- The following is the actual text of a speech delivered
in December, 2005 by Comrade Chi Haotian the Vice-Chairman of China's
Military Commission to top officers and generals. Keep in mind that China has
for many years advocated deceitful and covert warfare against its enemies.
This is their Modus Operandi. There should be little question that a "Bird
Flu" Pandemic would deeply excite them. (Don't forget how they have
poisoned thousands of American pets and knowingly placed lead paints on
toddler's toys.)
-
- "Comrades, I'm very excited today, because the large-scale
online survey sina.com that was done for us showed that our next generation
is quite promising and our Party's cause will be carried on. In answering
the question, "Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners
of war," more than 80 per cent of the respondents answered in the
affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations. Today I'd like to
focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey among our
people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during which
I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [Taiwan,
Diaoyu Islands and the Spratley Islands --- Ott] and mentioned that 20
years of the idyllic theme of 'peace and development' had come to an end,
and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for
China's next phase. I also mentioned we have a vital stake overseas. The
central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at
women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far
beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the
Chinese people's attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers do not
hesitate to kill even noncombatants, they'll naturally be doubly ready
and ruthless in killing combatants. Therefore, the responses to the survey
questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards war..We
wanted to know: If China's global development will necessitate massive
deaths in enemy countries; will our people endorse that scenario? Will
they be for or against it?
-
- The fact is, our 'development' refers to the great revitalization
of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we
have now but also includes the whole world. As everybody knows, according
to the views propagated by the Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated
from one single mother in Africa. Therefore no race can claim racial
superiority. However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese
scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not
originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China.
Therefore, we can rightfully assert that we are the product of cultural
roots of more than a million years, civilization and progress of more than
ten thousand years, an ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single
Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls
itself 'descendants of Yan and Huang.'
-
- During our long history, our people have disseminated
throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim,
and they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic
groups in the South Pacific. We all know that on account of our national
superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization
was at the peak of the world. We were the centre of the world civilization,
and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours. Later on,
because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of
our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the centre
of the world shifted to the West.
-
- In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the centre of
the world civilization shift back to China? Actually, Comrade Liu
Huaqing made similar points in early 1980's Based on an historical analysis,
he pointed out that the centre of world civilization is shifting. It shifted
from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States; now
it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th Century
as the British Century and the 20th century as the American Century, then
the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century! (Wild applause fills the
auditorium.)
-
- Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because,
fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer
history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors
left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great
unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us
these heritages. These two heritages determined that we have a stronger
ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been
able to prosper for so long. We are destined 'not to be buried by either
heaven or earth' no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national
disasters. This is our advantage. Take response to war as an example. The
reason that the United States remains today is that it has never
seen war on its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, the enemies
would have already reached Washington before its congress finishes
debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don't
waste time on these trivial things. Maybe you have now come to understand
why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology
from the West into China and empty us from the inside, if we
let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will obediently
listen to us and follow us? If the common people don't believe Comrade
Hu Jintao is a qualified leader, begin to question his authority, and want
to monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why
we are leading God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China??
-
- The first pressing issue facing us is living space. This
is the biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last
speech, I said that the fight over basic living resources (including land
and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of wars in history. This
may change in the information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita
resources are much less than those of Germany's back then. In addition,
economic development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative impact,
and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very
short supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of
soil, water, and air. Not only our ability to sustain and develop our race,
but even its survival is gravely threatened, to a degree much greater than
faced Germany back then Anybody who has been to Western countries knows
that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests alongside
the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their sky
is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered with a layer
of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even
our ground water is so polluted that it can't be drunk without filtering.
They have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy
a small residential building; in contrast our streets are always crawling
with people, and several people have to share one room.
-
- Many years ago, there was a book titled Yellow Catastrophes.
It said that, due to our following the American style of consumption, our
limited resources would no longer support the population and society would
collapse once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our population has
already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to sustain
our nation. It's not that we haven't paid attention to this issue. The
Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue. But we must understand
that the term 'living space' (lebenstraum) is too closely related to Nazi
Germany.
-
- The reason we don't want to discuss this too openly is
to avoid the West's association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in
turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in
our emphasis on He Xin's new theory, 'Human Rights are just living rights'
we only talk about 'living' but not 'space' so as to avoid using the term
'living space.' From the perspective of history, the reason that China is
faced with the issue of living space is because Western countries have
developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries established colonies
all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue
of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people
outside of China, so that they can develop outside of China.
-
- Would the United States allow us to go out
to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm
in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and
some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India,
or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only
countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have
the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.
-
- Therefore, solving the 'issue of America' is the
key to solving all other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to
have many people migrate there and even establish another Chinaunder
the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered
by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit
to the White race. We the descendants of the Chinese nation are ENTITLED
to the possession of the land! It is historical destiny that China and United
States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and
fight. In the long run, the relationship of China and the United
States is one of a life-and-death struggle. Of course, right now it
is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening
to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology. We still
need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our
relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects
and use America as an example to reconstruct our country. Only
by using special means to 'clean up' America will we be able
to lead the Chinese people there. Only by using non-destructive weapons
that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for
ourselves.
-
- There has been rapid development of modern biological
technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another. Of
course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the opportunity
to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose
of 'cleaning up' America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping
was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to
make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focused
instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations
of the enemy country. Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness,
but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese
people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound
to take place. According to the computations of the author of Yellow Peril,
more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than
800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported
nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population
is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of its
capacity. One day, who know how soon it will come, the great collapse will
occur any time and more than half of the population will have to go.
-
- It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million
Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century,
a century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians,
do not want deaths, But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths
of Chinese and those of Americans, we'd have to pick the latter, as, for
us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and
the life of our Party. The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly
seizing the preparations for military battle. The central committee believes,
as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic
problems will all be readily solved. Therefore, our military battle
preparation appears to aim at Taiwan, but in fact is aimed at the United
States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft
carriers or satellites. Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife
for the birth of the new society. Therefore war is the midwife for the
birth of China's century."
|