SIGHTINGS


 
Clinton Said Planning To Nuke Iraq
New Nuke Policy By Clinton Directive
Allows Atomic Retaliation Against Hussein
By Patrick J. Sloyan.
Newsday, Washington Bureau
 
2-3-98
 
 
Washington - The Clinton administration has quietly changed U.S. nuclear-weapons policy to permit for the first time targeting Iraq with tactical atomic warheads, according to U.S. officials.
 
The top-secret directive, signed by President Bill Clinton in November, is part of the administration's contingency plan to possibly use atomic bombs on Iraqi weapon sites if President Saddam Hussein launches a major biological attack on Israel or other neighboring countries, said White House and Pentagon officials.
 
Administration officials said the policy shift involving tactical nuclear weapons and so-called "rogue states," such as Iraq was made as part of the most extensive overhaul of U.S. policy regarding both strategic and tactical nuclear weapons since the administration of Ronald Reagan.
 
"It is U.S. policy to target nuclear weapons if there is the use of weapons of mass destruction" by Iraq, said a senior Clinton adviser who spoke on condition of anonymity. "Whether we would use it is a another matter."
 
The new policy was part of Presidential Policy Directive 60, which Clinton approved after consultation with Defense Secretary William Cohen and Army Gen. Hugh Shelton, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The United States is the only country to have used atomic weapons in war, dropping bombs on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Through the Reagan administration, U.S. policy promised massive retaliation to prevent nuclear confrontations with the Soviet Union and China.
 
With the end of the Cold War, the threats changed from long-range strategic nuclear weapons targeted against major nations to new, more flexible weapons of mass destruction that could be used by smaller rogue states such as Iraq.
 
Administration officials said they fear the Iraqi president might use a handful of Scud rockets to spread a powdered version of anthrax spores over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Israel, killing thousands and making parts of Riyadh, Kuwait City and Tel Aviv uninhabitable for decades.
 
During the Persian Gulf war in 1991, President George Bush threatened to retaliate with nuclear force if Hussein used biological weapons, but his administration never formally adopted a policy, officials said. But it was Bush's warning that has evolved into Clinton's directive.
 
Until November, first use of nuclear weapons on Iraq would have violated U.S. pledges never to make such an attack on a signer of the Nuclear Nonprolif- eration Treaty, which includes Iraq. But U.S. officials say Hussein's efforts to develop nuclear weapons would forfeit Iraq's treaty protection.
 
"They [Iraq] are hardly members in good standing of the pact," said a senior Clinton adviser.
 
Clinton's threat has been deliberately vague. Pentagon spokesman Ken Bacon said last week the United States refused to "rule in or rule out" the use of tactical nuclear warheads. Bacon's words have caused rumblings abroad and among the arms control community.
 
"It's a mistake to threaten Hussein with nuclear weapons because it will not deter him," said William Arkin of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. "It didn't deter him during the gulf war, and it won't stop him now."


Email  eotl@west.net Homepage
Political