In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc -
the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as
it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court
wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA vaccines (being
used currently) then the (altered) genome CAN be patented.
This means that everyone who has had the 'vaccine' is now technically 'patented'.
Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'.
All people who are legally identified as being 'trans human' do not have access to
Human Rights or any Rights granted by the State. That is because they are not
classified as anything 100% organic or human.
Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'vaccine' can no longer have any access
to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently,
so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands.
Full Supreme Court Ruling
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
|
