- Our government's plans to finish the police state are
very similar to those used by the Israeli government in the pre-Intifada
days of September 2001, where the making of aggressive preparations to
create a defensible position served as the final spark needed to start
the uprising which they then planned to repel. In other words, the provocative
preparations that have been made in the name of fighting "terror"
will, at some critical point, trigger the conflagration. Like the Israelis,
the Bush government cannot know beforehand what the "last straw"
will be, but it can reasonably assume that there will be some violent reaction
to open government preparations for violence, which will serve as legitimate
provocation for the total police state transformation of our "democracy."
- According to retired Israeli Brigadier General Zvika
Fogel (chief of staff of Southern Command headquarters in February 2000),
in "Collision Course," By Yotam Feldman:
- "The constellation of preparations we made actually
led to the confrontation - there was no other choice...the conceptual sequence
is that we [were] creating the conditions for a confrontation by the very
fact of our preparations,"
- The Israelis prepared for the event by planning for the
day after, much like America's rulers did in the Patriot Act and the neocon
Project for a New American Century plots against freedom. They were plans
for a police state, awaiting the "catastrophic event" that would
trigger them. These coups were planned to begin the day after the next
random terrorist attack set it in motion.
- "It is clear to everyone that this is a self-fulfilling
prophecy. We want to decide which event would foment the explosion."
- Our government, like the Israelis, intended to be the
"explosion," that would come after a (Palestinian) terrorist
lit the fuse. Reflecting dominant Israeli thinking on the starting date
of the uprising, Gen. Fogel related the Zionist position, exactly the opposite
of the Palestinian testimony:
- "In the Gaza Strip, the second Intifada began on
September 27, 2000, the day before Ariel Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount.
A Fatah man initiated a roadside bomb attack on soldiers who were escorting
a convoy of settlers from Karni checkpoint to Netzarim [a settlement]."
- In this perfect example of militant Zionist thinking,
the plan was to discreetly provoke the violence that would one day justify
plans to retaliate with overwhelming force, under the guise of "self-defense."
This aggressive mode of thinking dominates American planners, as well,
with this and other faulty Israeli strategies repeated by American forces
in the war on terror.
- The Israeli plan was to come down with the full weight
of the brutal Zionist ideology, to create the"Iron Wall" conditions
that were recommended by Israeli hero Ze'ev "Wolf" Jabotinsky
(father of Jewish Defense League), intended to paralyze the Palestinians
with overwhelming fear for their lives.
- Hear is a great video on the Iron Wall doctrine, from
- This doctrine, formulated by one of Zionism's greatest
heroes, postulates that peace with the Palestinians will only be possible
when they are fully subdued into submission, on Israel's terms, by a wall
of deadly force, against which, resistance is impossible. This is the force
of division that drives the building of the "Apartheid Wall"
through Palestine. This wall strategy is the essence of American and Israeli
strategy in the war on terror build impenetrable walls to divide
and fence the people in, then pound them into submission behind them.
- "Settlement can thus develop under the protection
of a force that is not dependent on the local population, behind an IRON
WALL which they will be powerless to break down. ....a voluntary agreement
is just not possible. As long as the Arabs preserve a gleam of hope that
they will succeed in getting rid of us, nothing in the world can cause
them to relinquish this hope... only then will the moderates offer suggestions
for compromise. Then only will they begin bargaining with us on practical
matters, such as guarantees against PUSHING THEM OUT, and equality of civil,
and national rights." Ze'ev Jabotinsky http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Famous-Zionist-Quotes/Story640.html
- According to Gen. Fogel, "we opened a dialogue of
weapons." (Here is a video of Israelis "dialoging" a bunch
of protesters along the "Apartheid Wall" which runs through Bil`in,
Israel.) This video tells a portion of this fascist torment first hand,
taking the reader where my words cannot go. and also this guy (the father
of Daniel Pearl), keep getting free press to proclaim the lie, in places
like the Jerusalem Post.
- The Zionists are using slur tactics that will ultimately
backfire on them, as we are starting to see today. By resorting to the
tactic of relying on the charge of "anti-Semitism" as their first
line of defense for every incident where someone dares to criticize Israel
or the Israel lobby, the Zionists will see it come back to haunt them.
By attempting to counter anti-Zionism or anti-Israel statements with the
same blanket of protection that is given to the Jewish people, over the
charge of anti-Semitism (in the middle of two unpopular wars being waged
for Israel), the Zionist lobby will cause unjust persecution for all Jewish
Americans. If the American Jewish community fails to separate itself from
the Zionist supporters of the war for Israel, then the rapidly building
wave of anti-Israel sentiments might easily turn into a true wave of anti-Semitism.
- Mearsheimer and Walt have provided the documentation
to prove that Israeli Zionists have been the primary drivers for the Iraq
war and now the new global war centered on Iran. Abe Foxman and friends
have tried to call these patriotic authors anti-Semitic, charging that
they are reviving the "old canard," that accuses the Jews of
starting wars. Foxman, it is not a canard if it is true. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitic_canards
- Lobby-inspired legislation, like the hate crimes bill
and the Homeland Terrorism Act, focus upon conspiracy theories, and the
spreading of them. They focus upon critics of Israel, claiming to be fighting
the spreading of racial hatred. The bills' supporters claim that what they
do, they do for America. Even though America faces no realistic threat
from "homegrown terrorists" and occasional hate crimes are no
reason to shred the Constitution. One of the central complaints cited,
about the extremist belief systems of conspiracy theorists, relates to
alleged Israeli involvement in the 9-11 attacks. This is being played-up
as the mother of all hate crimes, in order to silence growing popular outrage
over the cover-up and the whitewash of one of the greatest crimes in American
history. There is ample evidence of Israeli foreknowledge and perhaps even
involvement in the attacks. http://youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw
- To remain silent while the proof of state involvement
in the attacks is flushed down the memory hole, would be a crime against
our forefathers and veterans. http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7127
- The Zionization of America continues apace. The replication
of Israeli police and military tactics is accelerating America's downfall.
The passage of Zionist-inspired (written) laws is making normal political
opposition to those policies nearly impossible. Like the Israelis in the
days just before the second Intifada, our government has laid the foundations
for a domestic war on protesters and resisters. What we do next, as concerned
defenders of the homeland, will determine what form the resistance is about
to take will we have our own peaceful "orange revolution,"
or an American Intifada?
- Morty, AKA,
- Jim Mortellaro