Current Mind Control
In America:
What We Think Is Going On
Eleanor White
E-weapons victims are of four basic types:
1. Guinea pigs 2. Corporate whistle blowers and workers' comp claimants whose claims expose corporate misdeeds 3. Pleasure objects for surveillance and e-weapon holders who are sexual perverts 4. Unlucky slobs who inadvertently pissed off the wrong person at the wrong time
Today's e-weapon guinea pigs are fundamentally different from the old-style institutional and child-abused MKULTRA victims in that the torturers NEVER need to come face to face with their victims. Tracking and telemetry have reached science fiction levels of efficiency, and I can tell you from 7 years' personal experience, those guys in adjacent apartments to mine can tell you the diameter of each nostril, even when I am sleeping in a sheet steel cocoon which even when the side door is open nearly blocks all AM and FM radio signals.
So today's e-weapons victims zap and torture you thru the walls and floors, with silent weapons which can cause enough pain to force suicide and still leave not a single physical trace. The weapons don't even budge my very ferrous sheet steel cocoon, even while the spooks move objects (conductive and non-conductive) within the enclosure.
Today's e-weapons fall into two main classes:
1. Old-fashioned pulsed microwave (radar-like) weapons which can transmit voices into your skull (no receiver or implant required) and do other things like bathe you in a perpetual itch which causes you to scratch down to the point of bleeding without relief, and cause the sens- ation of hot needles in any body part, with genitalia preferred. Some victims are subjected to simple brute- force maser burning of their skin.
2. New-fashioned weapons which use signal types that are probably unknown to unclassified science. These include the precise thru-the-wall and thru-sheet-steel CAT scanning equipment and most strikingly the remote manipulation equipment. I would also class the ability to energize unplugged appliances and to interrupt current in an AC line cord without actuating any switches as in this "second generation" class of e-weapons.
The current spooks can force you to dream about anything they damn well want you to, and you can either stay awake or dream as they want. No other choices available. Right now, they force dreams of me cutting cables, 3D, vivid colour, and so forcefully all I need to be is horizontal with my eyes closed, not asleep. More than the forced dream, they involuntarily manipulate my hands to perfectly imitate the motion being dreamed about.
This is only personal opinion: I think the current equipment is so advanced it's just possible it came from Roswell NM, but that isn't something I will discuss with the public.
We know how the pulsed-microwave equipment works more or less - pulses of carrier above perhaps 100 MHz and perhaps up to a few GHz can do one of two things:
- overcome the protective potential difference across cell walls which are caused by bodily electrolytes ionizing, where the cations and anions diffuse thru the cell walls at different rates - cause tiny fluctuations in temperature in nerve cells at the rate of the pulse modulation
The thermal effect seems to be the preferred theory in the lay press, at least, and is backed up by the rare articles by the guys who started this whole mess, like Ross Adey and Eldon Byrd, and others, but remember, this applies to the "first generation" weapons.
We haven't a clue what signal type the second generation weapons use, but over the past couple of years, these suggestions have been made:
1. Multiple low-powered microwave transmitters, aimed at the victim, and driven in sync by a master modulator, can, by their multiple paths, overcome noise and result in a kind of "resonance" that sets off biological responses.
2. Two masers aimed at the victim, driven at identical frequencies, where one maser is "pulled" (like "pulling" a crystal oscillator) at a bioeffective ELF/VLF rate and the other stays on center frequency. This could force ELF/VLF "like" signals to dissipate into the target's body, while remaining in a tightly focussed beam otherwise.
This would probably require an open air path from transmitter to victim; I would imagine the average masonry wall (depending on frequency) would cause dispersion of the signal at the wall, but if the signals are lower in the GHz range, perhaps they can reach the victim. I certainly don't have the money to experiment, but it might be worth a try.
3. The publicized experiment of more than a decade ago where a university biology lab connected EEG machines to plants, and monitored the traces while in another building across campus, a jar of brine shrimp was dumped into boiling water. Result: The EEG traces went wild exactly as the brine shrimp died.
A book, "The Secret Lives of Plants" covers this.
This suggests a sort of "all living things are linked to all other living things" principle, a little like the Indians' idea of everything having a soul. This was not classified and was said to be repeatable. I just can't remember where, now.
4. Physicists have fairly recently come up with a similar theory that says, more or less, "To hell with the speed of light. All points in the universe are 'aware' of all other points, INSTANTANEOUSLY." I don't know what the name of that theory is, but it appeared in the Scientific American a few years ago.
The theory was enhanced when a beam of light was split into two parallel beams. One beam was prism'ed off to the left, the other prism'ed off to the right.
The beam to the left was either polarized or had some property altered, and the right beam did not. Apparently this property is postulated as always 'conserved', like momentum is. (Can't remember which property.)
The unaltered beam going off to the right was measured, and even though it was not altered, it's property 'x' had spontaneously jumped to the equal and opposite value of the left beam, maintaining conservation.
There was no electromagnetic way, apparently, that the left beam could have influenced the right beam, yet somehow the 'right' beam 'knew' about the left beam's transformation.
It's just possible that the spooks have uncovered whatever makes this theory 'tick', and therefore don't even need to worry about shielding, because shielding in this type of transmission mode is irrelevant.
5. There is a theoretical type of 'field' which physicists call a 'scalar' field, and there's lots of chatter that this might be the mode in use by the 2nd generation weapons.
Some Internet 'authors' of unknown qualifications have proposed that a 'scalar' field can be generated in the bio- effective range by driving two air core coils with a common axis and shape so that one coil's magnetic field exactly cancels the other field, leaving net zero magnetic field, but this allegedly 'uncovers' a 'residual scalar field'.
I've seen articles claim that the frequency is quite low, ELF, and the power of this ELF modulation envelope is so biologically effective it can cause wild sensations to any observer within a few feet.
6. And of course, we can't leave out the much vaunted Hutchison effect, where Hutchison, in the mid 60s, in British Columbia Canada had a lab full of Tesla apparatus which caused outdoor power poles to wave back and forth, properties of nearby (say) aluminum to change such that a section thru the metal revealed embedded unburned wood, etc.
If I hadn't had equally strange experiences myself for the past 7 years, I'd discount this, but I can't discount it now. We have one victim (Mary Ritz) researching this - she doesn't work and has the time.
Now this spring (1997) in an article in US News and World Report, Eldon Byrd (ex Navy e-weapon developer) stated that his version of the e-weapon could cause dramatic effects in living organisms while having a signal "too small to detect".
I have a roomful of detectors which worked for a few minutes then not at all because the spooks detected their presence and switched transmission modes. One is a simple Radio Shack Stereo Equalizer with the range capacitors 100 times the original value, giving a range of roughly 0.3 Hz to 160 Hz - right in the thick of alleged bioeffective frequencies. I tried driving it with a tin can horn and a hot carrier diode from center conductor to the opposite side of the can, on the advice of a local radar maintenance supervisor (also a radio ham).
The first time I switched it on, the spooks transmitted me an absolutely pure 5 Hz signal for about 10 seconds, turned it off for about a minute, then another 5 Hz signal for 10 sec., then nothing since, INCLUDING observations while my body was full of hot needle in flesh sensations.
This tells me Eldon Byrd's comment about un-detectability is probably right on the mark.
I'd love to have a half hour with Byrd and Adey strapped to a gurney and sodium pentothal drips going. We'd learn some really interesting stuff, I betcha. I don't know how to contact Byrd; Adey is semi-retired at the VA Hospital at Loma Linda CA and won't answer calls or faxes.
Dr. Michael A. Persinger is doing quite a bit of experimentation of the effects of MAGNETIC fields on human subjects, using Radio Shack reed relays with the core removed and driven at various ELF/VLF wave shapes, with a double ended +/- 5 V power supply. Dr. Persinger is decent in that he at least ack- knowledges that e-weapons exist, but is having too good a time up there in his Sudbury, Ontario retreat to jump into the e- weapons fray.
Drs. Elizabeth Rauscher and Bill Van Bise are living partly on Elizabeth's family jewelry, having had a very rough time after their heyday in early EM research which assisted in the development of e-weapons. Very nice folks on the phone, but they've had to sell most of their test equipment just to eat.
There you have it, guys, that's where this mess stands at the moment. For your benefit, Jim, Steve is telling it like it is - no exaggeration. I'm in contact with about 50 others and 50 witnesses with consistent stories rates as "proof" in anyone's court.
Finally - the above info tells you why $5,000 (say) worth of T-shirts saying "Ban Electronic Weapons", and "MKULTRA Continues", and "Make the World Safe for Our Children" would put us light years ahead of even the best technical survey.
"All you have there, Mr. Bratcher, is a wiggly line on a piece of paper. Do you expect this jury to believe that is a weapon?"
A genuine harassment signal trace could be shot down by a good high school debating team.
Eleanor White

Status Of Mind Control In America:
A Victim's View

This is a copy of letter from Sen. John Glenn dated ll/7/97 to me:
Thank you for writing me about the Human Research Subject Protections Act of l997, S. l93. I appreciate your support for this very important legislation to protect people from being subject to experimentation without their informed consent.
I first became aware of the gap in our legal system which allows the government to perform experiments without the knowlede and consent of those involved in l993 when the Governmental Affairs Committee conducted an investigation into the Cold War radiation experiments. One of the most infamous of these experiments took place in my own state of Ohio, where scores of patients at the University of Cincinnati were subjected to large doses of radiation during experimental treatments without their informed consent. During the course of this investigation, I began to ask the question, what protections are in place to prevent such abuses from happening again? What law prohibits experimenting on people without their informed consent?
On an international level we have the Nuremberg Code, a list of ten ethical research principles created as part of the judment against Nazi physicians who engaed in truly heinous medical experiments during World War ll. The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that the voluntary consent of the human subject of research is absolutely essential. Unfortunately, as we look back through our history since the late l940s, it appears that researchers in America may not have taken the Nuremberg lesson completely to heart and thre is no law on the books requiring researchers to obtain informed consent. This must be remedied and I hope to do this through S. l93.
The Human Research Subject Protections Act of l997 would require informed consent and independent review for all research involving human subjects. Protections would apply to classified research as well as to research conducted in the open. It would defintiely prevent abuses such as the ones you have described. I have enclosed a fact sheet to give you more information on the bill.
The bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources and will remain there until the committee reports it out. There are no changes being made to the legislation at this time,but it is possible that it may be altered and amended as it continues through the legislative process. I suggest that you contact the Labor and Human Rsources Committtee and urge them to move quickly on S. l93 so that Congress can have an opportunity to vote on it early in l998.
I am very sorry to hear of your personal troubles and you may count on my continual commitment to legislation to protect every American from abuses in our research system.
Thank you again for contacting me about this very important issue. I apprecite your support and please let me know if I can be of assistance to you in the future.
Best regards,
John Glenn United States Senator
JG:aa Enclosure

Email Homepage