- Woodrow Wilson held a Ph. D. but wasn't bright enough
to restrain his bad judgment in supporting the Federal Reserve System and
its guarantee of citizen reimbursement via the unconstitutional income
tax. And as he failed in this, in spite of all his marvelous and outstanding
education, and couldn't see through the international bankers' plan to
enslave American government and its people, he failed to see also the benefits
provided by a strict adherence to the United States Constitution and the
combined genius of the Founding Fathers.
-
- This is offered to short circuit dismissal of idiotic
behavior that passes for acceptance relying upon the consideration of an
idiot's superior education. Offering "What have I done?" eleven
years after the fact doesn't erase an idiotic act and elevate it instead
to a "mistake." And considering the oath of office our long line
of chief executive idiots have taken in swearing to uphold the Constitution,
this also fails to excuse idiotic and unconstitutional behavior all the
more. All that these powerful, dangerous fools had to do was simply follow
the job description they swore on a bible to uphold, preserve and protect.
-
- Graduate degrees from prestigious "American"
institutions of higher learning notwithstanding, it is one thing to be
educated and thus informed, and yet entirely another to analyze situations
and when necessary act intelligently to the best of one's ability within
the prescribed legal parameters of one's station. Any power-laden fool
can really screw up, as Woodrow Wilson came to learn, albeit far too late.
And arrogant warmongers, Lincoln and FDR, never came to realize their damage
to America's beautiful plan for individual freedom.
-
- At first glance, Harvard Law School would seem to be
one of the best, if not the best, law school in the United States. Yet
a former Republican Congressman, John LeBoutillier, obviously railing against
its "liberalness" at a time when that term meant something, wrote
a book entitled, Harvard Hates America. And considering the tortured use
of the English language, intellectual "law genius" Alan Dershowitz,
Harvard Law's most publicly recognized spokesman, recommended, sanctioned
and eventually helped "legitimize" the torture of human beings
without a warrant, without a statement of charges, without evidence, without
a trial by a jury of one's peers, and other egregious expediencies, to
provide the state with unlimited powers over anyone that falls prey to
its deadly clutches.
-
- And then we have, of course, another outstanding example
of a Harvard Law School achiever: former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
Viva Gonzales! Viva Harvard Law! By the way, where the hell is Gonzales
these days? Shouldn't he be on trial somewhere for selectively firing attorneys
that didn't toe the GOP line and selectively execute the unconstitutional
"laws" of the Cheney-Bush criminal dictatorship? Oh, that's right
I forgot. This is the America of the Projected New Age Communism!
-
- In spite of Bush's outstanding education, and in spite
of the glitter and polish of his Ivy League MBA when compared to my run-of-the-mill
MBA, the guy can't eat a pretzel properly and continually falls off his
bicycle. He has neither a moral nor constitutional compass, both of which
serve admirably to sharpen non-incriminating extemporaneous verbal responses
to aggressive journalistic inquiry. He has just about acquired the ability
to read a speech!
-
- But aggressive journalistic inquiry in these here United
States today is sadly lacking, thanks to the communist gatekeeping of The
New York Times. And where real journalism thrives, namely Europe, our "Potemkin
President" is heavily shielded and protected by imperial storm
troopers of the intergalactic empire, and thereby secure from assaults
of intelligent inquiry by true, aggressive journalists.
-
- Neither Bush, nor his boss, Dick Cheney, have the required
legal education and training that a graduate of Harvard Law School would
have; that's why criminals with law diplomas from this institution of higher
legalized subversion are needed. They legalize illegal laws and illegally
invalidate legal laws. Did I really write that? This, of course, explains
how Cheney-Bush not only disparage the very name of our nation's rule of
law, denigrating it to a mere "goddamned piece of paper" that
incessantly gets "thrown" into our rulers' faces, but elevates
their contempt all the more when neutered by the Harvard rats' nest of
lawyers with criminal intent and a penchant for legalistic trickery and
word magic.
-
- This burgeoning legal talent at the disposal of "ShrubCo"
quickly provides the regime with legal escape windows and ladders. When
the Plame outing clearly violated Title 18, Section 784, part (b), a capital
offense during time of war, our foreign invasion policy was changed from
the "Global War on Terror [GWOT] and renamed the "Global Struggle
Against Violent Extremism, or GSAVE. Thus, the illegal Iraqi invasion is
no longer considered as a war and Title 18 has not been violated. This
also validates violating all international treaties against illegal invasions,
dispatches UN considerations and protocol, and saves ShrubCo by deploying
instead: G. ShrubCo's Armed Violation of Everystate. GWOT will they think
of next?
-
- Ask, and ye shall receive from our glorious emperor!
Enjoying fair, accurate and factual news from the European press, specifically
the Times of London, a real newspaper and not an establishment propaganda
rag like the communist New York Times and its subservient TV cable and
broadcast "Potemkin" news shows, American and Jewish patriot
Sibel Edmonds stood up to the Cheney-Bush criminal dictatorship, the United
States Congress of Criminals and Democrats, the Israel lobby, and yes,
even The Establishment's "American" MSM.
-
- After the Times of London and their Times Online.com
broke and expanded the story of Cheney-Bush's illegal and continuing Title
18 violations in selling nuclear secrets to "our friends" in
Turkey, who in turn brokered these to Pakistan and "our ally"
Israel, Cheney-Bush's pool of lawyers went quickly to work on this new
legal challenge. And when does a nation need enemies when we have friends
such as Turkey and Israel? What are friends and allies for if not to steal
from one another and knife one another in the back? And Uncle Sap has a
real broad back!
-
- It can be suggested that the "highest levels"
of American government were unaware of this treason involving BOTH the
State Department and the Pentagon. Need proof that this isn't the case?
Just observe the behavior of G. Bush IMMEDIATELY after the fact, motivated
into immediate action by the heroism of just one, single, solitary Jewish
patriot that had the courage to come to her country's aid and try her best
to save Americans by exposing the treason and criminality of the Cheney-Bush
national crime machine.
-
- Focusing the accusations of Sibel Edmonds upon one Marc
Grossman, and airing the nuclear secrets espionage, who was it that immediately
responded to this brave citizen's charges and complaint? As I had written
<http://www.rense.com/general80/consider.htm>earlier, their actions
after the fact are very telling in terms of their direct complicity.
-
- As was the case with ShrubCo changing the name of its
imperial invasions after the fact from GWOT to GSAVE, and as was the case
in "declassifying" Valerie Plame as a covert operative after
her criminal exposure by Cheney, G. Bush is now backpedaling once again
to make legal that which was formerly illegal. Neither Bush nor Cheney
have the legal brains to do this, so one needs to consider the emergency
after-the-fact huddle and damage control conference that was necessary
to responsd to the accusations made by Sibel Edmonds and published by the
Times of London.
-
- The Times of London broke the nuclear secrets espionage
story on Sunday, January 6, 2008. The report related how nuclear secrets
were transferred to the Turkish government through diplomats and exchange
scientists cleared by Marc Grossman. The exposé heavily implicated
the government of Turkey. Clearly, this was an egregious violation of Title
18 during a time of war.
-
- On Wednesday, January 23, 2008, G. Bush issued a "Message
to the Congress of the United States," a message that was very, very
low key, and very, very subtle, and therefore, almost secret. And jumping
immediately to the aid of the president and helping to cover up the treason,
was the ever-obedient, subversive, despicable American mass media. Never
mind that the message was released through the office of the Press Secretary;
the MSM and the communist New York Times summarily ignored it! Talk about
a "smoking gun" proving guilt!
-
- The five-paragraph <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/01/20080123-6.html>memo
was obviously a brief, one-page memo written by the Cheney-Bush rats' nest
of traitors with law diplomas to slide under the radar screen obliterated
by the MSM. If you cannot interpret this as proof of Bush's direct knowledge
and full participation, then you need to enlighten me as to what I'm missing!
-
- The memo to Congress opens: " I transmit to the
Congress, pursuant to sections 123 b. and 123 d. of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2153(b),(d))(the 'Act'), the text of the
proposed Agreement for Cooperation between the United States of America
and the Republic of Turkey Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy (the
'Agreement') together with a copy of the unclassified Nuclear Proliferation
Assessment Statement (NPAS) and of my approval of the proposed Agreement
and determination that the proposed Agreement will promote, and will not
constitute an unreasonable risk to, the common defense and security. The
Secretary of State will submit the classified NPAS and accompanying annexes
separately in appropriate secure channels."
-
- Now if you and I experience difficulties interpreting
this legal mumbo-jumbo, just think of how confusing it is to our "Decider"!
Let's take a shot at it: Clearly, an international policy statement and
law was issued via due process in 1954. This followed almost immediately
after the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg>execution
for treason of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for passing secrets of the atomic
bomb to Soviet Russia. ShrubCo is requesting an amended change to that
legal policy, specifically focusing on ONLY Turkey. ShrubCo's suggestion
that this is for peaceful purposes does not avoid the Times' report initiated
by Edmonds that MILITARY secrets were what was specifically asked for,
pursued and alledgedly provided to the Turks by Grossman. But concluding
the paragraph by offering a routine examination initiated by the State
Department serves to distance the White House procedurally, as well as
offering evidence of, the need for a technical review not within the competency
or purview of the State Department.
-
- As regards the latter point referencing the military
and nuclear technology security review requirement, let us now please remember
that such technical review capability had been originally the responsibility
and mission of such agencies as the Department of Energy, Department of
Defense, and others, and that Bush II's predecessor, Bill Clinton, jockeyed
and manipulated to create a deliberate bureaucratic oversight blur to allow
hundreds of millions of dollars into his pockets and the coffers of the
Democratic National Committee from the People's Republic of China.
-
- Here's an <http://www.salon.com/news/1998/05/29newsa.html>article
by Murray Waas from Salon.com dating back to 1998: "The flow of high-technology
exports from the U.S. to China in recent years has been significant. Between
1990 and 1993 -- during both the [first] Bush and Clinton presidencies
-- the Commerce and State Departments approved a total of 67 dual-use technology
export licenses, worth more than $530 million, to China, according to an
April 1994 report by the General Accounting Office, the congressional watchdog
agency. More recent figures have not yet been made public by the Clinton
administration." Where was the technological bureaucratic focal point
for export and military implication reviews for these under Clinton?
-
- More evidence of deliberate bureaucratic manipulation
and enfeeblement by the White House was engendered by the <http://www.usgovinfo.about.com/blcox.htm>Cox
Report that lambasted the Clinton regime in 1999, and elicited the regime's
response:
-
- "Domestic and International Export Policies
-
- The Administration agrees with the Committee that the
end of the Cold War and the dissolution of COCOM in 1994 has complicated
efforts to control transfers of militarily important dual-use goods and
technology. In this regard, the Administration agrees with the Committee
on the desirability of strengthening the Wassenaar Arrangement to improve
international coordination and reporting on the export of militarily useful
goods and technology, and to prevent transfers of arms and sensitive dual-use
items for military end-uses if the situation in a region, or the behavior
of a state is or becomes a cause of serious concern to the participating
states. All Wassenaar members currently maintain national policies to prevent
such transfers to Iran, Iraq, Libya and North Korea. We are making a concerted
effort this year to strengthen and enhance existing transparency mechanisms
and to expand restraint measures.
-
- We do not believe that other countries are prepared to
accept a legally binding international regime like COCOM directed against
China and we are not seeking such a regime. We note that a COCOM-style
veto could act against U.S. interests by letting other countries block
U.S. sales to our own security partners. The Administration agrees with
the Committee on the need to enact a new Export Administration Act with
new penalties. We have operated too long without updated legislation in
this very important area. The Administration will work with the appropriate
Committees in Congress and U.S. industry to obtain a new Export Administration
Act. The Administration believes that the existing dual-use export licensing
system allows adequate time for careful review of license applications
and provides effective procedures to take account of national security
considerations in licensing decisions."
-
- More evidence of the Clinton regime's treasonous technology
and military secrets transfers was articulated by none other than former
GOP 2008 presidential candidate Duncan Hunter, while acting in his capacity
of Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee: "The President
has said he acted aggressively in the case of nuclear espionage by China
at the Los Alamos laboratory. The record of the Administration's actions
says something else. It shows the President's men keeping Wen Ho Lee employed
in a sensitive position for some three years after he became the prime
espionage suspect and 15 months after the FBI told the Department of Energy
that there was no longer any investigative reason to allow the suspect
to remain in his position. Once again there is a clear case of what the
President said being at odds with the truth." History does repeat
itself!
-
- And speaking of Clinton, here's the second paragraph
in Bush's brief message: "The Agreement was signed on July 26, 2000,
and President Clinton approved and authorized execution and made the determinations
required by section 123 b. of the Act (Presidential Determination 2000
26, 65 FR 44403 (July 18, 2000)). However, immediately after signature,
U.S. agencies received information that called into question the conclusions
that had been drawn in the required NPAS and the original classified annex,
specifically, information implicating Turkish private entities in certain
activities directly relating to nuclear proliferation. Consequently, the
Agreement was not submitted to the Congress and the executive branch undertook
a review of the NPAS evaluation."
-
- Seems as what is being said is that due to some unfortunate,
unforseeable mere oversight, and bureaucratic differences of opinion, Turkey
was somehow unjustly targeted as being out of compliance with US foreign
policy regarding technology transfers formerly considered secret. And somehow,
Turkey was the only nation wrongly targeted; hence, the immediate need
to remedy this situation a little over two weeks after the Edmonds revelation.
-
- The final paragraph lights the 90-day fuse. It gives
Congress 90 days to object or request clarification, and then it automatically
becomes "law." Pretty neat stuff, no? Stroke of the pen, law
of the land! But it serves in reality to violate the Constitution's ban
against precisely such laws. Article I, Section 9, Paragraph 3 states:
"No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
But then again, Article I is confined to the powers of Congress, thereby
exempting such prohibitions in the case of an executive dictatorship.
-
- Just as ShrubCo backpedaled on Plame, and GWOT, and making
public that which formerly was secret and in the national interest, Cheney-Bush
will now make legal retroactively that which is illegal today. Thus they
can, once again, proclaim after-the-fact, that they did nothing wrong.
And if Bush wasn't directly involved, just as Clinton was directly involved,
why would he have acted so swiftly and so secretly?
-
-
- Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.
|