- First, please read this...
-
- http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27275
-
- Dear Legislator,
-
- I am writing to you on a matter of grave personal concern
at the suggestion of the Natural Solutions Foundation, a not for profit
humanitarian NGO devoted to health and health freedom, to educate decision
makers and to petition for respect for our basic human rights. This letter
is regarding the proposed Protecting Americans' Self-Shielding bill.
-
- When the people of this district elected you, we anticipated
that, true to your election words, you would protect our well-being and
our rights. The proposed enforcement of mandatory treatment, including
mandatory vaccines, for any alleged "pandemic" condition is both
a violation of that commitment and a violation of my rights to control
my own body and make my own health choices.
-
- Both State and Federal legislation now provides for the
mandatory vaccination, drugging or incarceration for those who refuse such
"treatment."
-
- The hype and hysteria of the media and the distortion
of the science of infection and contagion by governmental and international
bodies, coupled with the pharmaceutical industry's headlong rush to force
yet more profits from vaccines which are untested, uninsurable and dangerous,
and from drugs which are known to be both ineffective and unsafe, leads
me to write to you to urge you to push back this potentially deadly tide
of political pandemic response.
-
- Independent physicians such as Dr. Ron Paul MD, Dr. Rima
E. Laibow MD, Dr. Julian Whittaker MD, Dr. Joseph Mercola DO, Dr. John
Wilson MD, Dr. William Rea MD and Dr. William Sears MD, among others, have
all warned about the dangers of forced vaccination and the ineffectiveness
of such measures to stop infectious disease. Their independent medical
opinions must be given great weight while the self-serving opinions of
government "experts" who demand forced vaccinations must be discounted
as biased.
-
- It is a clear violation of the Constitutional provisions
against both slavery and indentured servitude since a free, unindentured
or enslaved person may make his/her own health choices while an indentured
servant or slave's body is owned by a master who may make health decisions
about the body of the slave which may be enforced on a compulsory basis.
-
- In addition to the moral and cultural repugnance which
mandatory treatment invokes, it violates the rights of citizens and introduces
the possibility of harm to them which cannot, under the current legal structure,
be recompensed. Vaccination is an uninsurable risk and vaccine manufacturers
are immune from liability for dangerous or even deadly products, while
vaccines have never been proven to be either safe or effective. On the
other hand, even the CDC admits that there are risks of significant proportion
with vaccines.
-
- Any "pandemic vaccine" would be untested upon
its use as predicted by the CDC and WHO in the fall of 2009. The possibilities
for disaster are enormous. Those of us who do not desire these "treatments"
should be free to make such a choice with the endorsement and support of
the State.
-
- As a person who is neither an indentured servant nor
a slave, but a member of your constituency, I urge you in the strongest
terms to:
-
- 1. Commit to holding fact finding hearings in the immediate
future to evaluate the true status of the pandemic threat and pandemic
treatment safety; the Baxter Pharmaceutical incident earlier this year
where annual flu vaccines intended for 18 countries were "accidentally"
contaminated by live Avian Flu viruses, must be fully investigated.
-
- 2. Commit to putting your efforts toward reversing dangerous
legislation and policies which can endanger the lives and health of the
members of your constituency.
-
- 3. Provide for sanction-free personal exemptions from
proposed mandatory drug or vaccination treatment, instead offering people
who do not wish to be so treated the opportunity and support necessary
for self-quarantine and self-shield at home, if needed for public safety
reasons. Such support would include food, water and communication support,
provision of medications or supplies of their choice and other means which
support their choice and safety. This alternative would be far less expensive
and socially disruptive than the forced relocation of "vaccine refusers"
in violation of the Geneva Conventions.
-
- We demand full recognition of our right to protect ourselves
in our own homes.
-
- Thank you for your support of liberty and of your sworn
duty to protect both the US Constitution and the well-being of your constituents.
-
- Here is a link to the text of the bill for which we are
seeking congressional sponsorship, the Protecting Americans' Self-Shielding
Act (Protecting Americans Act) - http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2888
-
- Yours in health and freedom,
|