- Below I pasted few quotations from "Green Book"
of Muammar Qaddafi. One can see that the proposed (and in all evidence
realized in Libya since several decades) "direct democracy" stresses
the principle of national representation of relatively "organic"
social units, in form of local Basic Popular Congresses & People's
Committees, plus representations of local professional Popular Conferences
(Agriculture, Education, Health, Housing, etc.). In this situation there
is not much place for demagogy, and for bribes of electorate and/or of
elected parlamentarians, which corruption is the principal occupation of
traditional "bourgeois" democracy. Also there is no place, at
the national scale, for parties and coteries, which like cancer realize
their egoist agendas inside "democratic dictatorships".
-
- In attachment an opinion of Frank Scott about the "banking
crime" of finacially independent Libya.
-
- (By the way, I heard in Poland that big help in writing
this Green Book furnished young Qaddafi's friend, Polish arabist and socialist
Franciszek Bocheski, I have to check further this information)
-
- Marek Gogoczowski
- http://www.szcpv.szm.com/05/marek.html
- lub/ou/or www.zaprasza.net/mglogo
-
- -------------------------------------
-
- http://911-truth.net/other-books/Muammar-Qaddafi-Green-Book-Eng.pdf
-
-
- PARLIAMENTS
-
- () To lay bare the character of parliaments, one has
to examine their origin. They are either
- elected from constituencies, a party, or a coalition
of parties, or are appointed. But all of
- these procedures are undemocratic, for dividing the population
into constituencies means
- that one member of parliament represents thousands, hundreds
of thousands, or millions
- of people, depending on the size of the population. It
also means that a member keeps few
- popular organizational links with the electors since
he, like other members, is considered
- a representative of the whole people. This is what the
prevailing traditional democracy
- requires. The masses are completely isolated from the
representative and he, in turn, is
- totally removed from them. Immediately after winning
the electors' votes the
- representative takes over the people's sovereignty and
acts on their behalf. The prevailing
- traditional democracy endows the member of parliament
with a sacredness and immunity
- which are denied to the rest of the people. Parliaments,
therefore, have become a means
- of plundering and usurping the authority of the people.
-
- () Moreover, since the system of elected parliaments
is based on propaganda to win votes, it is a demagogic system in the real
sense of the word. Votes can be bought and falsified.
-
- Poor people are unable to compete in the election campaigns,
and the result is that only
- the rich get elected. (...)
-
- THE PARTY
-
- The party is a contemporary form of dictatorship. It
is the modern instrument of dictatorial
- government. The party is the rule of a part over the
whole. As a party is not an individual, it
- creates a superficial democracy by establishing assemblies,
committees, and propaganda
- through its members. The party is not a democratic instrument
because it is composed
- only of those people who have common interests, a common
perception or a shared
- culture; or those who belong to the same region or share
the same belief. They form a
- party to achieve their ends, impose their will, or extend
the dominion of their beliefs,
- values, and interests to the society as a whole. A party's
aim is to achieve power under the
- pretext of carrying out its program. Democratically,
none of these parties should govern a
- whole people who constitute a diversity of interests,
ideas, temperaments, regions and
- beliefs. The party is a dictatorial instrument of government
that enables those with
- common outlooks or interests to rule the people as a
whole. Within the community, the
- party represents a minority.
- The purpose of forming a party is to create an instrument
to rule the people, i.e., to rule
- over non-members of the party. (...)
-
- Originally, the party is formed ostensibly to represent
the people. Subsequently, the party
-
- leadership becomes representative of the membership,
and the leader represents the party
- elite. It becomes clear that this partisan game is a
deceitful farce based on a false form of
- democracy. It has a selfish authoritarian character based
on maneuvres, intrigues and
- political games. This confirms the fact that the party
system is a modern instrument of
- dictatorship. The party system is an outright, unconvincing
dictatorship, one which the
- world has not yet surpassed. It is, in fact, the dictatorship
of the modern age. (...)
-
- POPULAR CONFERENCES AND PEOPLE'S COMMITTEES
-
- ()
-
- First, the people are divided into Basic Popular Conferences.
Each Basic Popular
- Conference chooses its secretariat. The secretariats
of all Popular Conferences together
- form Non-Basic Popular Conferences. Subsequently, the
masses of the Basic Popular
- Conferences select administrative People's Committees
to replace government
- administration. All public institutions are run by People's
Committees which will be
- accountable to the Basic Popular Conferences which dictate
the policy and supervise its
- execution. Thus, both the administration and the supervision
become the people's and the
- outdated definition of democracy - democracy is the supervision
of the government by the
- people - becomes obsolete. It will be replaced by the
true definition: Democracy is the
- supervision of the people by the people.
-
- All citizens who are members of these Popular Conferences
belong, vocationally and
- functionally, to various sectors and have, therefore,
to form themselves into their own
- professional Popular Conferences in addition to being,
by virtue of citizenship, members
- of the Basic Popular Conferences or People's Committees.
Subjects dealt with by the
- Popular Conferences and People's Committees will eventually
take their final shape in the
- General People's Congress, which brings together the
Secretariats of the Popular
- Conferences and People's Committees. Resolutions of the
General People's Congress,
- which meets annually or periodically, are passed on to
the Popular Conferences and
- People's Committees, which undertake the execution of
those resolutions through the
- responsible committees, which are, in turn, accountable
to the Basic Popular
- Conferences.
-
- The General People's Congress is not a gathering of persons
or members such as those of
- parliaments but, rather, a gathering of the Popular Conferences
and People's Committees.
- Thus, the problem of the instrument of government is
naturally solved, and all dictatorial
- instruments disappear. The people become the instrument
of government, and the
- dilemma of democracy in the world is conclusively solved.
(...)
-
-
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Marek Glogoczowski
- To: Israel Shamir ; Khaznachi
-
- Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 12:02 AM
- Subject: Re: [shamireaders] Touching words of Kaddafi
and the repetition of "war in Bosnia" scenario
-
- It is the repetition of the "war in Bosnia"
scenario. "Rebels" are shooting mortar projectiles with cluster
munitions, and journalists and HRW miracuously in the exact right place
immediately after to 'discover' that these mortar projectiles were shot
'from the Qaddafi side.'
-
- In Sarajevo in 1995 "Moslems" assisted by NATO
did this same trick with mortars shooting three times, bombing civilians
gathered at the local market place, while "chosen" journalists
were awaiting near by, to quickly relate in western media this "Serbian"
massacre. They did it until NATO got the permission of UN to attack Bosnian
Serbs with all possible means.
-
- (CNN wrote that supposedly forbidden "cluster munition"
shot in Misrata by Qaddafi troops, were produced in Spain, a member of
NATO, which in all evidence has permission to use cluster munition (and
cassette bombs). These prohibited by international conventions bombs were,
for example, abundantly dropped by NATO aviation on civil population of
Yugoslavia in 1999.)
-
- 'Bravo' NATO, helpful lessons of Bosnia War are not forgotten.
-
- By the way, these thousands of foreign workers, blocked
for 1.5
- months in barracks of Misrata port, were simply hostages
serving as "civil shields" for NATO "insurgents-mercenaries",
awaiting supplies and reinforcements from the sea. The victorious attack
on Tripoli was sheduled to start already 1,5 months ago from Misrata port,which
is close to Tripoli, but it failed - recently CNN showed a picture of
insugent's tank in Misrata intercepted by Khadafi forces.
-
- Marek Gogoczowski
- http://www.szcpv.szm.com/05/marek.html
- lub/ou/or www.zaprasza.net/mglogo
-
- -------------------------
-
- The mood in Libya's capital (from CNN, Friday )
-
-
- NATO: Give Gadhafi's assets to rebels
-
- RELATED TOPICS
- Moammar Gadhafi
- Libya
- Barack Obama
- Friday, April15th, 2011, www.cnn.com
- Human Rights Watch said cluster munitions were used about
a kilometer from the battle line between rebel and government forces and
appear to have landed about 300 meters from Misrata Hospital.
-
- But the organization, citing security concerns, said
it could not inspect the impact sites and had not determined whether any
civilians were hurt.
-
- CNN was not immediately able to obtain a response from
the Libyan government.
-
- The charge came as Western leaders were describing a
"medieval siege" Friday on Misrata, which has been pounded for
days by Gadhafi's mortar and artillery rounds.
-
- Some 1,200 of the more than 8,000 migrants stranded in
the besieged city were rescued Friday by the International Organization
for Migration (IOM). The group chartered a boat to pluck them from the
war-torn port city and deliver them to the Libyan rebel stronghold of Benghazi
in the eastern part of the country.
-
- The aid group said the migrants were from various nations
and included women and children. All were weak and dehydrated. Medical
agencies set up a small hospital on deck.
-
- The IOM identified 8,300 migrants living in the open
around the Misrata port without adequate food or medical care as the city
came under regular fire. The group hopes to send back the chartered boat
to evacuate a second round of people if it receives enough donations.
-
- "This is a terrible situation," said Pasquale
Lupoli, the group's Middle East representative. "They are the forgotten
victims of the crisis and shouldn't be."
-
- In Benghazi, about 2,000 anti-Gadhafi demonstrators held
up signs and shouted slogans that made it clear they are still fighting
for Gadhafi's removal. "Gadhafi Go to Hell," read one. "Thanks
for USA and NATO and France and U.K.," read another.
-
- But several participants voiced concern that the impact
of NATO efforts was not enough, telling CNN that, without more support,
they may fail.
-
- "They didn't do anything, the NATO," said one
man.
-
- "We want more support from the United States of
America, more power, more support for our people," said another.
-
- The military deadlock in Libya between Gadhafi's forces
and rebels shows little sign of resolution.
-
- Western powers have said repeatedly that airstrikes were
intended to fulfill a United Nations mandate to protect civilians. However,
in a joint opinion piece that appeared Friday in three European newspapers,
U.S. President Barack Obama, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British
Prime Minister David Cameron wrote about better times once there is a regime
change.
-
- "Our duty and our mandate under U.N. Security Council
Resolution 1973 is to protect civilians, and we are doing that," they
wrote. "It is not to remove (Gadhafi) by force. But it is impossible
to imagine a future for Libya with (Gadhafi) in power."
-
- "The International Criminal Court is rightly investigating
the crimes committed against civilians and the grievous violations of international
law," they wrote. "It is unthinkable that someone who has tried
to massacre his own people can play a part in their future government."
-
- The leaders likened the fighting in Misrata to a medieval
siege and called on the Libyan troops to return to their barracks.
-
- "We are convinced that better times lie ahead for
the people of LIbya," they wrote.
-
- Opposition forces kept up the fight Friday, saying they
had pushed west from Ajdabiya to the town of al-Brega, which has changed
hands several times and appears to remain under the control of Gadhafi
loyalists.
-
- War planes were heard Friday over Ajdabiya, but CNN could
not independently verify the rebel advance.
-
- The debate over NATO's strategy in Libya buzzed at high-level
meetings this week in Europe as well as in Qatar, host of the first gathering
of the international Libya Contact Group, charged with mapping out peace
for Libya.
-
- With the conflict at a deadly impasse, Britain and France
have been pressuring NATO to step up airstrikes.
-
- At a NATO summit in Berlin Thursday, Secretary General
Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters that NATO has the necessary assets
to continue aerial strikes, but the tactical nature of the fight has changed.
-
- "Now they hide their heavy arms in populated areas,
where before many targets were easier to get to," Rasmussen said.
"To avoid civilian casualties, we need very sophisticated equipment.
So, we need a few more precision fighter ground-attack aircraft for air-to-ground
missions."
-
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Israel Shamir
- To: Khaznachi
- Cc: Marek Glogoczowski ; shamireaders-owner@yahoogroups.com
- Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:52 AM
- Subject: Re: [shamireaders] Touching words of Kaddafi
with foreword by Marek Glogoczowski [2 Attachments]ybia
-
- Let us keep things in proportion. Is Qaddafi worse than
the rulers of Saudi Arabia, of Kuwait, of any Arab state? He uses the budget
like his own money - but all Arab rulers do the same.
-
- I sincerely want to understand why so many Arabs are
against Qaddafi - and I fail every time.
-
- -Shamir
-
-
- On 14 Apr 2011, at 16:41, Khaznachi wrote:
-
- Libya has billions Jordan doesn't have. When Qaddafi
goes you will hear of them in bank accounts all over the world. In Jordan
we have serious problems but you honestly can't compare the 2 situations.
-
- The Libyan government doesn't have a budget...everything
Libya owns is in Qaddafi's account.
-
- You must know what his sons do and how much they spend
on cars and prostitutes and you still call this socialism????
-
- yes you visited Libya many years ago and they took you
where you will be impressed, but still you didn't talk to the masses who
want him out. Mandella left office after his term was over...This man should
give his people the chance to have another democratic leadership.
-
- On 4/14/2011 3:00 PM, Israel Shamir wrote:
- Do you prefer your king Abdallah? Who is a better Arab
ruler?
- On 14 Apr 2011, at 00:04, Khaznachi wrote:
-
- Qaddafi isn't a socialist but a tyrant who stole Libya
blind!!!
- Please go and see for yourself before you call him so!!
-
-
- 0On 4/12/2011 8:21 PM, Israel Shamir wrote:
-
-
- Kadhafi, a socialist, is to be erased from the surface
of the Earth (by Soros/Rotschild Gang & Tandem of American Enterprise
Institute - Al Qaeda)
- From Marek Glogoczowski:
-
- I am indebted to Mr M. Kadhafi. Thanks to his generous
sponsorship I participated in several interesting meetings and conferences,
including the one in Benghazi, Libya in 2000, and Vienna, Austria in 2002.
For this last one I prepared a speech, which began my long-term friendship
with my 'comrade-in-arms' Israel Adam Shamir (in attachment this memorable
text prepared for the Vienna conference). On basis of these experiences
I testify that all which Mohammad Kadhafi had written below is truth. Truth
of course in its Aristotelian meaning of concordance of a description with
the reality.
-
- Dr Marek Gogoczowski
- http://www.szcpv.szm.com/05/marek.html
- lub/ou/or www.zaprasza.net/mglogo
|
