Share Our Stories! - Click Here
By Charlotte Iserbyt
Exclusive To Rense.com
Response to one of nation's finest education researchers:
By the way, education budget at federal, state, and local levels combined EXCEEDS that of Defense Department: Education spending slightly over one trillion dollars; Defense spending slightly under one trillion dollars.
I hope and pray you are right that the tide is turning. I subscribe to the digital version of Education Week and fear any brightness you may see on the horizon will be short lived, and is possibly even another deception or diversion (carried out, as usual, by "wolves in sheep's clothing". You have fought this battle better and longer than many and must know that there is ONE component required for smooth implementation of the globalist agenda (NWO). That is, and has always been, education, now, due to corporate fascist tax-funded charter schools with unelected boards referred to as "school to work": the end of capitalism as recommended in Carnegie's Conclusions and Recommendations for the Social Studies, 1934. How many on my list have read it? According to a leading British socialist,that book contains a plan for a socialist America.
Click on following link:
http://deliberatedumbingdown. com/ddd/wp-content/uploads/ 2003/10/Report_Commission_ Social_Studies-Krey-Counts- Kimmel-Kelley-1934.pdf
For those who haven't read the above Report, they better do so.. FAST.
There are still excellent researchers out there who put no blame whatsoever at the feet of Donald Trump even though Trump supported tax-funded school choice with unelected boards (taxation without representation: merger of public and private sector) long before he ran for President. Google "Crippled America".
Trump's Presidency was essential to the Insiders (corporations/tax exempt foundations, etc.) to pound last nail into coffin of freedom in this country: tax-funded charters schools with unelected boards, necessary for implementation of the ATHEIST Soviet polytechnical education system and lifelong control.
Trump's being a businessman really helped, since without business the satanic agenda (Soviet lifelong workforce training) cannot take place. National Alliance of Business stated at top of its letterhead, in the nineties, "KINDERGARTEN THROUGH AGE 80 WORKFORCE TRAINING".
Scroll to bottom for Turchenko link to paper which explains exactly what we are looking at.
Then click on http://mediaarchives.gsradio. net/rense/special/rense_ 061719_hr1.mp3 ( 20.48-32.32 min.) for Rense interview last Monday, June 17, during which I discussed the latest kid on the block: proposal to create a new federal agency, headed up by a Czar (yes their words, not mine) to chart a National Industrial Policy.
Our very good researchers have been diverted by the media from the real issue of the nail in the coffin "systems management" (original Planning, Programing, Budgeting, Management system aka TQM) which sounds red, white, and blue, but is RED, and is necessary to implement Carnegie's socialist National Industrial Policy called for in 1934.
Mary Thompson, brilliant education researcher for over 50 years, explained (in 1972) the beginnings of such a national industrial policy: 3D, page 110:
MARY THOMPSON, SECRETARY AND MEMBER OF THE SPEAKERS' BUREAU OF THE SANTA CLARA,
California Republican Women's Federation, gave a very important speech regarding Planning,
Programming, Budgeting Systems (PPBS) on June 11, 1972. Following are key excerpts:
When I was first asked to speak to you about PPBS (Planning, Programming, Budgeting
Systems), I inquired whether it was to be addressed to PPBS as applied to education. I
shall deal with it at the education level today, however you should remember that PPBS is
a tool for implementing the very restructuring of government at all levels in every area of
governmental institutions. What is involved is the use of government agencies to accomplish
mass behavioral change in every area....(important text removed for brevity purposes))... BE AWARE OF THE
FACT THAT THE VOUCHER SYSTEM IS LURKING IN THE WINGS TO BRING THE PRIVATE
SCHOOLS INTO THE NATIONAL CONTROL [emphasis in original].
Sound familiar? Think 1978 when President Carter did same thing with formerly locally-controlled education (proposed a U.S. Department of Education) which sailed through Congress with, believe it or not, significant opposition from public school teachers.
Then think President Reagan, who, pre-election, had promised the American people he would abolish Carter's U.S. Dept. of Education. Reagan then appointed the late commie T.H. Bell, Utah, to be his Secretary of Education. Secretary Bell used his phony Nation at Risk Report , the hoop-la-la garbage/ed circus media bandwagon across country, thrown at Americans regarding education being such a disaster (false), which ultimately resulted in education restructuring (carving in stone OBE (Ourcomes Based Education), Skinnerian/Pavlovian dog training method, which "works" for "school to work and value change" now being fully implemented through tax-funded charter schools with unelected boards.) Yes, it sure works. "Sit, Fido". Fido sits and gets dog biscuit (reward). Are our children animals to be trained and brainwashed, not educated? BACK TO BASICS OR OBE
Don't forget it was President Reagan who signed the extensive U.S.-USSR Education and Cultural Exchange Agreements (1985) which included health, transportation, and everything including kitchen sink. Don't forget all education and cultural agreements with the former Soviet Union were initiated and signed by REPUBLICAN, not DEMOCRAT Presidents. President Eisenhower signed the first agreement in 1958 at the peak of the Cold War.
By the way, it was Edwin Meese, Reagan's White House Counselor, still at Heritage Foundation, who recommended communist T.H. Bell to be Secretary of Education. Meese is still hanging in at Heritage. Meese supports the E. German STASI "snitch on your neighbor" spy network, aka the Community Oriented Policing System (C.O.P.S.) being implemented nationwide as I write.
I am amazed at our researchers who continue to support Trump. What planet are they living on? Yes, Hillary was/is Satanic. "Insiders" needed her on ballot in order to get Mr. "Red, White, and Blue" (who, I believe, is an Insider himself, and NOT stupid) elected. He and Reagan both were former Democrats and have same backgrounds as "actors". Reagan was even known as "Red Ronnie".
https://www.thoughtco.com/was- donald-trump-a-democrat- 3367571
http://www.apfn.net/ messageboard/03-28-05/ discussion.cgi.28.html
"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy."
I heard (unsubstantiated rumor?) Hillary is going to run again for President. That makes sense, doesn't it? That will make sure Trump gets in again to sew up the whole corporate fascist/commie workforce training agenda, with all its trappings such as lifelong Community Education (brainwashing/training), C.O.P.S. program, etc. carved in stone. By the way, that's Hilary's agenda as well, so if she happens to beat Trump, we'll still get the "Insiders" Soviet brainwashing education/training agenda.
Right and left media (both "fake") pound us, including our young children (!) daily, with nothing but discussion of lesbian/gay agenda. Anything to do with sex always captivates human beings, since time of cave men, and in case of USA, the American people. Dangerous as is that agenda, it is successfully diverting Americans from any less jazzy issues like nail in coffin "systems management" essential for communist New World Order (UN Agenda 2030)
It appears even our finest researchers are unable to recognize the importance of diversion and Hegelian dialectic (create problem, people scream, impose the solution) being played out day in and day out at all levels (right and left in bed together). We allowed the neoconservative Trotskyite "anti-common core assault" to divert us from need to fight "tax-funded school choice/charters" which was the #1 bogeyman necessary to kill our capitalist system AND our elected form of government.
We are now allowing the sick/satanic sex (3S) agenda (daily left and right media coverage) to divert us from SYSTEMS CHANGE. Once satanic systems change is implemented, using the most sophisticated computer behavior/mind controlling technology, do you think we will be able to get rid of the "controlled" gay/lesbian education agenda? We won't be able to extricate our nation from the gazillion programs that come under COMMUNIST SYSTEM, aka REGIONAL GOVERNMENT. Go to free pdf for 3D, page 133, and read "Planning Is Socialism's Trademark" by Morris Zeitlin.
THE DAILY WORLD OF NOVEMBER 8, 1975. Editor's note:
3 D Editor's note: importance of this article lies in its blatant admission that regionalism, which is gradually
becoming the accepted method of unelected governance in the United States (unelected councils
and task forces, participatory democracy, public-private partnerships, etc.) is the form of
government used in democratic socialist and communist countries."
Haven't we had the latest bogey man (sick, sick sex... satanic sexual revolution agenda) since the nineteen sixties? Where was everyone when a few of us were fighting and writing about the satanic perversions coming down the pike, such as in Maine in mid- seventies, the K-12 comprehensive health ed curriculum calling for students to understand the three types of sexual intercourse: man/woman; man/man; and with animals!!!!!!
When Guardians of Education for Maine spoke out against this evil curriculum, which was 99 percent oriented towards global government, one percent towards so-called "health", nobody would believe us, even though we had the curriculum which was out of California (fruit and nuts land) entitled The Berkeley Model.
Is what we are looking at today any worse than THAT? How do you like this quote from The Guidance Counselor's journal?
published a special issue on the subject of "Death" in its May 1977 issue (Vol. 24, #5). Here is KEY quote:
Helping Students Clarify Values:
The last goal is to help students clarify their values on social and ethical issues. An underlying,
but seldom spoken, assumption of much of the death education movement is that
Americans handle death and dying poorly and that we ought to be doing better at it. As
in the case of many other problems, many Americans believe that education can initiate
change. Change is evident, and death education will play as important a part in changing
attitudes toward death as sex education played in changing attitudes toward sex information
and wider acceptance of various sexual practices.
Ask yourself how many of us know of or have supported Judith Reisman's courageous and brilliant work on this subject, carried out over the past forty years at least? How come she gets invited to speak abroad before legislative bodies, etc., but has not been invited to speak before the U.S. Congress?
Have you noticed the deafening silence from those good and patriotic Americans who are now controlled by Heritage Foundation and Council for National Policy, which did everything possible to boycott my flyer "Soviets in the Classroom...America's Latest Education Fad" which covered in detail the U.S.-Soviet and Carnegie-Soviet Academy of Science, signed by President Reagan, and Carnegie Corp., respectively. Had it not been for Robert Morris, retired NJ judge and Congressional investigator during Investigation of Communism in the Schools in the fifties, taking over America's Future, in 1989, finding that flyer in bottom drawer of his desk, three years later, flyer would have never seen the light of day. (Former President of America's Future, Rudy Scott, neocon, had by mistake left that one page flyer in bottom drawer). SOVIETS IN THE CLASSROOM
We have been duped. We were always looking "left", when we should have been looking "right". Think "Quigley" every time media bombs you with Republican vs. Democrat, as if there is any difference whatsoever between the two parties "at the top".
I am not including some links, since one can find everything I have touched on in this email, plus gobs more, at my deliberate dumbing down website.
Link: The Scientific and Technological Revolution and the Revolution in education