SIGHTINGS


 
 
God To Be Revised? Pope Raises Eyebrows With New Comments
By Richard Owen and Ruth Gledhill
1-15-99
 
VATICAN - In the face of artistic images from Michelangelo to Blake, the Pope on Thursday spoke out against "patriarchal" images of God, declaring that the Deity is "not to be imagined as an old man with a flowing white beard."
 
The pontiff did not suggest how God should be pictured, and stopped short of saying the Divine Being was female. However, his comments immediately reopened the debate on the nature of God and whether God can be seen as feminine.
 
One leading theologian said that the Pope's comments had implications on the question of the ordination of women and married priests in the Roman Catholic Church. The subject of God's nature is now thought likely to come up when the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. George Carey, has a private audience with the Pope at the Vatican next month.
 
The Pope, who has increasingly revised theological doctrine over 20 years, said that it was wrong "to imagine the Divinity with anthropomorphic traits which reflect too much the human world." Quoting from Homer, the pontiff said that the popular Old Testament image of God derived not from Christianity but from the Ancient Greek myth of Zeus, chief of the gods on Mount Olympus, who was seen as alternately benevolent and prone to vengeance and anger. Speaking to pilgrims at St. Peter's on the theme of "God the Father," the Pope noted that both Judaism and Islam regarded attempts to depict God and give Him form as "idolatrous." St. Paul had written that God was perceived by humankind "through a glass, darkly," and would be seen "face to face" only after death.
 
But the Pope also observed, with apparent approval, that there was a "long and universal tradition of religious literature" in which God was seen as a "father figure." This was a reflection of Jesus's status as the Son of God.
 
Vatican officials said that the Pope was "responding to modern feminist critiques" which wrongly dismissed Christianity as "patriarchal." But the newspaper La Repubblica said that the Pope's predecessor, John Paul I, had been "more courageous" during his three-week reign in 1978, when he told astonished visitors that God had a "feminine nature" and was "more of a mother than a father." The present Pope had resisted the advancement of women in the modern Church, the paper said.
 
Monsignor Gianfranco Ravasi, head of the Ambrosian Library in Milan and a leading biblical scholar, said that there was no description of God in the Bible, and that Greek and Hebrew words for God meant "spirit" or "power."
 
"The name Jehovah, for example, which means the origin of being, or the one from whom all existence derives, was considered too sacred even to be uttered," Monsignor Ravasi said.
 
Claudio Strinati, Superintendent of Fine Arts in Rome, said that the image of a bearded, paternal God derived not only from Zeus but also from the assumption by medieval and Renaissance painters that the father of Jesus "must have looked something like Him only older."
 
Jesus had been depicted from Byzantine times onwards as a stern, imposing man with long hair and beard, Professor Strinati said. But he also pointed out that Caravaggio, one of the greatest of late Renaissance painters, had been more subtle, implying the presence of God as a universal force "through the use of light," an idea taken up in films and other modern media.
 
The Pope has raised eyebrows several times in recent months by reinterpreting accepted doctrine. He noted that there was "no evidence" that Jesus had been born at Christmas, a symbolic date which he said was in reality a Christianization of Ancient Roman midwinter festivals celebrating the coming rebirth of the Sun. He also declared recently that the Virgin Mary had been the first to see the resurrected Christ, even though St. Mark's Gospel clearly states that Mary Magdalene was the first to arrive at the tomb.
 
According to Carey, the Bible uses male and female images to describe God. The Book of Genesis states that God "created human beings in His own image," and records that Adam and Eve "heard the sound of the Lord God walking about in the garden at the time of the evening breeze." In his great ceiling frescoes in the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo depicts a long, bearded, paternal God creating Eve from Adam's rib, and transferring spiritual and intellectual power to man through his outstretched finger.
 
Carey, in a recent sermon at Telford, conceded that fatherhood is more common in biblical images of God. But he said female images also occurred and "God transcends and includes both categories."
 
The Pope's comments were welcomed by Hans Kung, a leading Roman Catholic theologian, as showing a "slow, modest process to enlightenment." Professor Kung, a theologian at Tubingen University in Germany and president of the new Global Ethic Foundation, said he would have preferred it if the Pope had gone further and said that God was mother as well as father.
 
 
 
Comment
Jane Smith
1-15-99
 
 
According to a caption under the picture of the pope in the story he also is said to have suggested that Jesus may not have been born in December.
 
Also "Jehovah" according to Exodus 3:14 means "I am that I am" (in other words as the author of "Martian Genesis" put it, "God" was telling Moses to mind his own business when he asked which God he was, and so said "I am who I am") which MEANS Jehovah (shown right in the Bible) so that "scholar and theologian" is WRONG.
 
Also people are wondering what religion was going to replace the "Pisces" Christian religion? Well... I think Rome has been working on this, and is coming up with a unisex God (remember unisex clothing in the 60s? Now we're gonna have a unisex God and a reworking of the Bible).
 
Watch things like "the fisher of men" type phrases be ditched when describing this new "saviour" with something like the "soul's water bearer" or something like that. Who knows? This time the "saviour" might be a watermaid - a female.
 
After reading that really strange article on the pope's announcements about God not necessarily being a man, etc.... It got me thinking that Jordan Maxwell REALLY DOES KNOW what's going on with religion. So, I did a little research offline in my set of World Book encyclopedias to see what the various zodiac signs symbolized.
 
Anyhow the gist of this is that the following astrological ages are as follows (all the way back to Leo - which is SIGNIFICANT):
 
Pisces 2000AD - 600BC
 
Aries 600BC - 3200BC
 
Taurus 3200BC - 5800BC
 
Gemini 5800BC - 8400BC
 
Cancer 8400BC - 11,000BC
 
Leo 11,000BC - 13,600BC
 
Ok as we all know that Christianity is supposed to be the religion for Pisces. Prior to that the ram (a sheep) represents the age of Aries - hence the sacrificial lamb that the Hebrews were required to sacrifice to "God" (or more aptly the priests). Before that was the age of Taurus and I don't know for sure as I didn't go research that, I do believe that Hinduism started in that time frame hence the sacred cow. However, in the Bible there is a mention of the God "Baal" which people worshiped and his symbol was the "Golden Calf" (I believe). Prior to that is the age of Gemini and while I don't know what God/s represented that period, I do know that the Sumerians and Egyptians etc, created writing (the written form of communication). Before that is the age of Cancer which is represented by a crab and I have no idea what happened in that time period which is between 8400BC and 11,000BC.
 
However.... This is the kicker for the theory that the Sphinx may be older than 10,000 years old. I believe that it's between 13,000 and 15,000 years old IF it's a symbol of the astrological age in which it was built that being Leo which is symbolized by a lion and is associated with the symbol of the kings. That may be when the pyramids and sphinx were built - during that age and pharonic dynasties that existed back in Moses time, might simply have been ancestors of the builders and inherited the pyramids (maybe as some kind of sacred monuments inherited from their "gods").
 
Anyhow that's just my thoughts on the teenie-tiny bit of research I was able to do on the zodiac signs offline. Didn't research the religions though (not yet) to see when they were established etc.... Need to find a historic timeline somewhere though so I can find out what civilizations existed during which periods, so I can research them and their beliefs more. No such timeline exists in the World Book though.





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE