- AOL is cheating so openly and unashamedly on the Ron
Paul - Abe Lincoln poll that it even amazes me and it's hard to astonish
me when it comes to what the Zionist media is capable of doing. AOL is
so obviously cheating and doing so little to effectively cover it up that
I'm beginning to wonder if they aren't conducting some kind of experiment
on social conditioning; seeing just how far they can go and much they can
get away with.
-
-
- On December 26, 2007, I wrote an article entitled <http://rense.com/general79/pll.htm>AOL
posts disingenuous Ron Paul poll, fixes the results," in which I revealed
screen captures I had personally obtained proving that AOL was engaged
in some very shady polling, whenever a state neared agreement with Ron
Paul's position on Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War, the strangest thing
happened, the disagreement numbers began to rapidly accelerate in an impossible
manner, twice I captured images of the poll that revealed numbers and percentages
that were literally impossible, such as when Wyoming had 6,234 votes against
Ron Paul when AOL's own counter revealed that less than 30 citizens of
Wyoming had voted as of 1:43 p.m. on December 26, 2007. No I'm not kidding,
<http://rense.com/general79/pll.htm>please see the screen captures
for yourself. The rapidly accelerating numbers only happened as a state
neared agreement with Ron Paul's position and both times I noted this odd
phenomenon, it quickly resolved itself, but when it did, miraculously the
pro-Ron Paul numbers associated with the state dropped significantly lower
than where it had been moments before.
-
-
- What this clearly revealed to me was that AOL was cheating
and doing a rather poor job of it. I was quite pleased with myself yesterday
having obtained the screen captures proving their deceptive and deceitful
polling because I figured that eventually they'd get their shit together
and start doing a better job of covering up their nefarious activities.
Today, I'm happy to report that this isn't the case, I've caught them in
even bigger and more obvious lies today.
-
-
- Two hours and six minutes had elapsed between the two
screen captures I obtained yesterday. In that time period approximately
14,535 Americans had voted either for or against Ron Paul's position on
the Civil War. That's approximately 7,250 individuals an hours. This was
actually in the earliest stages of the poll and before the workday had
ended and people had scrambled home and gotten on the Internet, meaning
that significantly more people could easily have been expected to access
the poll in the evening of the 26th.
-
-
- The fact of the matter is, at about the same time I had
obtained my first screen capture, when less than 25,000 Americans had voted,
the poll actually began to take off, people were finding out about it via
emails and/or from forums and chat rooms, and the word spread like wildfire.
As everyone knows Ron Paul is numero uno on the Internet, so when a poll
is released involving him, it gets picked up by proud Paulites like myself
and disseminated quickly.
-
-
- Bear in mind though that dissemination takes some time,
it doesn't happen immediately, people have to read their emails, and/or
visit their favorite forum, information clearing house, what have you.,
pick up the item of interest and then pass it along to others. In any case,
between 1:43 p.m. and 3:49 p.m. 14,535 individuals from across America
had accessed and taken the poll, once again, approximately [conservatively]
seven thousand an hour. At 3:49 p.m. AOL's "Total National Vote Counter,"
which can be seen immediately below the US map on the screen captures revealed
that 36,759 Americans had already voted. As of this very moment, 10:34
p.m. AOL's Total National Vote counter shows 72,447 or 35,688 more than
what it was 30 hours ago.
-
-
- Even taking into consideration that nobody voted between
the hours of 11:00 p.m. on 12/26/07 and 0600 on 12/27/07 which as you well
know isn't likely, and given the fact that the poll would have been a major
hit today, after everyone interested had learned of it, the counter should
have far more than what it does. We can assume, at least theoretically,
that the counter should have received more than 116,000 hits since 6:00
a.m. this morning, with a conservative average of 7,000 hits/votes an hour,
meaning that the counter should at least be showing approximately 140,000
respondents, rather than the meager and highly unlikely 72,447 it does.
-
-
- So, it seems obvious to me that AOL dropped the unreliable
practice they were engaged in yesterday of accelerating the Ron Paul opposition
numbers and percentages, which was too obvious for reasons cited in my
last article and took up dropping votes instead. How do you know this Curt?
Well, allow me to show you. This particular poll is AOL's most popular,
for instance, just google Lincoln Wrong to Fight Civil War?" which
is part of the polls link and you'll see that it receives 754 hits. Now
google Can Edwards win in Iowa, and you'll see that it receives a paltry
ten hits, which is approximately 1/10th of 1 percent of the number of hits
received by the link associated with the Ron Paul, Abraham Lincoln poll.
In short this means that Ron Paul's poll was much more popular among the
Internet crowd, who by the way are the ones voting in AOL's poll, and that
it received far more attention than did Edward's poll, as if anyone actually
gives a damn about John Edwards anyway.
-
- Well reader, here's the amazing part, the John Edwards
poll has received even more votes than the Ron Paul poll, with 76,905 respondents
taking part, which seems damn near impossible given that there probably
isn't that many people in the entire world that have heard of John Edwards,
let alone care enough about him to actually vote in a poll in which he's
featured. I know I didn't. The really funny thing is, despite the fact
that Edward's poll has allegedly been taken by more people than Ron Paul's
poll, Edward's poll has only received some 340 comments whereas the Ron
Paul poll has 2,200 and is still accumulating more every few seconds.
-
- Given the above facts, which can easily be verified simply
by clicking on the links I've provided, wouldn't you say something seems
awfully fishy?
-
- The fact of the matter is, despite the terribly unprofessional
manner in which AOL has gone about its polling business, my God, the Ron
Paul poll is led with the following loaded question. "Ron Paul says
Lincoln was wrong to fight the Civil War. Do you agree?" Despite this,
I think the number of people agreeing with Ron Paul's position on this
matter took off, and took off in such an embarrassing fashion that the
"tolerance and diversity police" at AOL, which is owned by the
Zionist Time Warner company, just couldn't allow the American people to
see that not everyone is as enamored with Abraham Lincoln as the Zionist
educational system would like us all to believe, thus they felt they had
no choice but to cheat. And that's exactly what they did.
-
- If you haven't voted in this poll yet, please do so,
it'll just provide me with even more grist for the mill and enough material
for a follow up article on this one. Despite all of their desperate actions,
it seems AOL has still failed to cheat successfully enough to prevent every
state from disagreeing with Ron Paul, because as of 11:00 CST, Alaska,
Idaho, Montana, North and South Dakota, Wyoming, Kansas, Arkansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia and South Carolina are in agreement
with our future President. Oh yeah, and by the way, wake up America and
vote for Ron Paul, because without him, you and your children will be taken
for a ride you'll never return from!
-
|
