- The record is fairly clear. You can find it on the Israeli
website, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs website. Israel broke the ceasefire
by going into the Gaza and killing six or seven Palestinian militants.
At that point and now I'm quoting the official Israeli website Hamas retaliated
or, in retaliation for the Israeli attack, then launched the missiles.
-
- Now, as to the reason why, the record is fairly clear
as well. According to Ha'aretz, Defense Minister Barak began plans for
this invasion before the ceasefire even began. In fact, according to yesterday's
Ha'aretz, the plans for the invasion began in March. And the main reasons
for the invasion, I think, are twofold. Number one; to enhance what Israel
calls its deterrence capacity, which in layman's language basically means
Israel's capacity to terrorize the region into submission. After their
defeat in July 2006 in Lebanon, they felt it important to transmit the
message that Israel is still a fighting force, still capable of terrorizing
those who dare defy its word.
-
- And the second main reason for the attack is because
Hamas was signaling that it wanted a diplomatic settlement of the conflict
along the June 1967 border. That is to say, Hamas was signaling they had
joined the international consensus, they had joined most of the international
community, overwhelmingly the international community, in seeking a diplomatic
settlement. And at that point, Israel was faced with what Israelis call
a Palestinian peace offensive. And in order to defeat the peace offensive,
they sought to dismantle Hamas.
-
- As was documented in the April 2008 issue of Vanity Fair
by the writer David Rose, basing himself on internal US documents, it was
the United States in cahoots with the Palestinian Authority and Israel
which were attempting a putsch on Hamas, and Hamas preempted the putsch.
That, too, is no longer debatable or no longer a controversial claim.
-
- The issue is can it rule in Gaza if Israel maintains
a blockade and prevents economic activity among the Palestinians. The blockade,
incidentally, was implemented before Hamas came to power. The blockade
doesn't even have anything to do with Hamas. The blockade came to there
were Americans who were sent over, in particular James Wolfensohn, to try
to break the blockade after Israel redeployed its troops in Gaza.
-
- The problem all along has been that Israel doesn't want
Gaza to develop, and Israel doesn't want to resolve diplomatically the
conflict, both the leadership in Damascus and the leadership in the Gaza
have repeatedly made statements they're willing to settle the conflict
in the June 1967 border. The record is fairly clear. In fact, it's unambiguously
clear.
-
- Every year, the United Nations General Assembly votes
on a resolution entitled "Peaceful Settlement of the Palestine Question."
And every year the vote is the same: it's the whole world on one side;
Israel, the United States and some South Sea atolls and Australia on the
other side. The vote this past year was 164-to-7. Every year since 1989
in 1989, the vote was 151-to-3, the whole world on one side, the United
States, Israel and the island state of Dominica on the other side.
-
- We have the Arab League, all twenty-two members of the
Arab League, favoring a two-state settlement on the June 1967 border. We
have the Palestinian Authority favoring that two-state settlement on the
June 1967 border. We now have Hamas favoring that two-state settlement
on the June 1967 border. The one and only obstacle is Israel, backed by
the United States. That's the problem.
-
- Well, the record shows that Hamas wanted to continue
the ceasefire, but only on condition that Israel eases the blockade. Long
before Hamas began the retaliatory rocket attacks on Israel, Palestinians
were facing a humanitarian crisis in Gaza because of the blockade. The
former High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson, described what
was going on in Gaza as a destruction of a civilization. This was during
the ceasefire period.
-
- What does the record show? The record shows for the past
twenty or more years, the entire international community has sought to
settle the conflict in the June 1967 border with a just resolution of the
refugee question. Are all 164 nations of the United Nations the rejectionists?
And are the only people in favor of peace the United States, Israel, Nauru,
Palau, Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Australia? Who are the rejectionists?
Who's opposing a peace?
-
- The record shows that in every crucial issue raised at
Camp David, then under the Clinton parameters, and then in Taba, at every
single point, all the concessions came from the Palestinians. Israel didn't
make any concessions. Every concession came from the Palestinians. The
Palestinians have repeatedly expressed a willingness to settle the conflict
in accordance with international law.
-
- The law is very clear. July 2004, the highest judicial
body in the world, the International Court of Justice, ruled Israel has
no title to any of the West Bank and any of Gaza. They have no title to
Jerusalem. Arab East Jerusalem, according to the highest judicial body
in the world, is occupied Palestinian territory. The International Court
of Justice ruled all the settlements, all the settlements in the West Bank,
are illegal under international law.
-
- Now, the important point is, on all those questions,
the Palestinians were willing to make concessions. They made all the concessions.
Israel didn't make any concessions.
-
- I think it's fairly clear what needs to happen. Number
one, the United States and Israel have to join the rest of the international
community, have to abide by international law. I don't think international
law should be trivialized. I think it's a serious issue. If Israel is in
defiance of international law, it should be called into account, just like
any other state in the world.
-
- Mr. Obama has to level with the American people. He has
to be honest about what is the main obstacle to resolving the conflict.
It's not Palestinian rejectionism. It's the refusal of Israel, backed by
the United States government, to abide by international law, to abide by
the opinion of the international community.
-
- And the main challenge for all of us as Americans is
to see through the lies.
-
- Norman Finkelstein is author of five books, including
Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, Beyond Chutzpah and
The Holocaust Industry, which have been translated into more than 40 foreign
editions. He is the son of Holocaust survivors. This article is an edited
extract of the views of Finkelstein given at DemocracyNow.org. His website
is www.NormanFinkelstein.com
-
|