- A new troubling myth has taken hold in Washington and
it is critical that the record is set straight. According to the mainstream
media, Republicans, and unfortunately even some Democrats, the President's
surge in Iraq has been a resounding success. In fact, nothing could
be further from the truth.
-
- This assertion is disingenuous, factually incorrect,
and negatively impacts America's national security. The Surge had a clear
and defined objective - to create stability and security - enabling the
Iraqi government to enact lasting political solutions and foster genuine
reconciliation and cooperation between Sunnis, Shias, and Kurds.
-
- This has not happened.
-
- There has been negligible political progress in Iraq,
and we are no closer to solving the complex problems - including a power
sharing government, oil revenue agreement and new constitution - than we
were before the Administration upped the ante and sent 30,000 more troops
to Iraq.
-
- Too many Democrats in Congress are again surrendering
to General Petraeus and have failed to challenge the Bush Administration's
claims that the surge has been successful. In fact -- it is just the
opposite.
-
- The reduction in violence in Iraq has exposed the continuing
failure of Iraqi officials to solve their substantial political rifts.
By President Bush's own stated goal of political progress, the Surge has
failed.
-
- Of course raising troop levels has increased security
- a strategy the Bush administration ignored when presented by General
Shinseki before the war in Iraq began - but the fundamental internal Iraqi
problems remain and the factors that were accelerating the civil war in
2007 have simply been put on hold.
-
- The military progress is a testament to the patience
and dedication of our brave troops - even in the face of 15 month-long
deployments followed by insufficient Veteran's health services when they
return home. They have performed brilliantly - despite the insult of having
President Bush recently veto a military spending bill that enhanced funding
and benefits, and increased care.
-
- Despite the efforts of American soldiers, the surge alone
cannot bring about the political solutions needed to end centuries of sectarian
divide.
-
- As it stands, little on the ground supports the assertion
that Iraqis are ready to stand up and govern themselves. Too few Iraqi
troops are trained, equipped and combat ready, and they cannot yet provide
adequate security. Loyalty is also an issue in the Iraqi army as Al Queda
and Sunni insurgents infliltrate their defense forces. The consequences
turned deadly just recently when an Iraqi soldier purposely killed two
U.S. troops.
-
- On the streets of Baghdad and Mosul, the Sunni and Shia
factions have paused their fighting, awaiting guarantees and protections
that have not yet been delivered. As Iraqi refugees return, there is no
mechanism to help them rebuild their lives, nor recover their now-occupied
homes. Neighborhoods once mixed are now segregated.
-
- In Northern Iraq, Kurdish terrorists conducting nefarious
operations across the border into Turkey have compelled our NATO ally to
strike at bases, inflaming tensions between Baghdad and Ankara.
-
- The surge is working? We suffered more U.S. casualties
in 2007 than in any other year of the war. We can't afford any more
of this type of success.
-
- How can we create the situation that is most likely to
deliver political progress in Iraq? Not by continuing the surge and occupation.
Our best chance (there is no guarantee) is by putting real pressure on
the Iraqi government to force action. Telling the national and local Iraqi
leaders that we are withdrawing our troops can help accomplish this goal.
Today, the majority Iraqi Shia government led by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki
has little incentive to act when American troops remain in the country
to provide security and stability.
-
- Based on the Administration's plan, John McCain's proposal
of a 100-year US occupation could be a reality!
-
- The Democratic Congress must act aggressively to first
cut off funding for the surge and then the entire war. Many of my colleagues
avoided a showdown with the administration because they mistakenly believed
such a fight would endanger the safety of the troops.
-
- In fact, we must accept that every soldier killed or
injured in the coming months should have already been home. Every billion
dollars of war-appropriations we spend from here on should have been spent
on genuine priorities here at home such as children's heath care.
-
- Enough is enough: While the Administration over-commits
American forces in Iraq, we see Al Qaeda-regrouping and Osama Bin Laden
still at large. We remain seriously bogged down in Afghanistan, and are
witnessing a crisis in Pakistan that has left a nuclear country on the
brink of a meltdown. America's resources and attention are desperately
needed elsewhere and our soldiers must no longer be needlessly sacrificed
as we wait for Iraqis to stand up.
-
- The Surge has failed. If my colleagues gullibly
accept the moving rationale for the Surge, just as so many have for the
war itself, we will have failed as well.
-
- ***
- To contact me or for more information, go towww.wexlerforcongress.com.
-
|