere.
Yet Obama's proposed budget includes $36 billion for new reactors, a shocking
disregard for global safety.
-
- Calling Fukushima an "apocalyptic event," Wasserman
said "(t)hese nuclear plants have to be shut," let alone budget
billions for new ones. It's unthinkable, he said. If a similar disaster
struck California, nuclear fallout would affect all America, Canada, Mexico,
Central America, and parts of South America.
-
- Nuclear Power: A Technology from Hell
-
- Nuclear expert Helen Caldicott agrees, telling this writer
by phone that a potential regional catastrophe is unfolding. Over 30 years
ago, she warned of its inevitability. Her 2006 book titled, "Nuclear
Power is Not the Answer" explained that contrary to government and
industry propaganda, even during normal operations, nuclear power generation
causes significant discharges of greenhouse gas emissions, as well as hundreds
of thousands of curies of deadly radioactive gases and other radioactive
elements into the environment every year.
-
- Moreover, nuclear plants are atom bomb factories. A 1000
megawatt reactor produces 500 pounds of plutonium annually. Only 10 are
needed for a bomb able to devastate a large city, besides causing permanent
radiation contamination.
-
- Nuclear Power not Cleaner and Greener
-
- Just the opposite, in fact. Although a nuclear power
plant releases no carbon dioxide (CO2), the primary greenhouse gas, a vast
infrastructure is required. Called the nuclear fuel cycle, it uses large
amounts of fossil fuels.
-
- Each cycle stage exacerbates the problem, starting with
the enormous cost of mining and milling uranium, needing fossil fuel to
do it. How then to dispose of mill tailings, produced in the extraction
process. It requires great amounts of greenhouse emitting fuels to remediate.
-
- Moreover, other nuclear cycle steps also use fossil fuels,
including converting uranium to hexafluoride gas prior to enrichment, the
enrichment process itself, and conversion of enriched uranium hexafluoride
gas to fuel pellets. In addition, nuclear power plant construction, dismantling
and cleanup at the end of their useful life require large amounts of energy.
-
- There's more, including contaminated cooling water, nuclear
waste, its handling, transportation and disposal/storage, problems so far
unresolved. Moreover, nuclear power costs and risks are so enormous that
the industry couldn't exist without billions of government subsidized funding
annually.
-
- The Unaddressed Human Toll from Normal Operations
-
- Affected are uranium miners, industry workers, and potentially
everyone living close to nuclear reactors that routinely emit harmful radioactive
releases daily, harming human health over time, causing illness and early
death.
-
- The link between radiation exposure and disease is irrefutable,
depending only on the amount of cumulative exposure over time, Caldicott
saying:
-
- "If a regulatory gene is biochemically altered by
radiation exposure, the cell will begin to incubate cancer, during a 'latent
period of carcinogenesis,' lasting from two to sixty years."
-
- In fact, a single gene mutation can prove fatal. No amount
of radiation exposure is safe. Moreover, when combined with about 80,000
commonly used toxic chemicals and contaminated GMO foods and ingredients,
it causes 80% of known cancers, putting everyone at risk everywhere.
-
- Further, the combined effects of allowable radiation
exposure, uranium mining, milling operations, enrichment, and fuel fabrication
can be devastating to those exposed. Besides the insoluble waste storage/disposal
problem, nuclear accidents happen and catastrophic ones are inevitable.
-
- Inevitable Meltdowns
-
- Caldicott and other experts agree they're certain in
one or more of the hundreds of reactors operating globally, many years
after their scheduled shutdown dates unsafely. Combined with human error,
imprudently minimizing operating costs, internal sabotage, or the effects
of a high-magnitude quake and/or tsunami, an eventual catastrophe is certain.
-
- Aging plants alone, like Japan's Fukushima facility,
pose
- unacceptable risks based on their record of near-misses
and meltdowns, resulting from human error, old equipment, shoddy maintenance,
and poor regulatory oversight. However, under optimum operating conditions,
all nuclear plants are unsafe. Like any machine or facility, they're vulnerable
to breakdowns, that if serious enough can cause enormous, possibly catastrophic,
harm.
-
- Add nuclear war to the mix, also potentially inevitable
according to some experts, by accident or intent, including Steven Starr
saying:
-
- "Only a single failure of nuclear deterrence is
required to start a nuclear war," the consequences of which "would
be profound, potentially killing "tens of millions of people, and
caus(ing) long-term, catastrophic disruptions of the global climate and
massive destruction of Earth's protective ozone layer. The result would
be a global nuclear famine that could kill up to one billion people."
-
- Worse still is nuclear winter, the ultimate nightmare,
able to end all life if it happens. It's nuclear proliferation's unacceptable
risk, a clear and present danger as long as nuclear weapons and commercial
dependency exist.
- In 1946, Enstein knew it, saying:
-
- "Our world faces a crisis as yet unperceived by
those possessing the power to make great decisions for good and evil. The
unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking,
and thus we drift toward unparalleled catastrophe."
-
- He envisioned two choices - abolish all forms of nuclear
power or face extinction. No one listened. The Doomsday Clock keeps ticking.
-
- Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com
and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the
Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays
at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs
are archived for easy listening.
-
- http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
|
