- Here are two separate commentaries we have received...
-
-
- Air France 447 - Biggest Coverup Since TWA
800
- By Aussi Shmozi
6-5-9
-
- The French and Brazilian governments are now participating
in the biggest cover-up since TWA-800.
-
- Air France Flt 447 cover-up is a repeat of the TWA-800
cover- up. Please read: http://tinyurl.com/rxbs6k
-
- The French and Brazilian governments are entangling
themselves in lie after lie.
-
- While before we were told that:
-
- "A search plane saw a band of wreckage in a 5km
(3 mile) strip, Brazil's Defence Minister Nelson Jobim said. A Brazilian
navy ship is expected to arrive in the area shortly to begin the task of
recovering wreckage. Late on Tuesday, Mr Jobim told reporters in Rio de
Janeiro he had no doubt the debris was from the Air France jet. He gave
few details of the wreckage, saying only that it included metallic and
non-metallic pieces.
-
- On Wednesday, senior French military official Capt Christophe
Prazuck confirmed the discovery...
-
- "While formal confirmation must still be obtained
by recovering debris and carrying out technical analysis, there is no longer
any room for doubt," Capt Prazuck told Agence France-Presse news agency.
An aeroplane seat, an orange buoy and signs of fuel have been spotted
in the ocean."
-
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8080290.stm
-
- TODAY, June 5, WE ARE TOLD THAT THERE IS NO WRECKAGE!
-
- IN ADDITION...
-
- Two pilots saw the explosion...see - http://tinyurl.com/ou8npu
http://tinyurl.com/rx6yce
-
- CONCLUSION... My conclusion today seems to support my
conclusion yesterday (see below).
-
- 1. There was an explosion aboard the plane.
-
- 2. Both governments are participating in the cover-up.
-
-
- 3. Like Boeing in TWA 800, I expect that Air-France will
get big contracts in exchange for participating in the cover-up.
-
- 4. If this was done by intelligence agencies, we need
to explore if it was done by an explosive or from satellite.
-
- 5. It could have been done also by intelligence agencies
by interfering with the plane's computer software, as we saw with Egypt-Air
990.
-
- 6. We must explore WHO WAS ON THAT PLANE? The NWO has
been in the business of assassinating opposition political leaders for
hundreds of years.
-
- 7. If there was really a warning in advance, we should
also explore the possibility of terrorist activities. However, Intelligence
Agencies have total control of all planes and staff. They could have planted
the bomb in the plane and no one would find it, no matter how long the
search.
-
- 8. If it was a real 'terrorist' act ('terrorist' is a
euphemism for an Arab Freedom fighter or most anyone who opposes Globalism),
it is possible the cover-up is conducted in order to protect Israel.
-
- PS - This is getting really interesting; I can't wait
to hear what the next lie will be tomorrow.
-
- **********
-
- AIR FRANCE FLIGHT 447or BRAZILIAN 'TWA 800' ?
-
- ANALYSIS June 4th 2009
-
- Initial reports indicated clearly that was NO SIGNAL
from plane's crew.
-
- Initial report is always the ONLY one we can trust 100%.
-
- After one day we were told that "there was a signal"...a
'single automatic electronic signal sent from the plane indicating there
was an 'electrical problem.'
-
- This is a direct indication Intelligence agencies are
involved.
-
- This is also an indication that we are notl dealing here
with a mass UFO abduction.
-
-
- This article clearly states that:
-
- PARIS, June 3 (UPI) -- Aviation authorities said an Air
France Buenos Aires-to-Paris flight was grounded temporarily because of
a bomb threat that turned out to be false http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/06/03/Another-Air-France-plane-got-
bomb-threat/UPI-18691244048844/
-
- Since all international aviation is controlled by Intelligence
Agencies, and since they refused to tell us the exact nature of these warnings,
it could only mean, IMHO, that Intelligence agencies are involved or attempting
to prevent publicity from going to the actual terrorists.
-
- Rense.com reported that above article included comment
by a pilot that he felt there was an explosion aboard the plane. As usual,
as soon as Rense.com report the truth, that article was censored and the
pilot comment was deleted. This further adds to the speculation that Intelligence
agencies are involved.
-
- Another clear indication was when Brazilian Defence Minister
Nelson Jobim immediately announced that there was 'no explosion' on board.
Minister Jobim, who is incidentally under direct control of western Intelligence
Agencies, was able in only a few hours to verify a 'fact' that usually
takes the American NTSB months or years to prove.
-
- http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25585128-23109,00.html
-
- This mouthpiece for Zionist propaganda, 'informs' us
that: "Terrorism 'unlikely' aboard Air France AF 447". This
is clearly a deliberate lie when we already know that authorities received
bomb warnings. The question is now, why the Intelligence agencies are trying
to divert our attention away from this blatant terrorist act.
-
- 10. Another indication that we are dealing here with
Intelligence Agencies is when another Zionist mouthpiece, TIMES ON LINE
tells us after just one day: "Mystery of why Flight 447 crashed may
never be solved "
-
- OH, REALLY? http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article6425236.ece
-
- Could it be that someone want us to forget this 'Brazilian
TWA-800' ?
-
- Another indication for possible Intelligence involvement
in this case came when a zionist-google search show us 290 articles trying
to convince us that "there was no explosion aboard the plane."
-
- Another classic example indicating a major cover-up in
this case:
-
- Google search: "Flight 447 EXPLOSION"
-
- Among the articles you will get:
-
- "Officials investigate Argentina bomb threat as
pilot claims Air - The Daily Mail (UK)
-
- This article was later censored, and now the title reads
exactly the opposite:
-
- "It couldn't have been a bomb: Oil stains from Flight
447 mean explosion is 'unlikely', says Brazil"
-
- Meanwhile, in another story...
-
- "A former Air France pilot yesterday said he believed
a terror attack to be the "highly likely" cause of the Flight
447 disaster.
-
- The pilot, who did not want to be named, said the chances
of an electrical fault seemed 'unfeasible' and lightning strikes were extremely
rare in modern planes."
-
- And he explained: "There was no mayday."
-
- "Likewise, if there was an explosion on board, the
wreckage would have been spread over a very wide area, as it was.
-
- "So, in my opinion, there is no other option than
the highly likely theory that a bomb went off on the plane.
-
- "Perhaps even a large bomb that destroyed the plane
in mid-air leaving no chance to send a message."
-
- See: http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/83389/Bomb-threat-just-days-
before-jet-disappeared/
-
- PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
-
- The A-300 was blown up by a large bomb. Authorities are
hiding that fact and the identity of the perpetrators.
-
-
- ______________________________
-
-
-
- I Know What Happened To Air France Flight
447
- By Dick Eastman
6-4-9
-
- According to Air France CEO Pierre-Henry Gourgeon the
Air France AirBus flying from Rio to Paris transmitted "a succession
of a dozen technical messages" indicated that "several electrical
systems had broken down'' which caused a "totally unprecedented situation
in the plane.''
-
- Gourgeon is wrong. The events that resulted in the death
of 128 people over the Atlantic were precedented. There have been several
similar events.
-
- Reuters has reported that AirBus is claiming that the
Airbus A330 has a good safety record, with no fatal accidents on a commercial
flight. This is a falsehood that Reuters did not bother to correct.
-
- In Miami in 1999 pilot and co-pilot of an American Airlines
Airbus
-
- A300 about to land suddenly lost control of the plane
to an exogenous agency. The rudder moved several times on its own. "The
rudder movements were extreme" said the NTSP.
-
- On Novemeber 12, 2001 American Airlines flight 587, an
Airbus A300, lost control to a remote agency resulting in the rudder suddenly
swinging back and forth violently, beyond the normal range that can be
effected from the cockpit. The flight data showed "unusual sideways
movements that slammed passengers back and forth," repeated banging
which caused tremendous strain of the vertical stabilizer
-
- until it broke off, despite the strengh of the lamination
construction. The passengers were slamed back and forth prior to the crash
in Queens, New York. But that was not all. After the rudder was gone
the remote controller began playing with other equipment.
-
- With the rudder gone the rudder could still fly, however
no the ailerons and elevators (the "flaps") began moving in fatal
ways. At one point was made to turn 10 degrees in just one second, and
180 degree turn in 18 seconds. The plane banked left, even though data
shows pilots were working controls to move in the opposite direction."
The black box contained pilot and co-pilot and tower dialog on this but
it was never released. (Marion Blakey, head of the NTSB, a Bush political
appointee with no experience for th job, who was also heading NTSP a month
before when the WTC was hit by two planes, the crash in Pennsylvania and
the alleged crash of a jetliner at the Pentagon.) After these turns the
remote controller put the plane into a nose dive and cut off the voice
recorder, both the plane's regular power and batteries. The plane was
brought to full throttle and then the flaps were brought down, causing
the engine pods to rip off their brackets and keep going as the plane
slowed down. The N.T.S.B. offered only two possible explanations, either
"the pilot made the rudder move intentionally or by accident"
or the plane was brought down by "butterfly effect" turbulence
from a Japan Airlines plane that had taken off ahead of the AirBus.
-
- Now perhaps we can begin to suspect that there was someone
on that Air France Flight that the people who benefited from the remote-
control crash of the 9-11 planes and the 11/12/01 plane did not like. By
the way, Dov Zakheim is the man I think is responsible for the 9-11 crashes
and one more crash which occured on the early morning of October 31, 1999.
-
- That Halloween morning EgyptAir 990, a Boeing 767 took
off from JFK for Cairo, Egypt. The plane had aboard 22 top Egyptian military
that had just received special training in the United States -- lured
into this trap by the bait of the unusual sharing of military information.
At about 2:00 a.m., from the vocie recorder, the Egyptian pilot excuses
himself to go to the toilet. The pilot and co- pilot are Egyptian and
they speak Arabic. But suddenly there is heard on the voice recording,
in English, the words, "Control it."
-
- Then the plane deviates from course on its own while
still on automatic pilot. The pilot responds to this event with an exclaimatory
prayer: "Taw ak kalt ala Allah," roughly equivalent to "Heaven
help us!" "May God protect us!" if not "Jesus Christ!"
The co-pilot attempts to disengage autopilot, but the remote controller
will not yield. The co-pilot is in a panic and again praying for help.
The plane, still on auto-pilot goes into a nose dive. After 16 seconds
of remote-controlled hijacking the pilot re-enters the cockpit and asks
the co-pilot what is happening. Both work to pull up and as they are both
trying the plane goes full throttle. The co- pilot cuts the fuel lines.
Then, again under remote control the right and left elevators move in
opposite directions. Ailerons on both wings move full up. The pilot orders,
in Arabic, "shut engines." The co-pilot replies: "They're
shut!" The last words heard are those of the pilot calling out, of
course still in Arabic, "Pull! Pull!" Then, exactly as happened
with Flight 587 over Queens, the voice recorders are remotely shut off
-- before the crash event. The US NTSB reached the conclusion -- against
all of this evidence -- that the co-pilot was somehow responsible.
-
- Some passenger in Miami in 1999 needed to be fightened
by a demonstration of power. Someone aboard Flight 587 was a problem for
the criminal conspiracy now in control of the US and Israeli governments.
And someone on the Air France flight was equally a threat or target of
vengence for the same interests.
-
- You will notice the lame excuses why the Air France black
boxes cannnot be recovered.
-
- 9-11 was not the work of "Islamic Fundamentalists"
who "hate our freedoms" and therefore hijacked four jetliners
on September 11 and and crashbombed the WTC towers and the Pentagon. No
one can argue the REAL evidence proving this. (They can and do of course
argue, for example on Fox News, with people who have impossible theories
about no planes at all hitting the WTC or absurd tales about energy beam
weapons in orbit bringing down the twin towers and Building 7 -- but that
is part of the pre-planned disinformation obstruction of justice psy-op
the perpetrators are using.
-
- I suspect the target of the crash was French and an opponent
of the Sarkozy, the very close supporter of the agendas of both the Bush
and Obama presidencies in international financial matters and middle east
and war on terror policies.
-
- The victims of this murder were from 32 countries. 61
were French, 58 were Brazilian and 26 were Germans. No Israelis were aboard
or American Jews were aboard. Sarkozy's French Environment Minister, Jean-Louis
Borloo, has declared officially that hijacking has been ruled out. How
in the name of Allah could they possible have done that in the light of
the facts I have relayed to you which are certainly known to them?
-
- One more point: The international killers crashed the
Air France plane in part because they were secure in the knowledge that
the Sarkozy government, like the Bush government in 2001, would do all
that was necessary to keep the truth from being told. The black boxes
will never be produced -- I haven't been following the news for since the
day of the crash, but I feel that is a safe prediction.
-
- Please post this, read it aloud over the phone, put it
up on your blog. It is up to them to embarrass and shame the French into
investigating this act of mass-murder.
-
- Death by airplane has been the preferred method of eliminating
individuals without drawing suspicion to the specific background and connections
of an "isolated victim." We can't let them continue to get away
with it.
-
- Dick Eastman Yakima, Washington
- Every man is responsible to every other man.
|