- For most of us, the events of September 11th 2001 may
have changed the world as we knew it, but not the world that was! The Hidden
Masters of that secret world which most know nothing about, took a quantum
leap towards the attainment of their `Great Work Of Ages` that fateful
Autumnal day, eight years ago. Ironically, and tragically, it took the
loss of thousands of lives, the destruction of millions of dollars worth
of property, and the sheer transparency of the official lie, to provide
a shock sodden wake up call to humanity that not all was as it should be.
- It is true that most of the global population sucked
up the official story programmed into them by the Mass Media; but nonetheless,
for many like myself, when those planes hit the twin towers, it was as
if a `Stargate` to a different reality had appeared before me, shattering
what illusions I had left, providing the impetus for me to once again use
the investigative skills I had learnt as a Police Officer, in order to
search for that most elusive element in the human experience; The Truth!
- Following five years of reading and investigation, it
was in 2007 that I began to write down my thoughts. I am neither academic
nor intellectual, just a retired Cop, so the course I am now following
is not an easy one. Yet the rewards of sharing one's findings with those
who have understanding, and leading them on to researchers far more capable
than myself, far outweigh the struggles and trials one faces in gathering
such information and then setting it down coherently for others to read.
- Here in this, the ninth part of what has become an extended
series of articles, we will bring our story more or less up to date, and
in the following conclusion, look forward to what likely scenario awaits
us as we move ever closer to that seemingly inevitable `crisis` point,
which will determine whether the intrinsic good that is in the heart of
the mass of humanity, will arise at last, and release itself, from its
tormentors, or whether a Third World War of catastrophic proportions will
cull the mass of the people of the planet, and thrust humankind into the
past darkly; inaugurating a brutal Global Fiefdom, with Lucifer as its
Royal Lord, and the Illuminists its Aristocratic Regulators.
- If we accept that a conflict, or `Clash Of Civilisations`
between the West and Islam can be regarded as the key to unlock the Illuminati's
Pandora's Box for the installation of a world government, then in this
the penultimate `episode` in the series, it is to the Islamic world, its
relations with the West, and the key conspirators involved, that we must
again return to and focus our attention on.
- So then, to the task at hand!
- The New Machiavelli:
- "World War Three is to be fomented by using the
differences the agentur of the Illuminati stir up between Political Zionists
and the Leaders of the Moslem world. The war is to be directed in such
a manner that Islam and Political Zionism (including the State of Israel)
will destroy themselves while at the same time the remaining nations, once
more divided against each other on this issue, will be forced to fight
themselves into a state of complete exhaustion physically, mentally, spiritually
and economically." Albert Pike.
- Have you heard of Michael Ledeen? As a non American,
I admit that I had not, prior to reading David Livingstone's book, Terrorism
And The Illumniati . I would hazard a guess that even those aware of
who Ledeen is, have no idea of the man's extraordinary influence in US
foreign affairs. I think it's time we get to know about a man whose whole
portfolio is tainted with murder and blood, and whose influence is such,
that innocent nations get invaded upon his recommendation.
- In order to ensure success in Pike's proposed clash with
the Muslim world, the Illuminati had intended all along, that following
the 9/11 `False Flag` operation, the already planned invasions of Afghanistan
and Iraq would accomplish far more than mere "regime change,"
and the ruse introduction of so called democracy; rather, territorial and
cultural conquest and occupation. Ledeen, one of the most most influential
of the Neo Con spokesmen, has termed the US strategy in the Middle East
and Central Asia as,"Total War."
- "No stages. This is total war. We are fighting a
variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about
first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq... this is entirely
the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go
forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever
diplomacy, but just wage a total war... our children will sing great songs
about us years from now."
- Ledeen is a resident scholar at the right-wing "think-tank",
the American Enterprise Institute, where he works with the former chairman
of the Defence Policy Board, Richard Perle. He is also a contributing
editor to the U.S. National Review and the Jewish World Review, and was
a founding member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs,
JINSA. In 2003, the Washington Post discovered that he was the only full-time
international affairs analyst consulted by Karl Rove, George W. Bush's
closest advisor. In other words, the man is mainline Illuminati.
- Ledeen had been present in Italy in the late 1970s, when
he acted in a consultative capacity for Italian military intelligence,
and cultivated strong connections to right-wing factions, including the
notorious P2 Masonic Lodge. P2 was responsible for Italy's `Strategy of
Tension,` which was a campaign of false-flag terror operations, waged by
the Gladio Brigades, under the patronage of the CIA and the Mafia. These
were intended to discredit the increasingly popular Communist Party.
- Early in 1978, Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro was kidnapped
and later assassinated by the so-called "Red brigades," an apparently
pro Soviet terrorist group. Evidence now exists that shows Moro's murder
was orchestrated by P2, and that both the "Red" and "Black"
brigades were heavily penetrated by US intelligence, who are credited with
"running" them. The `Strategy of Tension` campaign culminated
in the Bologna train station bombing of 1980.
- When P2 had come under increasing scrutiny in 1979, Masonic
grandmaster Lucio Gelli had reportedly made his base of operations the
Montecarlo Comite. Known members of the Montecarlo Comite are Gelli, Henry
Kissinger, Alexander Haig, former Supreme Commander of NATO, and Michael
- Ledeen then returned to Washington in 1981 as "anti-terrorism"
advisor to Alexander Haig, the new secretary of state. During the following
years, Ledeen used his position as consultant to Haig, the Pentagon and
the National Security Council under Ronald Reagan, to propagate the idea
of a global terrorist conspiracy based in the Kremlin, with the KGB supposedly
pulling the strings of all of the world's key terrorist groups, particularly
those in the Middle East.
- He was also a major player in the Iran-Contra Affair.
As a consultant of National Security Adviser Robert C. McFarlane, Ledeen
vouched for Iranian intermediary Manucher Ghorbanifar, and met with Israeli
Prime Minister Shimon Peres, and officials of the Israeli Foreign Ministry
and the CIA to arrange meetings with high-ranking Iranian officials and
the much-criticized weapons-for-hostages deal with Iran, that would become
known as the Iran-Contra scandal .
- Ledeen had, along with Arnaud de Borchgrave, in `The
New Republic,` "exposed" some details of Billy Carter's dealings
with the Muammar Gaddafi regime in Libya, which de-legitimized his brother's
presidency. Ledeen seems to be again involved in the fabrication of evidence,
this time in the instance of the forged documents "uncovered"
by Italian intelligence. These depicted an attempt by Iraq's Saddam Hussein
regime to purchase yellow-cake uranium from Niger, which formed the basis
of President Bush's support for the invasion of Iraq, and which subsequently
unravelled into the "Plamegate" scandal.
- Regarding regime change in Iraq, in 2002 Ledeen criticized
the views of former National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft, writing:
- "He fears that if we attack Iraq we could have an
explosion in the Middle East. It could turn the whole region into a cauldron
and destroy the War on Terror. One can only hope that we turn the region
into a cauldron, and faster, please. If ever there were a region that richly
deserved being cauldronized, it is the Middle East today. If we wage the
war effectively, we will bring down the terror regimes in Iraq, Iran, and
Syria, and either bring down the Saudi monarchy or force it to abandon
its global assembly line to indoctrinate young terrorists. That's our mission
in the war against terror."
- Ledeen specifically called for the deposition of Saddam
Hussein's regime by force in 2002:
- "Okay, well if we are all so certain about the dire
need to invade Iraq, then when do we do so? Yesterday!"
- Ledeen's statements prior to the start of the Iraq war
such as "desperately-needed and long overdue war against Saddam Hussein"
and "dire need to invade Iraq" make his later statement to Glenn
Greenwald that he "opposed the military invasion of Iraq before it
took place" to be an "outright lie". However, Ledeen maintains
these statements are consistent since: "I advocated - as I still do
- support for political revolution in Iran as the logical and necessary
first step in the war against the terror masters."
- In Ledeen's own words, on a leadership trait he admires,
from his book Universal Fascism:
- "In order to achieve the most noble accomplishments,
the leader may have to 'enter into evil.' This is the chilling insight
that has made Machiavelli so feared, admired and challenging... we are
rotten.... It's true that we can achieve greatness if, and only if, we
are properly led."
- Ledeen stated, at a meeting of the American Enterprise
Institute, involving Richard Perle, Newt Gingrich, Nathan Sharansky and
- Regime change" must be achieved by any means necessary
in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority."
- In his book, Machiavelli on Modern Leadership: Why Machiavelli's
Iron Rules Are as Timely and Important Today as Five Centuries Ago, Michael
Ledeen proclaimed, "Change above all violent change is
the essence of human history." Again we see how intrinsic the application
of the Hegelian Dialectic  is to the Illuminati Agenda. Ultimately,
Ledeen believes that violence in the service of the spread of what he feels
is "freedom" around the world is merely a continuation of America's
revolutionary struggle. "Total war" says Ledeen, "not only
destroys the enemy's military forces, but also brings the enemy society
to an extremely personal point of decision, so that they are willing to
accept a reversal of the cultural trends. The sparing of civilian lives
cannot be the total war's first priority... The purpose of total war is
to permanently force your will onto another people."
- An Arc Of Crisis - For Muslims.
- Following the defeat of the Soviet Union in 1989, at
the hands of the CIA backed Mujahideen in Afghanistan , and very much
in line with what the PNAC would later propose in it's 2000 document, `Rebuilding
America's Defences,` the US administration began to assume an ever more
aggressive stance in its international policies. As we have seen above
in Part Eight, (and dealt with below) in the wake of 9/11, the G.W Bush
administration launched what could be interpreted as a NEO CON -Zionist
Crusade against the nations of Afghanistan and then Iraq.
- In Afghanistan, even though some eight years later, hostilities
continue, a so-called victory was quickly declared over the Taliban's Islamic
Emirate, eliminating the rule of Shari'ah and replacing it with a puppet
anti-Islamic government that showered the Afghani people with promises
of a better life and freedom. In the absence of any rival superpower, the
US, now assuming for itself the role of global policeman, all indications
are that the PNAC conspirators in the US Government calculated that the
so-called victory in Afghanistan would pave the way for unconditional and
unopposed control over the Muslim world.
- However, a few months following the invasion, it became
evident the US had not even been able to secure the safety of its own soldiers
in Afghanistan-let alone to take control of the country-proving the Taliban,
having executed a tactical withdrawal of their troops from major cities
to preserve their arms and fighters, remained undefeated. The only discernible
achievement of the US led invasion has been the spread of poverty, crime,
diseases, a degradation of security and an `explosion` in drug trafficking
in those areas under the control of the Satanic alliance.
- In addition, the sharp increase in day and night Mujahideen
operations against the allied forces, forcing them to withdraw from many
of their positions in the south, east and centre of the country, had inflicted
continuous losses to the allied military forces. But despite all this,
the US has on the contrary, vigorously pursued the murderous Neo Con Agenda
of colonialism and conquest in Afghanistan, and at this juncture, there
seems no end to its ambitions there.
- Then, in 2003, ignoring world opinion and massive public
opposition, American led, so called coalition forces, invaded Iraq on grounds
which were nothing but lies, launching what was termed operation `Shock
And Awe,` against a people who had already suffered terribly for almost
a decade under US sponsored UN sanctions, and who were in no position to
- As in Afghanistan, the US administration exercised similar
inhumane and barbaric policies in their attempt to take control over Iraq,
as is reflected in the random detention, on a massive scale of Iraqi men,
women, the elderly and even children; along with the destruction and looting
of their homes and properties under the pretext of 'hunting down' resistance
- As a result, thousands of ordinary Iraqis with no part
to play in the saga, other than trying to live their lives and survive,
have been illegally detained and many killed whilst in detention. It is
clear that the objective of such a hostile policy against innocent civilians
has been to terrorize the Iraqi populace into subjection.
- In order appreciate the strategy of the operations now
being conducted against the Islamic world by the Illuninati Hidden Power,
in the ostensible form of the Neo Con/Libs and Zionists, we will briefly
examine in more detail the conflicts in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
- Afghanistan : Slaughter For Oil Pipelines And Poppy Fields.
- On September 11, 2001, as the twin towers of the World
Trade Centre collapsed to the ground, and part of the Pentagon lay in rubble,
all fingers almost immediately began pointing to the one man, whom the
US, has, over the years brainwashed the American public to hate, fear and
seek "protection" against. The U.S. has accused Osama bin Laden
of being involved in many acts of terrorism, not providing any evidence
to justify these accusations.
- In Afghanistan, the Taliban Government followed suit
and denounced the attacks. Wakeel Ahmed Mutawakel, the foreign minister
of Afghanistan's ruling Taliban regime, told the Arab television network
Al Jazeera, "We denounce this terrorist attack, whoever is behind
it." [CNN - 09/12/01]. Afghanistan was one of the very first nations
to express its condolences to the families of the victims of the horrific
and atrocious act, which has no basis in Islam.
- The U.S. Administration however, playing the wounded
and indignant victim, stated adamantly, via the bought and paid for global
media, that it was in no doubt that Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda network
was the force behind the attacks, and almost immediately threatened Afghanistan
with military measures for harbouring a "terrorist" and "terrorist
- The US quickly managed, mostly but not exclusively via
coercion, to get some forty other nations `on board, in their 'coalition
against `terror.` The Taliban asked the U.S. not to attack their already
war-ravaged country, which even at that time continued to feel the effects
of sanctions and an ever present famine. They also repeatedly asked the
U.S. to provide them with evidence for their accusations that Osama bin
Laden was responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon,
making it clear that they would try him in court, but no evidence was given
by the U.S., either to the world, or to the Taliban. The Taliban ambassador
to Pakistan, Abdul Salam Zaeef said in a press conference on Friday September
21 that, "It has angered Muslims of the world and can plunge the whole
region into a crisis. We are ready to cooperate if we are shown evidence.
If American agencies are bent on putting the blame on bin Laden, then they
won't be able to catch the real culprits."
- In an attempt to win popular support and pacify world
public opinion, the US claimed to have provided its allies with irrefutable
evidence that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks. However,
when British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, subsequently made this 'evidence'
public, numerous political analysts and journalists rejected it as being
flimsy and weak.
- Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar said, "It is
unacceptable that America issues ultimatums to the Islamic world either
to listen to America's message or accept destruction." Holding Osama
bin Laden responsible for the strikes in New York and Washington is an
excuse, he said. "Afghanistan does not have resources, nor is Osama
that powerful, nor does he have contacts with the outside world to carry
out or plan such attacks. We also do not give him permission to use Afghan
territory against any other country." Osama bin Laden has also explicitly
denied having any involvement in the attacks on the U.S.
- Whilst the Taliban made repeated efforts to prevent another
devastating war, by asking America to provide evidence of it's accusations
against Osama bin Laden, Mullah Omar also made it clear that if the U.S.
still chose to fight unnecessarily, the Taliban would retaliate. "Let
America be assured that war in Afghanistan is not a picnic," he said,
explaining that Afghanistan had never tried to create problems with America.
"We have held talks in the present and the past with U.S. governments
several times, and we are ready for more talks. If they choose otherwise,
they are looking for an endless war that will burn America and America
only. When America doesn't choose a peaceful way out of this and chooses
war and confrontation, she only is responsible for the consequences."
- Undeterred by the calls for justice, the U.S. together
with its biggest ally, the UK, began its preparations for war, placing
military forces on standby alert.
- Was The "Evidence" Against Osama Bin Laden
Justification For War?
- If the case against Osama Bin Laden was weak, and it
really was, then we have to ask ourselves "why did the US and the
coalition attack Afghanistan in the first place and why are they still
- The UK's Independent newspaper on 7th October 2001, published
an article of a UK Government document report intended to vindicate its
case against Bin Laden, as being entirely without substance.
- The report was initially heralded as being evidence of
Osama bin Laden's guilt, but instead, close analysis of the 21-page document
put out by the Government revealed a report of conjecture, supposition
and unsubstantiated assertions of fact. It used every trick in the Whitehall
drafter's arsenal to make the reader believe they were reading something
they were not: a damning indictment of Mr. bin Laden for the events of
- Tony Blair and his officials were it was said delighted
with the reaction to publication of the dossier. British Ministers believe
the document has sealed the propaganda war, convincing the country of the
need to move against Mr. bin Laden and al-Qa'ida and to accept limited
British and civilian casualties.
- The report was put together by a committee which included
senior members of MI5 and MI6, working round the clock, with drafts going
backwards and forwards to Washington. Within Whitehall, the dossier was
seen as vital to gaining the approval of a naturally cautious and sceptical
British public. As a paper produced by mandarins anxious to brook no argument
it is a classic of its kind, straight from the script of Yes Minister:
short on checkable detail; long on bold assertion; highly selective with
the choice of facts.
- UK Officials when they prepare such reports operate to
a set of principles. They know that unlike the US, and thanks to their
efforts in suppressing freedom of information down the years, Britain is
a secret society. The British are not accustomed to having anything presented
to us about intelligence matters and threats to national security. That,
plus the British characteristic of not defying authority, especially in
times of crisis, means that if the Government says loudly enough that something
is "evidence", even if it is not, it will be accepted as such.
- In the introduction, not the conclusion, the document
stated: "The clear conclusions reached by the government are: Osama
bin Laden and Al Qaeda, the terrorist network which he heads, planned and
carried out the atrocities on 11 September 2001." Introductions, as
the authors knew too well, normally set up a document, relating the background
as to why the book or, in this instance, a government document, has been
written. Here, that convention was rejected: from the word go, the Government
wanted to ensure the point of the document was conveyed.
- The document's complete lack of substantive evidence
proving that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks on 9/11, in
addition to all other official grounds given by the US Government renders
the war in Afghanistan illegal. Many people go on about the US obtaining
UN mandates for this action but the only type they obtained were mandates
which legitimise this action in principal, what that means is that the
UN mandates only say (in lay terms) that a nation is justified in retaliation
against another nations unprovoked attack, what is not mentioned is that
absolutely no mandate was obtained to bomb Afghanistan on the basis of
- Leaving that aside, lets' discuss the above points in
the two previous sections, did the US have something to hide in not presenting
the "evidence" to the Taliban and a World Court? Well of course
it did! If Osama was guilty then why did they not simply present the `evidence`
to the Taliban instead of belligerently demanding that the Taliban hand
him over, with no conditions even though the US provided absolutely zero
evidence that bin Laden was guilty? Certainly it would seem that the Taliban
were justified in not handing over Osama Bin Laden, just because a foreign
country demands his extradition, without presenting substantive `evidence!`
This swiftly moves us to conclude that the evidence was insufficient to
convict Osama Bin Laden! The conclusion of the article itself is summarised
quite neatly in this one sentence:
- "...close analysis of the 21-page document put out
by the Government on Thursday reveals a report of conjecture, supposition
and unsubstantiated assertions of fact. It uses every trick in the Whitehall
drafter's arsenal to make the reader believe they are reading something
they are not: a damning indictment of Mr. bin Laden for the events of 11
- Again we must ask ourselves, if the "evidence"
was not sufficient to convict bin Laden in a court of law (as the above
article says) then why was the war launched in the first place and why
are they still bombing Afghanistan? We would do well to remember that the
USA stated that they it was bombing Afghanistan specifically to make the
Taliban hand over Bin Laden.
- Another shoddy tactic used by the Western leaders to
further demonise Osama Bin Laden in order to rally public support, was
the disappearing "video" in which Osama Bin Laden apparently
"confesses" that he was in fact the mastermind behind 9/11. Needless
to say, the video which was scheduled to be screened to the world failed
to appear, and all we were left with as `proof` was the dubious word of
Prime Minister Tony Blair and an unsubstantiated transcript of the video.
But consider this; if they managed to make a transcript of Osama's `confession`
, why then were they unable to produce the video for the world to see?
Think about it, if they claim to have seen this video why did they not
show it to us? Since they had a transcript it is only logical that they
had the tape, so where was this tape? At this point I would like to offer
two good links which feature many good articles and links about this ongoing
saga, What really happened? and September the 11th, they provide good articles
and links from highly credible sources.
- To shed further doubt on the official reason for the
invasion of Afghanistan, here is a short transcript from a BBC article
which says that Bin Laden never claimed to have any nuclear weapons or
weapons of mass destruction in the Urdu translation of the interview he
had with the editor of the Pakistani newspaper, Dawn, and that it was only
in the English translation that he claimed to have these weapons. The full
article can be found here.
- Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir, the editor of the Urdu-language
newspaper Ausaf, conducted the interview with Bin Laden, who is widely
held responsible for the suicide attacks on the United States two months
ago. Dawn's English version quotes Bin Laden as saying:
- "If America used chemical and nuclear weapons against
us, then we may retort with chemical and nuclear weapons. We have the weapons
as a deterrent."
- Mr Mir then asks Bin Laden where he got the weapons,
which the al-Qaeda leader declines to answer.
- But in the Urdu version of the article, Bin Laden does
not threaten to use nuclear or chemical weapons.
- "The US is using chemical weapons against us and
it has also decided to use nuclear weapons. But our war will continue,"
he says, according to the BBC's own translation of the Ausaf article.
- The two versions are otherwise very similar, says the
BBC Monitoring unit."
- Truly an insight into the workings of the media whores
the world over! This clearly shows that an intended and purposeful propaganda
campaign to demonise Osama bin Laden in particular and Islam in general
in the eyes of the West, in an effort to gain support for the illegal war
against the people of Afghanistan.
- "I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider
the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable
act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and
other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle."-
Osama Bin Laden. This is what he declared in an interview with the Pakistani
newspaper, `The Ummat.`
- Since the "evidence" against Osama Bin Laden
is non-existent in legal terms, why then is the US led coalition still
occupying Afghanistan and condoning what can only be described as `Neo
Colonialism` and massive scale terrorism?
- Perhaps the same rational, logic and action should have
been applied to Israel when they they refused to hand over Ariel Sharon,
who was being investigated for major war-crimes (this is exactly the same
situation as with Bin Laden, who has never been convicted, and yet the
US demanded his extradition) yet we saw no great military coalition being
formed against Israel, let alone a bombing campaign! Again, it must be
emphasised that the Taliban were never provided with any evidence to prove
Osama's guilt, so could hardly be expected to hand over a man to another
country on the basis of mere suspicion?
- The Neo-Con Zionist Axis Turned America Into A Terrorist
- This is in flagrant violation of UN rules, but as we
all know by now, the USA government, or rather those pulling its strings
do not consider themselves to be subject to the multitude of laws and regulations
used to bind the rest of us, while at the same time, hypocritically condemning
other nations for not following UN rules.
- This link to a speech by Noam Chomsky explains how
the US, even though in not so may words, declared a terrorist state by
an International court of human rights, has refused to accept any responsibility
for it's covert operations (terrorism) in Nicaragua or to submit to due
process for it's policy which led to the deaths of thousands of people
in that land.
- Of interest is the The America service members protection
Act 2001 which effectively prevents it's VIP's, politicians and it's
military from being held to account and or prosecuted for war crimes. One
must ask, if a nation goes to these lengths to `immunise` itself from the
possibility of being prosecuted for war-crimes which are known about; is
it committing wartime atrocities which are hidden from public knowledge?
- I think it safe to say that the latter option is in the
affirmative. In fact, the Project Monarch and MK-Ultra Mind Control Programmes
attest to this fact. But I digress.
- Terrorism Is Subjective..
- So, former President Bush's `just war?` turns out to
be anything but. Clearly many other states harbour supposed terrorists,
so why are they specifically bombing Afghanistan (and now Yemen, Iraq,
Somalia, etc.)? America did not even accede to the Taliban's simple request,
that it hand over evidence of Osama's guilt to have him extradited. Of
course, they never had a case against him in the first place, and were
merely attempting to justify the implementation of `Phase One` in the build-up
to the Clash Of Civilisations.
- As an added bonus, most certainly the American defence
industry has reaped huge benefits from the war, and as Zbigniew Brzezinski
wrote in his book, `The Grand Chessboard,` the domination of Central Asia
and its plentiful supply of mineral deposits, would be the primary strategic
objective in the 21st Century.
- The Devastation Of An Innocent People.
- What causes the documented high level of civilian casualties
-- 3,767 civilian deaths in eight and a half weeks -- in the U.S. air war
upon Afghanistan? The explanation is the apparent willingness of U.S. military
strategists to fire missiles into and drop bombs upon, heavily populated
areas of Afghanistan. A legacy of the ten years of civil war during the
80s is that many military garrisons and facilities are located in urban
areas where the Soviet-backed government had placed them since they could
be better protected there from attacks by the rural Mujahideen. Successor
Afghan governments inherited these emplacements.
- To suggest that the Taliban used 'human shields' is more
revealing of the historical amnesia and racism of those making such claims,
than of Taliban deeds. Anti-aircraft emplacements will naturally be placed
close to ministries, garrisons, communications facilities, etc.. A heavy
bombing onslaught must necessarily result in substantial numbers of civilian
casualties simply by virtue of proximity to 'military targets', a reality
exacerbated by the admitted occasional poor targeting, human error, equipment
malfunction, and the irresponsible use of out-dated Soviet maps. But, the
critical element remains the very low value put upon Afghan civilian lives
by U.S. military planners and the political elite, as clearly revealed
by U.S. willingness to bomb heavily populated regions.
- "Current Afghan civilian lives must and will be
sacrificed in order to [possibly] protect future American lives."
- Actions speak, and words [can] obscure: the hollow pretence
of pious pronouncements made by Rumsfeld, Rice and the compliant corporate
media about the great care taken to minimize collateral damage is plain
for all to see. Other U.S. bombing targets struck are impossible to 'explain'
in terms other than the U.S. seeking to inflict maximum pain upon Afghan
society and its perceived 'enemies': the targeted bombing of the Kajakai
dam power station, the Kabul telephone exchange, the Al Jazeera Kabul office,
trucks and buses filled with fleeing refugees, and the numerous attacks
upon civilian trucks carrying fuel oil. Indeed, the bombing of Afghan civilian
infrastructure parallels that of the Afghan civilian.
- These Are people We Are Killing.
- Mohammed Raza, an `odd-job man`, was not so lucky. At
8 pm. as he was walking home, near to the Jalalabad airport. A cruise missile
targeted at a Taliban facility `a few hundred yards away,` strayed and
landed next to him. Shrapnel pierced his neck, grazing his spine, paralysing
- Three days later, a researcher at the Institute for Health
& Social Justice, Partners in Health of Harvard University, H.J. Chien,
confirmed that civilians had been killed in Jalalabad and elsewhere. On
October 9th, the Pakistan Observer [Islamabad] daily newspaper reported
on the first night, "37 Killed, 81 Injured in Sunday's Strikes."
The casualties spanned four provinces : Kabul - 20, heart -9, Kandahar
-4 and Jalalabad -4.
- By October 10th, The Guardian reported 76 dead civilians.
And by October 15th, the leading Indian daily, The Times of India was mentioning
over 300 civilian casualties and that the US-UK bombing action was in violation
of Article 51 of the United Nations Charter allowing the use of force in
self-defence. On the following day [October 16th], the alternative U.S.
media noted that during the first week of bombing, 400 Afghan civilians
had been slaughtered.
- Yet, the mainstream western press only took note of civilian
those casualties on October 9th when a cruise missile destroyed the building
of the United Nations land mine removing contracting firm, the Afghan Technical
Centre, in the upper class Macroyan residential district of eastern Kabul,
killing four night watchmen. Tellingly, the day before, October 8th, twenty
other Afghans living near the Kabul airport (in the Qasabah Khana neighborhood)
and near the Kabul radio station were also killed. On October 10th, the
Sultanpur Mosque in Jalalabad was hit by a bomb during prayers, killing
17 people. As neighbours rushed into the rubble to pull out one injured,
a second bomb was dropped reportedly killing at least another 120 people
(though I have not included this figure in my tally).
- Fleeing the intense bombing in Kandahar, Mehmood, a Kandahar
merchant, brought his family to his ancestral village of Chowkar-Karez,
a village 25 miles north of Kandahar. His extended family, crowded into
six cars, arrived at a village just about when it was attacked by U.S.
war-planes during the night of October 22/23rd. Ironically, the cars arriving
in the night may have prompted the raid -- as the Pentagon labels such
movements after dark as `a target of opportunity.` Said Mehmood, "I
brought my family here for safety, and now there are 19 dead, including
my wife, my brother, sister, sister-in-law, nieces, nephews, my uncle.
What am I supposed to do now?"
- One is tempted to naively ask, "Why is the media
covering up these events and giving a false image of low civilian casualties?
" But those who understand the Illuminati Agenda, and the personages
involved know full well why. The Western media is owned by the same people
waging war against the innocents. It plays a major role in the shaping
(programming) of public opinion in the West (and around the globe), and
if it were shown that there is a high casualty rate in Afghanistan there
would be protests hampering the American/NATO military effort in Afghanistan.
It should therefore seem logical to even the most uninformed citizen that
the media is aiding the American government in its destructive and murderous
campaign in Afghanistan. This is not only dishonest but it facilitates
the deaths of innocents by way of hiding from the people the knowledge
that this killing is happening.
- See http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/2009/09/afghani-killing-fields.html
for further evidence of Nato War Crimes.
- Iraq: Return To Babylon.
- It can reasonably said that the Illuminati conspiracy
began long long ago in a town called Babylon whose ancient ruins lie just
50 miles south of today's Baghdad. In his book Terrorism And The Illuminati,
David Livingstone explains thus:
- "The plot for a series of World Wars in the twentieth
century, culminating in a third against the Muslim world, was devised in
the eighteenth century, by American Civil War general, Albert Pike, then
Grand Master of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, a primary adjunct of the Illuminati.
However, though the final stages of this plot have been largely reserved
for our time, the conspiracy is affiliated with a lore of occult knowledge
that dates back to at least the sixth century BC. This lore begins with
a heresy, known as Kabbalah, which disguises itself as Jewish, but is a
pact to seek world domination, and the eradication of religion in favour
of the worship of Lucifer."
- In the sixth century BC, the Assyrians finally succeeded
in the sacking Jerusalem, and taking the remaining Jewish population into
captivity, this time to the city of Babylon, near what is now Baghdad in
Iraq. The tragedy was of enormous psychological consequence for Jewish
people. The presence of the Jewish people in the Holy Land was regarded
by many as a core tenet of their faith. According to the Bible, God had
ratified a covenant between Himself and Abraham, to grant the land of Palestine
to his descendants. This promise, however, was contingent on the Jewish
people adhering to the Commandments of the Law. Ultimately, their Exile
was a punishment fulfilled for their repeated transgressions and occult
- Nevertheless, there were some among the Jewish exiles,
who chose not to regard their captivity as a punishment, but as a temporary
trial. Instead, they interpreted their status as God's "Chosen"
as a permanent relationship, and that the Promise to inhabit the land of
Zion, or Palestine, was binding forever. Thus, this new Zionist interpretation
was closely intertwined with the mystical directions of the Kabbalah. Therefore,
this new Zionist interpretation was a bastardization of the real intent
of the Jewish faith, and, as we shall see, was not an integral part of
it, but was, through the centuries, increasingly imposed upon the rest
of the Jewish community, by a minority committed to this diabolical scheme.
- In Babylon, these heretical Jews, who refused to purge
their religion of pagan influences, instead added to them the adopted practices
of Babylonian magic. However, knowing that magic was forbidden in Judaism,
they rejected the God of Israel, choosing instead to honour Lucifer, who
they identified with the traditional enemy of the Hebrew faith, Baal. In
order not to reveal their apostasy, they disguised their hidden faith as
an "interpretation" of the religion, a cult now known as the
- Again, David Livingstone explains:
- This development is carefully described in the Koran,
which explains that, though it was claimed the Kabbalah was derived originally
from King Solomon, it was demons who taught such things, teaching them
that which had been revealed to the angels Harut and Marut in Babylon.
According to the Koran, chapter 2: 101-102:
- "When a messenger was sent to them (the Jews) by
God confirming the revelations they had already received some of them turned
their backs (to God's message) as if they had no knowledge of it. They
followed what the demons attributed to the reign of Solomon. But Solomon
did not blaspheme, it was the demons who blasphemed, teaching men magic
and such things as were revealed at Babylon to the angels Harut and Marut.
But neither of these taught anyone (such things) without saying; "we
are a trial, so do not blaspheme." They learned from them the means
to sow discord between man and wife. But they could not harm anyone except
by God' s permission. And they learned what harmed them, not what benefited
them. And they knew that the purchasers of (magic) would have no share
in the happiness of the hereafter. And vile was the price for which they
sold their souls, if they but knew."
- Borrowing from Jewish themes, therefore, these Kabbalists
would seek world domination by arguing that they were preparing the world
for the coming of the Messiah, and merely aiding God in bringing about
His promise to institute them as rulers of the world. Having rejected the
Jewish faith, however, they did not await the real Messiah, but would seek
to establish their own ruler, who they would falsely claim as messiah,
who would aid them in implementing the global acceptance of their occult
- According to their Kabbalistic interpretation of the
Bible, their `Messiah` is to be of line of King David, and since that time,
and in order to preserve this purported lineage, until the advent of their
expected leader, these Luciferians have been carefully intermarrying amongst
each other, and have included among them many of the leading figures of
history. They begin with a Persian Royal family, who intermarried with
that of Alexander the Great. By combining with that of Herod the Great,
these families were responsible for the creation and dissemination of the
leading mystery school of the Roman Empire, the Mysteries of Mithras, which
eventually succeeded in co-opting the emerging Christian movement, by producing
- Nevertheless, a secret, or Gnostic, version of Christianity,
also derived from Mithraism, survived to compete with Catholicism, in the
form of several secret societies, like the Templars, Rosicrucians and Freemasons,
practising occult arts, or what is known as `witchcraft.` This tradition,
was perpetuated by the most popularized branch of the Luciferian bloodline,
the Merovingians. Symbolized by the Holy Grail, the Merovingians, after
intermarrying into the family of a Jewish Exilarch, or claimant to the
Jewish throne, culminated in all the leading families of the Crusades.
- It was at this time that this European branch of the
family recombined with others from Eastern Europe and Armenia. These Eastern
aristocracies derived from the enigmatic Khazars, who had populated southern
Russia and the Basin of the Don River, and who, in the eighth century AD,
had converted to Judaism. Legend has it, however, that the Khazars were
remnants of the Lost Tribes. Armenia, just across the Caucasus, was another
locale of these supposed Lost Tribes. It was the intermarriage and perpetuation
of these aristocratic bloodlines that were being referred to in the heraldic
symbols of the lily, the rose, the double-headed eagle, and the skull and
- Also during the Crusades, this network connected with
an important occult center hiding within the Islamic world, in Cairo Egypt,
who followed the heretical version of Islam known as Ismailism. According
to Masonic legend, a number of these "Eastern Brethren" were
rescued and brought to Scotland, where they provided the basis of Sottish
Rite Freemasonry, which only emerged in the eighteenth century. However,
at the same time, this legend also provided the basis for the establishment
of Freemasonry in Egypt, which then became the second centre of Illuminati
activism. It was from these secret networks of impostors by which the Western
powers created Islamic terrorism, used to foment of a Clash of Civilizations,
through the fabrication of the terrorist threat.
- Operation Iraqi Freedom.
- The 2003 invasion of Iraq was officially, and now in
hindsight, grotesquely dubbed, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and has been followed
by an interminable U.S. Occupation of that sad country. As a propaganda
tool of its political perpetrators, this spurious action, having first
been promoted as a "War to liberate Iraq" has now become in effect
a "War in Iraq."
- "The invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of
blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept
of international law. The invasion was an arbitrary military action inspired
by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore
of the public; an act intended to consolidate American military and economic
control of the Middle East masquerading - as a last resort - all other
justifications having failed to justify themselves - as liberation. A formidable
assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of
thousands and thousands of innocent people. We have brought torture, cluster
bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation
and death to the Iraqi people and call it 'bringing freedom and democracy
to the Middle East"-- Nobel Laureate Harold Pinter.
- The US led seven-year war of aggression and subsequent
occupation of Iraq has at its core a Luciferian purpose, is driven by political
`Neo Con/Lib Zionism,` and is economically supported by a variety of very
powerful imperial interests. However these interests do not in themselves
explain the depth and scope of the sustained, massive and continuing destruction
of an entire society and its reduction to a permanent state of war.
- We will now examine the main orchestrator's, manipulators
and strategic reasoning behind the invasion of Iraq and as is ever pertinent
in such events, ask that perennial question, "Cui Bono," or who
benefits. It must be understood by the reader that although major players
in the `Geo Political` drama of current world events, these are not the
`Capstone Elite` of the Illuminati. Nonetheless, they wield significant
and malevolent influence within the halls of power.
- The Zionist Power Configuration (ZPC), which features
such prominent hard-line supporters of the State of Israel as Douglas Feith
and Paul Wolfowitz, Irving (Scooter) Libby, Stuart Levey, Elliot Abrams,
together with a cohort of consultants such as Presidential speech writer
David Frum, and secondary officials and policy advisers to the State Department.
These committed Zionist `insiders' were further supported by numerous `Israel-First`
functionaries in the fifty one primary American Jewish associations, which
form the PMAJO (President of the Major American Jewish Organizations).
It is their publicly affirmed goal to advance Israel's agenda, and using
its substantial influence, strongly advocated the case for an American
led war against Iraq in order to overthrow Saddam Hussein, occupy the country,
physically divide Iraq, destroy its military and industrial capability
and impose a pro-Israel/pro-US puppet regime. Their proposed plan intended
that Iraq be ethnically cleansed and then divided along religious and tribal
lines, as was advocated by the ultra-right, Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin
Netanyahu and the `Liberal' President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign
Relations and militarist-Zionist, Leslie Gelb.
- Influential and powerful criminals like Donald Rumsfeld
and Vice President Dick Cheney whose aim was to extend US imperial reach
in the Persian Gulf and strengthen its geo-political position by eliminating
a strong, secular, nationalist backer of Arab anti-imperialist insurgency
in the Middle East in the shape of Saddam Husein. These militarists sought
to a) further project the US military s encirclement of Russia and b) secure
complete control over Iraqi oil reserves thereby exerting economic and
strategic pressure on China. A far reaching element in all of this was
Vice President Cheney's past ties with the oil industry and current (at
that time) his role as CEO of Halliburton's giant military base contractor
subsidiary Kellogg-Brown and Root, which was consolidating the US Empire
through worldwide military base expansion. US oil companies, in fear of
losing ground to their European and Asian competitors, were anxious and
eager that Saddam Hussein be dealt with.
- The `Neo Imperialist` strategy of conquest and occupation
was designed to establish a long-term colonial military presence in the
form of strategic military bases with a significant and sustained contingent
of colonial military advisor's and combat units. The brutal colonial occupation
of an independent secular state with a strong nationalist history and an
advanced infrastructure with a sophisticated military and police apparatus,
extensive public services and wide-spread literacy naturally led to the
growth of a wide array of militant and armed anti-occupation movements.
- In order to offset the threat of a major collective insurgency
by Iraqi's, US colonial officials, the CIA and the Defence Intelligence
Agencies utilised the well proven `divide and rule' strategy (the so-called
`El Salvador solution' associated with the former `hot-spot' Ambassador
and US Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte) fomenting armed
sectarian-based conflicts and promoting inter-religious strife in order
to debilitate any effort at a united nationalist anti-imperialist movement.
The subsequent deconstruction of the secular civilian bureaucracy and the
Iraqi armed forces which remained was designed by the Zionists in the Bush
Administration to strengthen Israel's power in the region and to promote
the rise of those militant Islamic groups, which had been previously suppressed
- Israel was a past master of this strategy, having sponsored
and financed sectarian Islamic militant groups, like Hamas, as an alternative
to the secular Palestine Liberation Organization, thereby setting the stage
for sectarian fighting among the Palestinians.
- The results of these cynical policies were disastrous
for the Iraqi people as the occupation `gangsters` used US taxpayers money
to fund and exacerbate a plethora of internal conflicts as mullahs, tribal
leaders, political gangsters, warlords, expatriates and death squads proliferated.
Iraq pool of armed, unemployed young men formed the nucleus of a a new
mercenary army. The engineered `civil war' and `ethnic conflict' provided
spurious justification for the occupying forces and their Iraqi puppets
to render redundant huge numbers of experienced soldiers, police and civil
servants from the previous regime (especially if they were from Sunni,
mixed or secular families) and to undermine entirely the very basis for
- Using the pretexts of a generalized `war against terror,'
US Special Forces and CIA-directed death squads proceeded to spread terror
throughout Iraqi civil society, targeting those they suspected of daring
to criticise the puppet government. This tactic has decimated the Iraqi
educated and professional classes, who were purposely identified as being
subversives. Precisely the Iraqis most capable of re-constructing an independent
- A primary engine behind the second Iraq war was an influential
group of neo-conservative and neo-liberal ideologues with strong ties to
Israel. They regarded (what for them), was success in the Iraq campaign
as the first `domino' to fall, in a series of wars to `re-colonize' and
redraw the map of the Middle East . They disguised their imperialist ideology
with a paper thin veneer of rhetoric about spreading democracy in the Middle
East (notwithstanding of course, the undemocratic policies of their beloved
Israel over its subjugated Palestinian populace). In merging together Israeli
regional ambitions and US imperial interests, the neo-conservatives and
their neo-liberal fellow travellers in the Democratic Party have supported
the two Illuminati chosen Puppet Presidents, Bush and Obama in their escalation
of the wars against Afghanistan and Pakistan. They to a man supported Israel's
recklessly savage bombing campaign against Lebanon, the land and air assault
and massacre of thousands of civilians trapped in Gaza, the bombing of
Syrian facilities and are vocally behind Israeli lobby pushing for a pre-emptive,
full-scale military attack against Iran.