SIGHTINGS


 
Man Convicted For Injecting
His Son With HIV - Boy
Now Has AIDS
12-7-98
 
ST. CHARLES, Missouri (CNN) -- A man accused of injecting his 11-month-old son with HIV-tainted blood in order to avoid paying child support was convicted Saturday of first-degree assault.
 
Sentencing for Brian Stewart, 32, of Columbia, Illinois, was set for Jan. 8.
 
Jurors returned their verdict against Stewart after deliberating for about eight hours. They recommended life in prison. If his son dies, Stewart could be charged with first-degree murder.
 
The boy's mother, identified only as Jennifer to protect the boy's identity, wept briefly after the verdict was read.
 
Prosecutors used circumstantial evidence to convince the jury that Stewart, a phlebotomist whose job it was to draw blood from hospital patients, stole HIV-infected blood from his workplace and injected it into the boy during a hospital visit in 1992.
 
The boy, now 7, has AIDS. Prosecutor Ross Buehler called the injection a "death sentence" for the child.
 
"He had the knowledge and training to commit this offense," Buehler said during closing arguments. "And more importantly, had the motive."
 
Prosecutors claimed Stewart did it to avoid child support payments.
 
Defense attorney Joe Murphy denied the allegations, saying the prosecution presented no actual proof that Stewart injected his son.
 
"A tragedy is not a crime and theories are not facts," Murphy said. "Mom made an allegation and everyone ran with it."
 
Stewart is expected to appeal the conviction.
 
 
 
Miscarriage Of Justice
From Timothy Burgener <timburgener@usa.net
12-8-98
 
Jeff,
 
Have you been following this story much? There is quite a lot of circumstantial evidence to support that Brian did NOT inject his son. More than the evidence to support his conviction. My neighbor, and best friend of 10 years, grew up with Brian Stewart. He even worked with him at the hospital where this injection supposedly occurred. He also said there is no way he would believe that Brian would do this to any kid.
 
As for the person who said they saw him near the kid's room that day, how in the world would they remember? What were you doing on Oct 15th, 1995, at 10:10am? Who did you see in your office? Who did you eat lunch with? What did you have for lunch? Give me a break.
 
In fact, the house where the child lived with his mother was frequented by IV drug users. A day care worker and a family friend were convicted child molesters. The mother claims that he threatened to inject the child with HIV to get out of making child support payments. We convict a man with he-said-she-said evidence??? Of course she is going to say that. Besides, why choose a method of murder that would take years, when the goal is to get out of paying child support NOW.
 
The circumstantial evidence certainly is suspicious, but in no way conclusive! Evidence, not theory, is what should convict a man.
 
-Tim





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE