Red China & Other Nations
In The U.S. During The New World Order
By Gurudas
Copyright 1997 Gurudas

In recent months many people have expressed concern about the growing influence of Red China in the U.S.Red China is increasingly energized economically and continues to expand its military.  

Former White House aide George Stephanopoulos said March 16, 1997 on ABC This Week the administration support of China "reflected the influence of the Council on Foreign Relations(CFR)." Red China has always been part of the New World Order although at a more peripherial level. As the New York Times said in February, 1972 in conjunction with Nixon's opening to Red China, Nixon was "merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building a new world order."

China is building a large facility including an ammunition plant in Adelanto, California to distribute its products with 1,000 Chinese workers expected to move in. There are plans to build similar facilities in Charleston, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Louisiana. U.S. tax payers are subsidizing a $138 million loan guarantee to build ships for the China Ocean Shipping Co.(COSCO) in Alabama. This company is controlled by the Chinese military. In addition, Panama recently agreed to lease the port on each end of the Panama Canal to a COSCO subsidary, Hutchinson Corporation. According to the March 29, 1997 Charleston Daily Mail, "Panama peremptorily closed the bidding, secretly changed the rules, and simply awarded the contract to Hutchinson before the American or other firms could even know what was happening." Documents show that at least 3 more lucrative deals offered by U.S. companies were rejected. Obviously Panama would not have done this without U.S. urging.  

Rep. Traficant complained in Congress that Red China is now going to manufacture boots for the U.S. Army. On April 1, 1997 the AP said for the first time since the 1950s Chinese ships can now dock near U.S. military installations with only a day's notice. And there are plans to bring Chinese troops to the U.S. for training exercises. Yet currently 450 Chinese businesses are under federal investigation for espionage, and China continues to be attacked in the press for illegal campaign contributions to the Democratic/Republican Party. As occurred in the 1930s when the U.S. transferred vast resources to the Nazis, in recent years the U.S. has transferred much economic and military technology to China.

COSCO has been attempting, with White House support, to lease the closed naval facility in Long Beach. Under the agreement U.S. Customs could only inspect one in 8 COSCO ships so it will be impossible to prevent illegal drugs and weapons from entering the U.S. Strategic Investments (May, 1997) said the Chinese military has agreed to distribute opium/heroin for Burma. Last year U.S. Customs in Oakland seized 2,000 AK-47s delivered on a COSCO ship. According to federal documents these weapons were going to street gangs in southern California. Wang Jun chairman of Polytech, the manufacturer of these weapons, attended a White House function in February, 1996. On April 14, 1997 the AP said two truckloads of illegal Chinese arms bound for Mexico were found in a San Diego warehouse. According to the evidence there were four other truckloads of arms from China.

Why is Red China interested in arming American street gangs with thousands of weapons. There have been numerous reports that street gangs are being requited to be used as shock troops by the government during a national emergency partly to disarm the public and to make arrests. In June, 1996 the Justice Department said it was going to hold a conference with gang leaders to discuss common problems. The White House on May 13, 1996 said there were 16,000 gangs with 500,000 members. The San Jose Mercury News last year explained how the Contras supplied illegal drugs to the Crips and Bloods in L.A., apparently with CIA knowledge. These two gangs have now spread throughout the country. CIA involvement in smuggling illegal drugs into the U.S. has been documentated for decades by numerous sources. As the Nazis did in Germany before they took control the ruling elite support street gangs so they can be used to terrorize the people.

In the book Fateful Visions, which is edited by members of the CFR, various authors say that as a world government is established secession will not be allowed. Once a consensus has formed to establish a world government, all nations will have to join it. If some nations refuse to do this, it supposedly would threaten peace, so force would be used against them. (See page 211-2) Paul Warburg, a prominent Wall Street CFR leader, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950. He said: "We shall have world government whether or not you like it-by conquest or consent."(Hearings on Revision of the UN Charter, p. 494) In the July/August, 1995 issue of Foreign Affairs (p.8) Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. said: "We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." When influential people openly state these things, reasonable people have a right to be concerned. In hundreds of books, speeches, and journal articles influential people call for a one world government, the end of U.S. sovereignty, and the end of freedoms Americans have long held dear. This material is discussed in my book Treason: The New World Order. (See below)

Place yourself in the shoes of a corporate traitor planning to establish an open police state in America. Tens of millions of Americans are armed and aware that treason is taking place. And there are powerful elements in the military who will not sit by and support a police state. These corporate traitors cannot risk an open confrontation and hope for the best. They are well aware that if they lose they will lose everything so resistance must be met with force.

The plan is for Red China and many other nations to send large concentrations of troops to the U.S. As recorded in the Library of Congress, the invasion of the U.S. by vast armies from Asia, Europe, and Africa with great devastation resulting is the third great danger to America's survival that George Washington saw in his vision with an angel at Valley Forge in 1777. (See

These armies were immersed in a dark red light. The angel concluded: "Son of the Republic, what you have seen is thus interpreted: Three great perils will come upon the Republic. The most fearful is the third, but in this greatest conflict the whole world united shall not prevail against her. Let every child of the Republic learn to live for his God, his land and the Union." Washington had another vision which is less well known. He saw the Chinese invading the Western U.S. and by Divine intervention they were stopped in the Rocky Mountains.

The Spotlight April 28, 1997 quoted someone as reporting that President Carter signed an agreement with Red China to provide 5 million troops to maintain order in the U.S. if there was a rebellion with the planned takeover by 2,000. Another source told me Red China will be given land in the Western states. Recently a BBC documentary was shown in London with Chinese troops practicing amphibious landings in the Formosa Straits. When BBC newsmen were allowed to interview some of these soldiers, they asked: "What are you preparing to use this training for?" The soldiers said: "For the coming invasion of America!" The scheduled rebroadcast the next day of this documentary was cancelled.

The Senate passed Amendment 1122 to the 1993 crime bill to bring Hong Kong police into the U.S. to join our federal police. (Congressional Record November 5, 1993 S15183. See Section 5108 in this bill.) With Red China now taking possession of Hong Kong, this law would have provided legal cover to bring Red Chinese troops into the U.S. This clause was defeated in the joint House/Senate conference.

On November 30, 1994 NBC Evening News quoted the Pentagon as saying there were 5,000 foreign troops in the U.S. While there have been many reports of many foreign troops in the U.S. I have not seen evidence of this. However, while individxual foreign troops have come to the U.S. for military training for years, today entire units enter the U.S. and the press openly describes joint military exercises with these soldiers such as in N.C. and Fort Polk, La. In addition, foreign military equipment including tanks are now stored at various bases across the U.S. such as in Alamogordo, N.M. and Billings, MT. The German Air Force now has units at Holloman Air Base, N.M. Also, the National Guard State Partnership Program was established to exchange American soldiers in National Guard units with personnel from the former Soviet Union, supposedly to promote democracy and human rights in these foreign countries. This is another convenient excuse to send U.S. troops overseas and to bring communist troops here.

While there are over 5,000 foreign troops in the U.S. today, a greater concern are reports that foreign troops in growing concentrations are secretly stationed in Canada and Mexico. Col. Ammerman (retired) and others state that so many Russian troops are in the Mountains of Mexico that there are food shortages in that country. See 129 for a discussion of Russian, Chinese, and German troops in Canada. New rail tracks are being laid in Canada and reportedly tunnels between Russia and Alaska and Canada have been built.

Meanwhile the American military has been cut by one-third in manpower since 1989 with over 200,000 U.S. troops stationed overseas. More cuts in the military have just been proposed and bases continue to be closed. On May 10, 1994 the Combat Arms Survey was given to 300 marines at the Twenty-nine Palms Marine Corps base. Questions included "I am a UN fighting person." Many questions asked if the soldiers would serve under UN command. Question 46 said if the U.S. gave citizens 30 days to disarm and if Americans refused to surrender their weapons, "I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government." Other military personnel have been asked similar questions. Moreover, the military and FEMA continue to conduct late-night exercises in numerous cities using live ammunition and low-flying helicopters.

The most likely scenario to occur is that tens of thousands of foreign troops will be openly brought into the U.S. to patrol the streets. The most effective way to achieve this is to do it out in the open with the national press lying about exactly what was happening. Once entrenched these invaders, probably supported by street gangs and Gestapo elements of the federal police, will start seizing guns and arresting patriots. Such an invasion would radicalize the country unlike any event since the Civil War and widespread fighting would soon erupt. The NBC Evening News April 16, 1996 said: "5,000 police officers from around the world" will protect the Olympics in Atlanta. Newsweek June 24, 1996 said "foreign law enforcement agencies" would protect the Olympics. This event was the first time since the War of 1812 that foreign troops patrolled a U.S. city. Was this a test case for the future? There was no need for these troops. The Chicago Tribune, on Sept. 29, 1993 presented an editorial by Bob Greene describing many problems in the U.S. He said the U.S. desperately needed a UN multinational force.

Many influential people call for a UN army to promote and maintain a world government. Books like A World Effectively Controlled By the UN, Introduction to World Peace Through World Law, and World Peace through World Law describes these plans in great detail. Aside from local police who will carry small arms, the entire world is to be disarmed except for a powerful UN army. In 1961 the U.S. State Department issued a publication, Freedom From War, outlining in detail plans to disarm the U.S. military and establish a UN army. In 1992, UN Secretary General Boutros Ghali presented An Agenda For Peace calling for a permanent UN army. The report said: "The time of absoute and exclusive sovereignty has passed," and it listed reasons that would justify the UN using its army to intervene in a nation. Senator Boren in the New York Times August 26, 1992, said the world needs a UN army to create a New World Order. On June 27, 1995 the New York Times called for a UN army. Foreign Policy magazine presented an article (Winter 1992-93, p. 3-21) that actually listed nations to be taken over by the UN. The use of UN troops in Somalia and Bosnia exemplifies the coming trend. Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott(CFR) said (Time, December 14, 1992, p.35) "once a country utterly loses its ability to govern itself, it also loses its claim to sovereignty and should become a ward of the UN."

If there is an open move to establish a police state four other events might occur. First, another foreign conflict might be created by the ruling elite. A war in Korea or the Middle east would be most likely with many U.S. troops sent overseas. Second, foreign troops in Canada and Mexico would be greatly increased. Third, phony excuses would be created to have a national emergency requiring martial law in the U.S. Once again the militias will be falsely blamed. Many plans exist for FEMA to take control during a national emergency with the Constitution and Bill of Rights being suspended, as Jack Anderson noted in October, 1984. Numerous Executive Orders exist that would take away all our rights. Fourth, with many senior officers supporting the Consititution, there might be late night raids to arrest and remove hundreds of officers. There could be an announcement that there was a military coup threatened by officers with a call backed by the national press to support the president. Many people would be fooled into this lie just as most German citizens supported the phony national emergency created by Hitler. While I do not assume this plan would work, those in the military loyal to the Constitution have erred in not yet releasing documents such as on the internet showin that treason is taking place. Educating the public is essential.

I am not saying that an open dictatorship in U.S. will actually occur in the near future but the threat is clear. The secret government has long used the gradual approach to take away our rights. Now as their power grows some in the ruling elite want to shift to blunt force to have an open police state. Much depends on how unified and loyal the U.S. military remains. Obviously these foreign countries are not interested in being attacked by nuclear missiles and the many secret weapons the U.S. military possesses. If military officers loyal to the Constitution took aggressive actions against the corporate traitors promoting the New World Order, this would have an important impact. Because of space limitations many issues discussed above are only briefly presented here while in Treason The New World Order they are discussed in great detail. This includes: phony excuses, martial law today, how the elite create many wars such as WW I and WW II, UN activities, street gangs, Executive Orders, FEMA activities, people behind the New World Order, and foreign troops in the U.S.

Treason The New World Order by Gurudas. $14.95 320 pp. 833 footnotes, 885 quotes, 104 solutions, and 319 warnings 1-800-255-2665 Cassandra Press, Inc. $4.00-$5.00 P.O. Box 150868 San Rafael, CA 94915 for shipping one copy Distributors: Airlift Book CO.(for Europe), Baker and Taylor, Bookpeople, Gemcraft Books (Australia), Moving Books, New Leaf Books, Nexus Magazine, Pegasus Products, and Weisers. Direct sellers: A-albonic Research, Flatland Books, Illuminet, Militia of Montana, Newspeak, Perceptions Magazine, The Survival Center, Tom Davis Books, Virtue Productions, and WWW.


Email Homepage
Political Intrigue