SIGHTINGS


 
Discovery Of '10 Billion
Gallons' Of Water On
Moon To Open Development
By Byron Spice
Science Editor
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
From Stig Agermose <Stig_Agermose@online.pol.dk>
9-16-98
 
 
Alan Binder would have liked to have been an Apollo astronaut and left his bootprint in the lunar dust. At age 58, the former Lockheed engineer isn't any closer to becoming an astronaut, but he still is intent on leaving his imprint on the moon.
 
The chief scientist for the Lunar Prospector spacecraft now orbiting the moon, Binder hopes in 10 years to begin building a lunar colony where he can hang the shingle for his Lunar Research Institute, which is based, for now, in Gilroy, Calif.
 
The chances of that happening, as Binder sees it, increased significantly earlier this month when he reported in the journal Science that Prospector had found evidence of water ice on the moon -- perhaps 10 billion gallons buried at its north and south poles.
 
"I believe man's destiny is to move into space," said Binder, formerly a principal investigator for the Viking Mars Lander program. "The moon is key to that because it has resources we can use."
 
Lunar ice could be a source not only of water to sustain human life or support extraterrestrial agriculture, but also of rocket fuel -- hydrogen and oxygen -- for interplanetary travel. Mining ice on the moon, rather than launching water from Earth, could cut costs by a factor of 100, Binder maintained.
 
If humans are to return to the moon, it won't be on a National Aeronautics and Space Administration mission. NASA's sights are set on Mars and beyond, Binder said, leaving the moon open for private exploration and commercial development, much as low-Earth orbit and geosynchronous orbit now are used by the multibillion-dollar satellite industry.
 
Binder is part of a still-small band of space entrepreneurs who hope to spur exploration of the solar system by making a buck.
 
"None of us are in this business to get rich," Binder said. But he's convinced that the moon and planets will be explored only if it can be made commercially feasible. "This is just the way the world works."
 
Earlier this year, Binder agreed to be chief scientist for Icebreaker, a $22 million mission proposed by William "Red" Whittaker, director of Carnegie Mellon's Field Robotics Center, to look inside lunar craters for the ice that Lunar Prospector suggests is there.
 
Icebreaker would be a NASA-funded scientific project that would be part of LunaQuest, a $100 million, commercial mission to land a robot called Polaris at the moon's north pole in July 2002. LunaCorp of Arlington, Va., is planning and raising money for the mission, which would feature a robot designed by Whittaker and his team. Last week, Binder, Whittaker and David Gump, LunaCorp president, met here to discuss details of the mission.
 
But not everyone is so optimistic about commercial prospects on the moon.
 
"I'd be thrilled to see private exploration of the moon, but I don't expect to see it," said Robert L. Park, a spokesman and space policy expert for the American Physical Society. He thinks talk of setting up a colony on the moon is preposterous.
 
The energy and machinery necessary to extract water from buried lunar ice would make the water prohibitively expensive, Park said, arguing it would still be cheaper to launch water from the Earth to the moon. And the idea of making rocket fuel from water is an even wilder idea, he contended.
 
"Water is the end product of combustion, not the start," he said. Breaking water down into hydrogen and oxygen would require humongous amounts of power, perhaps from a nuclear reactor. Launching a reactor to the moon is relatively safe, he admitted, but likely would not be seen that way by the general public.
 
"I betcha NASA goes (to the moon) before a private group does," he added.
 
It's a high-risk venture, no question about it, Binder said. Large sums of money will be involved and, though he is convinced that exploration and development has to be made profitable, no one can yet be sure how to make that profit.
 
One thing that has to happen is to bring costs down, Binder said. Lunar Prospector, which he began working on 10 years ago, will cost $63 million. "If this were a NASA mission," he contended, "it would have been half a billion dollars."
 
Launched in January, Prospector is orbiting the moon at an altitude of about 60 miles. It's in a stable polar orbit but the moon revolves slowly beneath it. "Every two weeks, I've seen (via Prospector) every bit of the moon.
 
It will take a year of such observations to pick up the gravitational and magnetic information Binder seeks for mapping the surface of the moon, which is the size of South and North America combined.
 
An instrument aboard also is analyzing neutrons, which provide evidence of the existence of hydrogen, from which Binder infers the presence of water.
 
Next January, Prospector will dip down to an 18-mile altitude and do additional mapping for another six months, at which point NASA funding runs out.
 
Binder said several more such mapping missions would be helpful, as would missions to return samples and to set up seismic monitors.
 
Seismic arrays set up by Apollo astronauts, he noted, recorded moon quakes up to magnitude 4 on the Richter scale. That's not huge, but quakes on the moon can last up to an hour. More extensive monitoring is necessary to determine if larger quakes -- likely the result of shrinking that occurs as the moon's core continues to cool -- might occur, Binder said.
 
"If you get a magnitude 6 or 7 quake, it would be devastating," for a moon base, he explained.
 
Ultimately, a robotic mission, such as Icebreaker, will be necessary to prove that water ice exists. "You don't build billions of dollars of lunar base next to a dry hole," Binder said.
 
Whittaker said Icebreaker would drill at least three feet into the frozen lunar soil. Data from Lunar Prospector suggests the ice is buried at least a foot beneath the surface. How deep the ice itself may be is unknown.
 
Comets, which are 90 percent water, are the most likely source of the lunar ice.
 
"The idea of sending robots to explore is just wonderful," said Park, a physicist at the University of Maryland. "That's how we should have done moon exploration in the first place."
 
LunaCorp's Gump said he expects that a number of companies, including the giant aerospace firms, may become interested in the moon if LunaCorp and others succeed.
 
U.S., European and Japanese space agencies are among the obvious clients for a lunar base, as are astronomers who would like to use the far side of the moon as a site for telescopes. Some scientists have suggested mining the lunar soil for helium-3, an isotope that is rare on Earth, but that may someday make controlled nuclear fusion reactors feasible.
 
Binder said lunar tourism is another possibility for adventurers with the wherewithal to plunk down $100 million for a vacation.
 
"First," Gump said, "we have to prove we can do it (conduct a private lunar mission) and that we can do it for a price we promise."
 
The technological leap necessary for man to return to the moon in the next 10 years is far less than the one NASA faced in 1961, when President Kennedy set a moon landing by the end of that decade as a goal, Binder said.
 
He's in a hurry to get on with things, knowing it might take 10 years for private interests to send humans to the moon. He's not getting any younger, but that doesn't mean he's given up his dream of going there himself.
 
"If John Glenn can go into space at age 77, then I can get up there at 67."
 
 
 






SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE