SIGHTINGS


 
International Space Station
Project To Launch On November 20
By Jane Ellen Stevens
Discovery Channel Online
http://www.discovery.com/indep/newsfeatures/iss/iss.html
From Stig Agermose <Stig_Agermose@online.pol.dk>
11-6-98
 
On November 20 the science of engineering will take a giant step into the 21st century. After 15 years of delays and controversy, the first module of the International Space Station known as "Zarya" -- Russian for "Sunrise" -- will blast off a launch pad in Kazakstan. During the next five years, if all goes as planned, an international group of astronauts will take turns assembling the 43 pieces built by engineers and technicians in 16 countries. So begins the first global collaboration to build a way station to the stars.
 
When completed, the International Space Station will appear to 95 percent of the world's people as a star skimming across the morning and evening skies.
 
By 20th century standards it's a rather puny engineering project. The space station will stretch 356 feet by 290 feet, and weigh about a million pounds. That's one-quarter the size of the Empire State Building (1,454 feet), and that's much, much lighter than the Golden Gate Bridge (17 billion pounds). At any given time, the station will be only 250 miles from Earth -- or roughly the equivalent of a four-hour drive on an interstate.
 
What makes the International Space Station this century's most challenging, breathtaking and complex construction project is: location, location, location. In space orbit, microgravity rules.
 
It will also hold the dubious distinction of being the only $40 billion engineering project with its destruction built-in. After 12 to 15 years in slow free fall, the entire structure will crash into the Pacific Ocean.
 
Building In Space
 
This project requires its builders to take along all their own food, water, air, supplies and power, but the extraordinary demands don't stop there. It also forces them to work without the crutch of gravity, which makes moving huge components easy, but putting them together extraordinarily awkward and tiresome. And the crews must live insulated from an environment so hostile that without proper protection their blood would boil off in moments.
 
But space station supporters insist that the ends justify the means. From the station's maze of modules and transoms may emerge a cure for osteoporosis, methods to reduce air pollution, new miracle materials, a better way to study growing cancer cells, and improved methods to cleanup toxic waste. Hundreds of scientists and engineers will design thousands of experiments to be performed on the space vessel that has been described as the "The Next Logical Step."
 
That's what James Beggs calls it. Beggs, a former NASA administrator, was the point man in convincing President Ronald Reagan to give humankind's most ambitious modern engineering project the go-ahead in 1983.
 
See how the Space Station stacks up against other *20th century wonders.
 
As long ago as 1960, space scientists from NASA, the Rand Corporation and the Institute of Aeronautical Sciences put a space station on the national agenda. It was shoved aside, however, when President John F. Kennedy kicked off the race with the Soviet Union to put a man on the moon -- a dream fulfilled by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin nine years later.
 
After a few more American citizens left their footprints on the moon -- plus a flag, a golf ball, a gold olive branch, a packet of messages from the leaders of 73 nations, an Apollo patch, and other paraphernalia - the United States asked: What's next?
 
The Space Station That Could
 
NASA engineers and scientists resurrected the space station. It was to be built from pieces delivered by a fleet of winged shuttles. It wasn't an end in itself, though. It was intended to be a staging point on the way to Mars. In fact, says Beggs, if NASA's budget and plans had remained on course, we'd now be awaiting a blastoff to Mars, instead of fretting about whether Russia will finish the space station's third module in time. But in the 60s and early 70s money flowed to Vietnam. The space station was put on the back burner once again in 1972 when President Richard Nixon approved only the shuttle program.
 
Since then the project has barely stayed alive. As recently as five years ago it survived a challenge in the U.S. House of Representatives by one vote.
 
In the end it was foreign policy that kept the space station aloft, says Marcia Smith, an aerospace policy analyst at the Congressional Research Service. "What motivated the administration in 1993," says Smith, "was to ... support a Russian market economy, and keep Russian scientists and engineers in peaceful pursuits."
 
And so, The Next Logical Step moves forward. Its major components read like an international shopping list. Russia is providing the fuel, research modules, a service module and an emergency escape spacecraft. Canada's contribution is a 55-foot robotic arm for assembly and maintenance. Eleven member nations of the European Space Agency are building a laboratory. Japan will provide a laboratory with an exposed platform. The United States will provide the bulk of the ingredients, including solar power, a laboratory, major framework and connecting segments, and a habitation module.
 
The "Next Logical Step" To What?
 
What the station will not be is a satellite service, a jumping-off point into deep space, or an earth or stellar observatory. Its research into microgravity (near weightlessness) and life sciences is important, but pale in comparison to the bigger picture.
 
"To me, the most exciting idea is that the station will give us the know-how to live in space," says Howard McCurdy, professor of public affairs at American University in Washington, and author of Space and the American Imagination. "The goal is three years, which is the length of a Mars mission. It's an investment in the future."
 
In six billion years the sun, the literal light of our lives, will cease to exist. That's a long way off but eventually we will need to find another place to live outside our solar system. There's no way to know if 1998 is too early to put up a way station to another planet. But since we have the technology and the international wherewithal, the mothers and fathers of future space voyagers believe that we might as well start now.





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE