- Note - The opinions presented in this
article (and all others on this site) do not necessarily represent or reflect
the views of this site or its sponsors. Our policy has always been to present
a wide range of articles and analyses for your consideration. Responses
are welcome.
-
-
- The currently ongoing coup d'etat, aimed
to bring Vice-President Al Gore quickly into the U.S. Presidency, was proposed
publicly, by former U.S. Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger, in the
October 15 London {Daily Telegraph}. More recently, in the December 15
edition of the {Wall Street Journal}, former Nixon aide Clay T. Whitehead,
described that type of secret committee which Kissinger was proposing for
a Gore coup d'etat, as it had operated inside the Nixon administration.
This was, in fact, the so-called "Watergate" operation which
Kissinger coordinated under Vice-President Ford.
-
- Whitehead's version of Kissinger's proposals,
then and now, coincides exactly with a series of coordinated actions, which
have been operating within the Clinton Administration, largely behind President
Clinton's back. These operations, centered around Vice-President Al Gore,
have been pushed as a plan of action for preparing the ouster of the President.
-
- Neither of these two insider "secret
committees," neither that which operated against Nixon under Kissinger,
nor the not-so-secret "national security" cabal now aligned against
Clinton, behind Gore, is really original. As the writer Plutarch would
have described it, there is an ominous parallel between the presently attempted
coup d'etat against President Clinton, and the way in which the government
of Germany's Chancellor Kurt von Schleicher was overthrown, on January
28, 1933, by Hjalmar Schacht and London- backed forces inside the German
parliament, to hustle Adolf Hitler into power.
-
- To see the connection clearly, first
consider crucial highlights of the process through which a then-otherwise
unelectable candidate Hitler was brought into the Chancellorship, on January
30, 1933, and to dictatorial power on February 28, less than one month
later. The same London-centered, Anglo-American financier interests, now
represented by Prime Minister Tony Blair, which brought the then-virtually
unelectable Hitler to power in Germany, are behind the use of a rabid Anglophile,
the virtually unelectable Presidential candidate Al Gore, in the effort
to run a parliamentary coup d'etat now, against Clinton, as against von
Schleicher earlier.
-
- Both the motive and the method behind
these coups d'etat are so nearly identical, not only in astonishing fineness
of certain details, but in crucial strategic implications, as to scare
the pants off any U.S. citizen still capable of honest thinking.
-
- It is time for us all to say, "Never
again!" and let Al Gore serve out the remainder of his term, in that
quiet and obscurity which our nation's security interest demands for him.
-
- - Schacht and Hitler -
-
- If we examine both matters in their crucial,
political-economic setting, there is a precise parallel between the British
Commonwealth-directed launching of the "Whitewatergate" targetting
of President Bill Clinton, by the failed re-election campaign of President
George Bush, during 1992, and the earlier process leading to Hitler's legal
coup d'etat of January 28-February 28, 1933. The economic issues, in both
cases, are defined most sharply, by comparing the global crisis-developments
which burst into the open during October 1997, with the collapse of Germany's
discredited Social-Democratic government and party, in the aftermath of
the 1929 U.S. stock-market panic.
-
- The attempt of the Social-Democratic
government to find a "Third Way" between the German population
and maddened international bankers, led to the fall of that government,
and an ensuing succession of "ministerial" governments, from
the British government of Tony Blair "lookalike" Ramsay MacDonald,
June 8, 1929, through President Hindenburg's appointment of Adolf Hitler
on January 30, 1933.
-
- The key, London-directed figure of Germany
throughout this period was Brooklyn, N.Y.-born Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht,
a life-long asset of the J.P. Morgan interests, with direct control over
Schacht exerted by the Bank of England's Montagu Norman. This was the
same Norman who was a controller of the financial house of Averell Harriman,
during all of the relevant years leading up to and beyond the Hitler coup
d'etat. It was Schacht, deployed by Norman, to bring the New York bankers
into support for Hitler, who, assisted by British intelligence services,
organized the German side of the Hitler coup d'etat against the government
of Kurt von Schleicher (and Hitler's later assassination of von Schleicher).
-
- The Anglo-American financiers' immediate
motive for bringing Hitler to power, was the commitment of those London
and New York bankers behind Schacht, to prevent the implementation of an
economic- recovery policy designed by a brilliant key figure, Dr. Wilhelm
Lautenbach, of the pro-U.S.A. Friedrich List Society. Notably, the Lautenbach
plan, like the tradition of Friedrich List himself, expressed the political-economic
philosophy of the founders of the U.S.A., and was the only policy, other
than the like-minded President Franklin Roosevelt's U.S. recovery policy,
which could have provided a democratic solution for what is known in most
history books as "The Great Depression." This Lautenbach plan,
which echoes the November 1989 recovery plan of Deutsche Bank's assassinated
Alfred Herrhausen, was the intended economic recovery program for a von
Schleicher government in Germany. It was Norman's puppet Schacht, who
deployed to New York, to mobilize Wall Street support for a coup d'etat
to bring Hitler immediately into power in Germany.
-
- Notably, Schacht motivated the coup d'etat,
by libelling the Lautenbach plan, and von Schleicher, as "Bolsheviks"
who had to be stopped, just as Gore's backers use the foolish Gore as their
spearhead for putting an "enemy image" on the faces of the pro-national
sovereignty governments of Mexico, China, Russia, Malaysia, et al. Gore's
deployment, on behalf of the British Duke of Edinburgh's Transparency International,
to classify defense of national sovereignty as "corruption,"
shows the motive behind rabid Anglophile Gore's bloody hand in the situation
today.
-
- In a situation similar to that of 1932-1933
Germany, today, the only workable alternative for the presently ongoing
disintegration of the world's financial system, is the "New Bretton
Woods" program which I have introduced. With the full confirmation
of my warning of an October 1997 crisis, that "New Bretton Woods"
orientation went immediately onto a leading place on world's agenda. It
met resistance from the same species of sources (e.g., London's neo-Thatcherite,
neo-MacDonald Prime Minister Tony Blair), which resisted the Lautenbach
plan during 1931-1933. Essentially, it is the same Anglo-American financier
interests, who backed Hitler and opposed Franklin Roosevelt, during 1933-1938,
who are behind the use of Al Gore as their cat's-paw today. The economic,
strategic, and social consequences of a Gore coup d'etat now, would be
similar to, but far worse than the outcome of the original Hitler coup
d'etat.
-
- The result of that reaction, is the deployment
of what Kissinger and Clay T. Whitehead have described as a "secret
committee" organized to prepare for a coup d'etat against the U.S.
Constitution and its incumbent President, Bill Clinton.
-
- It must be emphasized, again, that the
strategic implications of such an Anglo-American national-security posture,
under presently unfolding world economic, political, and social conditions,
would, if tolerated, ensure a far more devastating result than Anglo-American
bankers' unleashing of the 1933 Hitler coup.
-
- - The flavor of 1932-1934 -
-
- The chronology of the most crucial related
developments in the U.S.A., Britain, and Germany during 1929-1934, gives
the flavor of the situation -- then, and now.
-
- The count-down to the Hitler coup d'etat
began in Paris, with the fateful prelude to the outbreak of the Great Depression,
the June 7, 1929 failure of the Young Plan to provide workable alternatives
for the looming international disaster posed by the unresolved issues of
Germany's war-reparations debt. The immediate next shoe to drop, came
in England, with the June 8, 1929 formation of the second government of
Labour Party Prime Minister (James) Ramsay MacDonald. MacDonald's quasi-fascist
government, which remained in office until June 7, 1935, is the forerunner
of today's Blair regime. This was followed by not only the October 24,
1929 stock-market panic in New York, but also the November 9, 1932 election
of "American Methods" spokesman Franklin Roosevelt as President-elect
of the U.S.A. Notably, Wall Street and London adversary Roosevelt was,
in economics, a co-thinker of the American System political-economic policies
of Germany's Wilhelm Lautenbach.
-
- The Anglo-American bankers responded
to this crisis of the Young Plan's failure, by pulling down the Grand Coalition
government of Social-Democratic Chancellor Hermann Muller, on March 27,
1930. The coup d'etat was set off by a rigged crisis in the German government.
The issue of the second reading of the doomed Young Plan, was turned into
a de facto coup d'etat by the abrupt resignation, on March 7, of the British
bankers' agent Hjalmar Schacht from his position as president of Germany's
central bank, the Reichsbank. In the ensuing parliamentary crisis, the
Muller government collapsed on March 27, and the "Ramsay MacDonald
of Germany," the brutal Heinrich Bruning, was installed on March 30.
-
- From that point, until the London-run
coup d'etat against the von Schleicher government, thus bringing the otherwise
unelectable Hitler to power in January 30, 1933, Germany was ruled by a
series of four ministerial regimes, all of which, excepting the von Schleicher
government, were tools of Schacht and the de facto Schacht-controlled Center
Party.
-
- That period, from 1928 through the September
12, 1932 collapse of the von Papen government, saw a combined, sudden collapse
in the Social-Democratic vote for the national parliament, and a zooming
upward of the Nazi vote. However, with the progressive self-discrediting
of the Social-Democratic Party, the fall of the von Papen government was
echoed by a significant turn away from the Nazi party, too. Schacht regarded
the possibility of a coup d'etat against von Schleicher, as London's last
chance to keep the Hitler option alive. London and Wall Street were alarmed
by the coincidence between Roosevelt's November 9, 1932 status as President-elect
of the U.S.A., and von Schleicher and Lautenbach's American System economic
policies coming into power in Germany.
-
- So, the British, together with London's
assets Morgan and Harriman, joined London in deploying the parliamentary
coup d'etat against von Schleicher, and bringing Hitler into power.
-
- - An ominous lesson for today -
-
- There is another bitter lesson for today,
to be learned from the later events of 1933-1938. The immediate, foolish
response to Hitler's appointment as Chancellor, from the Communists, Social-Democrats,
and others, was, in effect, "Wait until the Germans begin to see what
Hitler is like; they will turn to us." It did not work out that way.
See the tempo of events leading into Hitler's consolidation of dictatorial
and strategic power.
-
- Von Schleicher was ousted on January
28, 1933. Hitler was made Chancellor on January 30. On the night of February
27, the unprotected German parliament building, the Reichstag, was burned
down in an arson attack. That incident was used by the Nazi government
of Prussia, under Hermann Goring, to launch a wave of terror against the
political opponents and rivals of the Nazis. The power of government by
decree, under the terms of the so-called {Notverordnung}, was activated,
giving Hitler power of rule by emergency decree. By April 7, the {Gleichschaltung}
laws, Nazi Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels' echo of Prince Metternich's
1819 Carlsbad {Beschlusse} (decrees) were installed, coinciding with the
purging of Jews from influential positions in Prussian society. The Nazi
book-burning was launched on May 10.
-
- Hitler's dictatorship was consolidated
rapidly during the following months. In the famous plebiscite of November
1933, the Nazi vote reported was more than 96 percent of the total. The
end to effective resistance came in the Summer of 1934, approximately a
year and a half after Schacht's orchestration of the coup d'etat against
the von Schleicher government. This consolidation of Hitler's personal
power as a dictator, came in three developments:
-
-
- 1. The "night of the long knives,"
the so-called Rohm purge, which eliminated not only potential challengers
to Hitler from within the populist-based "brown shirts" of his
own party, but also provided the occasion to assassinate a key target of
Schacht's hatred, former German Chancellor and General Kurt von Schleicher.
-
- 2. The convenient death, on Aug. 2,
of President Paul von Hindenburg.
-
- 3. Hitler's use of the occasion of President
Hindenburg's death to supersede the elective position of President by Hitler's
perpetual personal authority as {Fuhrer}.
-
-
- Thus, on August 19, 1934, Hitler's dictatorship
was consolidated. By the close of 1938, with the October march into Czechoslovakia,
and the November "Crystal Night" against Jews in Berlin, Hitler
was politically positioned to unleash a new world war.
-
- Such are the disasters suffered by those
people of a nation which tolerates the sort of coup d'etat being run now
against the U.S. Constitution and President, a coup being run by those
Republicans and others, who have stated their disposition to welcome the
otherwise unelectable Al Gore immediately into the office of President.
-
- - Schacht and Gore -
-
- To speak with absolute objectivity, Al
Gore personally is an ideologically perverted, wooden-headed fool, utterly
lacking in visible cognitive intelligence, but with a sly and viciously
backstabbing cowardice, nonetheless, a shameless tory fan of the British
monarchy, and crony and bloody-handed accomplice of that Ramsay MacDonald-style
fascist "mad bomber" Tony Blair. Politically, he is thoroughly
owned by the same crew which created his political career, those intimate
circles of the British royal family, most notably the Duke of Edinburgh
and Prince Charles, with whose pet peeves and perverted causes British
lackey Gore became associated through his patron and controller Armand
Hammer.
-
- What Gore is, personally, is essentially
nothing. What he is, politically, is a tool of such others as do not flinch
from soiling their hands by taking over, manipulating, and, in time, discarding,
with equal shamelessness the same pathetic political creatures, such as
Gore, whom they have not merely used, but used up. It is easy to have
contempt for a Gore, but, in himself, he, like the village idiot and resident
firebrand, while a significant public security risk, is, like any pathetic
mental case, hardly deserving of such strong emotion as personal malice.
So, he is being used by Henry A. Kissinger et al., just as Kissinger set
up the President he manipulated, Richard Nixon, for self-destruction in
the Watergate affair. If you recognize Gore as the pathetic bi-polar personality
he is, you can readily understand how he is manipulated by those, of the
likes of Henry Kissinger, who use him, as if he were a mere puppet on a
string.
-
- The Gore problem lies entirely in two
matters. First, the strategic purpose for which he, as a mere dupe of
his own pathetic ambitions, is being used. Second, the disgusting corruption
shown by those, like a Clay T. Whitehead or cronies of the Henry A. Kissinger
and Bush pack, who wittingly betray the United States itself in such ways
as to put not only this nation, but much of the world at strategic risk.
This is a risk so grave that no standard of comparison from the earlier
experience of this century, even two World Wars, measures the sheer awfulness
of the treasonous things those accomplices of the "secret committee"
operations around Gore are doing.
-
- On the Gore issue, it is thus time for
Americans and others to face the kinds of facts which the German population
of 1932-1933 refused to face. The comparison of the coup d'etat around
Gore with the earlier case of Hitler, is not only justified; it is morally
urgent that that comparison be made, far and wide, and loud and clear.
-
- Gore must merely learn to play the Cheshire
Cat for those childish occasions, such as costume parties, he finds most
compatible with his limitations; let him, thus, fade, giggling happily,
but quietly, from the scene. Blair, meanwhile, must be removed. Unless
those two related measures are taken, no part of this planet will be safe
for anyone much longer. All Hell is about to bust loose in the weeks just
ahead. Wake up! Put Gore quietly into the background, and Blair out of
the way of doing more harm than he has done, not only to Britain, but the
world, already. Anyone who has yet to understand the importance of forcing
through those two actions now, knows nothing of much importance about world
events in progress today.
|
