Back to...

GET VISIBLE! Advertise Here. Find Out More







Share Our Stories! - Click Here

Trump Lost Only By MASSIVE Vote Fraud

By Joel Skousen
Reprinted By Permission And Copyright By
Joel Skousen's World Affairs Brief
WorldAffairsBrief.com
11-6-20

It is now certain that it wasn't just a slip of the tongue when  Joe Biden declared , "We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics." I think that's one of the original reasons for exaggerating this pandemic was to increase the use of mail-in ballots because they are more subject to fraud. At first, it appeared as if my worst fears about Democrats stealing the election might not be able to overwhelm the strong pro-Trump response the initial returns were showing. Not only was the predicted Blue Wave of Democratic votes not happening, but Trump was winning handily all the swing states, including Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. Trump won Florida and Ohio, and then even Georgia and North Carolina were trending toward Trump. 

It appeared that the American people had truly awakened to the danger of the radical Democrat agenda and turned out in record numbers to vote against it. But then the manipulation started. Impossible surges of huge numbers of votes for Biden (with none for Trump) pushed Biden to the lead in Wisconsin and Michigan, and even Trump's lead in Pennsylvania was rapidly dwindling from the same ballot stuffing fraud. Small amounts of voter fraud had been going on all night in Arizona and other tight states, but nothing like this massive fraud. This week, we will talk about how much we know so far of this brazen theft of a democratic election. 

What happened Tuesday night and into Wednesday explains why the media was putting out a series of claims weeks before the election that it would take days or weeks to count the votes but only in certain swing states. Now we know they were preparing everyone to accept what they knew was coming–delayed counting giving time to produce more votes until their side won the election.  Tucker Carlson blasted the media  and the polls for manipulating the idea that Biden would win by a wide margin. There was no margin of victory. They had to steal it.

Here are the four propaganda items that were constantly paraded before the public leading up to the election:

1. What would happen if  Trump failed to accept the results of the election ? 

2.  Trump will appear to be winning at first , but then Biden would come from behind and win.

3.  Democrats vote early more than Republicans  and those ballots wouldn't be counted until last because the most recent votes are counted first.

4. There will be  long delays . Certain states (which turned out to be key swing states) will have trouble counting their ballots in big urban areas (where Democrats dominate) and will need several days to complete. 

Looking at each point in turn. In excuse 1, why would Trump refuse to accept the results if they were clearly fair? They knew they weren't going to be fair and thus primed the public to blame Trump for doing what they predicted: being a "sore loser."

Excuse 2 was to diminish the surprise ending to the night. Small vote fraud wouldn't be visible at first and the first two-thirds of returns would be within 5% of what was real. They knew the real dirty tricks wouldn't kick in  until the end  when manipulators determined when and how much they would need to intervene in states where they were prepared to do so. This would be done in states where the machinery of corruption is in place, and where election leaders will allow falsified ballot insertions to happen. 

Excuse 3 was to prime the public to accept a  surge of ballots at the end , when all those mail-in advance voting ballots would be counted. Why was there a rule against counting them the day before the election? Election officials could certainly have kept the interim results private. But, no, they wanted an excuse to have delays at the end of the day where massive voter fraud would more easily go undetected, and when in the wee hours of the morning there may be less scrutiny from poll watchers. 

In fact, the Trump administration sued to stop the vote counting in Michigan because poll watchers were denied access in certain areas and at certain times. Trump supporters chanted for hours at a Detroit counting station, " Stop the Count ." While vote fraud can still happen while poll watchers are present, it is more difficult. 

For example, poll watchers only see the opening and processing of ballots. They aren't allowed on the loading dock of a facility where ballots may arrive from either the Post Office or a questionable unmarked vehicle in the wee hours of the morning. That's where mass produced printed and filled out ballots are introduced. 

Why would anyone predict a surge for Democrats at the end? In 2016, the last ballots were in favor of Trump and a Republican win. This was no proper justification for this excuse, except to prepare people for the lie.

Excuse 4 gave manipulators time to work the results their way. The long delays that we are experiencing allow time to produce and conceal fake ballots at the end. 

In fact, there is no reason why big cities can't be reporting voter results in increments as quickly as smaller towns. Big cities have many more personnel and the results should be fairly uniform both early on and later in the day–as they work through the stockpile. The volume will be different but if big cities report hourly results, it would allow the gradual state-wide tabulation to be more stable. 

But they don't want stable trends or results–they want to have an excuse to see surges which is the perfect opportunity to hide  illegal ballot drops . But leaving big blocks of votes to report by delay is suspicious of fraud. 

Several swing states used one excuse or another to stop counting ballots on election night for the first time ever that I recall. Then when they would restart counting, large batches of votes (mostly for Biden) would appear, tipping the race towards the Democrats. 

In Texas, one lawyer observed a person without a badge or credentials bring in a  heavy white box  (using a wagon) into the counting area early in the morning hours after all polling stations had closed and all ballots delivered. What was in the box? As reported by the Gateway Pundit:

A poll watcher filmed highly suspicious activity at a vote-counting center in Detroit at 4 a.m., the morning after election day. In the footage, taken by Kellye SoRelle, a Texas lawyer and member of Lawyers for Trump, a person in a white van was filmed loading up a red wagon outside the ballot counting location and bringing it [inside.]

SoRelle released the video to Texas Scorecard, because she wanted to raise "alarms that the box may have been a ballot box that arrived long after all ballots were expected to have been received at the counting facility."

He also observed rolling suitcases and coolers moving in and out of the secure area where mail-in ballots were being counted during a shift change at 4 a.m." Their report continues on to say that "according to SoRelle, visitors were able to enter and leave the facility where the votes are being counted without any identification check. The workers were apparently working in six-hour shifts, meaning they did not have a need for overnight luggage."

Revolver News  had a recap and analysis of this strategy that mirrored exactly what I was feeling as this played out Tuesday evening into Wednesday:

The margins in the decisive states are  [were] clear.  As of early Wednesday morning, the president was up 300,000 votes in Michigan. He was up 110,000 in Wisconsin. He was up a staggering 700,000 in Pennsylvania. He holds clear leads in Georgia and North Carolina.

The mess in Pennsylvania shows how this revolution  [against Trump]  will unfold. The president's lead there is a staggering 14 percentage points. From the early hours of Tuesday night it was clear the President was dramatically overperforming his polls in the Keystone State, and as votes poured in his lead only grew and grew. But Democrats control Philadelphia and the state government, and they had a plan. Early Tuesday night, they stopped updating vote totals in Philadelphia and  announced that they would only resume updates on Wednesday , with counting perhaps taking until Friday.

All to give time for them to execute the vote fraud

This is a farce. It does not take four days to count ballots anywhere; it doesn't even take more than one night. Philadelphia and every other Democratic city could absolutely have counted every vote in its possession on Tuesday night. The only reason to delay the tally is to [muddy] the waters and provide Democrats with the necessary time to "find" the votes they need to win. Philadelphia is the exact city to do it in. The city already has a proven record of voter fraud:

Even National Review isn't fooled by this behavior. On Tuesday night, the magazine laid out the sinister nature of the Democratic gambit in Pennsylvania:

The narrative that the Supreme Court has already authorized voting that  does not comply with state election laws  is just part one in a two-step scheme to enable post-election cheating:  First , infiltrate as many illegal ballots as possible into the state systems;  second , keep chanting that "every vote counts" and demagogue anyone who says otherwise – i.e., anyone who insists that state statutory law be followed – as "suppressing" votes, [is] no doubt motivated by racism.

The same stunt is happening around the country, in the deep blue cities of America's swing states. Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, all of them have slow-rolled or outright ceased counting votes, for no reason except to drag out the process and create the friction needed to add questionable votes. This isn't complicated. It's an effort to snatch an election they know they are on the brink of losing.

But when observers called out the shady behavior right in front of their eyes, Big Tech swooped in to suppress the narrative: It's no mystery what is happening here. Remarkably, most Republicans in the past would go along with it.

This battle will be the fiercest political fight in living memory. Every institution in America is arrayed against the president. Big Tech will try to silence his every word. Democratic state officials will collude with efforts to "find" ballots and count mail-in votes with no postmark or signature. The media will attack the President's every word while giving Biden endless deference.

Even Fox News did its part  on Tuesday night to undermine the president. All night, the network avoided calling states for Trump, even when the race was clearly over in states like Texas and Florida. But with Arizona, the network almost instantly called the race, even though huge amounts of election-day votes were outstanding (and could yet flip the state to Trump). 

Their eagerness makes complete sense once one learns that Fox's election guru is avid Democratic donor Arnon Mishkin. Mishkin has given more than $4500 to Democrats over the years, and on Tuesday night could be seen fanatically defending his decision to declare Arizona unwinnable for Trump, even as he dragged out calling states like Texas. The effort was clear: Even with President Trump leading in the key states, this strategy allowed election night to be treated as a "tie" or narrow Biden win, setting the stage for Biden to win as  new votes are found in the coming days.

Cable news, the press, the colleges, big tech, the bureaucracy, the intelligence agencies: All of them spent four years trying to bring down the Trump presidency. The days to come are the climax of that effort.

One of these untimely ballot drops appeared so outrageous and clearly fraudulent that is seemed to be the big break we needed to prove fraud. The Michigan count where Trump was maintaining a steady 4 point lead, all of a sudden showed an increase in Biden votes of 128k at Decision Desk HQ, a private vote tabulating source that other news outlets rely on. Suspiciously, there were no recorded votes for Trump in this load of data.

The news quickly spread among conservatives and a tweet by a Texas county GOP chairman went viral about the fraud, and the tweet got picked up and repeated by President Trump. It took Decision Desk HQ several hours to get around to correcting the charge, claiming that it was a typographical error. Decision HQ said, 

The data from Mackowiak's second map showing Biden receiving 100% of the newly counted votes was released at 5:04 a.m. by Decision Desk HQ which showed Biden with 2,130,695 votes at Trump with 2,200,902 votes.

They didn't say whether it was an error on the part of Shiawassee County, MI or at their end, but it is still a bit suspicious that any data dump from a rural county in Michigan would contain no votes for Trump. Was the denial by Decision HQ simply a coverup for the fraud? 

I could very well be a coverup. Here's  video of a poll watcher  in Detroit who says she and others saw 4 trucks drive up about 4 AM and unload about 130K ballots–long after the deadline for ballots to arrive through normal channels to be counted.  Big League Politics noted ,

" tens of thousands of absentee ballots arrived in large U.S. Postal Service boxes at the TCF Center in Detroit, Mich. on Wednesday morning at 3:30 am. The TCF Center, formerly Cobo Hall, is where the absentee ballots are counted for Wayne County, which is the home of Detroit." Former Michigan state senator Patrick Colbeck wrote that the total number of ballots dumped on the counting board totaled 38,000

Even if this first example of the128K Biden votes was an error, it would have only been an error in the volume of votes they mistakenly posted and not that no Trump votes were added to make it look plausible. They won't make either of those mistakes again. They had to debunk it because it was so obvious–but it didn't make any difference, since  lots of other false votes for Biden were being added in the early morning hours  along with a small amount for Trump to boost Biden into the lead, as I just detailed above. The  Daily Caller agrees :

Elections officials in Michigan and Wisconsin refused to explain Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's sudden and dramatic vote tally increase that occurred in both states Wednesday morning.

Another problem to overcome in falsifying mail-in ballots is the need to show a postmark. That can be easily overcome by machine stamping everything with a mark, knowing that election workers never take time to read the date on it. But just in case, in Michigan at least one post office in Traverse, MI was told to  back date ballots to the third  so they would qualify under the time deadline. 

The Barcode Issue : 

It is not difficult to print up duplicate ballots and have them computer marked and then dropped off to be processed. But Michigan and other states use a  barcode to match each ballot  with a  registered voter . Won't that stop this kind of fraud? 

Under normal, honest computing yes. But election computers are known to have been programmed before to alter results and flip votes for the Democratic candidate. It was observed in several localities when Trump ran in 2016. The software to do so can easily be programmed to erase itself at a certain time or trigger event, like an audit.

A tabulating computer can also easily be programmed to read a falsified bar code to accept it even if not tied to a registered voter and not reject the ballot. The software between the BMD (Ballot Marking Device) used by voters and the tabulation computer is completely hidden and never transparent, as this  computer blogger, Kevin Skogland, wrote :

I would argue that using barcodes to transfer vote selections from a BMD to a tabulator is not allowed under the VVSG 2.0 Principles. [Voluntary Voting System Guidelines principles]

* Barcodes are not transparent (Principle 3). They are an opaque, secret message being passed between the BMD and the tabulator. They are not a process or transaction which is "readily available for inspection," (3.2) and the public cannot "understand and verify the operations" (3.3).

* Most current barcodes are in a proprietary format. That means they are not exporting data (from the BMD) and importing data (to the tabulator) "in an interoperable format" (4.1) or in a "standard, publicly-available" format (4.2).

* Voters cannot read barcodes so they cannot "understand all information as it is presented" (7.3).

His objections to Barcodes as a safety device continue:

* Barcodes do not "provide individual voters the opportunity to verify that the voting system correctly interpreted their ballot selections" (9.1-B.1), and the voter does not "have the opportunity to identify ballot errors before it is cast" (9.1-F.4). Voters can verify the human-readable version,  but that is not the data being cast . Any malfunction or manipulation in the barcode data would  not be detectable by the voter . It most likely would not be detectable without using proprietary hardware.

* There is a danger that  barcodes would be used during recounts and audits . It is easier, faster, and cheaper to scan ballots again than to do a hand count or a proper audit. (Recently, a vendor demonstrated to me how to use a central-count tabulator to recount precinct-count ballots with barcodes

The fact that voting machines were programmed to flip votes for Hillary when people voted for Trump in certain districts in 2016 proves that bad actors have controlled voting computers in the past. This is not fake news. I documented in the WAB in November of 2016 the eyewitness accounts of those who say the machine changed their votes as they watched the screen, and election officials could get the machine to do it right. 

I am sure they are more sophisticated now so that changing a person's vote doesn't show up on the screen. Lt Gen. Tom McInerny (Ret) gave an  interview with Dave Jandy  on two voter manipulation software suites the Deep State got from the CIA, called  Operations Hammer and Scorecard . His interview got banned by Youtube, but not on the link above. Skip the intro in the link above and go to minute 7 to start. 

Gen. McInerny is not a plant in the movement. He correctly assessed that Obama was not eligible to be president, and that Sen. John McCain had succumbed to torture in Vietnam (why the others called him "songbird"). He used to be a regular guest on Fox News on military issues, but after his remarks against McCain he was banned from Fox–a badge of honor, indeed. 

He tells Janda that the Democrats have been colluding with the CIA to launch intelligence operation that alter voting machine results. He doesn't seem to be up to speed about the Deep State, which actually does these things on behalf of the Democrats, but he wouldn't know these code names if he didn't have access to some high level operations, after retiring. Here is part of the  transcript  of what he says in the interview:

This covert technology is called Operation Scorecard, and it was built by the CIA to surreptitiously steal elections in targeted countries. Now that technology is being turned against the United States of America and is about to be activated on Tuesday to steal the election for Biden, explains Janda's guest.

As McInerney explains in the video, after the closing of polls in Pennsylvania and other swing states, the voting machines will be intercepted and then altered using complex algorithms to alter the votes in a way that evades detection, handing a victory to the pre-designated "winner" (Joe Biden).

In the interview, he explains that a covert app called "Scorecard" steals votes by making sure Democrats always stay about 3% ahead of their Republican rivals. "Scorecard steals the elections by tampering with the computers at the transfer points," he adds.

He may know about these two secret election manipulation programs, but I don't think he really knows how they operate. Scorecard did not obviously keep Biden ahead of Trump by 3% during the entire process. I'm sure they were programmed to do it late in the game as we observed. 

So, why worry about adding falsified ballots, or "harvesting ballots" as paid agents for Rep. Illian Omar were caught doing by Operation Veritas, if the computers can do it all? Gen. McInerney explained that the intervention in computers didn't fully operate in 2016, and that's why altering physical ballots may still be in play, as a backup. 

It is also not a unified, controlled-from-the-top conspiracy. Local Democratic machine politics are used to doing their own vote manipulation, and it is safer to have a conspiracy decentralized so that a single whistleblower can't expose higher level direction. Here is a sampling of reports I have received. 

Summit News commented  on the evidence that voter turnout is statistically way too high compared to all former years, indicating votes are being added by fraud:

Trump supporters are questioning the record 89% turnout figure in Wisconsin, which represents a 22% increase on the amount of people who voted in 2016. President Trump was ahead in Wisconsin for most of last night, before massive vote dumps at around 4am suddenly turned the state blue, leading many to allege vote fraud.

Official figures put the turnout in the state at over 89%, which represents a new record and a phenomenal increase compared to recent presidential elections, including 2016 when voter turnout was 67%.

Numerous wards in Milwaukee also reported more votes in the presidential election than there were registered voters. Trump supporters say the activity in Wisconsin is highly suspicious and are calling for an investigation. "They're stealing this!" remarked Harlan Hill.

Commentator Bill Mitchell also pointed to suspiciously high turnouts in other states. "Along with Michigan, Pennsylvania also had 80% turnout. These numbers are just preposterous. And it's all due to the fake absentee ballots," he said.

Jim Hoft of the  Gateway Pundit reported  on the 23,277 votes found in Philly – all of them for Biden. So what happened in Wisconsin and Michigan is now happening in PA, which will put Biden over the 270 electoral votes to win. Trump's lead of 6 points in PA has been narrowed to less than 1 point. As Pennsylvania Attorney General  Josh Shapiro boasted

"Donald Trump can no longer win the state because of unprecedented measures Democrats have put into place to sway the election."

"If all the votes are added up in PA, Trump is going to lose. That's why he's working overtime to subtract as many votes as possible from this process," Shapiro wrote in a tweet.

And, as  The Duran wrote , a poll watcher in PA said "You don't want the vote to [be decided in] Pennsylvania, it is a mess, it is an absolute mess." But that's exactly where its happening.  Bigleaguepolitics. com reported

Michigan state representative Shane Hernandez initially discovered that a precinct in the small town of Marysville had a voter turnout that was roughly 35 percent lower than neighboring precincts.

St. Clair County Clerk Jay DeBoyer performed an investigation as a result of Hernandez's findings, and he discovered that the absentee ballots in the precinct were not counted because of a mistake that was made in the clerk's office. After the mistake was corrected, Trump gained an additional 500 votes.  [There never any admission of purposeful mistakes.]

This is far from the only instance of a voter irregularity that has occurred in the conservative rural areas throughout Michigan. There have also been abnormalities reported in Antrim County, a county in the ultra-conservative northern part of the state. Antrim initially went for Biden by a 2-to-1 margin,  [an impossibility in that part of the state]  but those results are now being reviewed and are expected to be corrected.

Sadly, they only get corrected if caught. I covered the report of Detroit workers being coached on how to implement fraud. 

The Sharpie Pen controversy :

Various states report voters having ballots rejected because they were given Sharpie brand markers or felt pens at the polls to mark their ballots. Felt pens bleed through to the other side and can get a ballot reject. Some complained that the computer scanner couldn't read the sharpie. Here is a  video  of a voter in AZ who documented the ballots marked with Sharpies being rejected, while ballpoint pens ballots were accepted and read. Arizona denies this, but complaints persist, as this  Penvibe blog wrote :

For example, there was a kerfuffle in the American state of New Mexico  [and Arizona, and Maine]  recently when state officials declared the Sharpie unfit for voting booths (Update: They didn't declare it unfit, but acknowledged there had been complaints.) While they stopped just short of banning the markers all together, they did order nearly 900 boxes of Paper Mate Flair felt-tip pens and shipped them to polling places as replacements.

The problem was that  Sharpies were bleeding through the paper ballots .

It's not the first time Sharpies have been trouble at the polls. In 2013, voters complained when the Sharpies they were given bled through their double-sided ballots in an election in New York. And in 2004, Sharpies were blamed for a miscount in Maricopa County, Arizona (although an expert later opined that voting machines were able to read Sharpies just fine, but could not read Bic ballpoint).

So bad were the number of voters whose ballots were invalidated after using election provide Sharpies, that they have filed a  class action lawsuit . In any case, the disputes only tend to happen in Republican areas. 

Mark Levin  covered the Pennsylvania violations of the rules on ballot postmarks and Wisconsin irregularities tabulating more votes than registered voters:

The Democrats have been litigating in various states for months to change election laws to favor Joe Biden and Democrat candidates. The Pennsylvania Secretary of State fundamentally altered her guidance and was asked to resign by Republicans. She changed the rules for ballots after telling the state Supreme Court she'd separate any ballots received after 8 pm on election day. She then co-mingled those ballots defying, undermining, re-writing the existing election statutes that she told the court agreed to uphold. 

Then, Kimberly Strassel from the Wall Street Journal editorial board calls in to explain something strange that happened in Wisconsin's election results from last night and today. Wisconsin has same-day voter registration. With turnout at 71%, Wisconsin would have needed 900k same-day registrations yesterday to reach the numbers being reported. Later, delays in counting votes occurred like never before as the Democrats waited for mail-in votes to arrive. Some states have extra days, why don't all states have extra days?

North American Law Center reported: 

Pennsylvania election laws require a photo ID for any first time voter in the registry, because without that, there is no way to know who is voting and whether or not they are eligible to vote. Every election Judge and Inspector had to sign an affidavit which requires them to offer only a provisional ballot to people trying to vote without any identification. The voter registries states ID REQUIRED next to the name of these voters, before they can be placed on a machine to vote... 

At around 6:00 PM ET in Steubenville, Allegheny County PA, Allegheny Country Election Commission official David Voe ordered election judges to allow everyone to vote without any ID. Voe threatened to arrest anyone who did not follow that order and shortly thereafter, Allegheny County Sheriff Frank Baker sent two Deputies, Clark and Walsh, to arrest two election workers. They were treated like criminals and hauled before Judge Jack McVay, Jr. where they were told that the law doesn't matter, the constitutional doesn't matter, their oaths do not matter and charged with contempt! 

Then there was the duplicate voting fraud that was allowed in Michigan and Wisconsin. Ineligible voters with no ID are still being allowed to vote. Family friend and DC pundit Mark Hemingway  tweeted about the corruption in Philadelphia

There were two indictments for voter fraud in Philly earlier this year involving a Democratic election judge and a former Democratic congressman. I would be watching these ballots if I were GOP.

A Nevada Postal carrier was caught on video by Project Veritas  pledging vote fraud  to remove Trump. A volunteer at a counting facility in Michigan claims there was at least one  box of 500 Ballots  from people not on voter rolls. 

One video posted by Will Chamberlain of Human Events  shows a poll watcher being kept out of the polling place where he was trying to verify accountability and transparency in the voting process. The Philadelphia Republican Party reported that poll watchers are being evicted from several voting precincts throughout the city, as the Democrats run their crooked election day operations.

Summary : 

The bottom line is that Pennsylvania will continue the false vote harvesting until Biden wins there too. Biden is already talking about  choosing his transition team . But it won't be a total disaster since Republicans have picked up seats in the House and will retain control of the Senate. Only the Senate can now block the Democrat's radical agenda. Biden won't be able to pack the Supreme Court or create two additional states (DC and Puerto Rico) to increase the Democrat roster of Senators. Mitch McConnell is a globalist, but he probably won't dare attempt an open betrayal of the Trump legacy. Major news services are now officially calling the election for Biden. Trump will continue to fight legally, but it's over. 

Subscribe To World Affairs Brief
http://www.worldaffairsbrief. com