SIGHTINGS


 
Hawaii And Alaska
Weigh Gay Marriage Bans
By Bruce Dunford
10-18-98
 
 
HONOLULU (AP) -- Azure waves break gently on gleaming white sand. A young man in a white tuxedo with a lei around his neck runs down the beach, arms outstretched, toward a vibrant young bride -- then rushes right past her into the arms of another man.
 
 
The TV commercial jabbing at gay marriage is part of intense political battles in Hawaii and Alaska, where proposed state constitutional amendments banning such unions are on Nov. 3 ballots.
 
 
Alaska's measure would amend its constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The Legislature put the question on the ballot after a Superior Court judge ruled in favor of two homosexual men who challenged the state ban on same-sex marriage. The judge said choosing a life partner was a fundamental right and the state had to prove a compelling reason to regulate it.
 
 
The Hawaii initiative is lawmakers' latest try to sidestep the state Supreme Court's 1993 ruling that the state had no constitutional right to ban homosexual marriages because that would deny some citizens the rights provided to others.
 
 
The Hawaii measure is half of a compromise devised 18 months ago. The second half was a bill granting same-sex and other unmarried couples some legal rights enjoyed by married couples, including inheritance rights and spousal medical benefits. Lawmakers hoped to satisfy the court while also preventing homosexuals from marrying.
 
 
Because the U.S. Constitution requires states to honor each other's statutes and legal bonds, Hawaii's 1993 ruling set off some furious preemptive legislating around the country. Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act, which denied federal recognition of gay marriage and allowed states to ignore same-sex unions licensed elsewhere. So far, 29 states have banned homosexual marriage.
 
 
But some in Hawaii hold out hope the state will eventually legalize gay marriage, if only to capitalize on the potential tourism boost.
 
 
"I think there are a lot of gay and lesbian couples out there waiting to see what will happen in Hawaii and will want to come here to be married if it becomes legal," said the Rev. Kenneth Grimes, an advocate of same-sex marriages.
 
 
His company, Simply Married, performs about 1,000 weddings each year but only half a dozen "commitment ceremonies" for homosexual couples, despite advertising in mainland gay publications.
 
 
But another potential beneficiary, the Rev. Karen Russ of Weddings of Hawaii, doesn't want the business. Her company does about 1,500 weddings a year.
 
 
"I am not for it in any shape or form," she said. "I have seen such pain in children who are being raised by one or the other of their parents. I feel in my heart that they need both a mom and a dad. That's what a marriage is for."
 
 
Polls show the majority of voters in both Alaska and Hawaii oppose giving marriage licenses to homosexuals.
 
 
But the attorney who represents the two lesbian couples and two gay men who first challenged Hawaii's law insists the proposed amendment won't touch the core of the high court's 1993 ruling: that benefits given heterosexual couples must be given to same-sex couples.
 
 
"If you want to end the debate on same-sex marriage in Hawaii, vote no," said attorney Dan Foley. "If the amendment is approved, the legal fight continues."





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE