The deliberate, vicious attack on Judge Brett Kavauagh is simply beyond evil. The grotesque treatment of Robert Bork so many years ago was something many of us prayed would never happen again. It did. The 'lynching' of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was another well-funded, well-orchestrated effort to keep him off the bench.

However, Justice Thomas came out swinging and so did Judge Kavauagh. I say good for him. His sterling life and career are destroyed even after he's confirmed (I pray). His wife and daughter's have been through Hell — all for a big, fat politically orchestrated — as Judge Kavanaugh said: Not advise and consent by the Senate under the Constitution but 'search and destroy'.

Yes, like 20 million other Americans I watched the victim's "heroic" testimony and sickening speeches by Dem-o-RATS on the committee. I watched Judge Kavanaugh and wanted to cry. The circus not only brought in the clowns but liars, connivers and toilet scum: Democrats on that committee and their deranged supporters.

What more can be done to further destroy Judge Kavanaugh with scurrilous lies, inuendo and unprovable accusations? You just wait for this week now that RINO Sen. Jeff Flake made his vote conditional on a waste of time:  A 7 th FBI investigation which is a total waste of taxpayer dollars as there will be nothing for agents to do but read the statements of the three individuals Ford 'recalls' being there and have a chat with them.

Really? Just what are they going to investigate that hasn't already been THOROUGHLY investigated already by the Judiciary Committee? Uh, how about something called the statute of limitations? Same link above: "For example, in 1982, assault and attempted rape were both misdemeanors and subject to a one-year statute of limitations," they wrote."

I've been in Maryland many times; a very beautiful state. Met many really nice people. But, tragically, politically it's gone into the sewer, over run by liberal brain-dead fools.

Nothing new will come out of it to corroborate the allegations from a very active political animal, Prof. Christine Ford — should she be persuaded by her handlers to file a complaint there. The victim who has no idea where the alleged assault took place except it was someone's house. Doesn't know the date, doesn't know who got her to the house or who took her home.  A 15-year old who allegedly was sexually assaulted never told her BFF. Best Friends Forever who tell each other everything. Someone who was allegedly there — offered up her sworn statement who would be subject to federal criminal statutes if she lied. Ford just runs out of some house and leaves her BFF, Keyser, alone with potential rapists. Sure.

"Ford told the Washington Post  that she remembered a friend of hers from high school, Leland Keyser, attending the infamous party where, she says, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her.

"But Keyser, communicating with the Senate Judiciary Committee which had queried her about the incident, said through her attorney that she did not know Kavanaugh and had no recollection of attending a party where he was present.

"Ford's attorney Debra Katz dismissed the significance of the email because "she did not share her story publicly or with anyone for years following the incident with Judge Kavanaugh."

"It's not surprising that Ms. Keyser has no recollection of the evening as they did not discuss it. It's also unremarkable that Ms. Keyser does not remember attending a specific gathering 30 years ago at which nothing of consequence happened to her. Dr. Ford of course will never forget this gathering because of what happened to her there," Katz said."

Gag me.

Do I believe Ford? Yes. I believe at the time (read the years books: WHY CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD'S HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOKS WERE SCRUBBED: Faculty Approved Racism, Binge Drinking and Promiscuity and Christine Blasey Ford's Racist High School Yearbooks: Part 2 ) she was a 15-year old drinking, spoiled party girl allowed to do what my parents would never have tolerated.

Did something happen to her back then? I believe something did and it was traumatic for her. Watching her testify was watching someone with mental health issues being manipulated by political players. BUT, the alleged attempted sexual assault was NOT done by Judge Kavanaugh. That is Ford's BIG lie .

The GOP brought in an outside, dependent prosecutor to question Ford instead of GOP senators: Rachel Mitchell.  A woman with decades of experience dealing with sexual assault victims. Her sterling reputation from all 'sides of the political spectrum' is that she is a kind, compassionate, caring woman — no matter who the victim is, where they come from, what color their skin might be or any other factor.      Her personal integrity has always been to find the truth.

Who is Rachel Mitchell, the prosecutor hired to question Kavanaugh's accuser during Senate hearing?

Based on Mitchell's questioning of Ford, her final, professional conclusion based on decades of experience is being completely ignored by the prostitute media, political whores on the committee — that would be Dem-0-RAT senators and a couple of RINOs along with the crazies out there who believe Ford is the greatest thing since night baseball.

In fact, useful fools out there have already donated more than $750,000 for Ford through GoFundMe. And, pray tell — just what does Ford need $750,000 bux for? Pro bono attorneys seeking world-wide fame during the hearings? There's a sucker born every minute.

Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell 'Would Not Charge Kavanaugh or Even Pursue a Search Warrant ', September 28, 2018

"Arizona sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell told Republican senators in a conference meeting Thursday evening that she would not charge Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh after hearing testimonies of the Judge or his accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

"Mitchell, who took a leave of absence from Maricopa County's Deputy County Attorney and division chief the County Attorney's Office's Special Victims Division to join the Senate Judiciary Committee's team of attorneys for the hearing, "broke down her analysis" of both testimonies to GOP lawmakers. In a nearly 30-minute presentation, Mitchell went over the "facts that were established and not established" and concluded that not only would she not charge Kavanaugh based on the record of evidence from both parties, but would not even pursue a search warrant for the judge, which in virtually all cases would require the standard of probable cause to be met, Politico reported .

"Brooke Singman of Fox News quoted one source as saying "Mitchell was very clear with senators that based on evidence presented, she couldn't bring the case 'anywhere near a court room.'"

Stay tuned because more 'victims' will be found as we get closer to a final confirmation vote. But, Demorats should be careful about what they wish for:

Backfire: Democrats #WalkAway In Droves Following Kavanaugh Circus — Dems say they'll vote red in November after Supreme Court nominee show trial

Avenatti's Kavanaugh Accuser Sued for Making False Claims

Yes, the effort to defeat practicing Catholic, Judge Kavanaugh, will worsen over the next few weeks. More vicious lies and smears will continue to flow from the pie-holes in the faces of the Hollywood crowd who do not get a penny of my money for their movies nor do I watch their trash on the boob tube.

The 'left' and its base of brainless imbecile females are not going to give up. They are terrified Roe v Wade could someday be overturned. The killing of unborn babies would stop and for them, that would be a tragedy. George Soros Sends $246 Million to Pro-Abortion Groups Smearing Brett Kavanaugh

For sewer rats like Sen. Cory Booker, this is all about his rise to the top so he can run for president — the same goal as the stinking Red, Sen. Kamala Harris. Power by senators and hatred by men and women who support butchering unborn babies.

Which brings me around to this critically important issue. Bear with me. Last month I volunteered at the GOP booth at our county fair. One couple I spoke with were adamant there should be term limits for members of Congress. I told them I agreed and the solution sitting in Congress is rotting away with so many other bills while Americans continue to be bombarded by the 'get Trump' mob.

You cannot recall members of Congress. Sen. Menendez Recall Killed by NJ Supreme Court, Dec. 2010. My column and as I predicted, a failed effort. Back in 1994 several states passed term limits for members of Congress. I knew back then the Supreme Court would shoot them down and they did. The issue was decided in May 1995 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against term limits in Congress passed by states; it requires a constitutional amendment. A close vote 5-4 (4 justices who've never read the Constitution) in the case, U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton.

I wrote about this back in Dec. 2016: This is a Constitutional Amendment We Must Fight For

"There is no need for a constitutional convention. The need is for the American people to wake the hell up and stop reelecting the same incumbents back to the U.S. Congress with the help of human and electronic vote fraud. Once again, last month the people of this country reelected 94% of the same crooks, cowards and thieves back to the U.S. Congress and somehow think there will be change. The only difference is this time around is Donald Trump the NY street fighter will be in the oval office. As Dr. Sebastian Gorka so brilliantly put it: "I'd like to recognize the fact that after eight years of Pajama Boys, it's time for the alpha males to come back."

"Term limits for the Outlaw Congress should have been written into the Constitution, but I speculate the framers believed individuals would serve a few terms and go back to their chosen livelihoods. Tragically for this country, nothing could be further from the truth. The following individuals are just a small number of the scum in Congress who have been shakers and movers in destroying this republic; three are gone. Some have served in both the House and Senate. Just look at how many years each of them have 'served'.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi [D], age 76, 29 years
Senator Robert Byrd [D], died in 2010 age 92, 57 years
Senator Mitch McConnell [R], age 74, 13 years
Senator Harry Reid [D], age 77, retired effective 12-31-16, 33 years
Rep. John Boehner [R], age 67, retired last year after 25 years in office

Senator Diane Feinstein [D], age 83, 24 years
Senator Barbara Boxer [D], age 76, 33 years
Rep. Paul Ryan [R], 17 years
Senator Chuck Schumer [D], age 66, 35 years"

On the Senate Judiciary Committee, most of them have been in office for decades. Leaky Pat Leahy, Feinstein and the ultimate ASS during the hearings (besides stinking commie, Kamala Harris and brain dead Mazie Hirono, a Buddhist), Dick Durbin have made a career off the sweat of your labor.

Of course, if the DASTARDLY and NON-RATIFIED Seventeenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was not in effect, we would not see these career crooks remain in the Senate in many states. I sued over this fraud just in case you are a new reader to my column.  The Appeals Court here in Texas (Austin) decided it's fine to leave this BIG FAT LIE in place.

"Then, much to my shock right on the heels of finding that case, what else did I discover? Oh, you won't believe this:

"On April 11, 2002, the State of Alabama decided out of the clear blue to ratify the Seventeenth Amendment — 89 years after the alleged ratification. Back in 1913, not all states were in session; some were out of session four years at a time. Others took no action on the amendment — Georgia specifically based on an investigation ordered by their governor at the time that the Seventeenth Amendment was not legally adopted by Congress before it was even sent to the states.

"On July 1, 2010, 97 years after the alleged ratification of that amendment, the State of Delaware ratified it. On April 1, 2012, 99 years after the alleged ratification, the State of Maryland voted to ratify the Seventeenth Amendment. How interesting that nearly 100 years after the alleged ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment and after people like me have been pounding on this issue for close to two decades, three states just up and decided to vote on an old constitutional amendment.

"Now you see why Dillon v Gloss is so important to my case as is the taxpayer 'standing' exception here in Texas."

Initial court filing

Court filing to the Appeals Court

There is a Term Limits Caucus in the U.S. Congress. Go look to see if your "public servant" is one of those who understands why term limits are so important.

Now, the majority of Americans know nothing about this. Why? BECAUSE NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT. Talk radio all across this country from the biggest like Limbaugh and Hannity to dozens and dozens of other conservative hosts never talk about this or H.R. 2552 to stop federal double taxation of your social security benefits . That bill WILL die 31 Dec 2018 for the third time. BECAUSE NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT. This gentleman wrote a short and accurate piece on this issue:

"Long-term incumbency leads to legislators being beholden to the special interest groups that fund their campaigns rather than the communities that actually vote for them.

Here are the two bills that must get passed in order to advance a constitutional amendment to the U.S. Constitution before it can be sent by the U.S. Secretary of State to the 50 States.

Support Term Limits for Members of Congress, S.J Res. 2 and H.J. Res. 6

"On behalf of FreedomWorks' activist community, I urge you to contact your representative and senators and urge him or her to support an amendment to the United States Constitution to limit the number of terms Members of the House and Senate can serve. This is a bicameral effort led by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), sponsor of S.J. Res. 2, and Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.), sponsor of H.J. Res. 6.

"The constitutional amendment proposed by Sen. Cruz and Rep. DeSantis would limit the number of terms a Member of the House can serve to three. Senators are limited to two terms. Members of the House or Senate who fill a vacancy and serve more than half a term, more than one year for a representative and more than three years for a senator, will have that counted as one term toward their total terms in office.

"When the American people voted to "drain the swamp," it sent a message to all elected officials that the citizens want a change in Washington. This legislation will ensure that it remains drained. Having the same people in office year after year creates a cycle that is hard to break and that needs to be refreshed. Term limits would not only refresh the cycle, they would address a dysfunction in the structure of our federal government.

"Thomas Jefferson said the omission of term limits in the Constitution was what he saw as the biggest problem with the founding document. Today, 74 percent of voters want Congress to enact term limits, which is more than ever before."

As usual, Jefferson was absolutely right. So, now what?

The same thing I've been writing for weeks: YOU have to get involved. YOU have to call your favorite talk radio show host and hound him or her to talk about bills (like H.R. 2552 to stop double federal taxing on SS benefits) and this push for a constitutional amendment for term limits for Congress.

WE CANNOT DRAIN THE SWAMP BY ALLOWING THE SAME ALLIGATORS EATING US ALIVE, BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY EVERY SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP IN THIS COUNTRY TO SERVE DECADES AND DECADES BEFORE THEY DROP DEAD.

No guarantee more political whores like Booker, Harris, Schumer, Pelosi and the rest of them wouldn't get elected but with term limits, at least we know they will be gone instead of staying in office for 20, 30, 40 years or longer.

I brought up this term limit effort to our head person in the county where I live at the county fair last month. He knew nothing about but ask if I could make a short presentation week after next at the monthly GOP luncheon/meeting. You see, I joined so I could make a difference here at the local level . Politely and respectfully get the information out to the good people who love this country who belong to that GOP group. And, they do.

YOU have to do the same at your local level. You and any organization you belong to. Use social media of every stripe and get this out there. Prohibition was overturned because the people didn't want it. We the people want term limits for members of Congress. I guarantee you most of those critters don't want it, but if millions of Americans demand it, those bills will get passed.

Here are the bills :

H.J.Res.6 — Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve

S.J.Res.2 — A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

All the shopping trips, nights out, TV time, bowling with your team, playing golf, going fishing ( Lord, how I wish I could go! ), going to a ball game or doing whatever you like to do: HOW IMPORTANT IS ANY OF THAT WHILE OUR COUNTRY BURNS TO THE GROUND?

If we do nothing, nothing will get done.

Links:

Pro-Life Leaders Slam Sen. Joe Donnelly on Kavanaugh 'No' Vote : "Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List), said:

"Joe Donnelly's decision to vote against Judge Kavanaugh is a profound betrayal and Indiana voters will remember this at the ballot box in November. Instead of standing with Hoosiers — who showed their trust in President Trump to nominate Supreme Court justices when they elected him by a 19-point margin — Donnelly caved to pressure from Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin and the radical abortion lobby."

No One Has Come Forward to Back Up Ford, Not Even the Person Who Drove Her Home

Blue State Blues: The Democrats' Absurd FBI Obsession

Hirono Sends Fundraising Email During Opening Remarks of Kavanaugh Hearing

© 2018 Devvy Kidd — All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Devvy: devvyk@npn.net