Anyone incapable of discerning the smear piece against Senator McCain, who I often refer to as Crazy Johnny "Madman" McCain, isn't politically astute enough to vote or to even read a typical non-journalistic American newspaper. It was definitely a hit piece! And how, you may ask, do I know this? Because as a true Republican, I was planning on doing precisely the same damned thing! But the cheesy, sleazy New York Times beat me to it! Damn!

My judgment regarding McCain's mental aberrations is based strictly on very light observation and heavily upon intuition. I don't like the guy's voice. I didn't care at all for his Beach Boys rendition of "Bomb Iran." Consider this low class/no class act and compare it to the sights of dead Iraqi children. Compare this "sarcasm" to the sight of toddlers with their arms and legs blown off, or the sight of dead babies burned or crushed beyond recognition by the criminal Cheney-Bush regime. Consider these horrific scenes of human suffering and compare these to Bush's smirks, Cheney's sneers, and "Madman" McCain's warped sense of humor. Recall his shoving Marie Shriver-Schwarzenegger when she tried to interview him immediately after his prior failed bid for the presidency. If I were Arnold, I would have kicked the dirty little bastard's ass!

A war hero, huh? For doing what? Getting captured? He was, and probably still is, a super lousy pilot. This flying pig crashed five, count 'em, five military trainer and combat aircraft. But because his father and grandfather were admirals of note with the United States Navy, the nasty little twerp got to stay. Madman McCain has also been documented as a womanizer, so the Times' story of an affair with Ms. Iseman is in all likelihood right on the money. But to get a well-documented account of this character's act, read Alexander Cockburn's [Counterpunch] article, "Mushrooming Clouds That Hang Over McCain."

Babbling historian, Doris Kearns Goodwin, appearing on Tim Russert's Sunday "Beat the Press," observed that members of the 1920s MSM journalistic corps knew about President Harding's 15-year extramarital affair, but felt that such matters were private and none of the public's business. I am somewhat ambivalent towards that position, but consider the vulnerability of a key office holder to blackmail. And if historian Goodwin really knew her history, she'd know that is how Justice Brandeis was appointed to the Supreme Court; via the blackmailing of Woodrow Wilson for his lapse in discretion! It was also very interesting to watch the flush in Goodwin's cheeks when the subject of plagiarism Hillary directed at Obama came up. If memory serves, she's been there and done that.

Goodwin, and the other MSM notables, offered that sex in the office is no longer an issue, but that Crazy Johnny's so-called crusade against lobbies and their buying influence through bribes and payoffs might fall more than flat. These allegations, if even remotely true and proven, can signal the end to McCain's campaign. And of course, the sleazy Marxist MSM gatekeeper, the Soviet New York Times of Walter Duranty, Jayson Blair, Judith Miller, and a host of other make-believe journalists, insists that this old news is now new news. Hmmmmm. How come the new news of the Downing Street Memo was old news to the Times' editorial board and therefore not fit to print, thereby arousing the ire of Jeff Cohen and his organization Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting?

The New York Times' contention that this expose of McCain was not timed to hurt his campaign is a lie. But more importantly, why was this done in the first place? Remember, the Times serves as the primary propaganda dispenser for The Establishment's power elite. And as FDR offered, nothing in politics just happens. After attacking McCain, the GOP's leading dumbos, to include the intellectually slow Rush Limbaugh, rallied to "conservative" McCain's defense. Is that it? Is it the Soviet propaganda industry's way of ensuring that the dumbos are permanently stuck with the worst candidate possible so that Hillary or the Bomber can waltz right in to office?

There's one way to find out! The Council on Foreign Relation's choice, as well as the choice of the international bankers, Bilderberg, Tri-Lateral Commission and Israel, is clearly Hillary. She's next in line in the Bush-Clinton dynasty to seal our fate within the gulags of the New World Order. She has received extensive military and geopolitical intelligence training via her many trips to Israel. Let's see which one of the candidates the Soviet Times attacks next. If it's Obama, we'll know their motives.

© THEODORE E. LANG 2/24/08 All rights reserved  

Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.