- An attorney and co-founder of the group Election Defense
Alliance says, "The thing is, these things always work in one direction-in
favor of the more conservative candidate, and that defies the law of quantum
mechanics."
-
- Could someone have messed with the vote in New Hampshire?
-
- That is what some people are wondering, after looking
closely at the totals in the votes for surprise Democratic primary victor
Hillary Clinton, and for Barack Obama, who placed instead of winning as
all the polls had predicted he would. And thanks to candidate Dennis Kucinich,
we are likely to find out. Kucinich today filed a request, and a required
$2000 fee, to order up a manual recount of the machine ballots cast in
the state.
-
- Polls taken as late as the day before the Tuesday vote
showed Obama up by 10 to 15 points over Clinton, whom he had just beaten
the week before in Iowa, but when the votes were counted, Clinton ended
up beating Obama in New Hampshire 39.4 per cent to 36.8 per cent. In a
replay of what happened in Ohio in 2004, exit polling reportedly also showed
Obama to be winning the New Hampshire primary.
-
- When that's not what happened, shocked polling firms
and surprised pundits, all of whom had been expecting a big Obama win,
were left stumbling for explanations for the Hillary comeback from an 8
per cent drubbing in Iowa (even the Clinton campaign, whose own internal
polling had predicted her defeat, were at a loss). Explanations ranged
from her teary eyed final public appearance before primary day and some
sexist heckling she had received, to dark talk about a wave of hidden racism
in the voting booth.
-
- But there were anomalies in the numbers that have some
people suggesting something else: vote fraud.
-
- What has had eyebrows raised is a significant discrepancy
between the vote counts done by voting machine, and the ones done by hand.
-
- In New Hampshire, 81 per cent of the voting was done
in towns and cities that had purchased optical scan machines from the Diebold
Election Systems (now called Premiere Election Solutions), a division of
Diebold Corp., a company founded by and still linked to wealthy right-wing
investors. In those towns, all voting was done on the devices, called Accuvote
machines, which read paper ballots completed by voters who use pens or
pencils to fill in little ovals next to the candidate of their choice.
The ballots are then fed into, read, and tallied by the machines. The other
19 per cent of voting was done in towns that had opted not to use the machine,
and to use hand-counted paper ballots instead.
-
- The machine tally was Clinton 39.6 per cent, Obama 36.3
per cent - fairly close to the final outcome. But the hand-counted ballot
count broke significantly differently: Clinton 34.9 per cent, Obama 38.6
per cent.
-
- Could something have happened in those machines to shift
some votes away from Obama or some of the other candidates in the race,
and over to the Clinton total?
- If all the votes cast had split the way the hand counts
split, Obama would have won New Hampshire by over 10,000 votes, instead
of losing to Clinton by about 5500 votes.
-
- "My suspicion is that nothing untoward happened
here," says Doug Jones, a professor of computer sciences at the University
of Iowa and a member of the board of examiners that approved the use of
the same Diebold optical scanning machines in Iowa. "But at the same
time, the Diebold machines are vulnerable to viruses that can be spread
through the machines by the PCMCIA memory cards, and there are other things
that can go wrong too. I'd be much happier if they had a routine random
audit procedure in New Hampshire."
- A random audit, he says, would involve doing hand counts
of some towns' optical scan ballots, and comparing those results with the
results of the machine reading of those same ballots, as recorded election
night.
-
- While California does conduct such random audits as a
matter of course, most states, including New Hampshire, do not. According
to the New Hampshire Secretary of State's office, any recount of ballots
would have to be requested by a candidate, and would have to be paid for
by the candidate making the request.
-
- An official in the press office of Obama's campaign in
Chicago, contacted on Wednesday, claimed not to know about the discrepancy
between the machine and hand-counted ballots. She said that there was no
plan to call for a hand count of machine ballots.
-
- As Prof. Jones notes, requiring a candidate to initiate
any hand count makes such hand counts unlikely, since unless the evidence
of vote tampering or fraud is overwhelming, such a call would open the
candidate to charges of "poor loser."
-
- Kucinich, in making his recount request, resolved that
problem.
-
- There is good reason to be suspicious of the results.
The counting of the machine totals, in New Hampshire as in all states using
the Diebold machines, is handled by a private contract firm, in this case
Massachusetts-based LHS Associates, which controls and programs the machines'
memory cards. Several studies have demonstrated the ease with which the
memory cards in the Accuvote machines can be hacked, with some testers
breaking into the system in minutes.
-
- There are, to be sure, alternative quite innocent possible
explanations for the discrepancy between the machine and hand votes for
Clinton and Obama. All the state's larger towns and cities, like Nashua,
Concord and Portsmouth, have gone to voting machines. While there are many
small communities that have also opted for machines, it is almost exclusively
the smaller towns and villages across the state that have stayed with hand
counts-most of them in the more rural northern part of the state. So if
Obama did better than Clinton in the small towns, and Clinton did better
in the large ones, that could be the answer.
-
- But that explanation flies in the face of logic, historic
voting patterns, and most of the post -election prognosticating.
-
- If it is true that there was "behind the curtain"
racism involved in people saying to pollsters that they were for Obama,
while privately voting against him, surely it would be more likely that
this would happen in the isolated towns of northern New Hampshire where
black people are rarely to be seen. Clinton was also said to have fared
better among people with lower incomes-again a demographic that is more
prominent in the rural parts of the Granite State. Finally, Obama, in New
Hampshire as in Iowa, did better among younger voters, and that is the
demographic group that is typically in shorter supply in small towns, where
job opportunities are limited. Furthermore, in Iowa, it was in the larger
municipalities that Obama fared best, not in the rural towns, so how likely
is it that his geographic appeal would be reversed in New Hampshire?
-
- David Scanlan, New Hampshire's deputy secretary of state
for elections, whom I contacted Thursday, said that while town election
officials are required to do test runs of the Diebold machines in the days
before an election, "to make sure that they are reading the ballot
markings accurately," and that at that point the machines and the
memory cards are sealed until the actual election day, there is no way
for his office to independently conduct a post balloting test. The ballot
boxes are sealed and the only way they can be opened if for a candidate
to request (and pay for) a manual recount, or for a court to order one."
Scanlan says that the same is true for the voting machines and the memory
cards. While the sealed ballots are retained "for years," however,
the memory cards will be back in the hands of the contractor, LHS Associates,
in "a few months," to be erased and prepared for use in the general
election next November.
-
- Scanlan says that the state legislature is currently
considering legislation to provide for routine audits of machines after
elections, but that won't help this election cycle.
- Scanlan said that because the machines are freestanding,
there is no chance of their being hacked from the outside, but critics
note that the hacking can be done in advance to the memory cards, which
can pass changes to each other like a virus as each is programmed for a
particular election.
-
- Jonathan Simon, an attorney and co-founder of the group
Election Defense Alliance, says that the vote discrepancies between machine
and hand counts in New Hampshire's Democratic primary are troubling, and
defy easy explanation.
-
- "The trouble is, whenever you have a surprise result
in an election, and it runs counter to the polls, the media always say
the problem is the polling, not the counting." But he adds, "The
thing is, these things always work in one direction-in favor of the more
conservative candidate, and that defies the law of quantum mechanics."
-
- www.thiscantbehappening.net.
|