Back to...

GET VISIBLE! Advertise Here. Find Out More


Share Our Stories! - Click Here

Why Democrats Now Act Like Drug Addicts



By Ted Tweitmeyer
11-17-24

Never before has America become so sharply, politically divided for a presidential election. Most people did not see the fanatic drug-addict like behavior coming after Harris lost the election. After speaking to known democrat friends and relatives about the election, common reactions like these became apparent:

* A business man I have known since the 90s has always been a very rational person. Recently he went ballistic. I had not even finished speaking the first sentence asking about the election to him when he went rabid saying, "I don't want to know about it, talk about it or discuss it. Just want to go skiing in Switzerland or go somewhere in Europe until the coming four years is over."

* One relative I brought it up with refused to discuss it. However, I know that she often watches one of the mainstream networks.

* An intelligent woman and friend of the family told me, "I need about a month to get over it."

* It was in the news a few days ago that Harvard university had cancelled classes. School is also often counseling to students who cannot cope with the loss.

Grade schools across America are also offering counseling to students.

At my first encounters with such voters, I attempted to rationalize with them. I explained how Harris never answered questions, and became known as an empty pants suit. She never made her position clear in any way, which should have scared away or angered most voters. Yet even her blank no-answer behavior and flip-flopping on important issues still went unnoticed by these voters. Even explaining to these people that a clear attempt to use lawfare went on for months. Trump's convictions were condemned live on television by such notable people like Jonathon Turley, a highly respected professor of law in Washington, DC.

Back in 1957, an experiment was conducted at a movie theater. A single frame of film in a race car movie contained a huge picture of a hamburger. It filled the theater screen one time for only tens of milliseconds. Patrons did not notice that brief image, but concession sales increased shortly after this was flashed on the screen. Clearly our subconscious mind doesn't miss very much. Yet there are those who claim this did not work. To claim this is like trying to stuff a genie back in the bottle.

Congress enacted a law many years ago, making mind control with subliminal images illegal. But audio was not made illegal, and store chain Woolworths decided to take advantage of it.

Woolworths played music over the overhead speaker system in their stores. A company in Ohio, doing subliminal research pioneered this field. It has never been made public how many companies and stores used their subliminal reel to reel tapes. According to a news story about the subliminal research company televised decades ago, it does work: Embedded in the soothing elevator- like music were messages like: "You feel good about yourself. You do not want to shoplift. You know it's wrong..."

I am not suggesting subliminal images were used to increase Harris's voter base. However, flat screen televisions now have high fidelity digital audio. Subliminal audio could be used anytime on any network for months before the election and virtually no one would know. No wonder Harris never clearly answered questions, with replies totally off topic like "I was raised in a middle class home."

People who voted for Harris have become like drug addicts. They are often cranky, miserable and may tell you "I need a month or two to get over it."