- Before we get to Whey & Sucralose and the regrettable
shortfalls of the "Dead Doctor's Don't Lie" Guy... Dr. Joel
Wallach, let me give the impetus for taking him to task in this piece...
-
- Folks, CODEX is coming! CODEX is an official movement
looming to facilitate corrupt Politicians & the Pharmz Industry.
These are entities controlling your health care so as to maximize a profit
only to them and to a cabal of MD's shilling for them. With CODEX, if
you want to take supplements -taken for granted now- you will have to
get a prescription from an MD to buy an expensively inferior Supplement,
likely, manufactured to "rigged-standards" by the evil Pharmaceutical
Industry, in their stead. Predictably, all Calcium will be "Carbonate"
- all Magnesium will be "Oxide"! All Vit. E will be synthetic
"DL." All supp's will be crap, crap & more crap - "from
A to Zinc"! Ummm... sort of like "Centrum" [tm].
-
- CODEX, you see, is a program designed to give the already
rich Pharmz industry, along with their pawns -the AMA, the FDA, and the
best Politicians money can buy - almost complete control over every aspect
of your nutrition & health-care. This is so they can have complete
control over YOU, reader!
-
- This "new world order" boondoggle is sweeping
through Europe, already! Consequently, we already see the lies &
misdirection utilized there to convince trusting "Sheeple" stateside
that CODEX is all about protecting our health and welfare... you know,
much like the IRS is only there to help.
-
- You see, they maintain they're protecting the consumer
by putting all "Supplemental-Charlatans" & "Snake-Oil
Salesmen" out of business. So, CODEX, convincingly if duplicitously,
conveniently points to rip-off crap like "SeaSilver", "Body-Balance",
"Nutria", "FrequenSea" & many more as so-called
good reasons for imposing a seemingly necessary CODEX on ALL the rest...
-
- Folks! Here is why that argument is completely fatuous!
If the objective is to protect us from Snake-Oil Salesmen? Then, with
my blessing, *they* should have a powerful and well funded Government
Agency testing every supplement for potency, purity, full- disclosure
labeling & general efficacy, along with every other consumable meat,
dairy and produce! These official purity and standards agencies become
increasingly under-funded, as spare as they are rare.
-
- All flagrant violators would be summarily sterilized...
I mean "get tough"! That "SeaSilver" guy would be
singing high falsetto in a "Boys Choir" when I was done with
him. But that's not the interest, reader. The interest is to qualify
their dodgy pharmz at the expense of the quality supplements that are
available today!
-
- See, accomplish the goal in a fair way, like I suggest
above (OK, maybe without the castration) -but not in an evil power-play
where the only way to get Supp's is to go through a freaking MD, a suspicious
entity ironically demonstrating over & over again that his goal is
to keep you sick by only treating symptoms, doing nothing to prevent or
fix the problem, so he can "manage" your disease for the rest
of your miserable life- extracting maximum revenue from that misery with
a smile and a back-rub.
-
- Believe me Folks, the Pharmz industry & their "lock-step"
MD's will manipulate every facet of their new *gift* of regulated Supplements
-that they'd control- to insure we, collectively, take even more toxic
Pharmz for the rest of our lives.
-
- Honestly, I should go to work for the Pharmaceutical
Industry... eh? I could show them all sorts of underhanded, sneaky ways
to make Supplements work for them & against YOU!
-
- To start, make it mandatory that every citizen start
the day with a Centrum (adults) & a FlintStones (children)..."yeah,
that's the ticket" ...and to insure most women develop Osteoporosis
& are put on "Once-a-Month" Boniva, make sure they take
a huge 2000mg dose of Calcium CARBONATE every morning. "I can do
that!"
-
- Yeah boy, even Supp's causing you to need even more pricy
Pharmaceuticals - Mo' Money, Mo' Money!
-
- Consequently, it is incumbent on all of us who like a
choice of quality supplements & who believe in the freedom to continue
choosing! We need to speak-out against these bogus products even if
our sister-in-law or church-deacon is selling the crap... eh?
-
- So, this is where the venerable Doctor Wallach of the
"Dead Doctor's Don't Lie" radio show, comes in. Doc is owner
of "Youngevity Supp's" & about a half dozen subsidiary supplement
companies comprising a massive MLM (multi level marketing) sales conglomerate.
-
- Don't get me wrong, "Youngevity" has mostly
great products (I especially like their liquid multi's)... I just have
issue with a couple of his other products. Also, I don't have a problem
with MLM except the prices are a little on the high side. Still, as long
as it is a good product - then no problem.
-
- Believe me though, reader. This is the most difficult
thing I have ever felt compelled to write! I think there has been tremendous
good accomplished through Doc Wallach, in the aggregate, by educating
people regarding disease prevention through nutrition & knowledge
of profit driven medical lies! All this far outweighs the 3 or 4 little
lies he tells, or should. The problem is, though, these lies can come
back to haunt you, me, him, and all the rest, eh?
-
- Consider: the "Heavy-Hitter's" in the Holistic
Community (like Doc Wallach) have to be held to a very high standard,
especially when they are such a hi-profile multi-millionaire already urinating
in the Post-Toastee's of every Medical Doctor out there by calling his
radio show "Dead Doctor's Don't Lie"... See -- this means "Living
Doctor's Do Lie"! BTW, this is a sentiment I happen to firmly believe
in, and can easily prove same if you care to challenge me.
- Please do. Please. I'll debate anyone anywhere, and
I'll be the one using logic and science. I digress.
-
- The Pharmz Exec's & MD's can't wait to eviscerate
Dr. Wallace & his supplement empire with CODEX ...and in my humble
opinion Wallach is giving them needless ammunition by doing some greedy
little things in a couple of his products which are unnecessary &
unhealthful (in my considered opinion), but would provide his evil enemy
just such an ammunition.
-
- The first two of these half-truths or lies I have known
about for many years. Regretfully, I was willing to keep my mouth shut
because I did not want to sully a guy I thought otherwise did such tremendous
good... but just a week or so back from this writing he said something
about Sucralose (Splenda) that was so blatant an obfuscation that it was
the final straw!
-
- A caller asked, straight out, if Sucralose -the stuff
in Splenda & the doc's big selling product "Nature's Whey"
Protein Powder- was safe. Doc said it was a no-calorie sweetener that
came from Molasses, so he loved Sucralose.
-
- Molasses!?! Great suffering ZOT! That's like saying
Plutonium is safe because it comes from "Dirt" & we grow
tomatoes in dirt!
-
- The ONLY tenuous connection I can make between Molasses
& Sucralose is that one way to make table-sugar is to extract sucrose
from molasses & then you can turn the sucrose (table-sugar) into
Sucralose by using an extremely long, convoluted, controversial series
of CHEMICAL processes centering around the removal of 3 hydroxyl groups
out of the sugar molecule and replacing them with 3 -potentially toxic-
chlorine atoms. This new "Chlorinated" Sucralose molecule is
the problem.
-
- But before we do a little simple chemistry on Hydrocarbons
& Chlorocarbons comprising same? I might as well quickly point out
the other 2 sneaky things I would like to see corrected concerning his
products and about which I'd been remiss in not reporting.
-
- 1).. "Protein Powder" - Here is how this product
is described on his web-site: "Whey is the purest, richest, most
complete and bio- available protein source known to man. Nature's Whey
contains pure whey protein, soy protein, and various vitamins and minerals
as co- factors".
-
- Well, it's called Nature's "WHEY" & this
blurb above certainly makes it sound like this is mostly "Whey Protein"
- but it did mention Soy Protein... though it mentioned it second; however,
so in keeping with the "Convention" (Law) that ingredients are
listed in order of decreasing amounts on a label, one might assume that
this product is mostly (the more expensive) Whey Protein... BUT, this
1,2 sequence of Whey & Soy was not on the label, it was in their web
advertisement... Still... ...shouldn't you sorta, kinda, and mostly follow
that Convention anyway? Say "yes" reader!
-
- ...OK, lets look on the label of Nature's "WHEY"....and
see which item tops the list? Humm, the first item listed is not WHEY...
it is Milk Protein Isolate (much cheaper than whey)! Well surely, Whey
must be listed next! NO Folks, Soy Protein Isolate is next!
- Whey Protein Concentrate (WPC) finally comes in third
and even then, it is not the superior WPI (Whey Protein Isolate), it is
the less expensive WPC, (concentrate).
-
- What does the item sequence in this case actually mean
as far as percentages of each ingredient? Well, you don't know!
-
- You have no way of actually telling how much Whey is
in there because it could shake down like the following, with a fair amount
of Whey for 3rd place... 35% Milk Protein, 33% Soy, and 32% Whey = 100%...
say... so the Whey could be as high as 30 to 32%. See?
- But shouldn't it still be called "Nature's Milk
Protein"...not "Nature's Whey"?...Whey is 3rd, Milk Protein
is FIRST. C'mon!
-
- Or, it could just as legally be a complete rip-off with
the following tiny amount for 3rd place: 50% Milk, 45% Soy & only
5% Whey... you have no way of knowing. I mean if they are already trying
to trick you by calling the product "Nature's WHEY", when whey
is listed 3rd with respect to amounts... why not go "Full Tilt Boogie
with the hammer down" and only put in a little, tiny bit of the...
most expensive item?
-
- Shoot, you could put in 99% Milk & Soy protein with
only 1% Whey & the label's descending order of amounts would still
be correct... legally, but what about morally and ethically? Can some
of you sales-people for this stuff tell me the percentage of whey? I
didn't think so.
-
- Also in ref. to the Soy in this product... it is Soy
Isolate, which most credible holistic practitioners would say is very
unhealthful crap because of Phytates, Oxalates & Phyto-estrogen!
Can you say Cartman's "boy boobies"? It's the estrogen, Booby!
-
- In fact, on any day of the week you can get Pharmacist
Ben Fuchs (he fills in for Doc Wallach quite often) to readily admit that
Soy Isolate has a very "Dark Side" (as he describes it) ...but,
when one of the callers ask him about the Soy in "Nature's Whey..."
Whoa Newt ...He starts back-peddling & tripping all over himself with
some industrial strength Hummina, Hummina before he recovered to say,
"Well, you shouldn't do too much Soy"...but wait a minute, Skippy!
-
- ... How much is too much when you consider Doc Wallach
seems to encourage people to do "Nature's Whey" several times
a day? OK, I've beat that enough. On to:
-
- 2).. "Nature's WHEY" Protein Snack Bars -
Here is the Doc's description, "...Besides the excellent whey protein,
they contain selenium, calcium, glucosamine and more. When you are skipping
a meal to lose weight don't skip taking in the good stuff your body needs"!
-
- OK Folks... I searched & searched the Nutritional
Facts and the Ingredients section and I did find the "selenium, calcium,
glucosamine and more" - but I did not find Whey Protein anywhere
in either section.
-
- I did; however, find "Soy Protein Isolate"
& the particularly evil, "Soy Protein Crisp Nuggets" but
NO WHEY! Then I quickly looked to make sure the candy bar wrapper didn't
say "Nature's WAY"...no, no, it says "Nature's WHEY"...I
just don't quite know what to make of this... it looks a little bit like,
oh, I don't know... ...a lie, you think?
-
- No whey? No way! Though, it is just this kind humbuggery
that will fuel the onslaught of an evil CODEX!
-
- OK, now for Sucralose (Su)...the stuff in Splenda.
Read Dr. Betty Martini's excellent article on Rense, ref. Sucralose http://
www.rense.com/general63/SPLENte.htm
-
- I also happen to agree with the #1 web holistic Doc,
Dr. Mercola (and many others I might add) that sucralose (Su) is not safe
because it is a manmade "Chlorinated-Molecule." However, this
paper is not to convince you Sucralose is unsafe, even though I hope
I do - I will explain both sides of the "Chlorination" issue
and then you can decide.
-
- This essay is not about a suspect sweetener, this essay
regards how a scientist like Dr. Wallach could explain the safety of his
product by making this huge leap from Molasses to Sucralose without stopping
off at that pesky little injection of 3 toxic atoms that "Create"
Sucralose... yes, Sucralose is created.
-
- It is not just some natural, harmless "part"
of Molasses that you get after Granny stirs up a big pot of "cane-squeezins"
on the wood fire... OK, that was a little bit of hyperbole, but Doc Wallach
certainly never mentioned any long, intricate, man-made process of "Chlorination"
that has many top holistic investigators crying foul!
-
- Do a web search for anything resembling "How Sucralose
is made" or "Sucralose processing" or "Sucralose Whatever",
without mentioning Chlorine or Molasses in your query...AND then every
time we see the word "Molasses" pop up in the 95,000 hits, I
will give you $20... but all you have to do is give me ONE Dollar every
1,000 times you see the word Chlorine or Chlorination... I will win about
$95... that's 95,000 to zero.
-
- I'm such a nice guy I'm gonna tell you what Doc should
have said, given it is... sorta-mostly true: "Sucralose is a chlorinated
sugar molecule rendering this New "sugar" unrecognizable to
us, so it is not metabolized, meaning it passes harmlessly out of your
body!
- The opposing view is that some of the Sucralose is metabolized,
but the FDA has found it to be safe."
-
- And he might have even been able to slip past some of
the weak pro- Su crap that you're apt to hear..." Suracrose is safe,
much like table-salt, which contains a Chlorine atom, but the toxic Chlorine
atom stays locked up in the salt & is not metabolized, so we love
Sucralose, Besides, chlorine is found naturally in food"...
-
- OK, let me take issue with my own "make-believe"
Pro-Su rebuttal while describing how this all works. Sugar is a hydrocarbon
comprised of 12 carbon atoms with a hydroxyl group (hydrogen & oxygen)
stuck to each one. 3 of these hydroxyl groups are then chemically replaced
with 3 chlorine atoms changing it from a hydro- carbon to a chloro-carbon.
Because it is not biocompatible with human physiology, it would appear
that much if not most of the stuff goes through w/o being metabolized...
the problem is, just how much, if any, is actually broken apart to release
the VERY aggressive and toxic chlorine atom.
-
- See, even the Splenda website is careful to say that
the Su molecule passes harmlessly through you and almost none is metabolized,
which means some IS metabolized... just "how much" is the question!
BUT you cannot use the bogus sodium-chloride (table- salt) argument &
here's why: Salt is not a fluorocarbon, chlorocarbon or hydrocarbon...
in other words, sodium-chloride is completely inorganic, (and held together
by the powerful "ionic bond"), so the body does not even try
to metabolize it - unlike chlorocarbons containing organic compounds like
carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, which -being held together with the
weaker "covalent bond"- our liver will try to metabolize! See
the problem? This is high school chemistry.
-
- Because I have no way of knowing for sure...I am going
to go with the conservative figure that Dr. Mercola finds to be closest
to reality - which is 15% of the sucralose will be converted... yow!
- I say conservative because others claim 25% & there
is a Japanese study that had the figure up to 40%!
-
- Next, it would certainly be wrong to use the FDA as credible
verification of Sucralose safety, considering Dr. Wallach is always pointing
out how the FDA is "in the tank" for "whomever" and
"whatever"...though this is another sentiment I endorse... look
at Vioxx.
-
- Lastly, the chlorine found naturally in food is GOOD
for you... it and the man-manipulated Chlorine like that found in Tap-water
(and Sucralose), et al, are as different as nite & day - so forget
that bogus argument.
-
- That's about it. Do a modicum of research & I think
you will agree with me! Why, take a chance with Sucralose at all when
there is Stevia & Xylitol available.
-
- For all you Youngevity (tm) associates who hate me right
now... if you have a rational rebuttal, please write. If you just want
to vent & call me names...go ahead, but I will put the ball right
back in your court with "Don't you read & understand the labels
of products you indorse & sell?" Finally, if I'm wrong, please
demonstrate it to me;
- I would be improved. It remains, too, I want to be a
Wallach- phile...but he makes it hard to love him.
-
- Otherwise? Move along and know you're being managed
like cattle so sociopaths can prosecute their pecuniary pharmaceutical
perversions, et al, upon your spirit, body, and soul. Think that doesn't
require a perverted sociopath? These perverts, moreover, embrace CODEX!
Chill, remember! I just bear the message.
-
- Write if you like...
-
- Until next time, Well Be.
-
- Alan Graham
- alan068@centurytel.net
|
