SIGHTINGS


 
Clinton Warns Iraq
To Comply -- Or Else
By Patrick Worsnip
3-3-98
 
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Clinton underscored a stern warning sent to Iraq by a unanimous U.N. Security Council on Monday, urging Iraq to allow U.N. weapons inspectors to do their work or face ``severest consequences.'' ``Tonight's unanimous vote by the United Nations Security Council sends the clearest possible message: Iraq must make good on its commitment to give the international weapons inspectors immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access to any suspect site, any place, anytime,'' Clinton said in a statement read by a White House spokeswoman. ``All of the members of the council agree that failure to do so will result in the severest consequences for Iraq,'' Clinton said in the statement.

And although he stopped short of spelling out exactly what those consequences would be, U.S. officials have indicated they still reserve the right to use force if Iraq doesn't comply. The statement, issued shortly after the vote to warn Iraq of ``severest consequences'' if it again barred inspectors from any suspected arms sites, came even as Washington continued to prepare for the possible use of military force against Iraq. State Department officials met ambassadors of more than 30 countries that have promised to provide troops or other support to a military coalition if Washington decides to use force against Baghdad, U.S. officials said. They met to discuss continued preparations for possible military force should Iraq fail to comply, officials said. But the 15-member body came close to barring any use of force.

Most members, including France, Russia, China, Brazil, Sweden, Costa Rica, Kenya, Gambia and Gabon said that the resolution did not authorize military action. The United States has said it has the right to use force against Iraq if it barred arms inspectors again. But it was clear from the council debates that there would be little international support for this position at this time. Clinton said inspectors would resume their work and the onus was now on Iraq to comply. |

``Iraq now has the responsibility to turn the commitment it has made into full compliance,'' he concluded. The Security Council, in its vote late on Monday, also endorsed the agreement that Secretary-General Kofi Annan signed in Baghdad a week ago that gives the inspectors access to so-called ``presidential sites'' under special procedures. Thomas Pickering, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, and Eric Newsom, Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs, ``emphasized the importance of continued coalition preparations'' in their meeting with the allies, the State Department said. It said the United States hoped the agreement negotiated with Baghdad last month by U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan would provide access to all suspected sites where weapons of mass destruction may be hidden.

``But as recent events have made clear, it is necessary that the international community remain prepared to act forcefully if Baghdad fails to comply with its commitments and obligations,'' it added in a statement. Annan agreed with Iraq that so-called ``presidential'' and other sites that Baghdad had declared off-limits would be open to inspectors of the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) in charge of destroying Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. The agreement led the United States to put on hold plans to launch air strikes on Iraq, but Washington has voiced skepticism that President Saddam Hussein will honor the deal. U.S. officials refused to list all the countries represented at Monday's meeting. Britain has been Washington's leading supporter but other NATO nations, Australia, Argentina and some East European states have also promised help.

The pledges of help have ranged from Britain's commitment of significant combat forces to minor logistical assistance. State Department spokesman James Rubin said Washington hoped the resolution would send ``a strong signal to Iraq.'' ``We have made clear what those consequences would be, and we have also made clear that we don't see the need to return to the Security Council,'' Rubin told a news briefing. ``And we also have very clear assurances from key governments that they would understand and be more supportive of that decision if it comes to that.'' Possible action against Iraq will come up during a six-day tour that Secretary of State Madeleine Albright plans to start on Thursday. Among countries she will visit are key allies Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Canada. ``I would fully expect them to go over the Iraq issue in great detail and plan for possible contingencies if past is prologue and Iraq does violate the agreement,'' he said. Rubin dismissed suggestions Sunday by Iraq's U.N. envoy, Nizar Hamdoon, that diplomats appointed by Annan and not UNSCOM would be in charge of inspections at the presidential sites -- a view contested by UNSCOM chief Richard Butler. ``The simple answer is Ambassador Hamdoon was wrong, Chairman Butler was right,'' he said.


Email  eotl@west.net Homepage
Political