SIGHTINGS


 
Britain Travelers Face
Jail If They Refuse To
Let Customs Scan
Their Laptops
By Simon Davies
The Electronic Telegraph
9-16-98
 
 
"Unlike cases involving body searches, Customs officers are not required to establish grounds for "reasonable suspicion" before conducting a computer search."
 
 
BUSINESSMEN carrying laptops into the country are having their computers routinely scanned, and even snapshots taken of their disks. Those who fail to cooperate are liable to arrest.
 
The practice came to light after a senior computer journalist was stopped while returning on the Eurostar last week.
 
Kenneth Cukier, the Paris correspondent for Communications Week International, was detained by Customs officials who threatened to scan his laptop. The plan was thwarted when the officers discovered of British that they were dealing with an Apple. They told Cukier that the alleged scanning equipment could not handle Apple Macs.
 
A spokesman for Customs and Excise said officials would routinely scan laptops for illegal material such as pornography. Encrypted files will be treated in the same way as a ordinary luggage. "So far as we are concerned, there is no difference between an encrypted file and a locked suitcase," said the spokesman. "All travellers entering the country should be prepared to have their equipment scanned."
 
Laptop carriers will have little choice but to submit to the demands of Customs officials. People refusing to open files or divulge keys will be subject to a court order. Refusal to obey the order would constitute contempt of court - an offence that can result in imprisonment.
 
Unlike cases involving body searches, Customs officers are not required to establish grounds for "reasonable suspicion" before conducting a computer search.
 
The Home Office has not issued specific guidelines on the practice, leaving Customs officers free to take copies of disk scans. This has alarmed business leaders, who have raised concerns that sensitive commercial data could be compromised.
 
Customs and Excise refused to disclose the nature of their equipment, saying that the matter constituted "operational security". The spokesman did confirm, however, that the department used "a large variety of equipment".
 
However, Peter Sommer, a visiting fellow in the Computer Security Research Centre of the London School of Economics, said he believed Customs and Excise may be using disk imaging equipment such as DIBS and Flight Server which takes a complete copy of a hard-disk - not only the visible files but hidden material including previously deleted material.
 
"Once they have a copy to work on a simple directory search will identify graphics files and quite often the name of the file is indicative of content." Sommer believes this information would be enough for a preliminary "pull" requiring little skill.
 
The chairman of the CBI Information Security Panel, Chris Sundt, said there was a fundamental difference between physical searches, and searches of electronic data on computers. He said guidelines should be developed to ensure adequate protection of security and personal privacy.





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE