SIGHTINGS


 
The End Of Aging - Average
140 Year Life Span Soon?
By Eve Hanks
From The Australian . . .
From Gerry Lovell <mario@farshore.force9.co.uk>
http://www.farshore.force9.co.uk
6-5-98
 
 
IT has been a never-ending quest since the dawn of humanity to stop the clock, to find the so-called fountain of youth. What's different today is that the riddle of why we age has become the focus of intensive scientific research across the globe.
 
The research has even attained a strong air of respectability, with some geneticists predicting an average life span of 140 years by the mid-21st century, through the development of new longevity drugs.
 
Biotechnology is indeed the flavour of the year. In the US, a ballooning number of commercial organisations are dedicated to unearthing the mysteries of ageing.
 
The Geron Corporation with 89 employees is one of the more established pioneers in the area, attempting to introduce potentially lucrative rehabilitative and diagnostic products for treating cancer and other age-related diseases.
 
The company has taken its research into the microscopic world of the single cell. Theoretically, the scientists believe, working on the parts that make up the whole could help the whole to survive longer.
 
Geron concentrates its cell investigation on telomeres, tiny non-coding cuffs on the ends of chromosomes that act like the plastic ends of shoelaces. Geron is building on research published by anatomist Leonard Hayflick, who in the early 1960s discovered that telomeres grow shorter as cells replicate until, after 100 or so cell divisions, the cells themselves grow old. If we can get to the bottom of what causes telomeres to shorten, then the secrets of ageing will reveal themselves or so the theory goes. Ageing appears to be nature's way of bringing a halt to cell mutation telomeres appear to act as a protector of reliable genetic information. Aged cells do not die immediately; they are simply no longer capable of reproducing daughter cells with replicated DNA. In one of those quirks of nature, some cells such as sperm and cancer cells don't suffer telomere shortening, and divide thousands, not hundreds, of times.
 
In 1984, Elizabeth Blackburn (an Australian) and Carol Greider from the University of California used a single-cell organism to find why telomeres shorten in some cells and not in others, and detected an enzyme called telomerase responsible for sustaining telomere length.
 
Telomerase may be an exciting enzyme for cancer researchers. To be able to switch telomerase output off in cancer cells would halt mutated cells in their tracks. In April this year, Geron announced that telomerase-deficient mice suffer a decline in tissue and organ function when, after a certain number of cell divisions, telomeres become critically short. Conversely, the presence of telomerase in reproductive and cancer cells, for example, imparts a kind of immortality by rewinding the telomere clock.
 
This may bode well for those interested in inhibiting telomerase as part of cancer treatment. Sydney's Garvan Research Institute executive director John Shine paints a more realistic picture: not all cancer cells produce telomerase. Cancerous cells proliferate because of a spectrum of mechanisms and genes, he insists.
 
Even if scientists could isolate the parcel of DNA responsible for ageing, every cell in the human body would have to be modified. The only way to circumvent this is to change genetic information in an embryo. When the sperm has fertilised an ovum and before any cell division has taken place at this miraculous point in nature the DNA of the human could be changed to eradicate the ageing code. This genetic manipulation would alter not just the cells of the foetus in question, but every generation of offspring thereafter.
 
Genetic changes of this kind which would effectively mutate the human race create a minefield of ethical issues. Perhaps that's why in Australia, research into ageing has concentrated on improving the quality of life for the elderly. Hormone replacement therapy in both men and women can slow down some of the symptoms of ageing despite accompanying risk factors while synthetically produced human growth hormone, available as a prescribed drug for children affected by dwarfism, can also improve lean muscle mass and bone density in the elderly.
 
However, research in the US has shown that synthetic hormone treatments can set off serious side effects such as diabetes and heart disease.
 
Meanwhile, as the hunt for a "longevity drug" heats up, two new theories on the genetic foundations of ageing are being advanced:
 
Gumming Up This theory holds that cell ageing is triggered by sugar or food molecules gumming up the body's works by forming complexes with proteins and other vital molecules. This backs up another rather controversial theory: that eating less helps you to age more slowly. George Roth from the National Institute on Ageing in Maryland in the US found that mice reared on a draconian diet live 30 to 40 per cent longer than other mice. The study's message: eat less, live longer. As the average Western diet makes this a rather impractical aim, scientists are working on a drug that tricks cells into thinking they are receiving less food. Roth believes that with this sort of advance people could live up to 120 years.
 
Free radicals The by-products of cells metabolising energy, free radicals, are thought to play a part in the ageing process. The cells, unbalanced by one extra electron, run around the system trying to redress their imbalance by bonding with other cells, causing damage as they go. In one study, vitamin E was found to soak up free radicals and expel them from the body's system.


Sightings HomePage